Home Blog Page 462

Iconic Bengal tiger faces extinction threat

Spanning more than 10,000 square kilometres, the Sundarbans region of Bangladesh and India is the biggest mangrove forest on Earth, and also the most critical area for the endangered Bengal tiger. Scientists believe that, Sundarbans — the iconic Bengal tiger’s last coastal stronghold and the world’s biggest mangrove forest — could be destroyed by climate change and rising sea levels over the next 50 years.

“Fewer than 4,000 Bengal tigers are alive today,” said Bill Laurance, a professor at the James Cook University in Australia. “That’s a really low number for the world’s biggest cat, which used to be far more abundant but today is mainly confined to small areas of India and Bangladesh,” Laurance said. “What is most terrifying is that our analyses suggest tiger habitats in the Sundarbans will vanish entirely by 2070,” said Sharif Mukul, an assistant professor at Independent University Bangladesh.

The researchers used computer simulations to assess the future suitability of the low-lying Sundarban region for tigers and their prey species, using mainstream estimates of climatic trends from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Their analyses included factors such as extreme weather events and sea-level rise.

“Beyond climate change, the Sundarbans are under growing pressure from industrial developments, new roads, and greater poaching,” said Laurance.

However, the researchers emphasise that there is still hope. “The more of the Sundarbans that can be conserved — via new protected areas and reducing illegal poaching — the more resilient it will be to future climatic extremes and rising sea levels,” said Laurance. “There is no other place like the Sundarbans left on Earth. We have to look after this iconic ecosystem if we want amazing animals like the Bengal tiger to have a chance of survival,” he said.

Data is not a useless commodity, it’s oil of 21st Century: Govindacharya

0

India’s Parliamentary Panel summons Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to explain allegations of bias by its platform. Thinker and activist KN Govindacharya says other social media giants and the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology should also explain their actions (or inaction).

Eminent thinker KN Govindacharya has written to India’s Parliamentary panel to summon heads of US tech giants including Facebook and Google along with Twitter executives, and question them on a range of issues from tax compliance, data transfer and data localisation of Indians.

The Standing Committee of Parliament on Information Technology headed by Anurag Thakur had summoned Twitter executives over a perceived bias towards a section of Twitter accounts. The committee had fixed February 11, 2019 as the date of hearing. However, global Twitter executives did not turn up before the Indian Parliament’s Standing Committee. The committee has now fixed February 25, 2019 as the date of hearing and has summoned Jack Dosey, Chief Executive Officer of Twitter to come over and explain the allegations of willful prejudice by their platform.

Anurag Thakur, Chairman of the Standing Committee on Information Technology, Lok Sabha Secretariat

India will vote in the months of April and May to elect a new union government. Social media platforms have become a major source of news consumption for both rural and urban voters in the country. The Cambridge Analytica scandal which involved Facebook has proved that social media platforms can have a major undue influence over voter’s minds during elections. For several months there had been murmurs over Twitter’s perceived bias towards certain accounts and their tweets. Of late, these protesters had grown vocal and it was then that the Standing Committee of Indian Parliament decided to summon Twitter executives to explain the allegations.

Govindacharya has been raising the issue of data privacy and data protection of Indians. He had earlier petitioned in the Delhi High Court and had written to Prime Minister Narendra Modi that data about Indians should remain within the territorial limits of India and in severs located within India.

“Data is not a useless commodity but oil of the 21st century. Indian data should remain in Indian servers,” Govindacharya wrote in his letter to Modi.

Industry estimates suggest that the foreign internet companies do a data business of around Rs. 20 lakh crore ($282.5 billion) from India and yet the country gains almost nothing or a pittance in the form of taxes. Govindacharya says all the companies indulge in this mass scale transfer of Indian data abroad, and the Indian “government’s silence is rather disappointing”.

In a fresh letter addressed to Anurag Thakur, chairman of the Parliamentary panel, Govindacharya has urged the Standing Committee to summon other tech giants such as Facebook and Google along with Twitter.

“For maximising revenue, companies like Facebook and Twitter encourage fake and bogus users on their platform as is clear from their annual statements before the USA authorities. As per industry sources 30% of the users are anonymous or fake, which are the biggest source of trolling, fake news, interference in elections and many other crimes. Verification of users in India is mandated for Telecom Service Providers and KYC (know your customer) compliance is mandatory for Banking and Insurance industry. Similarly social media companies as per own rules are duty bound to verify all their users. Such verification will not only ensure a healthy cyberspace and protect the children but also ensure rules of law. If social media companies fail to verify all their users they must be held liable as per polluter pay principle,” Govindacharya wrote in his letter addressed to Anurag Thakur.

