Home Blog Page 435

Jammu Blast: 1 dead, 28 Injured in grenade explosion at Bus stand

One person died and 28 were injured in a grenade blast that rocked the busy SRTC bus stand in Jammu on Thursday. The blast occurred even as security had been tightened in the state over the now – cancelled scheduled visit of Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman to Jammu province on Thursday.

The grenade reportedly went off under a bus, resulting in the shrapnel being contained to a smaller area. The injured were immediately rushed to the hospital. The police have cordoned off the area and further investigation is underway. “The explosion has caused injuries to approximately 18 people, all have been shifted to hospital,” IGP Jammu MK Sinha was quoted as saying by ANI.

This is the third grenade attack by terrorists in the bus stand area of the city since May last year.  Two months ago, a similar blast had occurred at the main bus stand here. The grenade fell short of the target and exploded in the air, without causing any damage or casualty, an official had said.

The state has been on the edge since 40 CRPF jawans were killed in a suicide bomb attack carried out by the Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammad terror group in Kashmir’s Pulwama district on February 14.

UK May Be OK: Medical Assistance in Dying Law

Humanists UK has been pushing for what they have been terming a compassionate assisted dying law, in which there is a law set forth in support of a “compassionate, humane, assisted dying law.”

This movement comes with a wide variety of terms. One of the important aspects of all of this is the public support for it. The Royal College of Physicians is opposed to a humane right to die law.

However, if we look into the public support, it is overwhelming at 80%. 4 out of 5 citizens support the law for this most important of choices about the end of the journey — likely — for human life.

The recent survey can be important for the advancement of medical assistance in dying, in a prominent nation. Humanists UK formed the Assisted Dying Coalition.

With the cooperation and coordination with other organizations, this can be an important move for the empowerment of those who truly want to plan and make the choice for their final days.

UK citizens may be forced to travel to another country for an assisted death. If most of the nation wants it, and if this can be passed to democratically support what the nations wants, then this can be an important democratic advancement and, in fact, a compassionate one too.

Photo by Erzsébet Vehofsics on Unsplash

Delhi University’s Daulat Ram College organises Sanskrit Fest

Sanskrit, being the oldest known language and the foundation for many modern languages, including English, presents a rich source of study. However, today there are not many takers of Sanskrit, which was once known for its comprehensiveness and refinement. In an attempt, to revive the popularity of Sanskrit language, particularly among the youth, a Sanskrit cultural festival was organised in Delhi University’s Daulat Ram College.


Ceremonial Lamp Lighting at the Sanskrit Fest by Shri Niwas (National Joint Organising Secretary of ABVP), Prof. Kaushal Sharma (Director, ICSSR), Prof. Ramesh Bhardwaj (Director, Gandhi Bhawan) and Dr. Savita Roy (Principal Daulat Ram College)

Enthusiastic response of students towards Sanskrit marked the first edition of ‘Mantra Cultural festival’ organised by Shreyas – The Sanskrit Association of Daulat Ram College to promote Sanskrit. The one day cultural festival was inaugurated by lighting of lamp by the Chief Guest, Shri Niwas (National Joint Organising Secretary of ABVP), Guest of Honor, Prof. Kaushal Sharma (Director, ICSSR), Special Guest, Prof. Ramesh Bhardwaj (Director, Gandhi Bhawan) and College Principal Dr. Savita Roy.

In the inaugural session, Chief Guest Shri Niwas talked about how our youngsters have not been able to understand and appreciate Sanskrit language. This is because our education system was manipulated right after the independence to keep our upcoming generations away from the Indian culture and its glory. The ‘modernization’ of our country and its education system has done more harm than good.

