Home Blog Page 410

Chidambaram: After meteoric rise, the steep fall

It was nothing short of a blockbuster thriller– cops and enforcement agencies with arrest warrant frantically looking out for Congress leader and former Union Minister Palaniappan Chidambaram, who was “missing” for about 24 hours. Suddenly, Chidambaram—faced with money laundering and corruption charges– decided to appear at the Congress headquarters on Wednesday evening and addresses a press conference barely a couple of hours before he was arrested. 

At the widely watched press conference, the 73 year old lawyer-turned-politician appeared comfortable and composed exchanging pleasantries with his colleagues.

This is no surprise to people who know him well. A simple analysis of the sequence of events will tell that even as the focus remained on the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), it was Chidambaram who managed to hog the limelight with the press conference.

In his signature style, he asked the enforcement agencies to respect the law and wait for the Supreme Court hearing.

“If I am asked to choose between life and liberty, I will unhesitatingly choose liberty,” Chidambaram, who denied all charges against him, said at the presser. Now, anybody who has been in the news business would know that this statement of his will hit the headlines.

Chidambaram did not take any questions from media people. If he had to skirt questions from the media, then why have a press conference!
But then that is the trademark of Chidambaram. 

Congress leader P Chidambaram (centre) addressing a press conference along with party leaders Kapil Sibal (right) and Abhishek Singhvi (left) at Congress headquarters in New Delhi on Wednesday, August 21, 2019. Almost an hour after this presser, Chidambaram was arrested by the CBI from his Jor Bagh residence. (Photo:PTI)

The man, who is known for his arrogance, strong likes and dislikes always had a love-hate relation with the media. He remained a union minister for full 10 years in the UPA-I and UPA-II governments and use the media to the fullest. He regularly held press conferences and met reporters –whether or not he shared any piece of information.

The rise of Chidambaram

The erudite Chidambaram, armed with a degree in law and an MBA from the Harvard Business School, joined the Congress party in 1984. While he was associated with several ministries including that of commerce and industry mostly as junior minister till mid-1990s, it was in 1997 that he made his mark with his “dream budget”. Interestingly, Chidambaram, at this point had quit the Congress to join Tamil Maanila Congress—breakaway faction of the state Congress unit. He was given the plum portfolio of finance by the then Prime Minister Deve Gowda, who was leading a fragile United Front government at that time.

Chidambaram brought in bold reforms and drastically reduced personal and corporate tax rates. However, soon the government fell and he joined back the Congress party.

Even as many of his colleagues from the United Front government saw the end of their political careers, Chidambaram kept himself widely alive in the newsrooms and even wrote a weekly column for the Indian Express. As finance and home minister, he regularly held media briefings. Not just that, he off and on invited journalists for meals. In fact, his Pongal parties were a big hit among journalists.

In 2004, the Manmohan Singh led UPA government took centre stage and there was no looking back for Chidambaram, who is known for his proximity to Singh. In 2004, he once again assumed charge as India’s finance minister. But this time the road was bumpy for finance minister Chidambaram. Many of his proposals were shot down by the Left parties, which were in coalition with the Congress.

Despite that, Chidambaram won the trust of his bosses and was considered one of the performing ministers. In fact, it was his brainchild to carve out a Rs 70,000 crore farm debt waiver scheme to woo the farmers especially at a time when they were in absolute distress.

While the move was fiercely criticised by economists and policymakers, it played a huge role in helping UPA win the subsequent 2009 Lok Sabha elections. 

The down slide begins for Chidambaram

In November 2008, Chidambaram was shifted to the home ministry. At home, many say, he was never comfortable. There were several security lapses and in 2011 the three co-ordinated bomb explosions ripped Mumbai within three years of the 26/11 terror attacks.

In August 2012, Chidambaram shifted back to the North Block. Many felt that his primary role was to once again carve out schemes which could help the Congress in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. But the man had lost his mojo by then. He had used up all his tricks to woo the masses and moreover, people had begun to see through his trickery. Congress party decisively lost the 2014 General Elections and Narendra Modi took the reins of the country.

It was thence that Chidambaram’s misdeeds that lay buried in dusty files came into the limelight. One of these was about the misappropriation of funds in INX Media. Narendra Modi who came on the mandate to fight corruption was in no mood to brush this under the carpet. A shrewd lawyer that he is Chidambaram continued to dodge the CBI during Modi’s first term. His luck ran out when Narendra Modi returned back with a bigger mandate for a second term. CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) issued a Look-Out notice for Chidambaram and arrested him after high drama on Wednesday night. CBI and ED continue to grill their former boss and are preparing to take Chidambaram on a remand for fourteen days as he continues to evade their questions.

Modern Environmental Concerns Under Bolsonaro: Deforestation in the Amazon highlights autocratic traits in Brazil’s president

By Pamela Machado and Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Developments of autocratic governmental tendencies emerge from the deleterious effects of nationalism bolstered around prejudice, bigotry, hatred, suspicion amplified by anxiety, conspiracy theories, denialism of fundamental concepts of science, rejection of facts, and the celebration of a powerful figure in a strongman, applicable to men or women but, mostly seen in men as demagogues provoking the worst sentiments in the population. There are few leaders in the world nowadays that could represent this idea more accurately than Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro.

