Home Blog Page 446

FGM has adverse psychological impact on a woman’s male partner: Aissa Edon

Aissa Edon is an FGM (female genital mutilation) specialist midwife and former Community Midwife Team Leader at the Hillingdon Hospital Foundation NHS (National Health Service) Trust. She currently works for Medecins Sans Frontiers.  She is a Mary Seacole Scholar and founder and director of the FGM Hope Clinic, which grew out of her passion to end female genital mutilation. Here she is interviewed by Terri Murray.

Terri: Can you tell us a bit about the aims of the project you undertook as a Mary Seacole Scholar? 

Aissa Edon: It was to understand the needs of survivors of FGM and their partners in terms of psychological and pyschosexual support in Britain’s NHS system. So it was a service evaluation to hear the voices of the practicing community and people who have undergone female genital mutilation and to see how the NHS can improve their services and answer the needs of care.

Terri: It’s pretty cool that your project included partners. Is it an angle that has been looked at much before? 

Aissa Edon: No it wasn’t really looked at before because FGM is often seen as a women’s issue. I do believe that it is a community issue. That was why I wanted to look at the place of the partner.  Also, if you look at the origins of the practice, it was done for men, and most of the time it was by men, so I think we need to go back to the origin of the problem and make sure we include everybody impacted to eradicate the practice and find a solution. I also wanted to understand how FGM can impact [male partners] because in my studies, when I did the literature research, there was a little information about the impact on female survivors, but I haven’t seen anything on the how men and partners of FGM survivors are affected.   

Terri: A lot of FGM survivors I’ve met have said that this is actually a form of child abuse, even if it is culturally acceptable and conventional.  What is the psychological impact of that?

Aissa Edon:  If you look at the practicing communities, talking about the psychological needs or the psychosexual needs is not something very ‘usual’ in these communities, so obviously it is a long process. The impact is still there, and we in the practicing communities feel it, but it is difficult to talk about the impact of the trauma. So it is difficult even to just scratch the surface, but I think it is really important that we try because the healing should not only be physical; it should also be for the whole well-being of the person, mental and social as well.  

Terri: What recommendations did you make as a result of your research?

Aissa Edon: The recommendations are in different sectors, because they all came from what I was told in the ten focus groups: five with men and five with females. It was their experiences and their recommendations to be fair, not really mine.  First of all, they wanted education to be provided to the front-line caregivers, and that means to ensure that it is part of the teaching curriculum for doctors and health care providers. They also talked about the need for education about FGM, so that teachers in schools have this in the curriculum, as well as social services and police. So the first step was education. They were very keen on that. 

 In terms of care provision, they wanted to have holistic care. That meant that they wanted to have standardised care, to make sure that wherever they live, they will have the same quality of care and a global care. They also wanted to work in partnership with the healthcare provider to make sure it is individual care, so that they have a say in their treatment, a voice and a plan where they have a consultation for their care.  And they want to be seen not just as individuals but also as couples, with couple care so that partners of females who have undergone female genital mutilation could be included. 

They also wanted to look at FGM care in a ‘global view’. They understand that in the UK it is an illegal practice and there is a lot of education and prevention, but they feel like it should not stop at the UK border but should be a global thing. They felt there should be the same approach in their countries of origin, where FGM was originally practiced. They also expressed a desire for the healthcare professional to go there and not only stick to the UK and do things here.

Terri: You’ve worked in this area for a long time and gained lots of experience.  Were there any big surprises in your research findings?

Aissa Edon: For me it was really to have the voices of the partners of FGM survivors.  That’s not something I’m used to hearing. I’ve been very touched and shocked also how big the impact of FGM is on these men, and how devastating and harmful FGM is for them.  That’s something we need to understand because it may be the way we will stop the practice, if we have more men coming forward and fighting against female genital mutilation. It is affecting the women in terms of their physical well-being; it is affecting her obstetric history or sexual history and also her relationship. For men, who are not living the harm of FGM physically, they do feel a very huge impact emotionally and psychologically and that needs to be known. The relationship and sexual intimacy issues FGM causes with their wives was something male respondents talked about a lot. 

Terri: What insights or advice can you offer to health care professionals who want to be better equipped to handle FGM? 

Aissa Edon: It’s about having good training and also having a gentle, respectful approach, and a non-judgemental approach. It is also really important to make sure you are treating the patient and the family respectfully.  Knowing what you’re talking about and how to approach things in a sensitive manner, and sometimes we don’t always have the words or attitude to say things, but fortunately the Mary Seacole Awards allowed me to also meet others who are working on the issue. One of the other Mary Seacole Award Scholars, Joanne McEwen, developed an App called Let’s Talk FGM, which teaches healthcare professionals how to talk about FGM in a simple manner. This is a really helpful tool you can download for iPad. It allows patients and professionals to give and receive information about FGM.

Worldwide, 200 million girls undergo FGM, and one in three women experience sexual or physical violence.

Terri: During your many years working to eradicate FGM, what was your most proud moment or achievement?

Aissa Edon: That’s a difficult question.  I think when I will be the most proud is when FGM will be eradicated, so I’m not done yet.  Every milestone… uh, I’m not really a very proud person anyway, but I’m waiting for the end of FGM and I will make sure everything I’m doing until then is for this goal.

Terri: One of the big problems in combating female genital mutilation seems to be that Western Europeans feel it would be an imposition on other cultures to criticise practices that are non-Western. We can easily be perceived as ‘superior’ or engaged in ‘cultural imperialism’ if we criticise the practice.

Aissa Edon: I don’t think we need to look at it this way. I prefer to look at it as a human rights violation. We need to recognise it as the cause of health complications and mental health issues, as well as other problems.  It is not knocking on peoples’ doors and saying “you’ve done wrong”. It’s looking at the effects. For example, urinary problems or obstetric problems that exist because of female genital mutilation.  Some pregnant women with FGM can’t have a normal vaginal delivery. That’s because of female genital mutilation. The fact that when you have sex it is so painful that you scream your head off: that’s because you had female genital mutilation. That’s fact. That’s not judgemental. It’s not saying that you’ve done wrong. It’s just telling the facts, showing the facts, and nobody can deny facts. Facts are the way to move forward, and by this means people will understand why this practice should be stopped. There is nothing judgemental in facts.

Terri: What’s next for you in your personal journey?

Aissa Edon: For me it is about carrying on what I’m doing.  Then too, I still want to make sure that restorative surgery will be offered in the UK.  I would like FGM to end in one generation, and if it can be in my generation that will be great.  That’s the goal. 

Donald Trump’s Himalayan Blunder in Afghanistan and India’s options

Among the many disasters that have marked the presidency of Donald Trump, his Afghanistan policy will stand out in history as the most catastrophic. Trump has, right from his campaign for the presidency, rooted for total withdrawal from Afghanistan. No issues with this, since America has realised the blunder that it committed in 2001 by entering Afghanistan and has been trying, since long, to find an honourable way out. It is something that Barack Obama also desired but could not achieve. The problem lies in the manner in which Trump is trying to implement his policy.