Prof. Kaushal Sharma, Director, ICSSR said that most of our literature was written in Sanskrit. Sanskrit has one of the richest and most extensive literatures of all known languages, such as the The Ramayana and The Mahabharata. It introduces children to vast epics, profound scripture, subtle philosophy, voluminous mythology, exquisite poetry and much else. Sanskrit slowly took a backseat during the Mughal era and the British period. The rise of the princely states also played a vital role in the downfall of Sanskrit as every state puts more focus on the use of its local language. He was of the view that interdisciplinary research among Sanskrit and other courses in universities will surely help us understand Sanskrit not just as a language but as culture. Prof. Ramesh Bhardwaj said that India is a country that defines unity in diversity and Sanskrit could be a language that binds us together. Dr. Savita Roy, Principal, Daulat Ram College said that Sanskrit is not just a language, but a mix bag of knowledge – full of economics, politics and religion.

The day-long activities in the festival included Sanskrit kavyali competition, Sanskrit bhashan competition and Sanskrit ekal shlok sangeet competition.

India needs to contain Pakistan Deep State to win this proxy war

Amidst all the war frenzy, the big question is who do you fight – Pakistan or also the Taliban, Jaish-e-Mohammed and other riff-raff elements?

The Pulwama blasting of CRPF jawans has caused remorse and frenzy for revenge. There is cry of teaching Pakistan a lesson. Many want a war. Indians are hurt. It’s blow on the nation. Howsoever anyone wants, the solution is not easy. The situation today is more complex than in 1971, when Bangladesh was created despite radicalization even at that time. There are many non-state actors. India has military preparedness but a war is expensive and not just in cash.

The sub-continent is passing through severe uncertainty as the neighbouring nations – Iran, Afghanistan, China are changing track every now and then. US is in a hurry to withdraw its troops from Afghanistan, and Taliban is flexing muscles. Russia and Iran are not shy of a deal with Taliban. Will the Taliban take control of Afghanistan, where India has invested huge sums as also in diplomacy, as the US withdraws? It may be seen as yet another failure of the US after Vietnam, Somalia, Iraq and Syria. Since 2001, after spending billions, the US controls not even half of Afghanistan. The Afghan soldiers and civilian casualties are heavy. The Saudi Arabia, Qatar and UAE are working out the face-saving for the US for its withdrawal. They are also pressurizing Pakistan to help as also providing financial aid to boost its forex reserves touching low of $6 billion. Saudi Arabia is giving $32 billion to Islamabad.

Apart from this the big money plays its role. It is not just the nation states that are pouring funds – in fact they, including the US, are having trouble arranging it. India is just next to a troubled Western Asia singed by ISIS. The ISIS war is being fought not for a “holy cause of jihad”. The terror is complex mix of arms-drug peddlers, cyber frauds, human traffickers and other hegemonists. The motivators of school girls from Europe to West Asia rake in huge money bags for turning them as sex fodder for marauders. It generates illicit funds.

Conflict is rising in northern borders of Pakistan. Even Iran lost 28 soldiers in a blast on its borders with Pakistan on February 12. Frenzy is there too. Iran also vowed retribution. The sub-continent is on a tinder box. A war is too complex. Astute diplomacy is needed to save India’s economic assistance and friends in Afghanistan and Iran. Taliban resurgence is a problem for Islamabad. It fears losing its might to it. Moreover, the tribal regions on Pakistan borders are on ferment with sub-nationalism. Slight change in equilibrium would cause major problems for India and other states in the region.

An aggressive diplomacy, lobbying, negotiations, and operations need huge investment as also manpower. The conflict with Pakistan costs 3% of India’s GDP, according to Indian think tank Strategic Foresight Group in 2004. India lost 3843 soldiers in 1971 and captured 93,000 soldiers. Almost a million person were in India as refugees. It had bled the economy then. Various surcharges were levied. Even on each postal item a 5-paise special refugee surcharge had to be affixed. The post-1971 war costs were higher. It had caused over 13% inflation and severe unrest. The imposition of internal emergency was another fall-out.