The election of Jair Bolsonaro into the presidency of Brazil created a new era in the political landscape for Brazilian citizens with the alignment of Evangelical Christian fundamentalism and strongman negative populism. The autocratic tone in Bolsonaro’s government is no longer a surprise for those worrying about the waning status of democracy around the world, and of civil liberties internationally. Since taking office in January of 2019, the Brazilian president has made tens of international headlines starring his homophobic rhetoric, lack of diplomacy, poor social media etiquette, and disastrous handling of environmental degradation, amongst some of a litany of faux pas moments and real political scandals.

Week after week, Brazil’s president has shown signs pointing to a tyranny being instituted in Brazil under his rule. The latest recurrences involve the Amazon, with the international community funding the Amazon removing financial support because of the deforestation ongoing within the country, including by Norway and Germany. In response, Bolsonaro said, as a childish tease helpful in ascertaining his character, “Isn’t Norway that country that kills whales up there in the north pole?… Take that money and help Angela Merkel reforest Germany.” Bolsonaro shows no intention to take on criticism from the international community and scientists, and then act to curb deforestation. 

As a matter of fact, Bolsonaro has strong allies in Brazil pushing him to disregard environmental discussion as a ‘conspiracy from the left’ and ‘fake news’. One of the strongest lobbyists in Bolsonaro’s government is indeed the agribusiness sector, which is among the most powerful industries in South America. The agribusiness model, which leaves soils impoverished and lands devastated, is at the opposite side of environmentalism and indigenous land advocacy; and Bolsonaro’s intentions are to open the Amazon for agribusiness lords. Conservation of the Amazon is one of the key aspects in establishing international alliances, especially with countries in the European Union, where the green influence has grown in the political realm since the last EU elections last May. Bolsonaro’s stance can only lead to Brazil’s isolation in a global scenario in times when cooperation is a fundamental virtue to avoid a global ecological collapse.  

Bolsonaro has caused outrage after sacking the director of Brazil’s National Space Research Institute (INPE) at the beginning of the month. Ricardo Galvão, the previous director of INPE, had called out Bolsonaro’s government on skyrocketing deforestation in the Amazon after data showed that deforestation was 88% higher in June compared to a year ago. To compound this, Bolsonaro is a major climate change denier and sees the science of climate change as a Marxist plot. He claimed INPE’s latest report is lying and the methodology of the study is not trustworthy, even as the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change continues in its Sixth Assessment Cycle. Bolsonaro and his coterie have a history of climate change denial, not even skepticism. He was clear about destroying the Indigenous environments and the ties between them. Bolsonaro is not informed or does not want to believe the realities and seriousness of the climate crisis facing us, where he proposes citizens, not himself, eat less and defecate every other day in order to help the climate while working to destroy the environment. Citizens should become active and involved in the political process, as they have become increasingly active and involved in the political process based on these atrocious attitudes, statements, and opinions on science.

Also, he made clear the intent, if elected, to leave the Paris Climate Agreement from 2015, mimicking US President Donald Trump. Ed Atkins, from the University of Bristol, has stated that leaving the Paris Agreement is not really in the hands of Bolsonaro: “Ultimately, his power to reverse the decision is limited, however. This is because the Paris deal was approved via the Brazilian congress, which is currently divided between 30 parties, and Bolsonaro would face the tricky task of convincing a broad church of conservatives.” However, Bolsonaro seems to care little about the rules of democracy and the institutions he should respect. 

If only environmental concerns were the only thing to worry about – but the president’s latest scandal about the Amazon are only another indicator of the autocratic turn taking place in Brazil. 

Bolsonaro is surely familiar with fake news tactics that undermine the strength of democracy: this is his strongest weapon to keep his electorate faithfully supportive as the economy continues to wade in Brazil leaving almost 14 million unemployed, worsening criminality or increasing the number of “cockroaches” in his opining, and quality of life – among other atrocities such as censoring LGBTI+ films and cutting funding to federal universities. 

The far-right president is progressively turning himself into an authoritarian force in Latin America’s major country – and he is quite proud to be so. The stance of dehumanization against one’s own most vulnerable citizens simply shows to the public in glaring and gory detail an arrogance fit for authoritarian rule. 

Bolsonaro has a long-lasting and widely reported passion with authoritarian leaders in South America. Like attracts like, one may assume here. He also has an open disgust to democracy and state institutions: “My pen is mightier than yours,” he told the lower house Speaker Rodrigo Maia earlier this year, implying that congressmen are not as powerful as him.

At a worrying speed, Bolsonaro takes steps closer in his vision to turn Brazil into a country where those who appreciate diversity and show respect to nature have no voice. Brazilian democratic institutions, where corruption is deeply ingrained, seem to get weaker by the hour and there is dooming scenario about the next three years until the next election is held make it looks like an obscure endless era.