Having already declared a massive troop reduction, he has opened talks with the Taliban without making the incumbent government of Afghanistan a party to the same. This act, by itself, has caused a serious dent to the credibility of the government of Afghanistan and made the situation in the trouble-torn region even more fractious. It also constitutes a serious breach of trust by the US government which was instrumental in putting the government in place after throwing out the Taliban.

The US-Taliban talks are poised to enter the third round and the US special envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, is speaking of a forward movement as the two main agenda points of a structured withdrawal of US forces and a commitment from Taliban to not allow safe haven to extremists in territories under its control. The negotiating team claims to be pushing for intra-Afghan talks but, quite obviously, the Taliban will be unwilling to agree to the same. A ceasefire and direct talks between the Taliban and the Afghanistan government with an outside moderator (that can be the US) is imperative to proceed further. Further, a reasonable troop presence will need to be maintained to ensure that the accord is implemented in full.

Once again, the complete lack of understanding of the US with regards to Afghanistan is quite visible. Everybody except the US knows that the latter has no means to ensure that the Taliban will honour its agreement. The Taliban is quite aware that the window for the US to seal the deal is closing down; it cannot be later than early 2020 to give Trump enough time to leverage the “military and diplomatic victory” for his re-election bid in November 2020. Safely ensconced in a position of strength the Taliban are playing out a waiting game knowing fully well that US desperation will increase with each passing day and more concessions will be forthcoming. Taliban is also in direct talks with Russia, China and Iran to see what it can garner when the balloon goes up. Taliban may be talking of an “inclusive Afghan world” but their history does not refer to any such ideology. They have always believed in “all or nothing” with betrayal and violence being their forte.

Pakistan is playing the dual game that it is most adept at. It looks upon the development as an opportunity to regain the goodwill of the US and get the financial support that it so desperately wants. Ostensibly, it is pushing the Taliban toward talks but under wraps it will probably be advising the Taliban leaders to play the waiting game so that the US can be diplomatically bled by both entities. Once the US is out and the Taliban in control of Afghanistan, Pakistan will have the strategic partner against India that it so desperately needs.

The tragedy that is unfolding due to this inexcusable lack of strategic foresight of the US is that the unfortunate people of the region are staring at black days with imposition, once more, of the most medieval form of Sharia, replete with denial of any rights to the women, wanton killing, suppression and persecution. Those who supported the Afghanistan government will be systematically put to death and a reign of terror will be unleashed across the land. In short, Afghanistan will once again stare at regression into the stone-age, from where it was just about coming out.

It is time for India to leverage her position as a global power and stand up for the Afghanistan government and the people of Afghanistan who look upon the country as a friend in whom they have reposed faith and trust. On the diplomatic front, it is incumbent upon India to create awareness internationally and pressure the US into looking at the issue from a strategic position and not as an election promise made by Donald Trump which needs to be honoured to facilitate his re-election. India needs to clearly state its position of being fearful of a full-fledged civil war in case these parameters are not ensured.

At the regional level, India should fully support the legitimate Afghanistan government and expose the double-speak of Pakistan. Whatever help can be given to strengthen the Afghan Armed Forces should be forthcoming speedily and urgently. The Chabahar Port should be made functional soonest in order to boost the Afghan economy. Stability of Afghanistan should form part of bilateral dialogue with Russia, China, Iran and the Central Asian Republics.

If India fails to contain the US blunder in the making, she will have to gear up for an intensely radicalised neighbourhood and its immediate effect on Kashmir and to the rest of the country. Jihad in Kashmir is bound to gain momentum, infiltration attempts will rise, the success in Afghanistan will be leveraged and psychological operations restructured to enhance recruitment of locals into the terrorist fold, availability of arms and ammunition will increase. Attempts will also be made to impact the rest of the country with radicalised Islamist ideology.

The security forces in Kashmir need to remain sensitive and vigilant of the emerging situation that will have far reaching ramifications. The bid to eradicate terrorism from Kashmir needs to be intensified in order to stop, in its tracks, the terrorism push that will come, yet again, from Pakistan. Clearly there is much to be done and little time left for India to do the same. It is time to move decisively since procrastination will cause severe damage to both countries.

Who loses, who gains from CBI’s Bengal game

Everything is fair in love and war. So is it to the run up to India’s General Elections this year. The Bengal drama has turned out to be a national drama as the opposition, including the Congress, finds it suitable to rake up anti-Modi propaganda.

Is India thinking the way Bengal is thinking?

There is a sense of fear as also brinkmanship. It also opens up questions on the CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation). Interestingly enough it is not formed as per provisions of constitution. It exists since 1941 as Special Police Establishment to probe into corruption and bribery cases. None knows whether it has a mandate to do that. Its actions had always been questioned and often accused of having functioned as the handmaid of the political bosses.

West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee is gunning on that ground and has been able to bring together the opposition by raising the bogey of fear that opposition leaders are being targeted through the CBI.

The Supreme Court’s refusal to allow for the arrest of Kolkata Police Commissioner Rajiv Kumar but just asking him to appear before the court substantiates Mamata Banerjee’s contention that the CBI should not have gone to the residence of Kumar. It also supports her posturing that the action was highhanded and unwarranted in a federal set up.

This makes it difficult for the BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party), though it may be correct or not on Saradha issue to bash Mamata on the issue of constitutional failure.

The Supreme Court had ordered CBI to investigate the Saradha case five years back, in May 2014. CBI has undermined its own case by gunning for the Kolkata Police Commissioner ahead of the Lok Sabha elections. It needs to answer why it dithered for so long. Was it looking for a politically opportune time? It cannot be equated with its investigations in the Godhra case.

The opposition hands are full on these from disproportionate incomes of SP (Samajwadi Party) and BSP (Bahujan Samaj Party) leaders of Uttar Pradesh, RJD (Rashtriya Janata Dal) leaders of Bihar to the family of former finance minister P Chidambaram. Right or wrong these are being projected as cases more of political nature than corruption. The overdoing of CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) actions are leading to unsavoury questions.

It is now a ding-dong battle. The ruling BJP is playing the probity card while opposition plays the oppression by ruling clan—the victim card. The voters are watching the scenario with amusement. The final judgment will come from them. Till such time the political rivals can play the game to satisfy the voters as Bihar Chief Minister has said that such games will be seen everyday till the final leg of the Lok Sabha polls.

Rahul Gandhi – Congenital Liar or Simply Delusional?

0

Rahul Gandhi, since being nominated the President of the Congress Party, seems to have suddenly found his voice after remaining virtually silent or absent in the first 10 years of Parliament when his Government was in power. Here is an individual who genuinely believes that the nation owes him allegiance because of his ancestors and that he is entitled to everything.

Entitled to the top position in his party because of his family’s name. Entitled to all the trappings of power and the accompanying perquisites because of the sacrifices of his ancestors. Entitled to say anything he wants knowing that an army of senior leaders will jump to his defence. And of course, entitled to aspire to lead the country with no accountability.