The proxy war since 1990 has claimed more casualties and economic cost be it in Kashmir, Kargil conflict 1999, Parliament attack in 2001, Mumbai-attack 2008 or subsequent several other blasts and raids. Military and civilian casualties are more than it was in full-fledged wars in 1965 and 1971. It is estimated that since December 2001 every year almost $600 million is spent to protect the western border. Pakistan spending is estimated to be a little less but it is higher in percentage terms for its GDP and geographical area. Carnegie Foundation has stated that even not fighting a war has a cost that is not less than an actual war. The Federation of Indian Chambers for Commerce and Industry (FICCI) estimated a huge business cost to the ongoing Indo-Pak conflict.

So what does Pakistan gain? A conflict with India, be it for Gen Zia ul Haq or Gen Parvez Musharraf has been huge economic gains in assistance from West Asia, the US and the West. US despite the World Trade Center attack considered Pakistan a strategic ally and gave Musharraf enormous aid. Even Donald Trump is doing it today. India-baiting is survival technique for the artificial state. Chinese support to Jaish-e-Mohammed operator Masood Azhar is a testimony. Chinese move is said to keep India under pressure. It is also said that saving Azhar is its insurance for checking terror by Muslim Uighurs in Xinjiang.

For India, apart from financial and political cost there is human misery. Certain powers want the rogue state to survive as they have business, territorial and other interests.  India has to chart out a new course. A war may not be easy but breaking the tentacles of those who lead to war is a necessity. India has to re-strategize and ensure global alliance to break the backbone of terror and its illicit funding.

Salman tweets wrap of his film “Bharat”

Directed by Ali Abbas Zafar, Salman Khan and Katrina Kaif starrer “Bharat” is slated to be released on Eid in 2019. On Wednesday Salman Khan announced the wrap of their film.

Salman shared the news on Twitter. “And it’s a wrap for #Bharat. @aliabbaszafar #katrinakaif @atulreellife #AlviraAgnihotri @WhoSunilGrover @DishPatani #Tabu @Bharat_TheFilm,” he wrote alongside a picture with Katrina.

Salman stars in the title role in the movie, which his third film with Ali Abbas Zafar after “Sultan” and “Tiger Zinda Hai”. The film also features Tabu, Disha Patani and Sunil Grover.

“Bharat” is an official adaptation of 2014 South Korean film, “Ode to My Father”, which narrates modern Korean history from the 1950s to the modern day through the life of an ordinary man and events such as the Hungnam Evacuation during the 1950 Korean War. The film will also depict the government’s decision to dispatch nurses and miners to West Germany in the ’60s and the Vietnam War. Presented by T-Series, the film is produced by Salman and Atul Agnihotri and has been shot extensively in Abu Dhabi and Spain.

Time for FIR against PM in Rafale: Congress

Alleging huge corruption in the Rafale fighter jet deal Congress has said the time has come to lodge an FIR against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. “It is now crystal clear that blatant and massive corruption has taken place in the Rafale deal. It is undoubtedly established that Modi misused his office as Prime Minister to grant undue benefit to Dassault Aviation and caused a loss to public exchequer ,” Congress chief spokesperson Randeep Surjewala told reporters.

“This is a clear cut case under Section 13 (1) (d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and different provisions of Indian Penal Code. Time has now come to register an FIR against PM Modi and every other individual so that a time-bound investigation takes place in this entire sage of Rafale corruption reaching the highest echelons of power,” he said.

Citing a report of the Indian Negotiation Team (INT), now in public domain, he said it is now crystal clear that Modi “misled Parliament and duped the country to cover up the murky dealings and blatant corruption, besides, squandering away national security interests”. 

The Congress leader alleged that after documents that have come out in the open, the responsibility now lies at the door steps of Modi and a case be registered under the Prevention of Corruption Act. “Responsibility for negotiating the 36 Rafale aircraft purchase was that of the Indian Negotiating Team (INT) constituted by the Ministry of Defence on May 12, 2015. But PM Modi was indulging in direct negotiation with the French, which weakened the credibility of the INT. Simple question is, how is it the domain of NSA to negotiate and finalise a fighter aircraft purchase deal? Obviously, the PMO and the NSA were doing so under direct instructions of PM Narendra Modi,” he said.