In what appears as a mockery of rules mandated by the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, Twitter India’s Grievance Officer is based in Ireland, when (s)he should have been based in India. Govindacharya has strongly urged the Parliamentary panel to also summon senior officials from the Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology and question them for their failure to enforce the law.

#InterimBudget: Rural subsidies, welfare for lower castes, Swadeshi push

Indian political economy is at test. The Union Budget has caused discomfort in opposition ranks. It has taken away the wind out of their sail as the government proposes income guarantee and welfare of the most populous communities – farmers, labourers, working class, the low-earners, and indicates more sops after polls.

Income guarantee is a masterstroke as it keeps farmers out of the WTO ambit.

Has it turned the opposition jittery? Is it not the reason for upping their ante? May be. More so as the figures of total subsidies from food, urea, LPG, cotton procurement, North-East industries and Jammu and Kashmir interest subventions are continuously rising from Rs 2,24,428 crore in 2017-18 to Rs 3,34,234 crore in 2018-19.

The allocation for scheduled castes’ welfare has also jumped to Rs 76,800 crore from Rs 49,177 crore in 2017-18 which is a Rs 27,623 hike. This is at a time when the government claims that it has been reducing subsidies.

The railways for long were used for populist purposes. The Modi government has carefully showcased it through the Train 18 – semi superfast.

The budgetary figures indicate that the railways are being given special attention. Its capital outlay has seen whopping rise of Rs 72,407 crore from Rs 152,255crore in 2017-18 to Rs 224,662 crore. The total outlay increases by over Rs 115,810 crore. It means a lot and it touches almost all corners of the country.

The ruling NDA can carefully use it for electoral campaign. The opposition has to work overtime to negate these figures.

A careful rejig of e-tail (electronic retail) rules is to help Indian businesses – a plus during the poll time. The new policy puts a series of curbs on how the world’s giant retailers Amazon India and Flipkart operate  — restricting discounts, now ownership in sellers on the market place platform and disallowing exclusive product launches – forcing them restructure operation to take a hit on sales.

The grand swadeshi move has led to $50 billion market value loss in the global equity market for the US giants – Walmart and Amazon, which owns 77% stake in India’s online retailer Flipkart.

A quiet Indian move that saw the two giants committing less investment in the Indian market as their business saw a slower growth.

The figures are spread to various heads and the ruling combine is likely to make a kill during the campaign. The opposition has reason to feel jittery.

So is not there anything for bashing the NDA? There are many but the recent offers of sops would not make it easy to counter these. Jobs are definitely one. Unemployment in 2017-18 was a 45-year high of 6.1%, says the labour survey of the National Sample Survey Office against 2.2% in 2011-12. It was higher in urban areas at 7.8%. That is the BJP’s major support base. In rural areas it is 5.3%.

A major job crisis is reflected as over 6% more people have been found to be displaced from jobs since 2011-12 and 10% since 2004, the NDA-I.

This shows that proportion of people in the 16-64 age group have less chance of having a job, technically signified as fall in labour force participation. In 2004, labour force was 43%, in 2011 this shrunk to 39.5% and in 2017 to 36.9%.

The Centre for Monitoring the Indian Economy (CMIE) shows job deterioration throughout 2018, when 11 million jobs were lost – 7.4% unemployment till December 2018. The figures suggest that job crisis has persisted during the UPA and despite promises NDA could not check it.

The overall investment rate has also come down. Bank credit growth is slow. The employment is falling. The stark question is how India would be able to maintain 7% growth.

The GST has created a pan-India market. It looks good but it has also hit many small businesses that could survive on tax avoidance.

Demonetisation also caused loss of jobs and slowing down. But the subsequent poll results right from UP in 2017 to MP in 2018 does not show much loss of votes for the BJP. While should not make the BJP complacent, it has also little logic for the opposition to be buoyant unless they play deftly.

What can hit the BJP are some no-traditional aspects that nobody has taken note of. In the rural areas, major criticism of the party is not so much on job losses but imposing of various cess from petrol, tolls on roads, city entries, junking of ten-year-old vehicles as per NGT orders and post-demonetisation “scrutiny” by the income-tax department (I-T).

Despite income guarantee now, farmers are not getting remunerative prices. The LPG price increases has hit the rural hearth. The slowdown of the real estate sector has hit many supportive industries like brick kilns. Even NGO work has been hit by imposition of GST on their donations. These are raising discontent at the minutest levels.

The issues could be cashed by the opponents. The people are wondering why the government did not take note of these issues.