Mr Gandhi seems to depend on the philosophy that if he shouts out an allegation, crying himself hoarse long enough, some of the dirt may stick. He assumes that because of the financially dirty reputation of his own family and party, whereby he and his family have had a sticky finger in virtually every pie, Prime Minister Modi can also be tarnished with such nonsensical allegations. He recognises that the only salvation for him and his family is to somehow convince the electorate that Mr Modi and the ruling party is “also corrupt”!

Deep inside he recognises that this will not happen, since there has been no case of corruption in this Government.

Therefore, he has decided to invent a pack of lies. If told repeatedly and convincingly, lies and untruths can certainly sow a seed of doubt in the mind of the listener for a limited period.

Let us examine some of his more recent lies and about turns.

  • Rafale: Rahul Gandhi’s arguments on the Rafale fighter aircraft purchase are moving from the sublime to ridiculous. He needs a counter to the Augusta Westland expose that are likely to happen and the Bofors matter that has sunk into the minds of the electorate.

His shrill comments are being loyally parroted by the senior Congress leaders because once their “Prince” has spoken, they have no option but to comply and defend. They have nothing concrete to establish their allegations.

  • Crony Capitalism: Mr Gandhi and his family have been beneficiaries from several corporate houses over the years. In order to hide their own issues, he has chosen to make the charge of crony capitalism on the Prime Minister. The fact that Mr Anil Ambani’s company has recently filed for bankruptcy has been conveniently ignored by Mr Gandhi since this goes against his narrative.
  • Mr Manohar Parrikar: He made a personal visit to the Goa Chief Minister purportedly to enquire about his health and then promptly misquoted Mr Parrikar at an election rally. When his lie was questioned by Mr Parrikar, he tried to shift the blame to Mr Modi without any compunction.
  • EVM’s: Rahul Gandhi blames the Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) when his party loses an election and maintains a studied silence when his party wins an election. For him, EVM’s and the Election Commission are simply a matter of convenience – to be abused when they are perceived to be working against him and his party and to be ignored when they work in his favour.
  • Loan Waivers: Rahul Gandhi announced loan waivers through the election campaigns in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. To the credit of the new Governments, the loans were waived immediately. However, the poor farmers generally received loan waivers of less than Rs 1,000 making a mockery of the promises. No one has bothered to revisit the commitments made. These elections are over and new promises will need to be made after 5 years.
  • Non-Performing Assets: Rahul Gandhi has been busy blaming the Prime Minister for non-performing assets without understanding that loans become non-performing after they are due. Loans are normally given for say 5 years and after that repayment is due. Once the loan is due and if repayment is not commenced, loans are categorised non-performing. Therefore, NPA’s during the NDA tenure were loans given during the UPA tenure.
  • Job Creation: He has just claimed that he has developed a plan to create 70 million jobs in the next 5 years. No plans have been announced on how this will be achieved and which sectors these jobs will be created. However, no accountability is sought from him on anything he says. It is worth looking at the fact that less than 17 million jobs were created during the 10-year term of the UPA.
  • Saradha Scam: Rahul Gandhi needs to make up his mind on where he and his party stand on this matter. From talking about the losses in 2014 to castigating Mamata Banerjee for not taking action on the scam to now offering full support, no one really knows where he stands and what his next U-turn will be. Clearly, his position is based on what he believes may get him some headlines in the here and now. The past will be addressed by his minions and he will be protected at all costs.
  • Relations with other opposition parties: It is interesting to see how easily, Rahul Gandhi changes his position. From cursing and abusing another opposition party leader to extending unquestioned support happens seamlessly and without any explanation. It would be interesting to see if there is any leader who he has not abused and later sought to partner with. Does any opposition party leader believe anything he says or is it simply a matter of convenience and prudence to stay silent till the elections are over?

The best form of defence is offence.

When nothing else works and the lies do not seem to stick, Rahul Gandhi very easily, resorts to name calling. Over the past year he has threatened Mr Modi to unilateral debates but kept surprisingly quiet in the Lok Sabha. He has used every possible negative adjective in his book for Mr Modi from Fuehrer to Chor (thief) to Insecure Dictator. Unfortunately, no one is buying into his narrative and this is frustrating him even more.

So is the honourable Congress President a congenital liar as suggested by Smriti Irani or is he simply delusional?

The word “delusional” comes from a Latin word meaning “deceiving.” So delusional thinking is like deceiving yourself by believing outrageous things. A delusion is a false idea. It is a belief that has no evidence. A delusional person believes and wants to be true something that is actually not true. More so in the strong hope that something miraculous will happen that will make his beliefs come true.

Sounds familiar specially in context of the subject matter of this article?

Clearly, Rahul Gandhi’s only objective is to politicise every issue rather than see even a single issue to its logical conclusion. He has often been asked to show proof of the various allegations he keeps making and by his own admission on Rafale, he does not yet have proof. His delusional self seems to believe that proof will appear on its own to establish that he was right. Till then, he will continue with his “shoot and scoot” politics unabashedly.

He does not seem to have the confidence that he will be able to pull off a spectacular victory in the coming elections. The electorate has stopped believing him. It is only a matter of time before his party workers stop believing in him as well. The day is not far when someone from the crowd will should out that the prince has no clothes!

How long will Mr Gandhi keep crying “wolf wolf”?

As President Abraham Lincoln had famously said, “You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time.”

Hibo Wardere Talks to Terri Murray about Female Genital Mutilation

What started as an interview became a moving story that will make anyone want to read CUT, Hibo Wardere’s eloquent memoir of how she became an anti-FGM campaigner helping young girls whose families plan to take them abroad for a procedure that leaves them with devastating permanent health problems and psychological trauma. She has devoted the past ten years of her life to the campaign against FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) and vows to continue.

TerriWhat prompted you to start campaigning against Female Genital Mutilation, or the FGM, in the first place?

Hibo Wardere: I was never going to talk about FGM to be honest with you… never in life, because it was too personal, too intimate; it just felt like I was never going to talk about it and I knew it was eating me up anyway.  It’s just something that you normalised. You normalised how you felt: physical pain, emotionally drained, psychologically disturbing, hurting – you just normalised it because everybody else around you also normalised it. 

But when my youngest went to school and I didn’t have anything else to do I went and I asked the Head Teacher if I could volunteer. And he said, “OK … we can do better.”  And I was like, “What would you want?” and he said, “Your kids are very clever.  What do you do with them?” He had a conversation with me and I said, “I dunno, I just sit with them every day after school.  I go back over what you’ve taught them each day and they tell me what they did and that way I can get a bit of what they’ve learned. You know, I just sit down with them every day.” And he said, “Well, you could do that in the classroom and it’s called teaching assistants – you help the students.”  And I said, “OK, but I don’t have any qualification.  I’ve never done college or anything.” And he said, “It’s OK, we’ll train you. We’ll pay for you and we’ll train you.” And I was thinking ‘Oh my God, I haven’t touched a book or pen since I arrived in this country.  How am I going to do that?’ And I was asking him, “What does it entail?” and he said, “You’re going to do a lot of writing, a lot of reading….”  I have anxiety about seeing a lot of words; it really messes me up. And said, “OK, can I just do it without writing or reading?”  I was just joking with him, but it turned out I enjoyed it. I really, really did enjoy it and I just excelled in it. I don’t know how, but I did.