Pakistan’s posture: A lull before the storm ?

The respite since the handing over of Wing Commander Abhinandan to India by the Pakistani authorities is being viewed with a degree of relief by many. There is a perception of receding war clouds. The question here is– is this a lull before the storm?

The situation along the Line of Control (LOC) is heated up with both sides resorting to intensive firing. India has reported civilian casualties and so has Pakistan. The neighbouring country has gone a step further and blamed India for the escalation. A editorial in the Pakistani English newspaper, Express Tribune, published on March 3 says, “Shelling by Indian troops took place in Azad Jammu and Kashmir in which one casualty, Mohammad Sudhir, and three injured youngsters were reported just hours prior to Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman’s promised release by Prime Minister Imran Khan. The violent lashing out continued on March 2, with responses from both sides, resulting in two civilian deaths.”

Newspapers in Pakistan continue to remain in denial with regard to the downing of the F-16 fighter aircraft of their country. “Last week, Indian jets dropped payload at a hilly forest area in Balakot. In reply to that, Pakistan Air Force on Wednesday shot down two Indian military aircraft in Pakistani airspace after repeated LOC violation,” says an editorial on March 3 of yet another English newspaper, Daily Pakistan. It also refers to “unprovoked firing along the Line of Control (LoC).” A gist of these editorials have been carried by the website, Indian Observer Post.

The decision of Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan to release Wing Commander Abhinandan has witnessed a fair degree of opposition within Pakistan. Some members of the Pakistani National Assembly spoke against the decision and one Barrister Muhammad Shoaib Razak, filed a petition in the High Court to stop the release of pilot, which was dismissed by their Court.  Some rabid veteran army officers have spoken against the same on television, clips of which have gone viral. Hamid Mir, a noted Pakistan Journalist presently working with Geo News tweeted, “Nawaz Sharif Govt release Indian pilot after 8 days captivity and lost his Govt within 6 months in 1999.” The innuendo was quite obvious.

On the positive side, Pakistan witnessed a lot demands upon its government to release the Indian pilot. These came predominantly from women and elders of the educated society.  An organisation named “Women in struggle for empowerment” carried out a rally in Lahore against escalation of the situation into an all out war. They carried banners saying “war is not a solution” and “Women against war.” Other banners demanded “Safe return of Abhinandan Varthaman” with hash tags of #NoToWar, #IStandAgainstHatred, #ProfilesforPeace etc.

The public relations machinery of the Pakistan Army (ISPR) has, in a tweet, confirmed that the Pakistan Army Chief, General Qamar Bajwa, spoke to his counterparts in the US, UK, Australia and also to ambassadors of these countries as well as China with regard to the impact of the situation on “peace and stability in the region and beyond.” “Pakistan will surely respond to any aggression in self defence,” he said. It is from this tweet that one gets an inkling of the anxiety within the Pakistan Army.

The retaliatory actions other than military taken by India have also started having an effect. Inflation in Pakistan is rising due to removal of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) status and imposition of heavy duty on trade between the two countries. The Indian hint towards a reassessment of the Indus Water Treaty (IWT) is also causing widespread disquiet.

Close to the heels of face-off between the two countries came the meeting of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC) at Abu Dhabi where India was invited for the first time since inception of this grouping of 57 Islamic countries. A sulking Pakistan refused to attend the proceedings, but it did manage to convince the grouping to stick its original posture on Kashmir. One day after the address of Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj, the Foreign Minsiters session of the group passed a resolution highlighting, “intensified Indian barbarities (in Kashmir) since July 2016” and “illegal detentions and disappearances in Jammu and Kashmir.” The communiqué also praised Prime Minister Imran Khan for sending the Indian pilot back.  India has, of course, responded with a reaffirmation that Jammu and Kashmir is an integral part of India and the matter is strictly internal to the country.

