Aissa Edon is an FGM (female
genital mutilation) specialist midwife and former Community Midwife Team Leader
at the Hillingdon Hospital Foundation NHS (National Health Service) Trust. She
currently works for Medecins Sans Frontiers. She is a Mary Seacole Scholar and founder and
director of the FGM Hope
Clinic, which grew out of her passion to
end female genital mutilation. Here she is
interviewed by Terri Murray.
Terri:Can you tell us a bit about the aims of the project you undertook as a Mary Seacole Scholar?
Aissa Edon: It was to
understand the needs of survivors of FGM and their partners in terms of
psychological and pyschosexual support in Britain’s NHS system. So it was a
service evaluation to hear the voices of the practicing community and people
who have undergone female genital mutilation and to see how the NHS can improve
their services and answer the needs of care.
Terri: It’s pretty cool that your project included partners. Is it an angle that has been looked at much before?
Aissa Edon: No it wasn’t really looked at before because FGM is often seen as a women’s issue. I do believe that it is a community issue. That was why I wanted to look at the place of the partner. Also, if you look at the origins of the practice, it was done for men, and most of the time it was by men, so I think we need to go back to the origin of the problem and make sure we include everybody impacted to eradicate the practice and find a solution. I also wanted to understand how FGM can impact [male partners] because in my studies, when I did the literature research, there was a little information about the impact on female survivors, but I haven’t seen anything on the how men and partners of FGM survivors are affected.
Terri: A lot of FGM survivors I’ve met have said that this is actually a form of child abuse, even if it is culturally acceptable and conventional. What is the psychological impact of that?
Aissa Edon: If you look at the practicing communities, talking about the psychological needs or the psychosexual needs is not something very ‘usual’ in these communities, so obviously it is a long process. The impact is still there, and we in the practicing communities feel it, but it is difficult to talk about the impact of the trauma. So it is difficult even to just scratch the surface, but I think it is really important that we try because the healing should not only be physical; it should also be for the whole well-being of the person, mental and social as well.
Terri: What recommendations did you make as a result of your research?
Aissa Edon: The recommendations are in different sectors, because they all came from what I was told in the ten focus groups: five with men and five with females. It was their experiences and their recommendations to be fair, not really mine. First of all, they wanted education to be provided to the front-line caregivers, and that means to ensure that it is part of the teaching curriculum for doctors and health care providers. They also talked about the need for education about FGM, so that teachers in schools have this in the curriculum, as well as social services and police. So the first step was education. They were very keen on that.
In terms of care provision, they wanted to have holistic care. That meant that they wanted to have standardised care, to make sure that wherever they live, they will have the same quality of care and a global care. They also wanted to work in partnership with the healthcare provider to make sure it is individual care, so that they have a say in their treatment, a voice and a plan where they have a consultation for their care. And they want to be seen not just as individuals but also as couples, with couple care so that partners of females who have undergone female genital mutilation could be included.
They also wanted to look at FGM care in a ‘global view’. They understand that in the UK it is an illegal practice and there is a lot of education and prevention, but they feel like it should not stop at the UK border but should be a global thing. They felt there should be the same approach in their countries of origin, where FGM was originally practiced. They also expressed a desire for the healthcare professional to go there and not only stick to the UK and do things here.
Terri: You’ve worked in this area for a long time and gained lots of experience. Were there any big surprises in your research findings?
Aissa Edon: For me it was really to have the voices of the partners of FGM survivors. That’s not something I’m used to hearing. I’ve been very touched and shocked also how big the impact of FGM is on these men, and how devastating and harmful FGM is for them. That’s something we need to understand because it may be the way we will stop the practice, if we have more men coming forward and fighting against female genital mutilation. It is affecting the women in terms of their physical well-being; it is affecting her obstetric history or sexual history and also her relationship. For men, who are not living the harm of FGM physically, they do feel a very huge impact emotionally and psychologically and that needs to be known. The relationship and sexual intimacy issues FGM causes with their wives was something male respondents talked about a lot.
Terri: What insights or advice can you offer to health care professionals who want to be better equipped to handle FGM?
Aissa Edon: It’s about having good training and also having a gentle, respectful approach, and a non-judgemental approach. It is also really important to make sure you are treating the patient and the family respectfully. Knowing what you’re talking about and how to approach things in a sensitive manner, and sometimes we don’t always have the words or attitude to say things, but fortunately the Mary Seacole Awards allowed me to also meet others who are working on the issue. One of the other Mary Seacole Award Scholars, Joanne McEwen, developed an App called Let’s Talk FGM, which teaches healthcare professionals how to talk about FGM in a simple manner. This is a really helpful tool you can download for iPad. It allows patients and professionals to give and receive information about FGM.
Terri: During your many years working to eradicate FGM, what was your most proud moment or achievement?
Aissa Edon: That’s a difficult question. I think when I will be the most proud is when FGM will be eradicated, so I’m not done yet. Every milestone… uh, I’m not really a very proud person anyway, but I’m waiting for the end of FGM and I will make sure everything I’m doing until then is for this goal.
Terri: One of the big problems in combating female genital mutilation seems to be that Western Europeans feel it would be an imposition on other cultures to criticise practices that are non-Western. We can easily be perceived as ‘superior’ or engaged in ‘cultural imperialism’ if we criticise the practice.
Aissa Edon: I don’t think we need to look at it this way. I prefer to look at it as a human rights violation. We need to recognise it as the cause of health complications and mental health issues, as well as other problems. It is not knocking on peoples’ doors and saying “you’ve done wrong”. It’s looking at the effects. For example, urinary problems or obstetric problems that exist because of female genital mutilation. Some pregnant women with FGM can’t have a normal vaginal delivery. That’s because of female genital mutilation. The fact that when you have sex it is so painful that you scream your head off: that’s because you had female genital mutilation. That’s fact. That’s not judgemental. It’s not saying that you’ve done wrong. It’s just telling the facts, showing the facts, and nobody can deny facts. Facts are the way to move forward, and by this means people will understand why this practice should be stopped. There is nothing judgemental in facts.
Terri: What’s next for you in your personal journey?
Aissa Edon: For me it is about carrying on what I’m doing. Then too, I still want to make sure that restorative surgery will be offered in the UK. I would like FGM to end in one generation, and if it can be in my generation that will be great. That’s the goal.
Among the many disasters that have marked the presidency of Donald Trump, his Afghanistan policy will stand out in history as the most catastrophic. Trump has, right from his campaign for the presidency, rooted for total withdrawal from Afghanistan. No issues with this, since America has realised the blunder that it committed in 2001 by entering Afghanistan and has been trying, since long, to find an honourable way out. It is something that Barack Obama also desired but could not achieve. The problem lies in the manner in which Trump is trying to implement his policy.
Having already declared a massive troop reduction, he has opened talks with the Taliban without making the incumbent government of Afghanistan a party to the same. This act, by itself, has caused a serious dent to the credibility of the government of Afghanistan and made the situation in the trouble-torn region even more fractious. It also constitutes a serious breach of trust by the US government which was instrumental in putting the government in place after throwing out the Taliban.