After that, he said, you need to work with year six.  They assigned me to year six and then assigned me particularly to one student.  She was Somalian, a very scrawny little girl. She just reminded me of me. Instantly we bonded, and we became quite good friends.  And then one day, the head teacher said, “I need you to come to the office. There’s a meeting happening. We just want you to observe. Don’t say anything. Don’t get involved. Just observe.”  I was very intrigued. What kind of a meeting were they involving me in? I was very nervous. But then, when I went into the office and I was sitting with the two Deputy Heads and him, in walked her Mum. The penny dropped. For some reason the penny dropped for me; I just thought… ‘Surely not. Surely not! It’s not what I’m thinking that they’re thinking, is it?’ I just thought to myself ‘don’t let your imagination run wild, it could be something else’.  They sat down and they were like, “Oh you can’t take her out. It’s April, she’s going to do exams in May. She needs to be coming back to get extra help during the break time.” But she was adamant: “No I need to go see my Dad, who’s very ill, dying… I haven’t got anyone to leave this child with.”  But she did! She had two grown up daughters who were married already. And I was thinking, ‘I know your daughters. They are married. They have family.  What do you mean you can’t leave her with them?’ But she was adamant that she didn’t want to leave her daughter.  And then she left. And I knew what they were thinking about. And I was very upset because I just finished learning the policy and procedures and everything in the school, and there was no mention of FGM, not even in one single line: nothing about that. But all the other abuses were there. 

So when she left, the headteacher said, “So what do you think?” and I said, “What do you want me to think?” He said, “Well, we’re thinking that she’s taking her to perform circumcision.” And I went, “OK, so what do you want me to say?” They said, “What’s your instinct? What do you think?” I really got mad and I said, “You really want me to tell you what I think, yes? I have no say in this.”  And I walked out.

I walked out because I was fuming.  This is a child I had bonded with and there was this thing hanging in the air and I knew what it was, so my emotions were all over the place. I went back home and I was literally fuming.  I was telling my husband what happened today, so the next day I went back.  The Head called me to the office and he said, “We really value your opinion.”  I said, “Listen, first of all, why do think about FGM when there’s nothing in your books? How do you expect your teachers or the people who work with children to handle FGM? Have you ever given them training?”  He said “No.”  I said, “There’s nothing said about FGM but you have all the other abuses in your folders… but there’s nothing on FGM. And why do you think I have something to think about that?”  And he replied, “You’re from that region…”  But I thought, “That doesn’t qualify me, to know what this woman’s going to do, does it?” So I left.

I went home and there was one assignment left for my training that I needed to write. The assignment was to write about an abuse that I care about, whether I know, or I experienced it or somebody close to me has experienced it.  And I thought, ‘I’m going to write about FGM.’  It was the perfect time to write it.  I went back home.  After I put my kids to sleep I took the laptop and I was just looking for stories online and my husband said, “What are you doing?” and I said, “I’m looking for stories.” And he said, “About what?” So I said, “About FGM.” And he said, “Why are you looking for stories?” and I said, “Why? I need to write something.” And he said, “Yeah, but why are you looking for stories? Why can you not write what happened to you?” I remember just looking at him and laughing and I said to him, “Are you mad? You want me to write about me? You do know these are the people I go out to dinner with, they think I’m ‘crazy, funny Hibo’… and you want me to write about my business … are you mad!?”  And he just stopped at my shoulders and said, “I think it’s about time maybe for you to think about talking about it.  You have been talking to me about it all the time we’ve been married.”  And I just thought, “He’s mad.”  For some reason, he knows how to get to me.  He did. Afterwards, when I looked at the internet, I just closed my laptop and I thought ‘why?’ –  what is it preventing me to go back to that day …. and to look at myself as a six year old, ….what is it?’ And I just started writing; I opened the laptop and I started writing and I remember just crying, silently at first.  My tears were just streaming down, I couldn’t stop them, and I kept on writing and I started to whimper and I didn’t notice but my husband was under the stairs nearby, and every time he heard me cry he would come and hug me and just go back and come back and he didn’t sleep because all night I was writing. 


“…I do get men sometimes talking to me on the internet, Twitter: “Oh, you need to stop talking about the culture, you tarnish our culture”, and this and that. And I just ask, “OK, are you trying to tell me not to talk about what happened to me?” And there was one man in particular telling me, “You know what, you should stop talking about this.” And I said, “Are you married?” and he said “Yes.” “Is your wife cut?” “Yes.” “Do you think that’s a good thing?” “Yes.”  “So, let’s chop up your penis and see what happens to you.” He didn’t say a word after that…”
—Hibo Wardere

The next morning I was so traumatised by what I did, because this was my first time ever actually confronting myself. I took the USB, went to the school, printed it out, and went to the Head’s office and I said, “You’re going to read this.” When he saw the title he said, “Can I give it to my Deputies, because they’re ladies?” I said, “No,” and I closed the door. “People are gonna talk. I’m not leaving, … until you read it.” He said, “I’ve got no choice have I?” And I said “No.” You could see it in my eyes, I was really traumatised and I was starting to cry. So I sat on a chair.  He read it and afterwards he stood up and hugged me. He wouldn’t let go.  He hugged me and he was crying, and he said, “You’ve changed my world today. And I am going to make sure this goes on the agenda, I’m going to make sure all staff are trained. I’m going to make sure everybody knows. But here’s the thing – you have to tell your colleagues.” And I went, “No, this is a private thing, and I wrote it for you, to help the other kids.”  And I had actually done it for that little girl because I loved her so much. And I said, “No. You have to…. I’m not doing it.” So he said, “If you want a job, you have to do it.”  [Laughing] He was kind of blackmailing me. He just said, “There’s bigger things than you.  This is bigger than you. You need to think about that.  You need to think about why…. You did it because you wanted to save the girl.”  Which by the way, he said ‘yes’ to her Mom taking her and she took her and she never brought her back.  He said, “imagine hundreds of other girls out there… I was ignorant. I didn’t know what I know today.  Many schools. . .  in fact”, he said, “all the head teachers I meet, nobody discusses FGM.  But I’m going to change that. Next meeting I’m discussing it.” So I said I would think about it and I went home and discussed it with my husband and he said “Right.  You need to talk, you need to tell them.”