The bottom line is that though the OIC is taking baby steps towards facilitating India, with whom most member countries have good diplomatic and financial relations, it is not ready to forsake Pakistan altogether. There is, as such, much remaining to be done by India on the diplomatic front, especially so, with the Islamic world.  

So we have a situation where Pakistan government and Pakistan Army are on the back foot but not wholly without friends. Internally, a substantial element of the educated society in Pakistan is quite fed up with this consistent war mongering and they wish to move away from escalatory mechanisms to a more normal life with good relationships. The rising inconvenience due to Indian non-military retaliations will play a big role in forming perceptions in Pakistan.

India may think that the cross border skirmish was enough to put the matter of the Pulwama strike at rest but Pakistan definitely does not think so. It will be weighing its options. One option is to follow the path of reconciliation; this is possible only if Pakistan manages to control the terror activity emanating from its soil. The second option is to retaliate with strength to contain the receding credibility and stature of the government and its Army. Since both options are open, India cannot afford to get complacent; a constant eye on the situation and high level of vigilance/ preparedness for any contingency is important. This is definitely the proverbial lull before the storm.

Why is former RAW Chief AS Dulat upset with Narendra Modi’s approach to Kashmir?

Peaceniks who have begun a propaganda of peace amidst this ongoing India-Pakistan tension need to understand that the ongoing war in Kashmir is only against terrorists and terror masterminds. Any let-up in the operations will give a breather to terrorists. Even earlier, terrorists have used the lull moments to re-group and prepare themselves to launch fresh strikes later on.

AS Dulat, the former chief of Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) — India’s external intelligence agency, in his latest interview has made a rather strange observation. “Modi is milking the current situation to the extreme,” Dulat said in his interview to a monthly news magazine. He finds several strategic faults in the current standoff between India and Pakistan and reminisces of how New Delhi has lost the Kashmir plot from the highpoint where former Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had steered it.

Incidentally, Dulat headed RAW during Vajpayee’s tenure and later on served as his Advisor on Kashmir.

Well, there can be different approaches to deal with exigencies but when it comes to something like a boiling pot situation in Kashmir then options get limited for any head of the state. India’s response to Kashmir had hitherto been to maintain the status quo. All advisors (Dulat included) to the government on Kashmir have wanted to maintain the existing situation. Nothing changed or moved on the ground over these years only because India’s polices were never aimed to change the ground realities.

However, if one goes with the intention to solve this Kashmir conundrum then the options available are very few, because this would mean striking at the roots of Islamic terrorism. And this is where Narendra Modi’s present handling of the situation after Pulwama terrorist attack is better than all his predecessors.

Let’s first make a quick assessment of the options available before India after the February 14 suicide terrorist attack in which 40 CRPF jawans were martyred. One, as has always been, New Delhi could have made some noise, raised the issue at international forums, given speeches, a few angry articles would have had been written, evidence and counter-evidence could have been exchanged with Pakistan, a few peaceniks would have talked about peace and an Aman ki tamasha (sham of peace) would have happened and India would have moved on and waited till the next terrorist strike took place. This is what happened after the December 13 Parliament attack, 26/11 Mumbai attack, IC 814 Indian Airlines plane hijack etc. In fact, the December 13, 2001 terrorist attack on the Indian Parliament was an act of war by Pakistan’s deep state that took place when Dulat was the advisor to Atal Bihari Vajpayee. Of course, the armies of India and Pakistan remained in an eyeball to eyeball situation for several weeks but there was no concrete action and India was back to square one. Pakistan Army dared to intrude Kargil peaks at the time when Dulat was at the helm of affairs of Indian intelligence. And despite this India did not cross Pakistani air space during the Kargil war in 1999. If the peaceniks, Dulat included, wanted something like this then they were in for a big surprise for how India responded after the Pulwama terror attack came in completely out of the script.

Indian fighter jets ripping apart the Pakistani air space after Pulwama terror attack speaks volumes of the changed mindset of the ruling establishment in New Delhi and of our confidence.

