One person died and 28 were injured in a grenade blast that rocked the busy SRTC bus stand in Jammu on Thursday. The blast occurred even as security had been tightened in the state over the now – cancelled scheduled visit of Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to Jammu province on Thursday.
The
grenade reportedly went off under a bus, resulting in the shrapnel being
contained to a smaller area. The injured were immediately rushed to the
hospital. The police have cordoned off the area and further investigation is
underway. “The explosion has caused injuries to approximately 18 people,
all have been shifted to hospital,” IGP Jammu MK Sinha was quoted as
saying by ANI.
This
is the third grenade attack by terrorists in the bus stand area of the city
since May last year. Two months ago, a
similar blast had occurred at the main bus stand here. The grenade fell short
of the target and exploded in the air, without causing any damage or casualty,
an official had said.
The
state has been on the edge since 40 CRPF jawans were killed in a suicide bomb
attack carried out by the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad terror group in
Kashmir’s Pulwama district on February 14.
Humanists UK has been pushing for what they have been terming a compassionate assisted dying law, in which there is a law set forth in support of a “compassionate, humane, assisted dying law.”
This movement comes with a wide variety of terms. One of the important aspects of all of this is the public support for it. The Royal College of Physicians is opposed to a humane right to die law.
However, if we look into the public support, it is overwhelming at 80%. 4 out of 5 citizens support the law for this most important of choices about the end of the journey — likely — for human life.
The recent survey can be important for the advancement of medical assistance in dying, in a prominent nation. Humanists UK formed the Assisted Dying Coalition.
With the cooperation and coordination with other organizations, this can be an important move for the empowerment of those who truly want to plan and make the choice for their final days.
UK citizens may be forced to travel to another country for an assisted death. If most of the nation wants it, and if this can be passed to democratically support what the nations wants, then this can be an important democratic advancement and, in fact, a compassionate one too.
Sanskrit, being the oldest known language and the foundation for many modern languages, including English, presents a rich source of study. However, today there are not many takers of Sanskrit, which was once known for its comprehensiveness and refinement. In an attempt, to revive the popularity of Sanskrit language, particularly among the youth, a Sanskrit cultural festival was organised in Delhi University’s Daulat Ram College.
Enthusiastic response of students towards Sanskrit marked the first edition of ‘Mantra Cultural festival’ organised by Shreyas – The Sanskrit Association of Daulat Ram College to promote Sanskrit. The one day cultural festival was inaugurated by lighting of lamp by the Chief Guest, Shri Niwas (National Joint Organising Secretary of ABVP), Guest of Honor, Prof. Kaushal Sharma (Director, ICSSR), Special Guest, Prof. Ramesh Bhardwaj (Director, Gandhi Bhawan) and College Principal Dr. Savita Roy.
In the inaugural session, Chief Guest Shri Niwas talked about how our youngsters have not been able to understand and appreciate Sanskrit language. This is because our education system was manipulated right after the independence to keep our upcoming generations away from the Indian culture and its glory. The ‘modernization’ of our country and its education system has done more harm than good.
Prof. Kaushal Sharma, Director, ICSSR said that most of our literature was written in Sanskrit. Sanskrit has one of the richest and most extensive literatures of all known languages, such as the The Ramayana and The Mahabharata. It introduces children to vast epics, profound scripture, subtle philosophy, voluminous mythology, exquisite poetry and much else. Sanskrit slowly took a backseat during the Mughal era and the British period. The rise of the princely states also played a vital role in the downfall of Sanskrit as every state puts more focus on the use of its local language. He was of the view that interdisciplinary research among Sanskrit and other courses in universities will surely help us understand Sanskrit not just as a language but as culture. Prof. Ramesh Bhardwaj said that India is a country that defines unity in diversity and Sanskrit could be a language that binds us together. Dr. Savita Roy, Principal, Daulat Ram College said that Sanskrit is not just a language, but a mix bag of knowledge – full of economics, politics and religion.
The day-long activities in the festival included Sanskrit kavyali competition, Sanskrit bhashan competition and Sanskrit ekal shlok sangeet competition.
Amidst all the war frenzy, the big question is who do you fight – Pakistan or also the Taliban, Jaish-e-Mohammed and other riff-raff elements?
The
Pulwama blasting of CRPF jawans has caused remorse and frenzy for revenge.