This political cascade of anti-democratic leaders and forces contains racial elements to it. According to the latest data available, Brazil’s population is mostly non-white. The portion of Brazilian identifying themselves as whites fell from 53.7% in 2000 to 47.7% in 2010, when the latest statistic was released. Issues of self-identification or self-report in the collection of the data aside; the result is collective actions taking place all over Brazil to educate about ethnicities and gender rather than an actual decrease in the number of white people, as seen in the number of mixed-race which rose from 38.5% to 43.1%. Thanks to open conversations about racial questions and structural racism, a larger number of Brazilians have become more literate on identity politics and the issues following from them.

Bolsonaro’s contempt towards mixed-raced and non-white communities is escalating. Even more explicit comes from the majoritarian authoritarianism of the statements, Bolsonaro, in 2017, said, “Minorities have to bend down to the majority… The minorities [should] either adapt or simply vanish.” The rhetoric of dehumanization creates the basis for autocratic and tyrannical orientation leading to an easy denial of civil liberties for minorities and other, typically, vulnerable populations within Brazil. The demagoguery around denial of the real world, of living in a fantasy concocted of delusions of mass and widespread conspiracy theories, forms the basis for decoupling popular discourse from facts, common Brazilian values and shared identity, and democratic orientation of the government. There needs to be rapid damage control and broad activism to begin to solve the problems created, the fires started, by the Brazilian president and his coterie.

Photo by Alexandre Perotto on Unsplash

It’s time for ‘Kashmir Experts’ to take a back seat

1

The situation in Jammu and Kashmir has been more or less stable ever since the legislative process for reorganisation of the state and necessary amendments to Article 370 has been approved by an overwhelming majority in the Indian Parliament.

No untoward incidents of violence have been reported in the state. The Eid celebrations went off in a peaceful manner and people are slowly returning to their routine. The security forces, while keeping an Eagle’s eye, are facilitating this movement in a very cooperative and courteous manner. Government offices and primary schools have been opened, but attendance is low. Landline facility has been restored. Kashmir has seen much worse earlier in terms of disruption, disturbance and disorder. It can therefore be said that the situation is tense but very much in control.

Pakistan has said and done what it had to say and could do. After the initial bluster exhibited by Prime Minister Imran Khan and the drama orchestrated with a few friends in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) that fell flat, the country now stands without option. It has some support from China and surprisingly also from the United Kingdom, but the same is insufficient to make a diplomatic impact. The country’s leadership has realised that there is not much that it can do and that it needs to concentrate on its own precarious internal situation which has the potential of spiralling out of control should it poke its face too much into Kashmir. It is therefore giving lip service to the so-called support and attempting to instigate the people of the state to agitate.

Pakistan will love to see the locals of Kashmir reacting forcefully with what it terms as “Intifada.” While the Kashmiris’ will be egged on to the self destructive path, Pakistan will give only “moral support.” So, what can be expected is a massive religion-based psychological campaign by Pakistan to incite the people of Kashmir to come out in open revolt. It will be driven by the social media and supported by the many assets that Pakistan has nurtured in the valley and in its own land. Already the leaders of Pakistan-based terrorist groups are circulating audio, video and text messages in social media groups in which they are inciting the people.

While things in the state and at international level are well in control, sadly, there is a lot of excitement in some circles within the country and outside of the state to see some modicum of disruption and instability coming up. Journalists, analysts, writers, authors, columnists and those who have a self-view of being opinion makers, all have become experts on Kashmir of late. Volumes are being written on the subject, views are being expressed, advise rendered and predictions made. It is being said that the Kashmiri people are ready to strike as soon as the limitations are removed. Lifting of the restrictions, therefore, is being awaited with a bated breath as the harbinger of Hartals (Strikes), Bandhs (Lockouts) and stone pelting towards which end the hapless Kashmiris are being psychologically manoeuvred by forces from outside the country and also from within. The many elements out to ignite the situation have vested political and financial reasons to do so. Once things open up, these elements will actively engineer protests and disruption. The government is, quite rightly, unwilling to allow such a situation to develop which could lead to avoidable casualty to innocent civilians; hence, it is quite content to play the waiting game.

It has been firmly said by the Indian government that the changes made are an internal issue of the country and most nations have accepted this. They are maintaining a discreet distance. A similar courtesy from our local “experts” would not be out of place. It does not behove them to take ownership and decide for the people of Jammu and Kashmir. In Jammu and Kashmir there are so many regions and so many communities, each one of them will be affected in a different manner and will have to work out its own adjustments.  It is very important to give to the people of Jammu and Kashmir adequate time and space to absorb the changes that have taken place and work out their response to the same.