The US-Taliban talks are
poised to enter the third round and the US special envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, is
speaking of a forward movement as the two main agenda points of a structured
withdrawal of US forces and a commitment from Taliban to not allow safe haven
to extremists in territories under its control. The negotiating team claims to
be pushing for intra-Afghan talks but, quite obviously, the Taliban will be
unwilling to agree to the same. A ceasefire and direct talks between the
Taliban and the Afghanistan government with an outside moderator (that can be
the US) is imperative to proceed further. Further, a reasonable troop presence
will need to be maintained to ensure that the accord is implemented in full.
Once again, the complete lack
of understanding of the US with regards to Afghanistan is quite visible.
Everybody except the US knows that the latter has no means to ensure that the
Taliban will honour its agreement. The Taliban is quite aware that the window
for the US to seal the deal is closing down; it cannot be later than early 2020
to give Trump enough time to leverage the “military and diplomatic victory” for
his re-election bid in November 2020. Safely ensconced in a position of
strength the Taliban are playing out a waiting game knowing fully well that US
desperation will increase with each passing day and more concessions will be
forthcoming. Taliban is also in direct talks with Russia, China and Iran to see
what it can garner when the balloon goes up. Taliban may be talking of an
“inclusive Afghan world” but their history does not refer to any such ideology.
They have always believed in “all or nothing” with betrayal and violence being
their forte.
Pakistan is playing the dual
game that it is most adept at. It looks upon the development as an opportunity
to regain the goodwill of the US and get the financial support that it so
desperately wants. Ostensibly, it is pushing the Taliban toward talks but under
wraps it will probably be advising the Taliban leaders to play the waiting game
so that the US can be diplomatically bled by both entities. Once the US is out
and the Taliban in control of Afghanistan, Pakistan will have the strategic
partner against India that it so desperately needs.
The tragedy that is unfolding
due to this inexcusable lack of strategic foresight of the US is that the unfortunate
people of the region are staring at black days with imposition, once more, of
the most medieval form of Sharia, replete with denial of any rights to the
women, wanton killing, suppression and persecution. Those who supported the Afghanistan
government will be systematically put to death and a reign of terror will be
unleashed across the land. In short, Afghanistan will once again stare at
regression into the stone-age, from where it was just about coming out.
It is time for India to
leverage her position as a global power and stand up for the Afghanistan government
and the people of Afghanistan who look upon the country as a friend in whom
they have reposed faith and trust. On the diplomatic front, it is incumbent upon
India to create awareness internationally and pressure the US into looking at
the issue from a strategic position and not as an election promise made by Donald
Trump which needs to be honoured to facilitate his re-election. India needs to
clearly state its position of being fearful of a full-fledged civil war in case
these parameters are not ensured.
At the regional level, India
should fully support the legitimate Afghanistan government and expose the
double-speak of Pakistan. Whatever help can be given to strengthen the Afghan
Armed Forces should be forthcoming speedily and urgently. The Chabahar Port
should be made functional soonest in order to boost the Afghan economy.
Stability of Afghanistan should form part of bilateral dialogue with Russia, China,
Iran and the Central Asian Republics.
If India fails to contain the
US blunder in the making, she will have to gear up for an intensely radicalised
neighbourhood and its immediate effect on Kashmir and to the rest of the
country. Jihad in Kashmir is bound to gain momentum, infiltration attempts will
rise, the success in Afghanistan will be leveraged and psychological operations
restructured to enhance recruitment of locals into the terrorist fold,
availability of arms and ammunition will increase. Attempts will also be made
to impact the rest of the country with radicalised Islamist ideology.
The security forces in Kashmir
need to remain sensitive and vigilant of the emerging situation that will have
far reaching ramifications. The bid to eradicate terrorism from Kashmir needs
to be intensified in order to stop, in its tracks, the terrorism push that will
come, yet again, from Pakistan. Clearly there is much to be done and little
time left for India to do the same. It is time to move decisively since procrastination
will cause severe damage to both countries.
Everything is fair in love and
war. So is it to the run up to India’s General Elections this year. The Bengal
drama has turned out to be a national drama as the opposition, including the
Congress, finds it suitable to rake up anti-Modi propaganda.
Is India thinking the way Bengal
is thinking?
There is a sense of fear as also
brinkmanship. It also opens up questions on the CBI (Central Bureau of
Investigation). Interestingly enough it is not formed as per provisions of
constitution. It exists since 1941 as Special Police Establishment to probe
into corruption and bribery cases. None knows whether it has a mandate to do
that. Its actions had always been questioned and often accused of having
functioned as the handmaid of the political bosses.
West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata
Banerjee is gunning on that ground and has been able to bring together the
opposition by raising the bogey of fear that opposition leaders are being
targeted through the CBI.
The Supreme Court’s refusal to
allow for the arrest of Kolkata Police Commissioner Rajiv Kumar but just asking
him to appear before the court substantiates Mamata Banerjee’s contention that
the CBI should not have gone to the residence of Kumar. It also supports her
posturing that the action was highhanded and unwarranted in a federal set up.
This makes it difficult for the
BJP (Bharatiya Janata Party), though it may be correct or not on Saradha issue to
bash Mamata on the issue of constitutional failure.
The Supreme Court had ordered CBI
to investigate the Saradha case five years back, in May 2014. CBI has undermined
its own case by gunning for the Kolkata Police Commissioner ahead of the Lok
Sabha elections. It needs to answer why it dithered for so long. Was it looking
for a politically opportune time? It cannot be equated with its investigations in
the Godhra case.
The opposition hands are full on
these from disproportionate incomes of SP (Samajwadi Party) and BSP (Bahujan
Samaj Party) leaders of Uttar Pradesh, RJD (Rashtriya Janata Dal) leaders of
Bihar to the family of former finance minister P Chidambaram. Right or wrong
these are being projected as cases more of political nature than corruption.
The overdoing of CBI and Enforcement Directorate (ED) actions are leading to
unsavoury questions.
It is now a
ding-dong battle. The ruling BJP is playing the probity card while opposition plays
the oppression by ruling clan—the victim card. The voters are watching the
scenario with amusement. The final judgment will come from them. Till such time
the political rivals can play the game to satisfy the voters as Bihar Chief Minister
has said that such games will be seen everyday till the final leg of the Lok Sabha
polls.
Rahul Gandhi, since being nominated the President of the Congress Party, seems to have suddenly found his voice after remaining virtually silent or absent in the first 10 years of Parliament when his Government was in power. Here is an individual who genuinely believes that the nation owes him allegiance because of his ancestors and that he is entitled to everything.
Entitled to the top position in his party because of his family’s name. Entitled to all the trappings of power and the accompanying perquisites because of the sacrifices of his ancestors. Entitled to say anything he wants knowing that an army of senior leaders will jump to his defence. And of course, entitled to aspire to lead the country with no accountability.