There is cry of teaching Pakistan a lesson. Many want a war. Indians are hurt. It’s blow on the nation. Howsoever
anyone wants, the solution is not easy. The situation today is more complex
than in 1971, when Bangladesh was created despite radicalization even at that
time. There are many non-state actors. India
has military preparedness but a war is expensive and not just in cash.
The sub-continent is passing through severe uncertainty as the neighbouring nations – Iran, Afghanistan, China are changing track every now and then. US is in a hurry to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, and Taliban is flexing muscles. Russia and Iran are not shy of a deal with Taliban. Will the Taliban take control of Afghanistan, where India has invested huge sums as also in diplomacy, as the US withdraws? It may be seen as yet another failure of the US after Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq and Syria. Since 2001, after spending billions, the US controls not even half of Afghanistan. The Afghan soldiers and civilian casualties are heavy. The Saudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE are working out the face-saving for the US for its withdrawal. They are also pressurizing Pakistan to help as also providing financial aid to boost its forex reserves touching low of $6 billion. Saudi Arabia is giving $32 billion to Islamabad.
Apart from this the big money plays its role. It is not just the nation states that are pouring funds – in fact they, including the US, are having trouble arranging it. India is just next to a troubled Western Asia singed by ISIS. The ISIS war is being fought not for a “holy cause of jihad”. The terror is complex mix of arms-drug peddlers, cyber frauds, human traffickers and other hegemonists. The motivators of school girls from Europe to West Asia rake in huge money bags for turning them as sex fodder for marauders. It generates illicit funds.
Conflict
is rising in northern borders of Pakistan. Even Iran lost 28 soldiers in a
blast on its borders with Pakistan on February 12. Frenzy is there too. Iran
also vowed retribution. The sub-continent is on a tinder box. A war is too
complex. Astute diplomacy is needed to save India’s economic assistance and
friends in Afghanistan and Iran. Taliban resurgence is a problem for Islamabad.
It fears losing its might to it. Moreover, the tribal regions on Pakistan
borders are on ferment with sub-nationalism. Slight change in equilibrium would
cause major problems for India and other states in the region.
An aggressive diplomacy, lobbying, negotiations, and operations need huge investment as also manpower. The conflict with Pakistan costs 3% of India’s GDP, according to Indian think tank Strategic Foresight Group in 2004. India lost 3843 soldiers in 1971 and captured 93,000 soldiers. Almost a million person were in India as refugees. It had bled the economy then. Various surcharges were levied. Even on each postal item a 5-paise special refugee surcharge had to be affixed. The post-1971 war costs were higher. It had caused over 13% inflation and severe unrest. The imposition of internal emergency was another fall-out.
The proxy war since 1990 has claimed more casualties and economic cost be it in Kashmir, Kargil conflict 1999, Parliament attack in 2001, Mumbai-attack 2008 or subsequent several other blasts and raids. Military and civilian casualties are more than it was in full-fledged wars in 1965 and 1971. It is estimated that since December 2001 every year almost $600 million is spent to protect the western border. Pakistan spending is estimated to be a little less but it is higher in percentage terms for its GDP and geographical area. Carnegie Foundation has stated that even not fighting a war has a cost that is not less than an actual war. The Federation of Indian Chambers for Commerce and Industry (FICCI) estimated a huge business cost to the ongoing Indo-Pak conflict.
So what does Pakistan gain? A conflict with India, be it for Gen Zia ul Haq or Gen Parvez Musharraf has been huge economic gains in assistance from West Asia, the US and the West. US despite the World Trade Center attack considered Pakistan a strategic ally and gave Musharraf enormous aid. Even Donald Trump is doing it today. India-baiting is survival technique for the artificial state. Chinese support to Jaish-e-Mohammed operator Masood Azhar is a testimony. Chinese move is said to keep India under pressure. It is also said that saving Azhar is its insurance for checking terror by Muslim Uighurs in Xinjiang.
For India, apart from financial and political cost there is human misery. Certain powers want the rogue state to survive as they have business, territorial and other interests. India has to chart out a new course. A war may not be easy but breaking the tentacles of those who lead to war is a necessity. India has to re-strategize and ensure global alliance to break the backbone of terror and its illicit funding.
Directed
by Ali Abbas Zafar, Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif starrer “Bharat” is slated to
be released on Eid in 2019. On Wednesday Salman Khan announced the wrap of
their film.
Salman
shared the news on Twitter. “And it’s a wrap for #Bharat. @aliabbaszafar
#katrinakaif @atulreellife #AlviraAgnihotri @WhoSunilGrover @DishPatani #Tabu
@Bharat_TheFilm,” he wrote alongside a picture with Katrina.