My colleagues already knew I had written something and the whole school was on fire, because the assistant was not allowed to disclose what I’d written but people knew that I had written something that would change the school. So at lunchtime I said “I really want to see you all, it would be really good to see you all this afternoon if you are free.” I didn’t have to ask twice. The entire 120 of them turned up. All of them turned up! And I went to the hall and I remember looking and thinking ‘Oh my God!’ And I just said “You all turned up, I was expecting  2 -5 people. What are you all doing here?” I was so nervous. I was cracking horrible jokes. But I told them.  For 45 minutes I just talked, cried, talked and cried – and they were all crying with me.  And when I finished they just, … everyone was angry – they were very angry because some of the TA’s said they were definitely sure that children in their class had undergone FGM. In fact one of them was very courageous, and had gone to a head teacher and said something is going on with this child, and she was told, “Don’t worry because it is the culture they come from, the children are like this.” But they weren’t like that, I’m sure of it, they weren’t. 

It snowballed from there – from me talking to my colleagues and them going and talking on FaceBook and everywhere else and the Head Teacher literally pimping me out in every meeting he attended: “I have a lady in my school who talks about FGM.” And Waltham Forest started me off in a big style after I told one councillor who was a friend of mine.  And one Head booked me in a school without telling me first, and she said “We’re going to this school and you have only 35 people. Just talk about FGM.”  I said, “Really?” She said, “Yes.”  I went in there and it wasn’t 35 people.  It was about 200+ — it was two schools — and she disappeared when we went to the school because she knew how nervous I was and thought I might just leave, so she disappeared somewhere in the building and left me there. But she came back when I was talking with a big grin at the back of the room and I thought “I’m going to kill you when I’m finished with this.” But it was kind things like that… my councillors were the most amazing people.  Waltham Forest Council just scooped me up the minute I decided to talk about FGM, every single one of them, the councillors, the leader, everyone just scooped me up and ran with me and soon every school was banging on my door and I was going from one place to the other.  So here I am today.  It was that 10 year old who made me talk. 

Terri: That’s an amazing story.  

Hibo Wardere: It is. She touched me.  She just literally reminded me of me – very scrawny, didn’t even like lunch hour… I used to go and sit with her so that she could eat.  It was … I loved her to bits. To this day I don’t even know what happened to her.  What we know is: The Mum took a secondary school student as well, without telling the school, and she never returned them back and we don’t know where they are. 

Terri:  One thing that strikes me is the difficulty for you of having to talk about something that is very private, very intimate, and yet, the whole reason why you kind of have to do so is that it is, as he said, bigger than you.  Is it hard …? I guess you’ve already answered that question…

Hibo Wardere: It is extremely hard.  Even now as I talk about it publicly, so many times over and over and over. Every time you talk about it, it has an impact on you. It does, because you’re feeling it when you’re talking about it. You are explaining to somebody and you want the person to understand, and to actually feel literally emotional about it and that takes a toll on you.  But it’s something that we have to do.  For me, in my head I always see that six year old. I see millions of other six year olds, I see even babies. I see that… and I feel like, I’m in that position where I can talk about it, I will continue to talk about it and there’s no choice in that. 

Terri: Clearly this is an intimate part of your culture of birth.  When did you first recognise that there was something problematic about the practice or about what had happened to you? Was it before this incident (of writing your story) or was it really at that moment when you started to write that paper that you realised?

Hibo Wardere:  I actually didn’t know what it was.  All I knew was that it was something that all the girls were proud of, because I got bullied at school because I wasn’t cut.  It was something that everybody went through and I thought it was really lovely because, if these girls were so proud and bullying me about it, surely it must be something good.  Then when it happened it was like, ‘No!’ – It wasn’t something good. It wasn’t something to be proud of.  When I went back to the school they wanted to welcome me to their gang, and I said “no, no… I don’t want to be part of your gang.  I was thinking in my head, ‘How can I bully another girl, knowing what I went through? Why would I wish that on another girl?’  I just felt ‘no’ and I was alone again. Even after I was cut I was a loner again and I didn’t want to communicate, or you know, be with this group that felt very proud. I didn’t. I just felt what happened was wrong. It was, ‘why did it happen?’ The nagging question in my head was why?

Terri: How long would you say you’ve been working on this issue (combating FGM)?

Hibo Wardere: I think about the last seven years, publicly. But personally, working on this issue I think it’s from the day it happened to me until now – working on that issue never stops.  It’s part of your life, so you learn to live with it. You learn to cope with it, but it never leaves. It’s there.  Physically it’s there, emotionally, psychologically . . .  every aspect of your life is touched by it.  You just learn how to cope with that and to get on with life, but it never disappears; it’s always there.

Terri: This is what a lot of survivors have told me… especially the medical consequences that go on and on.  So, at what point in your work did you think, ‘I’m going to write a book about this’?

Hibo Wardere:  I actually didn’t think ‘I’m going to write a book.’ Not in a million years.  And then all of a sudden this ghost writer Tweets me.  She’s like, ‘Hibo, I need to write to you a private tweet.  Can you please follow me back?’ And I followed her back. She was like ‘Oh, I’ve been asked by Simon & Schuster to write a book.’ And I was like, ‘Who is Simon & Schuster?’ first.  I Googled before I asked and found out they are publishers. She wrote me, ‘I need to write a book, about female genital mutilation, and I want you to write the book with me.’  And here I was telling her, ‘OK, sorry I’m not famous like Leyla Hussein.  I gave her the names of the famous people who have worked to eradicate FGM: Nimko Ali and others. I asked her, ‘Why are you not talking to them?’ And she said, “Yes, I know but the way you talk is different. You talk so raw.” And I went, “Ohh, what do you mean by ‘so raw’?” She went, “You don’t mince your words. You are out there, you don’t talk like a professional. You talk like you.” And I was like, “OK, are you insulting me right now?”  [laughing]   She went, ‘No, no, no, not insulting you…it’s just that the way you talk touches people. The way you talk is something that everyone can stop and listen to and I want that.”  So, I said “no” to her at first.  But she kept on being persistent. She didn’t leave me alone.  And I went, “OK, let’s see.” So she came and we spent three days together, where she asked me all kinds of things, while all kinds of emotions were going through me.  She wrote a few chapters and said, “OK, I’m going to take these chapters and send them to Simon & Schuster and then we’ll know.”  Within three days they replied. They said “We want this story.  We need it now.”  And I was thinking ‘Who’s going to buy a book about mutilation? People are afraid to talk about the vagina.  Do they really want to know what happens to it?’ And I was having huge blocks – thinking that no one would want to know about this….  at all.  And when we finished seven months later the book came out, and it became a sensation … (I have got no idea how that happened. I am really shocked sometimes when I look at Google and the amount of people who have left reviews, and how much it’s selling, it’s crazy.)

Terri:  What was the response within the Somalian community and practicing communites? Or is the response mostly from outside communities?

Hibo Wardere: I have got no idea how Somalis reacted to this book. None of them said anything. I only know that outside the community people love my book. Inside the community, I haven’t had a word from them about the book.  I do get men sometimes talking to me on the internet, Twitter: “Oh, you need to stop talking about the culture, you tarnish our culture”, and this and that. And I just ask, “OK, are you trying to tell me not to talk about what happened to me?” And there was one man in particular telling me, “You know what, you should stop talking about this.” And I said, “Are you married?” and he said “Yes.” “Is your wife cut?” “Yes.” “Do you think that’s a good thing?” “Yes.”  “So, let’s chop up your penis and see what happens to you.” He didn’t say a word after that. So there are people like that, but nobody’s actually come out and said anything about my book yet.  They’ve read it; I know they have. Many women have bought a lot of books but none of them has said anything publicly, to me or anyone else.