Let us keep away from polarising the narrative, let us stop building a doomsday scenario. There is no apocalypse taking place in the region that calls for such stringent action from the self appointed guardians of the Kashmiri people as is being witnessed presently.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has never deviated from its policy of abrogating Article 370 and Article 35A. Yet, the party got a sizeable success over a series of elections for local and parliamentary bodies in Jammu and Kashmir over the last five years plus. The party also won with an overwhelming mandate in the last two general elections. Surely, it was known that it would make good its policy and promise whenever the opportunity came its way; so, why this sudden show of horror and disgust over something that was bound to happen?

Let us get real, most parties were good with abrogation of Article 370 but were not ready to bell the cat. Now that the BJP has done it, they should at least show the courtesy of staying quiet instead of crying themselves hoarse for petty political considerations. The beauty is the legislations have not been removed, legal remedies have been resorted to make them redundant, yet there is a problem.

It is very important to give to the people of Jammu and Kashmir adequate time and space to absorb the changes that have taken place and work out their response to the same. It would be best for all those who are not directly affected to take a back seat and allow those affected to decide on their future course? Let us join hands to give peace a chance.

India-US strategic partnership to strengthen energy security: Dharmendra Pradhan

Union Minister of Petroleum & Natural Gas Dharmendra Pradhan has said that India is making a quick transition into cleaner fuels, with a predominant role for natural gas and renewables, and there is greater opportunity for India and the US to evolve a new paradigm of engagement. He was addressing the 2019 edition of the India-US Forum.

He also shared India’s approach in the next five years. “Hon’ble Prime Minister of India Narendra Modi announced that India will target to become a US$ 5 trillion economy by 2024. It is natural to expect that the energy sector will assume a prominent role in achieving this target.”

The minister said that India’s energy consumption is projected to grow at 4.2 percent per annum up to 2035, faster than all major economies of the world. Driven by strong economic development, India’s share of total global primary energy demand is set to double to 11 percent by 2040.  

In June 2017 Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Donald Trump had envisioned a Strategic Energy Partnership between India and US. The Strategic Energy Partnership was launched in April 2018. The minister said, “The partnership provides for deeper and more meaningful engagements through government and industry channels. We need to collectively enhance energy security, expand energy and innovation linkages across our respective energy sectors, bolster our strategic alignment, and facilitate increased industry and stakeholder engagement in the energy sector.”

While speaking at the forum he informed that India’s hydrocarbon imports from US have exceeded the US $ 6 billion mark and US has emerged– for the first time– among the top ten sources of crude oil for India, with 9th position in 2018-19. 

Talking about the changes taking place in India, he said that there is already a cardinal shift in energy production in India with emphasis on renewables and other environmentally sustainable forms of it. “Our renewable energy target of 175 GW by 2022, with solar target of 100 GW by 2022, is well on its way to be achieved.”

The International Energy Agency, in its World Energy Investment 2019 Report, highlighted that foreign energy investments in India grew to US $ 85 billion. This marks a record 12 percent increase, and the highest growth of energy investments anywhere in the world. The minister informed that the government is moving simultaneously on energy infrastructure expansion. Augmenting power generation capacity, improving energy efficiencies across the board and faster integration of more renewable energy with the grid are proceeding apace. Simultaneously, hydrocarbon investments in a number of areas such as refinery upgradation, petrochemicals, pipeline, city gas network, LNG terminals, marketing network and so forth, are on the increase.

Given the complex and fast-growing nature of India’s energy needs, the country depends on all sources of energy that are secure, efficient, affordable and sustainable. “We have embarked on a realization of a gas-based economy. The share of natural gas is set to increase from 6 percent to 15 percent in the primary energy mix by 2030. To achieve this vision, we have entered into long-term contracts for LNG imports from many countries, including with the US. The imports from the US are increasing progressively since the imports started in March 2018. The India-US Gas Task Force set up last year has begun its work. It will prepare a blueprint for greater engagement of the US in realizing a gas trading hub in India, which is our next priority.”

The minister outlined the four pillars of strategic energy partnership – Oil and Gas; Power and Energy Efficiency; Renewable Energy and Sustainable Growth; and Sustainable growth in Energy sector, which covers the key priorities of India’s energy engagement. 

“There is already enough momentum through our existing cooperation on clean energy. It needs to be aligned to support India’s ambitious renewable and clean energy targets by supporting research and deployment of clean energy technologies.  I invite US oil and gas majors to join innovative and attractive schemes for oil and gas exploration and production in India.”

He also informed that Indian companies are also acquiring quality producing oil and gas assets in the US. “Presently, Indian public sector companies have already invested in the US worth approx. US$ 500 million. Our companies are exploring more investments opportunities in the upstream sector.”

The minister emphasized on the growing convergences in energy sector between India and the US and hoped that the great potential that exists in energy cooperation would enable India and US to scale new heights in their bilateral engagement.

Veteran music composer Khayyam passes away at 92

Legendary composer Khayyam, best known for his music in classic films such as ‘Umrao Jaan’, ‘Kabhi Kabhie’ and ‘Noorie’, passed away after a prolonged illnesses at a hospital here on Monday.