Mr Gandhi seems to depend
on the philosophy that if he shouts out an allegation, crying himself hoarse
long enough, some of the dirt may stick. He assumes that because of the
financially dirty reputation of his own family and party, whereby he and his
family have had a sticky finger in virtually every pie, Prime Minister Modi can
also be tarnished with such nonsensical allegations. He recognises that the
only salvation for him and his family is to somehow convince the electorate
that Mr Modi and the ruling party is “also corrupt”!
Deep inside he
recognises that this will not happen, since there has been no case of
corruption in this Government.
Therefore, he has
decided to invent a pack of lies. If told repeatedly and convincingly, lies and
untruths can certainly sow a seed of doubt in the mind of the listener for a
limited period.
Let us examine some of his more recent lies and about turns.
Rafale: Rahul Gandhi’s arguments on the Rafale fighter aircraft purchase are moving from the sublime to ridiculous. He needs a counter to the Augusta Westland expose that are likely to happen and the Bofors matter that has sunk into the minds of the electorate.
His shrill comments are being loyally parroted by the senior Congress leaders because once their “Prince” has spoken, they have no option but to comply and defend. They have nothing concrete to establish their allegations.
Crony
Capitalism:
Mr Gandhi and his family have been beneficiaries from several corporate houses
over the years. In order to hide their own issues, he has chosen to make the
charge of crony capitalism on the Prime Minister. The fact that Mr Anil
Ambani’s company has recently filed for bankruptcy has been conveniently
ignored by Mr Gandhi since this goes against his narrative.
Mr Manohar Parrikar: He made a personal visit to the Goa Chief Minister purportedly to enquire about his health and then promptly misquoted Mr Parrikar at an election rally. When his lie was questioned by Mr Parrikar, he tried to shift the blame to Mr Modi without any compunction.
EVM’s: Rahul Gandhi blames the Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) when his party loses an election and maintains a studied silence when his party wins an election. For him, EVM’s and the Election Commission are simply a matter of convenience – to be abused when they are perceived to be working against him and his party and to be ignored when they work in his favour.
Loan
Waivers: Rahul Gandhi announced loan waivers
through the election campaigns in Rajasthan and Madhya Pradesh. To the credit
of the new Governments, the loans were waived immediately. However, the poor
farmers generally received loan waivers of less than Rs 1,000 making a mockery
of the promises. No one has bothered to revisit the commitments made. These
elections are over and new promises will need to be made after 5 years.
Non-Performing
Assets: Rahul Gandhi has been busy blaming
the Prime Minister for non-performing assets without understanding that loans
become non-performing after they are due. Loans are normally given for say 5
years and after that repayment is due. Once the loan is due and if repayment is
not commenced, loans are categorised non-performing. Therefore, NPA’s during
the NDA tenure were loans given during the UPA tenure.
Job
Creation: He has just claimed that he has
developed a plan to create 70 million jobs in the next 5 years. No plans have
been announced on how this will be achieved and which sectors these jobs will
be created. However, no accountability is sought from him on anything he says.
It is worth looking at the fact that less than 17 million jobs were created
during the 10-year term of the UPA.
Saradha
Scam:
Rahul Gandhi needs to make up his mind on where he and his party stand on this
matter. From talking about the losses in 2014 to castigating Mamata Banerjee
for not taking action on the scam to now offering full support, no one really
knows where he stands and what his next U-turn will be. Clearly, his position
is based on what he believes may get him some headlines in the here and now.
The past will be addressed by his minions and he will be protected at all
costs.
Relations
with other opposition parties: It is interesting to see how easily, Rahul
Gandhi changes his position. From cursing and abusing another opposition party
leader to extending unquestioned support happens seamlessly and without any
explanation. It would be interesting to see if there is any leader who he has
not abused and later sought to partner with. Does any opposition party leader
believe anything he says or is it simply a matter of convenience and prudence
to stay silent till the elections are over?
The best form of defence is offence.
When nothing else works and the lies do not seem to stick, Rahul Gandhi very easily, resorts to name calling. Over the past year he has threatened Mr Modi to unilateral debates but kept surprisingly quiet in the Lok Sabha. He has used every possible negative adjective in his book for Mr Modi from Fuehrer to Chor (thief) to Insecure Dictator. Unfortunately, no one is buying into his narrative and this is frustrating him even more.
So is the honourable Congress
President a congenital liar as suggested by Smriti Irani or is he simply
delusional?
The word “delusional” comes
from a Latin word meaning “deceiving.”
So delusional thinking
is like deceiving yourself by believing outrageous things. A delusion
is a false idea. It is a belief that has no evidence. A delusional person
believes and wants to be true something that is actually not true. More so in
the strong hope that something miraculous will happen that will make his
beliefs come true.
Sounds familiar
specially in context of the subject matter of this article?
Clearly, Rahul
Gandhi’s only objective is to politicise every issue rather than see even a
single issue to its logical conclusion. He has often been asked to show proof
of the various allegations he keeps making and by his own admission on Rafale,
he does not yet have proof. His delusional self seems to believe that proof
will appear on its own to establish that he was right. Till then, he will
continue with his “shoot and scoot” politics unabashedly.
He does not seem to
have the confidence that he will be able to pull off a spectacular victory in
the coming elections. The
electorate has stopped believing him. It is only a matter of time before his party
workers stop believing in him as well. The day is not far when someone from the
crowd will should out that the prince has no clothes!
How long will Mr Gandhi keep crying “wolf wolf”?
As President Abraham Lincoln had famously said, “You can fool
all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you
cannot fool all the people all the time.”
What started as an interview became a moving story that will make anyone want to read CUT, Hibo Wardere’s eloquent memoir of how she became an anti-FGM campaigner helping young girls whose families plan to take them abroad for a procedure that leaves them with devastating permanent health problems and psychological trauma. She has devoted the past ten years of her life to the campaign against FGM (Female Genital Mutilation) and vows to continue.
Terri: What prompted you to start campaigning against Female Genital Mutilation, or the FGM, in the first place?
Hibo Wardere: I was never
going to talk about FGM to be honest with you… never in life, because it was
too personal, too intimate; it just felt like I was never going to talk about
it and I knew it was eating me up anyway.
It’s just something that you normalised. You normalised how you felt:
physical pain, emotionally drained, psychologically disturbing, hurting – you
just normalised it because everybody else around you also normalised it.
But when my
youngest went to school and I didn’t have anything else to do I went and I
asked the Head Teacher if I could volunteer. And he said, “OK … we can do
better.” And I was like, “What would you
want?” and he said, “Your kids are very clever.