Terri: Well, let’s hope that your book can give them courage… because with you, people constantly had to draw you out and persuade you to talk about yourself and what happened to you. And although you were reluctant, every time you did so, it was sensational.  So tell us about your book’s content. Is it mostly biographical or is it more about the issue, or both?

Hibo Wardere: It is both. It contains educational stuff as well. For me, it is a book about my memories, my stories, the struggles. It’s a book full of information, about teaching, and overall it’s an empowering book. For me it is an empowering book, not just for FGM survivors but for any kind of abuse. I want people to read it and — whatever is going on in their life – to think, “I can also come out from the darkness. I can come out through the other side, because this lady has, I can do it as well.” It is that kind of book for me.  It is an empowering book.

Terri: You’ve focused so much energy on education.  Why is this your preferred arena in combating FGM?

Hibo Wardere: Education for me is the must. It’s the biggest tool we have on the planet.  Education for me … I didn’t know anything about FGM. I didn’t know what had happened to me.  I didn’t know anything until I started reading about it when I had my son, and it took me one year to translate one book from English to Somalian – one full year – to translate and understand and everything. So for me, it gave me all the things that were missing: all the links that I was missing. I was reading about things that I was suffering with.  Had I not read that, I would not have connected everything that was going on with FGM.  So education is so important. People, when they don’t know something, they normally seek to find out.  Seeking is education, and telling the women I’ve met, thousands of women in our area alone who have come to our clinic and love what I do, actually get some information for the first time.  You can see when you talk to them and you say, “you know you went through this, and this and this..?”  “Yeah.” “Where do you think it’s coming from?” The penny drops for them. You link them, through education, with what they are going through. They value that. So education is the key.

Plus, educating our youth – there is no comparison to that. Educating our youth is a must.  We have to if we want to eradicate FGM.  For me it’s that – as young as year two. We teach them about how nobody should touch your body, your body is yours, etc..  It’s the same thing about FGM. It’s about telling them, “Your body is yours.” Making them body conscious.  Then they go to secondary school and you should not hide what you tell them. They ask me ‘Miss have you undergone FGM?’ and I tell them ‘yes’.  If they ask me intimate questions, with kids you can never be economical with truth, you have to be honest with them. That has worked beautifully. The work that they do with me keeps me going every single day. That’s what propels me and I never get tired.

Terri: I was wondering where you get all this energy.  Do you eat your spinach?

Hibo Wardere: I never get tired of going to school and teaching the youth.  Some of them, you never know whether they’ve undergone FGM or not.  You never know whether you’ve given them a clue about what was going on with them. But I did have a sixteen year-old who said, “Everything you’ve said, yes, I have gone through it. But my worry now is for my two younger sisters. I don’t want them to go through what I went through.”  So you do get that.  You do get people that have already undergone it, but they’re going to help their siblings. Or children who know nothing about FGM, and when they learn about they go, “Hang on, I am never going to go through this. I know what this is, and if my Mom tries it, I know how to seek help.”  It’s all about equipping them; it’s a protection tool as well.

Terri: Has the book been translated into Somali?

Hibo Wardere: Not yet. It’s my wish actually.  It’s my wish that one day it would be translated into Arabic as well as Somali. I know a lot of women would read it if it were in the Somali language because most of them have language barriers.

Terri: I agree, that needs to be done.  What are some of the biggest obstacles that you’ve faced in your work?

Hibo Wardere:  Families… especially um, some family members who don’t like what I do. But for me that is nothing.  What I do is my life. It’s up to me. I’m not interfering in their work, so they shouldn’t interfere with mine. When your own family members turn on you, that’s the worst part of life. Others, you can tell them where to go, but family members … what do you do when they’re your family and they’re telling you, “Oh you shouldn’t be doing this, you shouldn’t be doing that, you shouldn’t be talking about this.” It’s all about protecting them, their family name, their family honour, etc. And for me that doesn’t exist if you can’t talk about something that’s traumatised you for life.  What’s that got to do with the family honour? I have a right to talk about what happened to me. I’m not asking you not to talk about yours; don’t tell me not to do that. Family members sometimes can really make you stop and question yourself. But others, you can handle others. I don’t have a problem with this.


“…So I just started by saying, “We need to talk about vaginas and what happens to vaginas. Put that to one side and let’s think about what would happen if two hundred million penises and balls were chopped off.  What would the whole world be doing right now?” You could hear men gasping and see some of them crossing their legs, and I’m going, “See? You’re closing your legs yet nobody required that of you, so why is it OK for us to accept two hundred million women mutilated like this?” That was, for me, a moment … because they were literally shocked….”
— Hibo Wardere

Terri: What would you say are your most notable success stories throughout all of this work?

Hibo Wardere: I don’t know… I went to Canada recently.  That was the most amazing trip I’ve ever had. I gave a talk in the Canadian Parliament and it was so lovely and I was asked, ‘OK, there are a lot of MPs here.  Do you want us to warn them?’ And I said, ‘No. You should not warn them.  What are you warning them about? I’m just going to talk about vaginas.  Why do you want to warn them?’ And they were like, ‘Exactly that’ And I was like, ‘No.’ I went there and I thought to myself, ‘How do I start the conversation, that I live with this every single day of my life, this memory that I will never forget even when they’re gone or in their eighties?’  So I just started by saying, “We need to talk about vaginas and what happens to vaginas. Put that to one side and let’s think about what would happen if two hundred million penises and balls were chopped off.  What would the whole world be doing right now?” You could hear men gasping and see some of them crossing their legs, and I’m going, “See? You’re closing your legs yet nobody required that of you, so why is it OK for us to accept two hundred million women mutilated like this?” That was, for me, a moment … because they were literally shocked. And by the time I finished they couldn’t stop clapping for God knows how long.  I had to beg them to stop clapping.  Moments like that stick with me.  Moments like the sixteen year old girl, who, even though she had already undergone FGM, wanted to protect her little sisters. That was a huge moment for me.  I felt, ‘You didn’t even care that much for you.  You just wanted to protect your two siblings.’ Talking to her about what happened to me created that – and it was a very special moment for me.  And it was also very brave of her wanting to help her little sisters.  Or another occasion when a girl in year nine stayed after and said, “I know I’ve had FGM but I don’t know what type I’ve had.” When I see things like that, I know I’m doing the right thing.  Even if it is only one girl that comes forward, I know she’s going to get the help she desperately needs afterwards, because that’s the time you actually need all the help you can get.  Lots of moments: My son telling me he’s the proudest son on earth, my kids telling me that, my family, friends who are very, very supportive. I am so blessed in so many was and that is what helps me to keep going on day in and day out. 