 The I-T can become a major issue as there is six-fold increase in scrutiny – from the 20,088 cases in 2017-18 to 134,574 cases as per finance ministry data. Majority of these are for I-T returns of 2015-16. It has hit many marginal farmers.

Separately, 2,99,937 notices were sent by the department during 2017-18 to those who deposited large sums during demonetisation but did not file income tax returns,

There is a cry that rent-seeking has increased. A progressive society lets the people move freely. But tax shackles are causing harassment. The Modi government has done well in freeing those earning upto Rs 5 lakh from the I-T net.

It needs to consider I-T abolition in its manifesto. It would save the people from tax terror as also increase essential money flow into the economy.

The path to the elections is interesting. It is a major social churning. The emerging Mahagathbandhan and NDA are poised to woo the voters with easing of the economy. Brain wracking for a new economy would continue.

ISI’s vicious propaganda around Kashmir Solidarity Day has no takers anywhere

Pakistan Army’s propaganda against India is a 24×7 feature. It, however, peaks in the month of February with the sham of “Kashmir Solidarity Day” (KSD), an annual ritual since 1990 being observed on February 5 every year. The stated objective of this sham is to support the so-called struggle towards self-determination of the people of Jammu and Kashmir. But, the actual intention is downright propaganda. As the sham of Kashmir Solidarity Day culminates, the separatists are put to task by their masters in Pakistan Army to orchestrate a disgusting exploitation of the deaths of Maqbool Bhat and Afzal Guru by creating a political disruption in Kashmir. The evil actions are supported from across the border with a spike in ceasefire violations and terrorist strikes in the hinterland.

Kashmir Solidarity Day, this year, saw terrorist Hafiz Saeed at his vitriolic best who was openly spouting venom against India at a rally held in Lahore. His disgusting anti-India rhetoric and open incitement to the Kashmiris’ to revolt against their own country was of such a debased degree that India’s Ministry of External Affairs was compelled to send a Note Verbale to the Pakistan High Commission in India registering a “strong protest at the continued use of Pakistan controlled territory by extremist and terrorist elements” to “freely propagate and promote violence and terror against India.” Note Verbale is a diplomatic protest made by one country to another to express annoyance over some issue.

The issue played out in far off London as well, where attempts by Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) to mobilise support to internationally demonise India fell flat. A Pakistan-sponsored event in the House of Commons witnessed strong protests by the London-based Dogra and Kashmiri Pandit communities who were strongly supported by the Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK) diaspora. A delegation of POJK demonstrating against the observance of Kashmir Solidarity Day and Pakistan’s atrocities was told to leave the House of Commons amidst protests in their favour from some Parliamentarians. The Dogra’s and Kashmiri Pandits standing outside were not allowed entry at all and nor was Indian media. Despite all this, the protestors made their presence felt by their unity of purpose. Undoubtedly, the British law makers would have realised the true picture of Human Rights violation by Pakistan in territories of the erstwhile Dogra kingdom of Jammu and Kashmir that are under its occupation.

With the sham exercise of solidarity falling flat, the next prong of the propaganda is already in place. The so-called Joint Resistance Leadership (JRL), a grandiose name coined by the marginalised Hurriyat to keep its relevance alive, issued a protest calendar for February 9 and 11. As usual, a demand has been made for return of their mortal remains accompanied by a march from Lal Chowk to the United Nations (UNMOGIP) office at Sonwar to submit some sort of a memorandum to the United Nations, an exercise whose worthlessness has been established since many decades. Their pathetic efforts will be covered by such segments of the media in Kashmir that is captive to the Pakistani establishment.

That the attempt is half-hearted and simply a method to tick off an activity on the calendar is obvious from the lack of interest of the leadership. Except for giving a call for the protest, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and a large number of separatist leaders have remained silent on the subject. These fans of Afzal Guru, who are now screaming their lungs out, were nowhere to be seen when he needed them the most? Those who are bending backwards to show allegiance to him did not raise a finger in his support while he was alive. They did not deem it necessary to provide Guru with the legal aid that he required while his case was being tried in court.

Maqbool Bhat entered the political arena of Kashmir with an ideology of Jammu and Kashmir existing as an independent state. Being young and impressionable, he came under the devious spell of Pakistan Army and ISI. He and his friends generated anti-India propaganda and committed a number of crimes, including hijacking and murder.