What do you do with them?” He had a conversation with me and I said, “I
dunno, I just sit with them every day after school. I go back over what you’ve taught them each day
and they tell me what they did and that way I can get a bit of what they’ve
learned. You know, I just sit down with them every day.” And he said, “Well,
you could do that in the classroom and it’s called teaching assistants – you
help the students.” And I said, “OK, but
I don’t have any qualification. I’ve
never done college or anything.” And he said, “It’s OK, we’ll train you. We’ll
pay for you and we’ll train you.” And I was thinking ‘Oh my God, I haven’t
touched a book or pen since I arrived in this country. How am I going to do that?’ And I was asking
him, “What does it entail?” and he said, “You’re going to do a lot of writing,
a lot of reading….” I have anxiety about
seeing a lot of words; it really messes me up. And said, “OK, can I just do it
without writing or reading?” I was just
joking with him, but it turned out I enjoyed it. I really, really did enjoy it
and I just excelled in it. I don’t know how, but I did.
After that, he
said, you need to work with year six.
They assigned me to year six and then assigned me particularly to one
student. She was Somalian, a very
scrawny little girl. She just reminded me of me. Instantly we bonded, and we
became quite good friends. And then one
day, the head teacher said, “I need you to come to the office. There’s a
meeting happening. We just want you to observe. Don’t say anything. Don’t get
involved. Just observe.” I was very
intrigued. What kind of a meeting were they involving me in? I was very nervous.
But then, when I went into the office and I was sitting with the two Deputy Heads
and him, in walked her Mum. The penny dropped. For some reason the penny
dropped for me; I just thought… ‘Surely not. Surely not! It’s not what I’m
thinking that they’re thinking, is it?’ I just thought to myself ‘don’t let
your imagination run wild, it could be something else’. They sat down and they were like, “Oh you
can’t take her out. It’s April, she’s going to do exams in May. She needs to be
coming back to get extra help during the break time.” But she was adamant: “No
I need to go see my Dad, who’s very ill, dying… I haven’t got anyone to leave
this child with.” But she did! She had
two grown up daughters who were married already. And I was thinking, ‘I know
your daughters. They are married. They have family. What do you mean you can’t leave her with
them?’ But she was adamant that she didn’t want to leave her daughter. And then she left. And I knew what they were
thinking about. And I was very upset because I just finished learning the
policy and procedures and everything in the school, and there was no mention of
FGM, not even in one single line: nothing
about that. But all the other abuses were there.
So when she left,
the headteacher said, “So what do you think?” and I said, “What do you want me
to think?” He said, “Well, we’re thinking that she’s taking her to perform
circumcision.” And I went, “OK, so what do you want me to say?” They said,
“What’s your instinct? What do you think?” I really got mad and I said, “You
really want me to tell you what I think, yes? I have no say in this.” And I walked out.
I walked out
because I was fuming. This is a child I
had bonded with and there was this thing hanging in the air and I knew what it
was, so my emotions were all over the place. I went back home and I was
literally fuming. I was telling my
husband what happened today, so the next day I went back. The Head called me to the office and he said,
“We really value your opinion.” I said,
“Listen, first of all, why do think about FGM when there’s nothing in your
books? How do you expect your teachers or the people who work with children to
handle FGM? Have you ever given them training?”
He said “No.” I said, “There’s
nothing said about FGM but you have all the other
abuses in your folders… but there’s nothing on FGM. And why do you think I have
something to think about that?” And he
replied, “You’re from that region…” But
I thought, “That doesn’t qualify me, to know what this woman’s going to do,
does it?” So I left.
I went home and
there was one assignment left for my training that I needed to write. The
assignment was to write about an abuse that I care about, whether I know, or I
experienced it or somebody close to me has experienced it. And I thought, ‘I’m going to write about
FGM.’ It was the perfect time to write
it. I went back home. After I put my kids to sleep I took the
laptop and I was just looking for stories online and my husband said, “What are
you doing?” and I said, “I’m looking for stories.” And he said, “About what?” So
I said, “About FGM.” And he said, “Why are you looking for stories?” and I said,
“Why? I need to write something.” And he said, “Yeah, but why are you looking
for stories? Why can you not write what happened to you?” I remember just
looking at him and laughing and I said to him, “Are you mad? You want me to write about me? You do know these are the people I go out to dinner with, they
think I’m ‘crazy, funny Hibo’… and you want me to write about my business …
are you mad!?” And he just stopped at my
shoulders and said, “I think it’s about time maybe for you to think about
talking about it. You have been talking
to me about it all the time we’ve been married.” And I just thought, “He’s mad.” For some reason, he knows how to get to
me. He did. Afterwards, when I looked at
the internet, I just closed my laptop and I thought ‘why?’ – what is it preventing me to go back to that
day …. and to look at myself as a six year old, ….what is it?’ And I just
started writing; I opened the laptop and I started writing and I remember just
crying, silently at first. My tears were
just streaming down, I couldn’t stop them, and I kept on writing and I started
to whimper and I didn’t notice but my husband was under the stairs nearby, and
every time he heard me cry he would come and hug me and just go back and come
back and he didn’t sleep because all night I was writing.
The next morning
I was so traumatised by what I did, because this was my first time ever actually
confronting myself. I took the USB, went to the school, printed it out, and
went to the Head’s office and I said, “You’re going to read this.” When he saw
the title he said, “Can I give it to my Deputies, because they’re ladies?” I said,
“No,” and I closed the door. “People are gonna talk. I’m not leaving, … until
you read it.” He said, “I’ve got no choice have I?” And I said “No.” You could
see it in my eyes, I was really
traumatised and I was starting to cry. So I sat on a chair. He read it and afterwards he stood up and
hugged me. He wouldn’t let go. He hugged
me and he was crying, and he said, “You’ve changed my world today. And I am
going to make sure this goes on the agenda, I’m going to make sure all staff
are trained. I’m going to make sure everybody knows. But here’s the thing – you have to tell your colleagues.” And I
went, “No, this is a private thing, and I wrote it for you, to help the other kids.”
And I had actually done it for that little girl because I loved her so
much. And I said, “No. You have to…. I’m not doing it.” So he said, “If you
want a job, you have to do it.”
[Laughing] He was kind of blackmailing me. He just said, “There’s bigger
things than you. This is bigger than
you. You need to think about that. You
need to think about why…. You did it because you wanted to save the girl.” Which by the way, he said ‘yes’ to her Mom
taking her and she took her and she never brought her back. He said, “imagine hundreds of other girls out
there… I was ignorant. I didn’t know what I know today. Many schools. . . in fact”, he said, “all the head teachers I
meet, nobody discusses FGM. But I’m
going to change that. Next meeting I’m discussing it.” So I said I would think
about it and I went home and discussed it with my husband and he said
“Right. You need to talk, you need to
tell them.”
My colleagues
already knew I had written something and the whole school was on fire, because
the assistant was not allowed to disclose what I’d written but people knew that
I had written something that would change the school. So at lunchtime I said “I
really want to see you all, it would be really good to see you all this
afternoon if you are free.” I didn’t have to ask twice. The entire 120 of them
turned up. All of them turned up! And
I went to the hall and I remember looking and thinking ‘Oh my God!’ And I just
said “You all turned up, I was expecting
2 -5 people. What are you all
doing here?” I was so nervous. I was cracking horrible jokes. But I told them. For 45 minutes I just talked, cried, talked
and cried – and they were all crying with me.