Salman
stars in the title role in the movie, which his third film with Ali Abbas Zafar
after “Sultan” and “Tiger Zinda Hai”. The film also
features Tabu, Disha Patani and Sunil Grover.
“Bharat”
is an official adaptation of 2014 South Korean film, “Ode to My
Father”, which narrates modern Korean history from the 1950s to the modern
day through the life of an ordinary man and events such as the Hungnam Evacuation
during the 1950 Korean War. The film will also depict the government’s decision
to dispatch nurses and miners to West Germany in the ’60s and the Vietnam War. Presented
by T-Series, the film is produced by Salman and Atul Agnihotri and has been
shot extensively in Abu Dhabi and Spain.
Alleging huge corruption in the Rafale fighter jet deal Congress has said the time has come to lodge an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. “It is now crystal clear that blatant and massive corruption has taken place in the Rafale deal. It is undoubtedly established that Modi misused his office as Prime Minister to grant undue benefit to Dassault Aviation and caused a loss to public exchequer ,” Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala told reporters.
“This is a clear cut case under Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and different provisions of Indian Penal Code. Time has now come to register an FIR against PM Modi and every other individual so that a time-bound investigation takes place in this entire sage of Rafale corruption reaching the highest echelons of power,” he said.
Citing a report of the Indian Negotiation Team (INT), now in public domain, he said it is now crystal clear that Modi “misled Parliament and duped the country to cover up the murky dealings and blatant corruption, besides, squandering away national security interests”.
The Congress leader alleged that after documents that have come out in the open, the responsibility now lies at the door steps of Modi and a case be registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. “Responsibility for negotiating the 36 Rafale aircraft purchase was that of the Indian Negotiating Team (INT) constituted by the Ministry of Defence on May 12, 2015. But PM Modi was indulging in direct negotiation with the French, which weakened the credibility of the INT. Simple question is, how is it the domain of NSA to negotiate and finalise a fighter aircraft purchase deal? Obviously, the PMO and the NSA were doing so under direct instructions of PM Narendra Modi,” he said.
The respite since the handing over of Wing Commander Abhinandan to India by the Pakistani authorities is being viewed with a degree of relief by many. There is a perception of receding war clouds. The question here is– is this a lull before the storm?
The
situation along the Line of Control (LOC) is heated up with both sides
resorting to intensive firing. India has reported civilian casualties and so
has Pakistan. The neighbouring country has gone a step further and blamed India
for the escalation. A editorial in
the Pakistani English newspaper, Express Tribune, published on March 3 says,
“Shelling by Indian troops took
place in Azad Jammu and Kashmir in which one casualty, Mohammad Sudhir, and
three injured youngsters were reported just hours prior to Wing Commander
Abhinandan Varthaman’s promised release by Prime Minister Imran Khan.
The violent lashing out continued on March 2, with responses from both sides,
resulting in two civilian deaths.”
Newspapers in Pakistan continue to remain in
denial with regard to the downing of the F-16 fighter aircraft of their
country. “Last week, Indian jets dropped payload at a hilly forest area in
Balakot. In reply to that, Pakistan Air Force on Wednesday shot down two Indian
military aircraft in Pakistani airspace after repeated LOC violation,” says an
editorial on March 3 of yet another English newspaper, Daily Pakistan. It also
refers to “unprovoked firing along the Line of Control (LoC).” A gist of these
editorials have been carried by the website, Indian Observer Post.
The decision of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran
Khan to release Wing Commander Abhinandan has witnessed a fair degree of
opposition within Pakistan. Some members of the Pakistani National Assembly
spoke against the decision and one Barrister Muhammad Shoaib Razak, filed a
petition in the High Court to stop the release of pilot, which was dismissed by
their Court. Some rabid veteran army officers
have spoken against the same on television, clips of which have gone viral.
Hamid Mir, a noted Pakistan Journalist presently working with Geo News tweeted,
“Nawaz Sharif Govt release Indian pilot after 8 days captivity and lost his
Govt within 6 months in 1999.” The innuendo was quite obvious.
On the positive side, Pakistan witnessed a lot
demands upon its government to release the Indian pilot. These came
predominantly from women and elders of the educated society. An organisation named “Women in struggle for
empowerment” carried out a rally in Lahore against escalation of the situation
into an all out war. They carried banners saying “war is not a solution” and
“Women against war.” Other banners demanded “Safe return of Abhinandan
Varthaman” with hash tags of #NoToWar, #IStandAgainstHatred, #ProfilesforPeace
etc.