Since Maqbool Bhat spoke more and more about an independent Kashmir, free from both India and Pakistan, he became persona non grata for the Pakistani military establishment. He was forced to flee from Pakistan Occupied Kashmir (POK) back to Jammu and Kashmir where he was arrested for his crimes, tried as per law and sentenced to death.  So the very Pakistan that is now paying handsomely to use his name for propaganda forsook him when he was in need of support.

The people of Kashmir no longer hold the conviction that the separatists are genuine in their regard for Afzal Guru and Maqbool Bhat since they are brought out of the closet with an eerie regularity every year in the month of February and forgotten as soon as the Bandh and the march to the UNMOGIP are over and done with.

The folly of misguided ideologies of both Maqbool Bhat and Afzal Guru is very visible in contemporary Kashmir that is rooting for democracy and freedom as a part of India, the largest democracy of the world. Today, separatist organisations like the Hurriyat are facing a potent threat of being politically marginalised and are invoking the names of Bhat and Guru only to save themselves. They have made no attempt to ameliorate the emotional suffering of the families of the two for whom they profess undying respect and loyalty.

It is time to neutralise those who are making millions by politically exploiting the deaths of Maqbool Bhat and Afzal Guru. It is time to derail their evil agenda of using misinformation as a tool to soil the minds of the younger generation and drive them towards a self-destructive path as is being attempted by observance of Kashmir Solidarity Day.  It is equally important for the people of Kashmir to ensure that their young boys do not become prey to Pakistan’s vicious propaganda.

Badrinath to reopen on May 10

After the winter break, the sacred portals of Badrinath will be thrown open to public in the wee hours on May 10. The gates of the Himalayan shrine will be reopened at 4:15 am on May 10. The auspicious hour for reopening the gates of the famous temple were announced on the occasion of Basant Panchmi Sunday at the residence of erstwhile Tehri royals in Narendra Nagar.

Located at a height of 10,279 ft above the sea level in Chamoli district, Badrinath temple which is dedicated to lord Vishnu is closed annually during winter when the area is snowbound.

28th Grammy for 85-year-old Quincy Jones

Legendary record producer Quincy Jones on Monday created history as he took home yet another Grammy with his documentary “Quincy” winning for best music film on the 2019 Grammy awards. He was last awarded in 2001 for best spoken word album, ‘Q – The Autobiography Of Quincy Jones’.

This is his 28th Grammy, making him the living artiste with the most trophies in Grammy history. 85-year-old Jones has won Grammys in more than 10 categories over his nearly seven decade long career but his win for “Quincy” is his first in the best music film category. “Quincy” released on Netflix in September, focusing on Jones’ extraordinary life and achievements in both the music and film industries.

PM Modi to launch a slew of projects in Haryana ahead of General Elections 2019

0

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is slated to launch a slew of projects at Kurukshetra, Haryana in an effort to woo the voters ahead of General Elections later this year.

On February 12, Modi will launch the Swachh Shakti-2019 programme, dedicated to women. About 7,500 women representatives from across the country and 15,000 women Panch and Sarpanch from across Haryana are participating in this programme.

Swachh Shakti-2017 programme was first launched from Gujarat, later on the Swachh Shakti-2018 from Lucknow in Uttar Pradesh was announced and now the third Swachh Shakti-2019 programme will be inaugurated from Kurukshetra in Haryana.

Under Swachh Shakti the central government and state government have, so far, released Rs. 122.69 crore and Rs. 169.75 crores, respectively to urban local bodies. In order to promote cleanliness in the state, the state government has implemented Swachhta Shehri Puraskaar Yojana, under which the best ward in municipal corporation areas would be awarded cash prize of Rs 2 lakh for its sanitation efforts, best ward in municipal committees with cash prize of Rs 1 lakh and best ward in municipalities with cash prize of Rs 50,000.

During his visit PM Modi will also lay the foundation stone of National Institute of Ayurveda at Shri Mata Mansa Devi Complex Panchkula. The estimated cost of this project is Rs 270.50 crore. This Institute will be a national level Institute for Ayurveda treatment, education and research with a 250 bed hospital. Spread across 19.87 acre the Institute will cater to over 500 medical students every year offering undergraduate, postgraduate and PHD degrees.

PM Narendra Modi will also inaugurate National Cancer Institute (NCI) at Badhsa, Jhajjar, from Kurukshetra through video conferencing during this visit.

The policies of paradox

0

What makes students dull and uncompetitive? Why is the Skill India mission an absolute failure for the urban educated youths? And why is the youth drifting away from active governance?