And when I finished they just, … everyone was angry – they were very
angry because some of the TA’s said they were definitely sure that children in
their class had undergone FGM. In fact one of them was very courageous, and had
gone to a head teacher and said something is going on with this child, and she
was told, “Don’t worry because it is the culture they come from, the children
are like this.” But they weren’t like that, I’m sure of it, they weren’t.
It snowballed
from there – from me talking to my colleagues and them going and talking on FaceBook
and everywhere else and the Head Teacher literally pimping me out in every
meeting he attended: “I have a lady in my school who talks about FGM.” And
Waltham Forest started me off in a big style after I told one councillor who
was a friend of mine. And one Head
booked me in a school without telling me first, and she said “We’re going to
this school and you have only 35 people. Just talk about FGM.” I said, “Really?” She said, “Yes.” I went in there and it wasn’t 35 people. It was about 200+ — it was two schools — and
she disappeared when we went to the school because she knew how nervous I was
and thought I might just leave, so she disappeared somewhere in the building and
left me there. But she came back when I was talking with a big grin at the back
of the room and I thought “I’m going to kill you when I’m finished with this.”
But it was kind things like that… my councillors were the most amazing
people. Waltham Forest Council just
scooped me up the minute I decided to talk about FGM, every single one of them,
the councillors, the leader, everyone just scooped me up and ran with me and soon
every school was banging on my door and I was going from one place to the
other. So here I am today. It was that 10 year old who made me
talk.
Terri: That’s an amazing story.
Hibo Wardere: It is. She
touched me. She just literally reminded
me of me – very scrawny, didn’t even like lunch hour… I used to go and sit with
her so that she could eat. It was … I
loved her to bits. To this day I don’t even know what happened to her. What we know is: The Mum took a secondary
school student as well, without telling the school, and she never returned them
back and we don’t know where they are.
Terri: One thing that strikes me is the difficulty for you of having to talk about something that is very private, very intimate, and yet, the whole reason why you kind of have to do so is that it is, as he said, bigger than you. Is it hard …? I guess you’ve already answered that question…
Hibo Wardere: It is
extremely hard. Even now as I talk about
it publicly, so many times over and over and over. Every time you talk about
it, it has an impact on you. It does, because you’re feeling it when you’re
talking about it. You are explaining to somebody and you want the person to
understand, and to actually feel literally emotional about it and that takes a
toll on you. But it’s something that we have to do. For me, in my head I always see that six year
old. I see millions of other six year olds, I see even babies. I see that… and
I feel like, I’m in that position where I can talk about it, I will continue to
talk about it and there’s no choice in that.
Terri: Clearly this is an intimate part of your culture of birth. When did you first recognise that there was something problematic about the practice or about what had happened to you? Was it before this incident (of writing your story) or was it really at that moment when you started to write that paper that you realised?
Hibo Wardere: I actually didn’t know what it was. All I knew was that it was something that all
the girls were proud of, because I got bullied at school because I wasn’t
cut. It was something that everybody
went through and I thought it was really lovely because, if these girls were so
proud and bullying me about it, surely
it must be something good. Then when it
happened it was like, ‘No!’ – It wasn’t
something good. It wasn’t something
to be proud of. When I went back to the
school they wanted to welcome me to their gang, and I said “no, no… I don’t
want to be part of your gang. I was thinking
in my head, ‘How can I bully another girl, knowing what I went through? Why
would I wish that on another girl?’ I
just felt ‘no’ and I was alone again. Even after I was cut I was a loner again
and I didn’t want to communicate, or you know, be with this group that felt
very proud. I didn’t. I just felt what happened was wrong. It was, ‘why did it happen?’ The nagging question
in my head was why?
Terri: How long would you say you’ve been working on this issue (combating FGM)?
Hibo Wardere: I think
about the last seven years, publicly. But personally, working on this issue I
think it’s from the day it happened to me until now – working on that issue
never stops. It’s part of your life, so
you learn to live with it. You learn to cope with it, but it never leaves. It’s
there. Physically it’s there,
emotionally, psychologically . . . every
aspect of your life is touched by it. You
just learn how to cope with that and to get on with life, but it never
disappears; it’s always there.
Terri: This is what a lot of survivors have told me… especially the medical consequences that go on and on. So, at what point in your work did you think, ‘I’m going to write a book about this’?
Hibo Wardere: I actually didn’t think ‘I’m going to write a
book.’ Not in a million years. And then
all of a sudden this ghost writer Tweets me.
She’s like, ‘Hibo, I need to write to you a private tweet. Can you please follow me back?’ And I
followed her back. She was like ‘Oh, I’ve been asked by Simon & Schuster to
write a book.’ And I was like, ‘Who is Simon & Schuster?’ first. I Googled before I asked and found out they are
publishers. She wrote me, ‘I need to write a book, about female genital
mutilation, and I want you to write the book with me.’ And here I was telling her, ‘OK, sorry I’m
not famous like Leyla Hussein. I gave her the names of the famous people who
have worked to eradicate FGM: Nimko
Ali and others. I asked her, ‘Why are you not talking to them?’ And she
said, “Yes, I know but the way you talk is different. You talk so raw.” And I
went, “Ohh, what do you mean by ‘so raw’?” She went, “You don’t mince your
words. You are out there, you don’t talk like a professional. You talk like you.” And I was like, “OK, are you insulting
me right now?” [laughing] She went, ‘No, no, no, not insulting you…it’s
just that the way you talk touches people. The way you talk is something that
everyone can stop and listen to and I want that.” So, I said “no” to her at first. But she kept on being persistent. She didn’t
leave me alone. And I went, “OK, let’s
see.” So she came and we spent three days together, where she asked me all
kinds of things, while all kinds of emotions were going through me. She wrote a few chapters and said, “OK, I’m
going to take these chapters and send them to Simon & Schuster and then
we’ll know.” Within three days they
replied. They said “We want this story.
We need it now.” And I was
thinking ‘Who’s going to buy a book about mutilation? People are afraid to talk
about the vagina. Do they really want to
know what happens to it?’ And I was having huge blocks – thinking that no one
would want to know about this…. at all.
And when we finished seven months later the book came out, and it became
a sensation … (I have got no idea how that happened. I am really shocked
sometimes when I look at Google and the amount of people who have left reviews,
and how much it’s selling, it’s crazy.)
Terri: What was the response within the Somalian community and practicing communites? Or is the response mostly from outside communities?