The public relations machinery of the Pakistan
Army (ISPR) has, in a tweet, confirmed that the Pakistan Army Chief, General
Qamar Bajwa, spoke to his counterparts in the US, UK, Australia and also to
ambassadors of these countries as well as China with regard to the impact of
the situation on “peace and stability in the region and beyond.” “Pakistan will
surely respond to any aggression in self defence,” he said. It is from this
tweet that one gets an inkling of the anxiety within the Pakistan Army.
The retaliatory actions other than military
taken by India have also started having an effect. Inflation in Pakistan is
rising due to removal of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status and imposition
of heavy duty on trade between the two countries. The Indian hint towards a
reassessment of the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is also causing widespread
disquiet.
Close
to the heels of face-off between the two countries came the meeting of the
Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) at Abu Dhabi where India was invited
for the first time since inception of this grouping of 57 Islamic countries. A sulking Pakistan refused to attend the proceedings,
but it did manage to convince the grouping to stick its original posture on
Kashmir. One day after the address of Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj, the
Foreign Minsiters session of the group passed a resolution highlighting,
“intensified Indian barbarities (in Kashmir) since July 2016” and “illegal
detentions and disappearances in Jammu and Kashmir.” The communiqué also
praised Prime Minister Imran Khan for sending the Indian pilot back. India has, of course, responded with a
reaffirmation that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and the
matter is strictly internal to the country.
The bottom line is
that though the OIC is taking baby steps towards facilitating India, with whom
most member countries have good diplomatic and financial relations, it is not
ready to forsake Pakistan altogether. There is, as such, much remaining to be
done by India on the diplomatic front, especially so, with the Islamic world.
So we have a situation
where Pakistan government and Pakistan Army are on the back foot but not wholly
without friends. Internally, a substantial element of the educated society in
Pakistan is quite fed up with this consistent war mongering and they wish to
move away from escalatory mechanisms to a more normal life with good
relationships. The rising inconvenience due to Indian non-military retaliations
will play a big role in forming perceptions in Pakistan.
India may think that
the cross border skirmish was enough to put the matter of the Pulwama strike at
rest but Pakistan definitely does not think so. It will be weighing its options.
One option is to follow the path of reconciliation; this is possible only if Pakistan
manages to control the terror activity emanating from its soil. The second
option is to retaliate with strength to contain the receding credibility and
stature of the government and its Army. Since both options are open, India
cannot afford to get complacent; a constant eye on the situation and high level
of vigilance/ preparedness for any contingency is important. This is definitely
the proverbial lull before the storm.
Peaceniks who have begun a propaganda of peace amidst this ongoing India-Pakistan tension need to understand that the ongoing war in Kashmir is only against terrorists and terror masterminds. Any let-up in the operations will give a breather to terrorists. Even earlier, terrorists have used the lull moments to re-group and prepare themselves to launch fresh strikes later on.
AS Dulat, the former chief of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) — India’s external intelligence agency, in his latest interview has made a rather strange observation. “Modi is milking the current situation to the extreme,” Dulat said in his interview to a monthly news magazine. He finds several strategic faults in the current standoff between India and Pakistan and reminisces of how New Delhi has lost the Kashmir plot from the highpoint where former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had steered it.
Incidentally, Dulat headed RAW
during Vajpayee’s tenure and later on served as his Advisor on Kashmir.
Well, there can be different
approaches to deal with exigencies but when it comes to something like a boiling
pot situation in Kashmir then options get limited for any head of the state. India’s
response to Kashmir had hitherto been to maintain the status quo. All advisors
(Dulat included) to the government on Kashmir have wanted to maintain the
existing situation. Nothing changed or moved on the ground over these years
only because India’s polices were never aimed to change the ground realities.
However, if one goes with the
intention to solve this Kashmir conundrum then the options available are very
few, because this would mean striking at the roots of Islamic terrorism. And
this is where Narendra Modi’s present handling of the situation after Pulwama
terrorist attack is better than all his predecessors.