Kashmiri Journalist pens his tribute to Lance Naik Nazir Wani

“We, the Kashmiris, readily believe the information we have been fed so far about atrocities being committed by government forces in the valley, but we refuse to accept that militants are also guilty of killing and injuring innocent people. We observe a Hartal (Lockout) even if a civilian is accidentally killed by security forces, but we don’t even utter a word to condemn when militants abduct and kill innocent Kashmiris.”

Lance Naik Nazir Ahmad Wani who laid down his life while fighting heavily armed militants in Shopian area of South Kashmir has been honoured posthumously with India’s highest peacetime award Ashoka Chakra, during 70th Republic Day celebrations, for displaying conspicuous gallantry and unparalleled devotion to duty.

On November 25, 2018 the 38-year-old Nazir Wani, hailing from Cheki Ashmuji village in Kulgam district of Kashmir, attained martyrdom in a fierce gunfight with a group of six hard core militants in Hirapur village near Batgund in Shopian. During this intense encounter, Wani who had single-handedly killed two militants was seriously injured by another militant but despite his grievous injuries he refused to give up and shot his assailant dead. Wani succumbed to his injuries only after he had killed the militants.

Nazir Wani was a fearless and upright soldier. He started off as a militant but soon got disillusioned and surrendered. He joined 162 Infantry Battalion (Territorial Army) where he displayed such valour and dedication that he was transferred to the elite Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry. Due to his exceptional military skills and raw courage he was specially deputed to assist the units of Rashtriya Rifles employed for counter-militancy operations in Kashmir. Wani proved his mettle and had the rare honour of being awarded Sena Medal for gallantry twice! Those who served with Wani respectfully recall how he would always volunteer for challenging missions and display great dare under adverse conditions. He never hesitated in exposing himself to grave danger in the line of duty especially when it came to assisting or extricating his comrades during encounters.

Kashmiris bid a tearful adieu to their hero Nazir Wani

A scrupulously honest and hard-working person, Nazir Wani was a very helpful person who considered fighting the menace of militancy his moral duty as it has killed thousands and ruined the lives of so many. He would always advise young boys not to get carried away by emotions and pick up guns as militancy was harming the people of Kashmir. “He always had the interest of Kashmiri people in his heart and he was ever helpful to everyone,” his neighbours recall. Besides being the epitome of courage and unflinching devotion to duty, he embodied and represented the idea of secular India where people of all faiths co-exist peacefully. Nazir Wani is no more with us today but due to these excellent personal qualities he will continue to serve as an inspiration and role model for the people of India, especially for the Kashmiris.

When it comes to issues related to Kashmir and the security forces, we tend to get emotional and stop thinking logically. While we readily believe the information we have been fed so far about atrocities being committed by government forces in the valley, we refuse to accept the fact that militants are also guilty of killing and injuring innocent people. We observe a Hartal  (Lockout) even if a civilian is accidentally killed by security forces, but we don’t even utter a word to condemn when militants abduct and kill innocent Kashmiris. From time to time media reports pour in about army harassing civilians and creating a sense of fear in the state, but is it not a fact that there is some order in the region only because of the security forces, otherwise there would be complete chaos.

The peace-loving, mild-mannered average Kashmiri is not an ‘army hater’ as the impression is often given out. There are plenty of Kashmiris who realize that they are safe only because the army is around. What most of us fail to realize is that the soldiers who are doing their duty in difficult terrain and harsh climate are very much like us, they too have feelings and families. The only difference is that since they have taken up the job of safeguarding our country and its people they are duty-bound to take action against those who pick up arms against the state.

However, even while confronting militants the security forces and police always try not to harm these armed persons by asking them to lay down their arms and surrender. Nazir Wani had also personally appealed to the militants hiding in a house in Cheki Ashmuji village to surrender and it was only when they refused to do so that Wani and his team had no other option but to use force against them.

Nazir Wani’s death is an irreparable loss and a colossal personal tragedy for his wife Mahajabeen and her two teenage sons. Yet, they would certainly be immensely proud that the nation has honoured Wani’s valour and sacrifice with the Ashoka Chakra and Mahajabeen’s calm composure during the award ceremony that the whole world watched on their TV screens has earned her accolades from all over for being the brave wife of a brave soldier.

Game of Thrones: Production for prequel pilot to start in early summer

HBO’s “Game of Thrones” prequel pilot now has a filming start date. The as-yet-untitled project, featuring Naomi Watts, will begin production in early summer, HBO programming president Casey Bloys told The Wrap. Bloys has previously said that a prequel will not air until at least a year after the epic-fantasy drama concludes.

The news follows the prequel landing director SJ Clarkson last month and announcing its full cast which is led by Watts, Naomi Ackie and Denise Gough. The prequel’s showrunner is Jane Goldman and the series will be based on a concept she developed with author George RR Martin.

Salman to be back in Rajshri Productions next film

Filmmaker Sooraj Barjatya is planning to have Salman Khan in his next film. Barjatya has revealed he will be reuniting with Salman Khan for a family drama, the idea of which he has already discussed with the superstar. 

Sooraj has collaborated with Salman, right from his debut “Maine Pyaar Kiya” to “Hum Aapke Hain Koun!”, “Hum Saath Saath Hain” and recently “Prem Ratan Dhan Payo.” The director said currently he is consumed with work on his production, “Hum Chaar” and work on the Salman film will begin much later.  “Right now the focus is on ‘Hum Chaar’. Then my younger son Avnish will debut as a writer-director with a film this year. It’s a very big responsibility. After that I start writing my film with Salman,” Barjatya said. 

When asked if the film will be on the lines of trademark Rajshri Productions strong, rooted family drama Sooraj said, “It’s a family drama, but not about joint family. It’s about husband and wife and I’ve already discussed the idea with Salman.” 

Kashmir: Significance of Nazir Wani’s Martyrdom

Nazir Wani was a former militant who first picked up the gun to fight for Kashmir’s freedom struggle. Soon, Wani realised that he had become a pawn in Pakistan Army’s proxy war. He quit militancy and joined the Indian Army to fight against his former comrades who had wreaked havoc in Kashmir Valley. Wani was part of operations that eliminated 30 terrorists. He was conferred Ashoka Chakra posthumously.

A lot has been written about the valour and devotion to duty displayed by late Lance Naik Nazir Ahmad Wani, who was posthumously conferred Ashoka Chakra and rightly so. India’s highest peacetime award doesn’t come easy, especially when valour and sacrifice have become the byword for our security forces who are courageously fighting a full blown proxy war sponsored by Pakistan in Jammu & Kashmir as well as left wing extremism in more than a 100 districts of nearly ten states. However, the case of Wani is more than just an act of exceptional gallantry — it tears apart the false story line being propagated by vested interests portraying Kashmiris as anti national Indians who want to become a part of Pakistan.