Hibo Wardere: I have got no idea how Somalis reacted to this book. None of them said anything. I only know that outside the community people love my book. Inside the community, I haven’t had a word from them about the book. I do get men sometimes talking to me on the internet, Twitter: “Oh, you need to stop talking about the culture, you tarnish our culture”, and this and that. And I just ask, “OK, are you trying to tell me not to talk about what happened to me?” And there was one man in particular telling me, “You know what, you should stop talking about this.” And I said, “Are you married?” and he said “Yes.” “Is your wife cut?” “Yes.” “Do you think that’s a good thing?” “Yes.” “So, let’s chop up your penis and see what happens to you.” He didn’t say a word after that. So there are people like that, but nobody’s actually come out and said anything about my book yet. They’ve read it; I know they have. Many women have bought a lot of books but none of them has said anything publicly, to me or anyone else.
Terri: Well, let’s hope that your book can give them courage… because with you, people constantly had to draw you out and persuade you to talk about yourself and what happened to you. And although you were reluctant, every time you did so, it was sensational. So tell us about your book’s content. Is it mostly biographical or is it more about the issue, or both?
Hibo Wardere: It is both.
It contains educational stuff as well. For me, it is a book about my memories,
my stories, the struggles. It’s a book full of information, about teaching, and
overall it’s an empowering book. For me it is an empowering book, not just for FGM
survivors but for any kind of abuse. I want people to read it and — whatever
is going on in their life – to think, “I can also come out from the darkness. I
can come out through the other side, because this lady has, I can do it as
well.” It is that kind of book for me.
It is an empowering book.
Terri: You’ve focused so much energy on education. Why is this your preferred arena in combating FGM?
Hibo Wardere: Education
for me is the must. It’s the biggest tool we have on the
planet. Education for me … I didn’t know
anything about FGM. I didn’t know what had happened to me. I didn’t know anything until I started
reading about it when I had my son, and it took me one year to translate one
book from English to Somalian – one full year – to translate and understand and
everything. So for me, it gave me all the things that were missing: all the
links that I was missing. I was reading about things that I was suffering
with. Had I not read that, I would not
have connected everything that was going on with FGM. So education is so important. People, when they don’t know something, they normally
seek to find out. Seeking is education, and telling the women I’ve
met, thousands of women in our area alone who have come to our clinic and love
what I do, actually get some information for the first time. You can see when you talk to them and you
say, “you know you went through this, and this and this..?” “Yeah.” “Where do you think it’s coming
from?” The penny drops for them. You link them, through education, with what
they are going through. They value that. So education is the key.
Plus, educating
our youth – there is no comparison to that. Educating our youth is a must.
We have to if we want to eradicate FGM.
For me it’s that – as young as year two. We teach them about how nobody
should touch your body, your body is yours, etc.. It’s the same
thing about FGM. It’s about telling them, “Your body is yours.” Making them
body conscious. Then they go to
secondary school and you should not hide what you tell them. They ask me ‘Miss
have you undergone FGM?’ and I tell them ‘yes’.
If they ask me intimate questions, with kids you can never be economical
with truth, you have to be honest with them. That has worked beautifully. The
work that they do with me keeps me going every single day. That’s what propels
me and I never get tired.
Terri: I was wondering where you get all this energy. Do you eat your spinach?
Hibo Wardere: I never get
tired of going to school and teaching the youth. Some of them, you never know whether they’ve
undergone FGM or not. You never know
whether you’ve given them a clue about what was going on with them. But I did
have a sixteen year-old who said, “Everything you’ve said, yes, I have gone
through it. But my worry now is for my two younger sisters. I don’t want them
to go through what I went through.” So
you do get that. You do get people that
have already undergone it, but they’re going to help their siblings. Or
children who know nothing about FGM, and when they learn about they go, “Hang
on, I am never going to go through
this. I know what this is, and if my
Mom tries it, I know how to seek help.”
It’s all about equipping them; it’s a protection tool as well.
Terri: Has the book been translated into Somali?
Hibo Wardere: Not yet.
It’s my wish actually. It’s my wish that
one day it would be translated into Arabic as well as Somali. I know a lot of women would read it if it were in
the Somali language because most of them have language barriers.
Terri: I agree, that needs to be done. What are some of the biggest obstacles that you’ve faced in your work?
Hibo Wardere: Families… especially um, some family members who don’t like what I do. But for me that is nothing. What I do is my life. It’s up to me. I’m not interfering in their work, so they shouldn’t interfere with mine. When your own family members turn on you, that’s the worst part of life. Others, you can tell them where to go, but family members … what do you do when they’re your family and they’re telling you, “Oh you shouldn’t be doing this, you shouldn’t be doing that, you shouldn’t be talking about this.” It’s all about protecting them, their family name, their family honour, etc. And for me that doesn’t exist if you can’t talk about something that’s traumatised you for life. What’s that got to do with the family honour? I have a right to talk about what happened to me. I’m not asking you not to talk about yours; don’t tell me not to do that. Family members sometimes can really make you stop and question yourself. But others, you can handle others. I don’t have a problem with this.
Terri: What would you say are your most notable success stories throughout all of this work?
Hibo Wardere: I don’t
know… I went to Canada recently. That
was themost amazing trip I’ve ever had. I gave a talk in the Canadian
Parliament and it was so lovely and I was asked, ‘OK, there are a lot of MPs
here. Do you want us to warn them?’ And
I said, ‘No. You should not warn them.
What are you warning them about? I’m just going to talk about vaginas. Why do you want to warn them?’ And they were
like, ‘Exactly that’ And I was like, ‘No.’ I went there and I thought to
myself, ‘How do I start the conversation, that I live with this every single
day of my life, this memory that I will never forget even when they’re gone or
in their eighties?’ So I just started by
saying, “We need to talk about vaginas and what happens to vaginas. Put that to
one side and let’s think about what would happen if two hundred million penises
and balls were chopped off. What would
the whole world be doing right now?” You could hear men gasping and see some of
them crossing their legs, and I’m going, “See? You’re closing your legs yet nobody
required that of you, so why is it OK for us to accept two hundred million
women mutilated like this?” That was, for me, a moment … because they were
literally shocked. And by the time I finished they couldn’t stop clapping for
God knows how long. I had to beg them to
stop clapping. Moments like that stick
with me. Moments like the sixteen year
old girl, who, even though she had already undergone FGM, wanted to protect her
little sisters. That was a huge moment for me.
I felt, ‘You didn’t even care that much for you. You just wanted to protect your two siblings.’
Talking to her about what happened to me created that – and it was a very
special moment for me. And it was also
very brave of her wanting to help her little sisters. Or another occasion when a girl in year nine
stayed after and said, “I know I’ve had FGM but I don’t know what type I’ve
had.” When I see things like that, I know I’m doing the right thing. Even if it is only one girl that comes
forward, I know she’s going to get the help she desperately needs afterwards,
because that’s the time you actually need
all the help you can get. Lots of moments:
My son telling me he’s the proudest son on earth, my kids telling me that, my
family, friends who are very, very supportive. I am so blessed in so many was
and that is what helps me to keep going on day in and day out.