Let’s first make a quick assessment
of the options available before India after the February 14 suicide terrorist
attack in which 40 CRPF jawans were martyred. One, as has always been, New
Delhi could have made some noise, raised the issue at international forums,
given speeches, a few angry articles would have had been written, evidence and
counter-evidence could have been exchanged with Pakistan, a few peaceniks would
have talked about peace and an Aman ki tamasha (sham of peace) would
have happened and India would have moved on and waited till the next terrorist
strike took place. This is what happened after the December 13 Parliament
attack, 26/11 Mumbai attack, IC 814 Indian Airlines plane hijack etc. In fact,
the December 13, 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament was an act of
war by Pakistan’s deep state that took place when Dulat was the advisor to Atal
Bihari Vajpayee. Of course, the armies of India and Pakistan remained in an eyeball
to eyeball situation for several weeks but there was no concrete action and India
was back to square one. Pakistan Army dared to intrude Kargil peaks at the time
when Dulat was at the helm of affairs of Indian intelligence. And despite this
India did not cross Pakistani air space during the Kargil war in 1999. If the
peaceniks, Dulat included, wanted something like this then they were in for a
big surprise for how India responded after the Pulwama terror attack came in completely
out of the script.
Indian fighter jets ripping apart the
Pakistani air space after Pulwama terror attack speaks volumes of the changed
mindset of the ruling establishment in New Delhi and of our confidence.
For the first time India struck at the
roots of this much-hyped “Kashmir issue”. After the Bangladesh liberation war
of 1971, India had crossed Pakistan’s airspace and bombed the terror modules at
Balakot. It needs to be borne in mind that Balakot is not Pakistan-occupied
Kashmir, rather it is Pakistan and is a part of their Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
province. There was a risk of this air strike escalating into a full-scale war
but then a nation cannot go ahead with such actions without having confidence
in the abilities of its defence forces, and without being sure of drumming up
international support in its favour. India under Narendra Modi was confident of
international backing for its air strikes. And the international community did
come out in full support of India because the air bombings were targeted only
at the Islamic terror infrastructure in Pakistan which is the root cause of
terrorism in Kashmir and in other parts of the world. The spirited response of
international community caused much heartburn to peaceniks who had expected
some cosmetic Indian action, like always, and the diffident diplomatic support
later on.
A senior intelligence officer with
whom I had detailed discussions about the current state of affairs explained that
talks about peace amidst the current tensions between India and Pakistan has
different meanings, connotations and objectives for those in Kashmir Valley and
elsewhere. So, there are two different categories of peaceniks—the politicians
and dynasts of Kashmir Valley such as Farooq Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti, Ghulam
Nabi Azad and similar others. The other bunch of peaceniks are from the rest of
India that include civil society members, a section of political class,
intellectuals, five-star activists and liberals.
The problem gets compounded when
these Kashmir-based peaceniks drum up support towards peace process and insist
for a suspension of operations against separatist and terrorist elements in
Kashmir and in Pakistan.
“This is where peaceniks from the
rest of India fall into their trap. The lull and ceasefire against terrorists
only helps Pakistan to prepare for the next spate of attacks,” explained the
intelligence officer.
In fact, talks of peace look quite
glamorous amid bomb blasts and air strikes. Yet, those talking of peace do not
understand the complex dynamics of proxy war and the massive disinformation
campaign unleashed by Pakistan. Those talking about peace need to understand
that India is not acting against common people in Kashmir or even in Pakistan.
The action is only against terrorists and their active supporters.
We need to understand that the times
when there’s no action against terrorists is actually a golden period for
terror masterminds. Massive efforts are being made to shift the current narrative
towards talks of peace only because it will give the terror mongers a breather
to re-organize and re-group for the next spate of offensives. “It is precisely
for this reason that Kashmir’s peaceniks have begun missing the lull moments
because under the current regime there is no let-up in anti-terror operations,”
the intelligence officer added.
Modi had always wanted to bring a
paradigm shift in India’s approach to Kashmir. From the day he sat on the hot
seat of New Delhi he had made his intentions clear. He made it known that he
would not like to talk to Hurriyat and has effectively side-lined them.
Jamaat-e-Islami has now been banned in Kashmir, the accounts of the
organisation frozen and scores of their cadres have been arrested. It is mostly
the Jamaat cadre who work as Over Ground Workers (OGWs) in the Kashmir Valley.
OGWs are the people who work as conduits for Islamic terrorists in Kashmir.
Now, if we put together these pieces
the picture becomes clearer. On the one hand, India confidently violated
Pakistan’s airspace and bombed the terror hideout of Jaish chief Masood Azhar.