Mohammed Zahur Hashmi, popularly known as Khayyam, 92, was admitted to hospital a few days ago owing to breathing issues and other age-related illnesses.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi tweeted, “India will remain grateful to Khayyam Sahab for giving us some of the most memorable compositions, which will be remembered forever.”

“He will also be remembered for his humanitarian gestures to support upcoming artists. His demise is extremely saddening,” he said.

Lata Mangeshkar also took to Twitter and wrote that Khayyam’s demise is the end of an era in music. “Great musician and a man with a kind heart, Khayyam sahab isn’t with us anymore. I am so saddened to hear this, I can’t put it in words. With Khayyam sahab, an era of music has ended. I offer my humble tribute to him,” she wrote.

“Khayyam sahab would treat me as his younger sister. For me, he used to make his special songs. I loved working with him but would also be a little scared because he was a perfectionist. His understanding and knowledge of Shayari was exceptional,” she tweeted.

Superstar Amitabh Bachchan remembered the music veteran as “a soft-spoken, amiable soul”, who contributed to his several films, including ‘Kabhi Kabhie’ and ‘Trishul’.

“…KHAYAM sahib…for all the memorable music he conducted and produced .. prayers condolences,” Bachchan tweeted.

“Umrao Jaan” director Muzaffar Ali remembered Khayyam as a “storehouse of feelings, emotions and music”. Reminiscing the memories of Rekha-fronted 1982 classic, the director said it took Khayyam and him almost two years to create music for the film. “Day in, day out, I used to go to him. He used to stay at my house. It was an evolution of music. Today, no composer, director or producer will spend so much time on making the music. We left no stone unturned for this film’s music,” Ali told PTI.

The musician’s other notable works include films such as “Trishul”, “Noorie” and “Shola Aur Shabnam”. In 2007, Khayyam was honoured with Sangeet Natak Akademi Award in Creative Music by the Sangeet Natak Akademi, India’s national academy of music, dance and theatre. Four years later, he was conferred the Padma Bhushan, the country third highest civilian award.

Now what can Pakistan possibly do in Kashmir

The change in status of the state of Jammu and Kashmir carried out in the most legitimate and constitutional manner is essentially an internal matter of the Indian nation. What is galling here is the undesirable and disgusting interference that is being attempted by our neighbour Pakistan. It was of course, expected, since the all-powerful political and military establishments of the country owe their existence to keeping the Kashmir issue on the boil. There is now a big question mark on the effectiveness of the ‘Kashmir Banega Pakistan’ (Kashmir will become Pakistan) and ‘Kashmir Hamari Shahrag Hai’ (Kashmir is Pakistan’s jugular vein) type of slogans that the political leadership of Pakistan, with active support of their army, uses to divert the minds of the people from their extreme poverty and deprivation.

The Pakistani leadership did not even imagine that the Narendra Modi-led government would move so fast and decisively towards bringing about the much needed reorganization of the state and its seamless integration with the rest of India. It has been caught completely off-guard and is unable to come up with a strong and cohesive response. The despair in the Pakistani political ranks is personified by the ‘What can I do’ lament of Prime Minister Imran Khan.

Secondly, Pakistan is on the verge of a financial break down. It simply cannot afford direct belligerence towards India for fear of reacquiring the terrorist state stamp which will close all doors of much needed financial aid from the international community.

Nevertheless, it would be simplistic to think that Pakistan will not hit back. It will definitely do everything possible to negate the emerging positive situation in Jammu and Kashmir with all the might and means that it can muster. The question that arises here is – what can Pakistan do? Some statements by eminent journalists and thinkers of this country can give a fair idea of the path that Pakistan is likely to follow.

“Pakistan is morally and politically bound to support the Kashmiris. However, supporting the resistance movement will have serious consequences for Pakistan. The poor state of Pakistan’s economy, internal political crises and struggling diplomacy are factors which will limit active support to the resistance movement in IHK (Indian Held Kashmir),” says a well known Pakistani journalist, Muhammad Amir Rana, in an article – The Kashmir Challenge.

A derivative of the statement is that Pakistan will love to see the locals of Kashmir reacting forcefully with what it terms as “Intifada.” An intifada is a concept of Arabic usage referring to an uprising against oppression. Mostly it has been used to describe the Palestinian uprising and has been adopted by Pakistan for Kashmir as a part of its psychological messaging. While the Kashmiris’ will be egged on to the self destructive path of “Intifada,” Pakistan will give to it no more than “moral support.”

So what can be expected is a massive religion-based psychological campaign being launched by Pakistan to incite the people of Kashmir to come out in open revolt. It will be driven by the social media and supported by the many assets that Pakistan has nurtured in the valley and in its own land. Already the leaders of Pakistan based militant groups are circulating audio, video and text messages in social media groups in which they are declaring their support for the Kashmir cause.