For the first time India struck at the roots of this much-hyped “Kashmir issue”. After the Bangladesh liberation war of 1971, India had crossed Pakistan’s airspace and bombed the terror modules at Balakot. It needs to be borne in mind that Balakot is not Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, rather it is Pakistan and is a part of their Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province. There was a risk of this air strike escalating into a full-scale war but then a nation cannot go ahead with such actions without having confidence in the abilities of its defence forces, and without being sure of drumming up international support in its favour. India under Narendra Modi was confident of international backing for its air strikes. And the international community did come out in full support of India because the air bombings were targeted only at the Islamic terror infrastructure in Pakistan which is the root cause of terrorism in Kashmir and in other parts of the world. The spirited response of international community caused much heartburn to peaceniks who had expected some cosmetic Indian action, like always, and the diffident diplomatic support later on.

A senior intelligence officer with whom I had detailed discussions about the current state of affairs explained that talks about peace amidst the current tensions between India and Pakistan has different meanings, connotations and objectives for those in Kashmir Valley and elsewhere. So, there are two different categories of peaceniks—the politicians and dynasts of Kashmir Valley such as Farooq Abdullah, Mehbooba Mufti, Ghulam Nabi Azad and similar others. The other bunch of peaceniks are from the rest of India that include civil society members, a section of political class, intellectuals, five-star activists and liberals.

The problem gets compounded when these Kashmir-based peaceniks drum up support towards peace process and insist for a suspension of operations against separatist and terrorist elements in Kashmir and in Pakistan. 

“This is where peaceniks from the rest of India fall into their trap. The lull and ceasefire against terrorists only helps Pakistan to prepare for the next spate of attacks,” explained the intelligence officer.

In fact, talks of peace look quite glamorous amid bomb blasts and air strikes. Yet, those talking of peace do not understand the complex dynamics of proxy war and the massive disinformation campaign unleashed by Pakistan. Those talking about peace need to understand that India is not acting against common people in Kashmir or even in Pakistan. The action is only against terrorists and their active supporters.

We need to understand that the times when there’s no action against terrorists is actually a golden period for terror masterminds. Massive efforts are being made to shift the current narrative towards talks of peace only because it will give the terror mongers a breather to re-organize and re-group for the next spate of offensives. “It is precisely for this reason that Kashmir’s peaceniks have begun missing the lull moments because under the current regime there is no let-up in anti-terror operations,” the intelligence officer added.

Modi had always wanted to bring a paradigm shift in India’s approach to Kashmir. From the day he sat on the hot seat of New Delhi he had made his intentions clear. He made it known that he would not like to talk to Hurriyat and has effectively side-lined them. Jamaat-e-Islami has now been banned in Kashmir, the accounts of the organisation frozen and scores of their cadres have been arrested. It is mostly the Jamaat cadre who work as Over Ground Workers (OGWs) in the Kashmir Valley. OGWs are the people who work as conduits for Islamic terrorists in Kashmir.

Now, if we put together these pieces the picture becomes clearer. On the one hand, India confidently violated Pakistan’s airspace and bombed the terror hideout of Jaish chief Masood Azhar. That there were no civilian casualties meant that New Delhi had no intention to wage war with its belligerent neighbour. This immediately drummed up international support in India’s favour because Islamic terrorism has become a gangrene for the entire world. The air strikes were immediately followed by incarceration of trouble mongers and rabble rousers (read Hurriyat and Jamaat) from the Kashmir Valley. These twin massive blows have struck at the roots of Kashmir issue that has become an industry of sorts for a section of peaceniks in India and of course for the Pakistani deep state.

Let’s also assess this so-called ‘peace gesture’ by Imran Khan of returning Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman. The peaceniks in India have been crying hoarse that India should take the peace process forward, that India should reciprocate to Imran Khan’s offer for talks and that India should immediately begin the dialogue process.

Well, we are yet to hear about the agenda of talks either by Dulat or by any of the other peaceniks.