That there were no civilian casualties meant that New Delhi had no intention to
wage war with its belligerent neighbour. This immediately drummed up
international support in India’s favour because Islamic terrorism has become a
gangrene for the entire world. The air strikes were immediately followed by incarceration
of trouble mongers and rabble rousers (read Hurriyat and Jamaat) from the
Kashmir Valley. These twin massive blows have struck at the roots of Kashmir
issue that has become an industry of sorts for a section of peaceniks in India
and of course for the Pakistani deep state.
Let’s also assess this so-called ‘peace
gesture’ by Imran Khan of returning Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman. The
peaceniks in India have been crying hoarse that India should take the peace process
forward, that India should reciprocate to Imran Khan’s offer for talks and that
India should immediately begin the dialogue process.
Well, we are yet to hear about the
agenda of talks either by Dulat or by any of the other peaceniks.
Moreover, for all those who have been saying that handing back of Wing Commander Abhinandan is a great ‘peace gesture’ by Imran Khan need to get their facts straight. Pakistan Army or its puppet PM Imran Khan never sent back Indian pilot Abhinandan due to their love for peace or because they follow the Geneva Convention in letter and spirit. Indian pilot was sent back only because of the immense international pressure on Pakistan to send him back safely to India. If there were no international pressure Pakistan would have physically tortured the Indian soldier or could have possibly even killed him. The treachery of Pakistan’s deep state were on full public display when they deliberately delayed the handing back of Abhinandan by several hours and released a doctored video just before his comeback to India.
What’s even more baffling in Dulat’s
assessment is when he states that Imran Khan’s actions were a result of
provocation by India. This declaration puts India in the dock, upturns the
entire standoff on its head and shifts the blame squarely on Narendra Modi.
It will be good to recall Pakistan’s offensive-defensive policy that was formulated by General Mirza Aslam Beg.The basic tenet of this policy is that Pakistan while defending its borders will use the terrorist apparatus of the likes of Masood Azhar to create mayhem in Kashmir. Pakistan raising the bogey of its nukes, ongoing ceasefire violations is part of its defensive strategy while the lethal terrorist strikes of Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama is its offensive gambit. Scores of Jamaat-e-Islami cadre and those in the Hurriyat separatist camp are the foot soldiers in Pakistan’s offensive against India.
If the peaceniks insist on talks
with Pakistan then let them state clearly that India will talk only about
dismantling of terror infrastructure within Pakistan. This means Pakistan’s deep
state will have to forego the offensive strategy of destabilizing India through
Islamic terrorism.
And for Pakistan to prove its seriousness
it must give credible evidence of acting against terror modules and terrorists
holed up in Pakistan. Sending back our Wing Commander under immense
international pressure is not a gesture of peace.
Yes, Narendra Modi is uprooting the
seeds of terror in the Kashmir Valley and there should be no let-up in this hot
pursuit.
Indian Railways has decided to rename the Arasalu railway
station to Malgudi railway station, which is on the Shivamogga-Talaguppa
railway line in Karnataka. The station is located in Hosanagar taluka in the
state.
This place is special as some of the scenes from the TV
series Malgudi Days were shot here. This is Indian Railways’ way of paying
homage to the legendary Shankar Nag, who directed and acted in Malgudi Days. Along
with renaming the station, Indian Railways has also decided to renovate it as
the old railway station where a lot of scenes from Malgudi Days were shot is in
a dilapidated state. According to reports, they have a budget of Rs 1.3 crore
to do so.
According to Member of Parliament from Shivamogga BY Raghavendra they have plans to set up a
Malgudi Days museum near the station. “I discussed the matter of renaming
the station and setting up the museum with the Divisional Manager and the
response was enthusiastic,” said the MP.
The Railway Ministry, in 2011, had renamed the
Yeshwantpur-Mysuru Express as Malgudi Express
As per an advisory issued by Amitabh Singh, Director
Operations, Air India, “With immediate effect, all (crew) are required to
announce ‘Jai Hind’ at the end of every announcement after a slight pause and
much fervor.”
While former Air India chairman Ashwani Lohani had issued a
similar directive to pilots in 2016, PTI quoted an official as saying that the
current advisory was a reminder to the staff in line with the “mood of the
nation”. Lohani, during his first stint as Air India chief, had issued a
directive in May 2016, saying using the words ‘Jai Hind’ by the flight
commander before takeoff would make a tremendous impact (on the passengers in
case of delays). Besides, in his communication, he had also asked the staff to
be “courteous and polite” to passengers and said wearing a smile would be a
“good thing”.
Last month, the Central government called back Lohani from
retirement to head the cash-strapped national carrier as chairman and managing
director for a second time within two years.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.