The second option is well elucidated by another well-known journalist Arif Nizami by his statement, “However, unfortunately ground realities are not in Pakistan’s favour. In the backdrop of a rather muted international response– even from our traditional friends– Islamabad has few options. Barring any military adventure by India, a military response is off the table. Pakistan has after the event embarked on a diplomatic offensive…..”

The derivative here is that being unable to go for military options, Pakistan will up the diplomatic ante for which it has only the United Nations to fall back upon. It has already used the offices of good friend China to initiate a discussion in the United Nations Security Council (UNSC). The UNSC meeting, however, has not gone in favour of Pakistan since four of the permanent member and nine of ten temporary members have termed the reorganization of J&K as India’s internal matter. A consultative meeting vetoed the idea of moving the issue to the next level. So it is already curtains for Pakistan on this side. But the matter will not end here; India can expect a frontal diplomatic assault from the country in the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) coming September. The aim will be to embarrass India and press for a fresh UN Resolution from the Security Council on the premise that India’s recent actions are not consistent with the status of Jammu & Kashmir as a disputed territory. Even the Muslim Ummah has remained unmoved by the machinations of Pakistan what to talk of the big powers so not much progress is envisaged. In all likelihood, the recent position adopted by the UNSC will set the pace of things.

A clear view of the Pakistani plan of action can give direction to the Indian counter measures. The most important is for the Kashmir people to not fall prey to Pakistan propaganda. It is very clear that Pakistan is looking to use them as cannon fodder and will not come to their assistance in any manner whatsoever.

The Indian Army is more than ready for any misadventure that Pakistan may be foolish enough to attempt. “Pakistan’s attempts to push in terrorist infiltrators will not succeed. Indian Army is alert and has been able to foil all attempts of infiltration and given effective response to ceasefire violations,” an emphatic statement by Lt. Gen. Ranbir Singh, Army Commander, Northern Command says it all.

It would be best for Pakistan to accept the reality and concentrate more on its precarious internal condition. In case it does not relent then India needs to be prepared for a structured point by point response to its ignoble machinations.

Naxalism thrived due to trust-deficit between tribals and govt. : Chhattisgarh CM Bhupesh Baghel

Bhupesh Baghel, Chief Minister of Naxal affected state of Chhattisgarh, has said that Naxals could thrive in Chhattisgarh due to the deepening trust-deficit between tribals and authorities. Speaking on ‘Changing Chhattisgarh under New Leadership’ at an event in New Delhi, Baghel said that under the previous government Naxalism spread from 4 blocks to 40 blocks in the state, due to anti-tribal policies and behaviour of government agencies. Earlier no one talked to the tribal population to know about their sufferings. They responded to violence by violence and that resulted in widening the gap between the authorities and the tribal population, he said.

“Naxalism is not just a security or law and order problem. Naxals could infiltrate Chhattisgarh because of the trust deficit between the authorities and the tribals,” he said, “The biggest challenge for us is to bridge that trust deficit between the government and local people,” he added.  

Social Indicators

Chhattisgarh Chief Minister Bhupesh Baghel said that malnutrition is a much bigger threat than Naxal violence in the state and that his government is working hard to improve the health of the people. “Today malnutrition is a bigger threat than Naxalism in the state.” He said over 37 per cent of the state’s children under the age of 5 years are malnourished and more than 40% women in the age group of 15-49 years are anemic.

“We have started camps in some of the worst Naxal-infested areas of Dantewada and Bastar and gave hot, cooked meal to children and women there, as part of the Suposhan scheme. Out of 124 panchayats in the state, 109 now have this programme and on October 2, the ‘Suposhan’ scheme will be launched in all the districts,” he said.

To provide better medical facilities in interior areas, Baghel said he took the primary health centres in the local ‘haats’, so that more tribal people can come there for treatment.

“I am happy to share that the number of patients arriving at the local haats is 20 times higher than the patients arriving at the OPDs of a primary health centre and government hospitals,” he said, adding that it has brought the medical facilities much closer to the people.

Earning the trust

Highlighting the works of his government in the last eight months in the state, Baghel said, “After we came to power we returned the lands of the tribals which were acquired in 2006 but no industries was set up.”

“We returned 4,200 acres of land located in 1,700 villages to the tribal people,” he said. It was a step to win the trust of the tribal population by returning their land that was taken over by previous governments. “They realised that it was the first time that the government returned them their land. Next, I waived their loans,” he said.

He shared that today Chhattisgarh is the only state in the country where no farmer is indebted. He said to increase the income of the farmers his government also bought the paddies from them at the rate of Rs 2,500 per quintal which is much higher than any state government.

Development to focus on agriculture and small scale industries

Baghel also appealed to investors to come to Chhattisgarh and that his government will help them in providing land and power. Though, he added that the focus of his government is not on establishing large scale industrial complexes but on small and medium scale industries.  

He also explained his mantra of rural development viz Narwa, Garwa, Ghurwa, Badi called as NGGB in official circles. Under it the development of pasture land, cattle and water resources are taken up. Referring to the water problem, he said, “Groundwater level is falling across the country. Thus I have made a scheme to recharge the groundwater in the state by working on the nallahs.” He said a detailed project report of over 1,028 nallahs has already been made.