“We, the Kashmiris, readily believe the information we have been fed so far about atrocities being committed by government forces in the valley, but we refuse to accept that militants are also guilty of killing and injuring innocent people. We observe a Hartal (Lockout) even if a civilian is accidentally killed by security forces, but we don’t even utter a word to condemn when militants abduct and kill innocent Kashmiris.”
Lance
Naik Nazir Ahmad Wani who laid down his life while fighting heavily armed
militants in Shopian area of South Kashmir has been honoured posthumously
with India’s highest peacetime award Ashoka Chakra, during 70th Republic
Day celebrations, for displaying conspicuous gallantry and unparalleled
devotion to duty.
On November
25, 2018 the 38-year-old Nazir Wani, hailing from Cheki Ashmuji village in
Kulgam district of Kashmir, attained martyrdom in a fierce gunfight with a
group of six hard core militants in Hirapur village near Batgund in Shopian.
During this intense encounter, Wani who had single-handedly killed two
militants was seriously injured by another militant but despite his grievous
injuries he refused to give up and shot his assailant dead. Wani succumbed to
his injuries only after he had killed the militants.
Nazir Wani was a fearless and upright soldier. He started off as a militant but soon got disillusioned and surrendered. He joined 162 Infantry Battalion (Territorial Army) where he displayed such valour and dedication that he was transferred to the elite Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry. Due to his exceptional military skills and raw courage he was specially deputed to assist the units of Rashtriya Rifles employed for counter-militancy operations in Kashmir. Wani proved his mettle and had the rare honour of being awarded Sena Medal for gallantry twice! Those who served with Wani respectfully recall how he would always volunteer for challenging missions and display great dare under adverse conditions. He never hesitated in exposing himself to grave danger in the line of duty especially when it came to assisting or extricating his comrades during encounters.
A
scrupulously honest and hard-working person, Nazir Wani was a very helpful
person who considered fighting the menace of militancy his moral duty as it has
killed thousands and ruined the lives of so many. He would always advise young
boys not to get carried away by emotions and pick up guns as militancy was
harming the people of Kashmir. “He always had the interest of Kashmiri
people in his heart and he was ever helpful to everyone,” his neighbours
recall. Besides being the epitome of courage and unflinching devotion to duty,
he embodied and represented the idea of secular India where people of all
faiths co-exist peacefully. Nazir Wani is no more with us today but due to
these excellent personal qualities he will continue to serve as an inspiration
and role model for the people of India, especially for the Kashmiris.
When
it comes to issues related to Kashmir and the security forces, we tend to get
emotional and stop thinking logically. While we readily believe the information
we have been fed so far about atrocities being committed by government forces
in the valley, we refuse to accept the fact that militants are also guilty of
killing and injuring innocent people. We observe a Hartal (Lockout) even if a civilian is accidentally
killed by security forces, but we don’t even utter a word to condemn when militants
abduct and kill innocent Kashmiris. From time to time media reports pour in
about army harassing civilians and creating a sense of fear in the state, but
is it not a fact that there is some order in the region only because of the
security forces, otherwise there would be complete chaos.
The
peace-loving, mild-mannered average Kashmiri is not an ‘army hater’ as the
impression is often given out. There are plenty of Kashmiris who realize that
they are safe only because the army is around. What most of us fail to realize
is that the soldiers who are doing their duty in difficult terrain and harsh
climate are very much like us, they too have feelings and families. The only
difference is that since they have taken up the job of safeguarding our country
and its people they are duty-bound to take action against those who pick up
arms against the state.
However,
even while confronting militants the security forces and police always try not
to harm these armed persons by asking them to lay down their arms and
surrender. Nazir Wani had also personally appealed to the militants hiding in a
house in Cheki Ashmuji village to surrender and it was only when they refused
to do so that Wani and his team had no other option but to use force against
them.
Nazir Wani’s
death is an irreparable loss and a colossal personal tragedy for his wife
Mahajabeen and her two teenage sons. Yet, they would certainly be
immensely proud that the nation has honoured Wani’s valour and sacrifice with
the Ashoka Chakra and Mahajabeen’s calm composure during the award ceremony
that the whole world watched on their TV screens has earned her accolades from
all over for being the brave wife of a brave soldier.
HBO’s “Game of
Thrones” prequel pilot now has a filming start date. The as-yet-untitled
project, featuring Naomi Watts, will begin production in early summer, HBO
programming president Casey Bloys told The Wrap. Bloys has previously said that
a prequel will not air until at least a year after the epic-fantasy drama
concludes.
The news follows the
prequel landing director SJ Clarkson last month and announcing its full cast
which is led by Watts, Naomi Ackie and Denise Gough. The prequel’s showrunner
is Jane Goldman and the series will be based on a concept she developed with
author George RR Martin.
Filmmaker Sooraj Barjatya is planning to have
Salman Khan in his next film. Barjatya has revealed he will be reuniting with
Salman Khan for a family drama, the idea of which he has already discussed with
the superstar.
Sooraj has collaborated with Salman, right from his debut
“Maine Pyaar Kiya” to “Hum Aapke Hain Koun!”, “Hum
Saath Saath Hain” and recently “Prem Ratan Dhan Payo.” The
director said currently he is consumed with work on his production, “Hum
Chaar” and work on the Salman film will begin much later.
“Right now the focus is on ‘Hum Chaar’.
Then my younger son Avnish will debut as a writer-director with a film this
year. It’s a very big responsibility. After that I start writing my film with
Salman,” Barjatya said.
When asked if the film will be on the lines of trademark
Rajshri Productions strong, rooted family drama Sooraj said, “It’s a
family drama, but not about joint family. It’s about husband and wife and I’ve
already discussed the idea with Salman.”
Nazir Wani was a former militant who first picked up the gun to fight for Kashmir’s freedom struggle. Soon, Wani realised that he had become a pawn in Pakistan Army’s proxy war. He quit militancy and joined the Indian Army to fight against his former comrades who had wreaked havoc in Kashmir Valley. Wani was part of operations that eliminated 30 terrorists. He was conferred Ashoka Chakra posthumously.
A lot has been written about the valour and devotion to duty displayed by late Lance Naik Nazir Ahmad Wani, who was posthumously conferred Ashoka Chakra and rightly so. India’s highest peacetime award doesn’t come easy, especially when valour and sacrifice have become the byword for our security forces who are courageously fighting a full blown proxy war sponsored by Pakistan in Jammu & Kashmir as well as left wing extremism in more than a 100 districts of nearly ten states. However, the case of Wani is more than just an act of exceptional gallantry — it tears apart the false story line being propagated by vested interests portraying Kashmiris as anti national Indians who want to become a part of Pakistan.
Wani’s first tryst with gun was in the
nineties when he dropped out of school and like many others of his age, joined
militancy. However, on realising that what was being flaunted as “freedom
struggle” was in reality a proxy war being sponsored by the Pakistan Army, he got
disillusioned and decided to quit after seeing how militants were silencing
dissent by killing innocent Kashmiris. After his surrender, Wani had the option
of returning to civil life but having witnessed militants terrorising locals,
he decided to do his bit to stop this menace. So he joined Ikhwan-ul-Muslimeen
(IuM), a counter-insurgent outfit of Kashmiris that was assisting security
forces in anti-militancy operations.