Moreover, for all those who have been saying that handing back of Wing Commander Abhinandan is a great ‘peace gesture’ by Imran Khan need to get their facts straight. Pakistan Army or its puppet PM Imran Khan never sent back Indian pilot Abhinandan due to their love for peace or because they follow the Geneva Convention in letter and spirit. Indian pilot was sent back only because of the immense international pressure on Pakistan to send him back safely to India. If there were no international pressure Pakistan would have physically tortured the Indian soldier or could have possibly even killed him. The treachery of Pakistan’s deep state were on full public display when they deliberately delayed the handing back of Abhinandan by several hours and released a doctored video just before his comeback to India.

India’s fighter pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman (in blue coat) just before walking over to India at the Wagha border. Abhinandan is accompanied by Dr Fariha Bugti (left), an official of Pakistan Foreign Office. (Photo: PTI)

What’s even more baffling in Dulat’s assessment is when he states that Imran Khan’s actions were a result of provocation by India. This declaration puts India in the dock, upturns the entire standoff on its head and shifts the blame squarely on Narendra Modi.

It will be good to recall Pakistan’s offensive-defensive policy that was formulated by General Mirza Aslam Beg. The basic tenet of this policy is that Pakistan while defending its borders will use the terrorist apparatus of the likes of Masood Azhar to create mayhem in Kashmir. Pakistan raising the bogey of its nukes, ongoing ceasefire violations is part of its defensive strategy while the lethal terrorist strikes of Pathankot, Uri, Pulwama is its offensive gambit. Scores of Jamaat-e-Islami cadre and those in the Hurriyat separatist camp are the foot soldiers in Pakistan’s offensive against India.

If the peaceniks insist on talks with Pakistan then let them state clearly that India will talk only about dismantling of terror infrastructure within Pakistan. This means Pakistan’s deep state will have to forego the offensive strategy of destabilizing India through Islamic terrorism.

And for Pakistan to prove its seriousness it must give credible evidence of acting against terror modules and terrorists holed up in Pakistan. Sending back our Wing Commander under immense international pressure is not a gesture of peace.

Yes, Narendra Modi is uprooting the seeds of terror in the Kashmir Valley and there should be no let-up in this hot pursuit. 

Meet Swami and his friends at Malgudi railway station

Indian Railways has decided to rename the Arasalu railway station to Malgudi railway station, which is on the Shivamogga-Talaguppa railway line in Karnataka. The station is located in Hosanagar taluka in the state.

This place is special as some of the scenes from the TV series Malgudi Days were shot here. This is Indian Railways’ way of paying homage to the legendary Shankar Nag, who directed and acted in Malgudi Days. Along with renaming the station, Indian Railways has also decided to renovate it as the old railway station where a lot of scenes from Malgudi Days were shot is in a dilapidated state. According to reports, they have a budget of Rs 1.3 crore to do so.

According to Member of Parliament from Shivamogga  BY Raghavendra they have plans to set up a Malgudi Days museum near the station. “I discussed the matter of renaming the station and setting up the museum with the Divisional Manager and the response was enthusiastic,” said the MP. The Railway Ministry, in 2011, had renamed the Yeshwantpur-Mysuru Express as Malgudi Express

Air India crew to say “Jai Hind” after every in-flight announcement

As per an advisory issued by Amitabh Singh, Director Operations, Air India, “With immediate effect, all (crew) are required to announce ‘Jai Hind’ at the end of every announcement after a slight pause and much fervor.”

While former Air India chairman Ashwani Lohani had issued a similar directive to pilots in 2016, PTI quoted an official as saying that the current advisory was a reminder to the staff in line with the “mood of the nation”. Lohani, during his first stint as Air India chief, had issued a directive in May 2016, saying using the words ‘Jai Hind’ by the flight commander before takeoff would make a tremendous impact (on the passengers in case of delays). Besides, in his communication, he had also asked the staff to be “courteous and polite” to passengers and said wearing a smile would be a “good thing”.

Last month, the Central government called back Lohani from retirement to head the cash-strapped national carrier as chairman and managing director for a second time within two years.