He said that to counter the issue of stray cattle, his government has kept 3-5 acres of land only for stray cattle in different areas. “There we tell farmers to put their extra straw that they would otherwise be burnt so that the environment is not polluted and the cattle get their food too,” he said.

Baghel said that the focus of industrial development under his government would be to create job opportunities for locals and improve earnings of tribals. “Our industries, mines and power plants have not benefitted the locals. They have only added to the pollution. Now we are focussing on establishing small and medium businesses that would give value addition to the tribals and will boost local incomes,” said Baghel.

Environment

Making a strong pitch for preserving the forests of Chhattisgarh Baghel categorically opposed uranium mining in the state. He said that he was not interested in any more projects that would involve massive mining including that of uranium.

Elaborating on why he was opposed to large scale mining specially of uranium, Baghel said, “Chhattisgarh has 44% of its area under forest. I am very keen to preserve this pristine environment and don’t want any more mining of forests. Also, large scale mining, over these years, has not benefitted our people and it has only added to pollution.”

Vidya Sinha: Hindi cinema’s woman-next-door passes away

Vidya Sinha, who has starred in popular and acclaimed Hindi movies such as “Rajinigandha”, “Chhoti Si Baat” and “Pati Patni Aur Woh”, died on Thursday after prolonged illness. She was 71 and was diagnosed with lung disorder a while ago. However, her condition had become worse in the past three months.

The veteran actor made a name for herself with her woman-next-door characters opposite Amol Palekar in “Rajnigandha” and “Chhoti Si Baat” and in mainstream commercial space for “Pati Patni Aur Woh” among others

In a career spanning over four decades, she also featured in “Josh”, “Love Story”, “Bodyguard” and TV shows such as “Kkavyanjali”, “Qubool Hai” and “Kullfi Kumarr Bajewala”.

Veteran actor Amol Palekar, who worked with her in memorable films like Rajnigandha (1974), Chhoti Si Baat (1975) and Safed Jhooth (1977), remembered his late co-star with fondness, saying that her passing away is a great loss. Producer Rajan Shahi, who worked with the actor on the TV show “Itti Si Khushi”, said Sinha was not only extremely talented but “most importantly a very down to earth person.” “I remember her very sweet request… When she was cast to play a pivotal role in the show, she requested me if I would direct one of her scenes. I had stopped directing since long… but could not say no to such a senior and veteran actor… She was extremely warm and created a family bond with all unit and actors,” he said in a statement.

TV actor Smriti Karla, who worked with Sinha on “Itti Si Khushi”, called her passing away “a big loss for the film and tv Industry.”

“As a child I have seen her as a heroine and then I had the honour of working with her as my ‘Dadi’… I remember gushing when she complimented me for being a fine actress. She was extremely loving and caring. We will miss her presence but she will live through her films,” she said

On Twitter, filmmaker Sanjay Gupta wrote, “RIP Vidya Sinha Ji. You were the epitome of grace and dignity on and off the screen.”

Director Madhur Bhandarkar said Sinha will always be remembered for her superlative performances in films like “Rajnigandha”, “Chhoti si Baat” & “Pati Patni Aur Woh”.

“My condolences to her family & friends. #OmShanti,” he tweeted

“RIP Vidya Sinha. You will be always remembered, specially for Rajinigandha, Chhoti Si Baat and Mukti,” Bengali superstar Prosenjit Chatterjee wrote on Twitter.

J&K returning to normal life as restrictions on movement of people are eased

Jammu and Kashmir is slowly returning to normalcy as restrictions on the movement of people in the Kashmir Valley were eased on Saturday, with landline services restored in some areas of the city. Primary schools across the Valley will reopen on Monday and government offices will also be fully functional from then.

Addressing a press conference, government spokesperson Rohit Kansal said the relaxations have been eased out in 35 police station areas. “The process of providing relaxation and easing out of restrictions is already in progress. Relaxation has been provided in 35 police station areas across the length and breadth of the Valley and so far, there are no reports of any untoward incident. The public transport is plying and we have encouraging reports of a lot of public movement,” Kansal said.

On the restoration of landline services, the government spokesperson said out of the 96 exchanges in the Kashmir Valley, 17 are functional and providing landline services to people.  “The endeavour is to make at least half of the exchanges in the Valley functional by today evening and by tomorrow evening, all of the exchanges, barring few in the vulnerable areas, would be made functional,” he said.

Kansal said in Jammu region, landlines and mobile phone services are functional and mobile internet services with some functionality in at least five districts have been restored.  “The services will be restored in other areas in a calibrated manner,” he said.

Regarding the detained political leaders, Kansal said such a decision would be taken by local authorities based on the law and order situation in their respective areas.