Wani’s first tryst with gun was in the nineties when he dropped out of school and like many others of his age, joined militancy. However, on realising that what was being flaunted as “freedom struggle” was in reality a proxy war being sponsored by the Pakistan Army, he got disillusioned and decided to quit after seeing how militants were silencing dissent by killing innocent Kashmiris. After his surrender, Wani had the option of returning to civil life but having witnessed militants terrorising locals, he decided to do his bit to stop this menace. So he joined Ikhwan-ul-Muslimeen (IuM), a counter-insurgent outfit of Kashmiris that was assisting security forces in anti-militancy operations.

Though ‘Ikhwanis’ (as members of IuM were commonly referred to) came under much criticism for their high handedness, there were no allegations of any type of misconduct against Wani. On account of his exceptionally high level of motivation and excellent personal qualities, he was enrolled in 162 Infantry Battalion (Territorial Army) affiliated to the Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry in 2004. Those who selected him still recall his extraordinary ‘josh’ (drive) that convinced them that even though he was a former militant, Wani would prove to be an asset- and their assessment was right. After donning the army uniform, Wani declared his personal war on militants since they were ruining so many lives in Kashmir and spurred by this mission he was an ever ready volunteer when it came to participation in anti-militant operations.

His professional skills and raw courage under fire during encounters with militants earned him a Sena Medal (Gallantry) in 2007, but this honour didn’t make him either conceited or complacent. He continued with the same zeal and participated in numerous operations that saw the elimination of more than 30 hard core terrorists. In 2018, Wani once again showed exceptional daring when he, unmindful of personal safety, gunned down a hard core terrorist in close combat. For this act of valour, Wani was awarded Sena Medal (Gallantry) for the second time (referred to as ‘Bar to Sena Medal’ in military parlance), which is quite a rare feat. Even after this singular achievement he continued to participate in anti-militancy operations with full vigour and the daring act in which he gave the supreme sacrifice bears testimony to Wani’s dedication and his resolute conviction that militants were a scourge that had to be eradicated at all costs.

Despite being aware of the grave dangers that lay ahead, Wani still chose to live life on the edge and died a heroic death. Wani isn’t the only Kashmiri who abhorred militants, this sentiment is nevertheless widespread in the Valley and it is the fear of reprisal from militants that prevents its public expression. The very fact that JK Police and Special Operations Group remain at the forefront of anti-militancy operations in Kashmir is a reality that the pro-Pakistan lobby cannot digest since it exposes their false claim of Kashmiris wanting to break free from India, which Pakistan and its proxies in Kashmir are desperately trying to sell to the world.

Indian soldiers salute the brave heart Lance Naik Nazir Ahmad Wani

This is why militants are being ordered by their handlers from across the border to strike terror into the hearts of people who are voluntarily cooperating with the establishment and security forces. The result is that today Kashmiri militants are shamelessly killing their own unarmed brothers to dissuade others from being nationalists. But despite these cold blooded murders (some of which have also been posted on social media for greater public impact), the militants’ strong arm tactics hasn’t worked. Despite ordering policemen to quit their jobs and killing many of them, the militants’ diktat hasn’t achieved anything substantial. Similarly, despite killing scores of civilians after branding them as informers, locals are still tipping off security forces regarding the whereabouts of militants.

Wani’s martyrdom brings to fore the indomitable Kashmiri spirit that will never succumb to subjugation by Islamabad through militants in the garb of “freedom struggle”. Though there was no public expression of grief on Wani’s demise but then this was more because of fear of militants and not due to indifference. Another plus point of Wani’s sacrifice is that it has dispelled the wrong impression in the minds of many that the security forces are fighting against the collective will of Kashmiris or that Kashmir has gone out of India’s control. Wani’s martyrdom has convincingly proved that the negative image of Kashmiris being projected is untrue and this malicious fabrication is the work of groups with vested interests who want to create a chasm between the people of Kashmir and those from other parts of the country.

Tailpiece:   

After learning about Lance Naik Nazir Wani, an acquaintance with extremely biased views about Kashmiris surprised me by saying, “Tell them (pro-Pakistan lobby) that if they have Burhan Wanis, then we too have our Nazir Wanis!” Though this may sound melodramatic but what he has said is absolutely right because as long as we have the likes of Lnk Nazir Ahmad Wani on our side, we have just nothing to worry about as far as Kashmir is concerned.

Global study examines how data and analytics can bring finance and HR teams together

A short-term mindset and entrenched cultural habits are the biggest barriers to collaboration between HR and finance teams according to a new study from Oracle. 

A global study of 1,510 HR, finance and business professionals has found that in order to successfully unlock the value from data and help their organizations adapt to the changing nature of the global talent market, HR teams need to rethink analytics technology, skills and processes to improve collaboration with finance and drive a competitive advantage. “HR and finance departments bring different, yet complementary skills to the table. While they traditionally have not worked together closely, that needs to change in order for organizations to create a competitive advantage in today’s evolving market and talent economy,” said Donald Anderson, Director, Organization & Talent Development, Oracle.

While data and analytics have proliferated HR and finance, the benefits are limited without effective collaboration and the ability to derive value:

  • The survey found that 49 percent cannot currently use analytics to forecast outcomes and 81 percent are unable to determine future actions based on predictive data.
  • The biggest barrier to collaboration between HR and finance is a short-term mindset, with 71 percent saying their teams focus on quarters rather than future strategic direction.
  • Culture clashes between departments was another top challenge with nearly a third (29 percent) ranking traditionally separate habits as the biggest barrier. Other barriers included mismatched skillsets (27 percentage) and organizational silos (17 percentage).
  • HR teams also lack the skills to act on data and solve issues (70 percent), cultivate quantitative analysis and reasoning (67 percent) and use analytics to forecast workforce needs (55 percent).

The majority (80 percent) of organizations believe HR and finance teams are already helping them make better data-driven decisions. But, their teams will need to acquire new skills, but with an increased focus on collaboration, organizations will be able to gain even bigger business benefits:

  • 88 percent of respondents believe HR and finance collaboration will improve business performance; 76 percent believe it will enhance organization agility.
  • Over half (57 percent) of organizations plan to achieve more holistic, enterprise-wide insight through collaboration and 52 percent of HR and finance professionals believe it will help them become more strategic partners.

AI for greater collaboration and better business results

HR and finance professionals are looking to emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to help drive business results:

  • While a quarter (25 percent) of survey respondents are primarily using AI to identify at-risk talent and model their talent pipeline (22 percent), they are rarely using AI to forecast performance (18 percent) or find top talent (15 percent).
  • Over the next year, 71 percent of survey respondents plan to use AI to predict high performing candidates in recruitment and source best-fit candidates with resume analysis (70 percent).
  • Other AI priorities for survey respondents include modeling their talent pipeline (58 percent), flagging at-risk employees through attrition modeling (52 percent) and supporting employee interactions with chatbots (38 percent).

“The world of analytics and AI opens tremendous doors for HR to harness meaningful insights in order to make smarter decisions and create a talent advantage,” said Tom Davenport, Babson professor and analytics expert. This survey interviewed 1,510 HR, finance and business professionals in late 2018. The respondents came from a variety of industries and geographies, and all were from companies with US$100 million of revenues or larger.