Though ‘Ikhwanis’ (as members of IuM were
commonly referred to) came under much criticism for their high handedness,
there were no allegations of any type of misconduct against Wani. On account of
his exceptionally high level of motivation and excellent personal qualities, he
was enrolled in 162 Infantry Battalion (Territorial Army) affiliated to the
Jammu and Kashmir Light Infantry in 2004. Those who selected him still recall
his extraordinary ‘josh’ (drive) that convinced them that even though he was a
former militant, Wani would prove to be an asset- and their assessment was
right. After donning the army uniform, Wani declared his personal war on
militants since they were ruining so many lives in Kashmir and spurred by this
mission he was an ever ready volunteer when it came to participation in
anti-militant operations.
His professional skills and raw courage
under fire during encounters with militants earned him a Sena Medal (Gallantry)
in 2007, but this honour didn’t make him either conceited or complacent. He
continued with the same zeal and participated in numerous operations that saw the
elimination of more than 30 hard core terrorists. In 2018, Wani once again showed
exceptional daring when he, unmindful of personal safety, gunned down a hard
core terrorist in close combat. For this act of valour, Wani was awarded Sena
Medal (Gallantry) for the second time (referred to as ‘Bar to Sena Medal’ in
military parlance), which is quite a rare feat. Even after this singular
achievement he continued to participate in anti-militancy operations with full
vigour and the daring act in which he gave the supreme sacrifice bears
testimony to Wani’s dedication and his resolute conviction that militants were
a scourge that had to be eradicated at all costs.
Despite being aware of the grave dangers that lay ahead, Wani still chose to live life on the edge and died a heroic death. Wani isn’t the only Kashmiri who abhorred militants, this sentiment is nevertheless widespread in the Valley and it is the fear of reprisal from militants that prevents its public expression. The very fact that JK Police and Special Operations Group remain at the forefront of anti-militancy operations in Kashmir is a reality that the pro-Pakistan lobby cannot digest since it exposes their false claim of Kashmiris wanting to break free from India, which Pakistan and its proxies in Kashmir are desperately trying to sell to the world.
This is why militants are being ordered
by their handlers from across the border to strike terror into the hearts of people
who are voluntarily cooperating with the establishment and security forces. The
result is that today Kashmiri militants are shamelessly killing their own
unarmed brothers to dissuade others from being nationalists. But despite these
cold blooded murders (some of which have also been posted on social media for
greater public impact), the militants’ strong arm tactics hasn’t worked.
Despite ordering policemen to quit their jobs and killing many of them, the
militants’ diktat hasn’t achieved anything substantial. Similarly, despite
killing scores of civilians after branding them as informers, locals are still
tipping off security forces regarding the whereabouts of militants.
Wani’s martyrdom brings to fore the indomitable
Kashmiri spirit that will never succumb to subjugation by Islamabad through militants
in the garb of “freedom struggle”. Though there was no public expression of
grief on Wani’s demise but then this was more because of fear of militants and
not due to indifference. Another plus point of Wani’s sacrifice is that it has
dispelled the wrong impression in the minds of many that the security forces
are fighting against the collective will of Kashmiris or that Kashmir has gone
out of India’s control. Wani’s martyrdom has convincingly proved that the negative
image of Kashmiris being projected is untrue and this malicious fabrication is
the work of groups with vested interests who want to create a chasm between the
people of Kashmir and those from other parts of the country.
Tailpiece:
After learning about Lance Naik Nazir Wani,
an acquaintance with extremely biased views about Kashmiris surprised me by
saying, “Tell them (pro-Pakistan lobby) that if they have Burhan Wanis, then we
too have our Nazir Wanis!” Though this may sound melodramatic but what he has
said is absolutely right because as long as we have the likes of Lnk Nazir
Ahmad Wani on our side, we have just nothing to worry about as far as Kashmir
is concerned.
A
short-term mindset and entrenched cultural habits are the biggest barriers to
collaboration between HR and finance teams according to a new study from Oracle.
A global study of 1,510 HR,
finance and business professionals has found that in order to successfully
unlock the value from data and help their organizations adapt to the changing
nature of the global talent market, HR teams need to rethink analytics
technology, skills and processes to improve collaboration with finance and
drive a competitive advantage. “HR and finance departments bring different, yet complementary
skills to the table. While they traditionally have not worked together closely,
that needs to change in order for organizations to create a competitive
advantage in today’s evolving market and talent economy,” said Donald Anderson,
Director, Organization & Talent Development, Oracle.
While data and analytics have
proliferated HR and finance, the benefits are limited without effective
collaboration and the ability to derive value:
The survey found that 49 percent cannot currently use analytics
to forecast outcomes and 81 percent are unable to determine future actions
based on predictive data.
The biggest barrier to collaboration between HR and finance is a
short-term mindset, with 71 percent saying their teams focus on quarters rather
than future strategic direction.
Culture clashes between departments was another top challenge
with nearly a third (29 percent) ranking traditionally separate habits as the
biggest barrier. Other barriers included mismatched skillsets (27 percentage)
and organizational silos (17 percentage).
HR teams also lack the skills to act on data and solve issues
(70 percent), cultivate quantitative analysis and reasoning (67 percent) and
use analytics to forecast workforce needs (55 percent).
The majority (80 percent) of
organizations believe HR and finance teams are already helping them make better
data-driven decisions. But, their teams will need to acquire new skills, but
with an increased focus on collaboration, organizations will be able to gain
even bigger business benefits:
88 percent of respondents believe HR and finance collaboration
will improve business performance; 76 percent believe it will enhance
organization agility.
Over half (57 percent) of organizations plan to achieve more
holistic, enterprise-wide insight through collaboration and 52 percent of HR
and finance professionals believe it will help them become more strategic
partners.
AI for greater collaboration and
better business results
HR and finance professionals are
looking to emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence (AI) to help
drive business results:
While a quarter (25 percent) of survey respondents are primarily
using AI to identify at-risk talent and model their talent pipeline (22
percent), they are rarely using AI to forecast performance (18 percent) or find
top talent (15 percent).
Over the next year, 71 percent of survey respondents plan to use
AI to predict high performing candidates in recruitment and source best-fit
candidates with resume analysis (70 percent).
Other AI priorities for survey respondents include modeling
their talent pipeline (58 percent), flagging at-risk employees through
attrition modeling (52 percent) and supporting employee interactions with
chatbots (38 percent).
“The world of analytics and AI
opens tremendous doors for HR to harness meaningful insights in order to make
smarter decisions and create a talent advantage,” said Tom Davenport, Babson
professor and analytics expert.
This
survey interviewed 1,510 HR, finance and business professionals in late 2018.
The respondents came from a variety of industries and geographies, and all were
from companies with US$100 million of revenues or larger.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.