Security forces continued to remain deployed, while barricades remained on the roads, but people were allowed to move after checking their credentials, they said. There was increase in movement of private vehicles in the civil lines areas and other district headquarters of the Valley, the officials said, adding that some inter-district cabs were also seen plying in Dalgate area of the summer capital. Some shops in the civil lines area opened on Saturday morning, the officials said.

Beijing helped India by taking Kashmir to UN Security Council

That nothing worthwhile emerged from the ‘closed door meeting’ on Kashmir at the UNSC (United Nations Security Council) shouldn’t come as a surprise to the people of Pakistan. After all, didn’t Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureshi already warn them in advance not to live in a “fool’s paradise” because when Islamabad would take the Kashmir issue to UNSC, no one would be waiting for them with “garlands in their hands”.

Some feel that being the Foreign Minister Qureshi shouldn’t have sounded so negative but his detractors fail to realise that he really didn’t have any other choice since Poland, which is the current president UNSC, had already rejected Islamabad’s request of raising the Kashmir issue at this forum on the grounds that it should be resolved “bilaterally.”

The hearing that Islamabad eventually managed to get at UNSC was a face-saving and heavily compromised alternative hastily brokered by its “all weather” friend China. For Islamabad, which was anxiously rearing to pounce upon New Delhi for its decision to revoke special status in J&K, which it believes is “illegal” that “violates UN resolutions on Kashmir.” For Islamabad, which was making so much noise, this came as a big climbdown.

Instead of getting a chance to use the UNSC podium for internationalising Kashmir, the meeting was held without Pakistan being in attendance. Being a ‘closed door meeting’ it was held under the less formal provision of “any other business” and to make things even more embarrassing, instead of deliberating on the issue of New Delhi’s latest actions in J&K as proposed by Pakistan, the agenda of the discussion was “India-Pakistan question.” 

No records of what transpires during ‘closed door meeting’ at UNSC are maintained and details of its deliberations aren’t made public. No statement is issued unless all its 15 members agree to do so and only a communique is made. In the absence of any statement, it’s more than evident that the UNSC members didn’t find any merit in the allegations and apprehensions levelled by Islamabad regarding New Delhi’s actions in J&K and its intent. But despite this, Islamabad is still terming this informal meeting that doesn’t even maintain a record of its proceedings, nor issues any statement, a big success.

Pakistan’s envoy to UN, Maleeha Lodhi is jubilant that “The voice of the Kashmiri people resonated in the chambers of the world’s highest diplomatic forum today,” but the people want to know the practical significance and positive implications of voices resonating in the UNSC. Similarly, in interpreting the ‘closed door meeting’ as being an act of the “whole world” discussing Kashmir and thereby deducing that Kashmir “is an international dispute,” Ms. Lodhi has stretched things a bit too far.

New Delhi may be annoyed with Beijing for having arranged a ‘closed door meeting’ at UNSC for Islamabad, but in retrospect, it has actually done New Delhi a great favour. Refusal of UNSC president Ms Joanna Wronecka to formally entertain Islamabad’s request for intervention highlights the fact that the international community respects India’s stand on Kashmir. Lack of any statement by UNSC after its ‘closed door meeting’ gives India’s stand of Kashmir being its integral part a collective ‘thumbs up’ from the international community.

Islamabad too has done New Delhi a big favour by approaching UN because Stephane Dujarric who is the spokesman for Secretary General Antonio Guterres once again made it clear that the UN chief “recalls the 1972 Agreement on bilateral relations between India and Pakistan, also known as the Shimla Agreement, which states that the final status of Jammu and Kashmir is to be settled by peaceful means, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations.”

After Islamabad’s abysmal failure at UNSC, Beijing did try and console Pakistan. In a joint press conference with his Pakistani counterpart, Beijing’s UN ambassador Zhang did say that “India has violated bilateral agreement to keep peace in the border areas” and “..It is obvious the constitutional amendment by India has changed the status quo by India.” But since these views wern’t conveyed by UNSC either in its communique or in the form of statement, it’s obvious that this is the viewpoint of Beijing and not that of UNSC. Some also see this statement as a means to divert attention from the fact that out of 15 members, Beijing was the only one who was on Pakistan’s side.

Finally, all that Islamabad can boast about is that “…The voice of the Kashmiri people resonated in the chambers of the world’s highest diplomatic forum,” which one can safely conclude either fell on deaf ears or wasn’t convincing because UNSC didn’t come out with any statement in support of Islamabad. But this was expected all along because the moment UNSC president refused to formally take up Pakistan’s request, it was obvious that Islamabad’s stratagem had misfired.

This is the reason why everyone had their fingers crossed when Qureshi who had warned Pakistanis to stop living in a “fool’s paradise,” suddenly changed track by telling the media in advance that the UNSC ‘closed door meeting’ was Pakistan’s big success on the diplomatic front. But then, Qureshi has always been a dreamer and a die-hard optimist to the point of gullibility-after all, wasn’t he the one who just recently hailed US President Donald Trump’s ludicrous offer of mediation on Kashmir as something that was “more than Pakistan’s expectations”!