What does an enlightened mind of a graduate student contemplate? It focuses on understanding and decoding life’s most unconventional questions. No, it’s not what you’re thinking –nothing even roughly close to life on Mars, or time-travelling. It tends to justify questions like that of- What is a full-time work experience? Does it include valued internships? Or Research Projects that one invest himself in, besides academics? What is the necessity and valuation of a fulfilled biannual “internship break” or a Research Project submission mandated by premier Indian Institutes? Does it actually have some real tangible benefits and utility after graduation?

Recently, a report by Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) was discussed and cited in the last Lok Sabha session. It states that, “an estimated 10 million jobs were lost in both rural and urban India last year”. The reasons for which are the usual –  growing population, shortage of well-trained formal skilled workforce among others. However, what is interesting is the fact that the Central Government’s highlight and solution on the issue of unemployment has been the Skill India Mission (2015). The programme was launched on a “Mission Mode” to enhance prospects of the educated workforce which had little or no job skills, making them largely unemployable. However, the objective of the Mission itself is unconvincing and unsatisfying. It is astounding that the government did not consider analyzing the problem thoroughly. Instead, it called for a “Mission Mode” campaign spending close to 17,000 crore last year (Budget) when it could just solve the skill set enhancement problem for free, coupled by sheer willpower to resolve. 

How? The universities across India mandate “Internship breaks”, Research Projects and Field-trainings. The idea behind these kinds of work experiences and trainings is to enhance skills of students and ensure their practical transition into the profession. The students are at liberty to make decisions and grow in their choice of skill-enhancement. The universities encourage research projects and field trainings under a professor, or at a firm or a company or with a centre. If the greatest hiccup was lack of skill sets, why did the government not encourage institutionalizing the internship/ training culture? It instead opted for an alternative route that failed in its core objective — to provide skill sets to ensure jobs for the educated class. Neither did it create jobs nor did it boost the skills of the graduated students.

Why would a student toil interning, acquiring experiences and skills for all his college years; undertaking projects and working on fields instead of ‘Netflix and Chilling’ if at the end there is  nothing substantial in terms of the outcome. If and if at all the government is genuinely keen on enhancing skill sets and creating jobs for students, it must work on institutionalization of graduate-level trainings and opening up contract vacancies to candidates who are competent through their skill enhancement trainings at graduate-level. They must act on considering college-level experience for contractual jobs. What makes our Government insensitive and inconsiderate towards the hard work and enthusiasm of the young, capable and competent? The policies of paradox!

NGMA denies Amol Palekar’s allegations

The National Gallery of Modern Art (NGMA) has denied Amol Palekar’s allegation that the advisory panel of the gallery’s Mumbai and Bengaluru centres have been scrapped, as a controversy erupted over the veteran actor’s speech at a Mumbai event being repeatedly interrupted by some NGMA members.

A video available on social media showed Palekar criticising the Ministry of Culture for reportedly scrapping the advisory committees at the gallery’s Mumbai and Bengaluru centres. Palekar was repeatedly interrupted during his speech by some NGMA members.

The veteran actor-director on Sunday said he was only trying to seek reasons behind the cancellation of retrospectives of two senior artists.

However later, NGMA’s Director General Adwaita Gadanayak said, “Regarding recent reports in media pertaining to NGMA Mumbai, it is clarified as under – The Advisory Committees of NGMA Mumbai, Bangaluru and Delhi have not been dissolved. Their terms have ended recently and they are in the process of being reconstituted.”

“The recommendations of previous advisory committee will be honoured and exhibitions of artists will happen as proposed. The new advisory committee will take a decision relating to future exhibitions,” he said.

FGM: The Patriarchal Cut

Female genital mutilation is a procedure in which female genitals are cut, injured or changed in some way. The practice is often done with inadequate equipment, in inappropriate places, by people with no medical qualifications because it is an illegal practice. FGM has no evidence of providing health benefits; contrary to this it is extremely dangerous, is life-threatening and impacts on young girls carries through their entire life. There is not one religion that explicitly encourages the celebrated cut, yet it is a cross-faith practice. Culturally there are approximately thirty countries in the entire world that practice female genital mutilation routinely and yet their immediate neighbours do not. So why is this life-threatening practice still prevalent and continues to be perpetuated? The answer is: Patriarchy.

The World Health Organisation has distinguished four major types of female genital mutilation: Type 1: Clitoridectomy, this is the partial or total removal of the clitoris (a small, sensitive and erectile part of the female genitals), and in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the hold of skin surrounding the clitoris). Type 2: Excision, this is the partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora (the inner folds of the vulva), with or without excision of the labia majora (the outer folds of skin of the vulva). Type 3: Infibulation, this is the narrowing of the vaginal opening through creation of a covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and re-positioning the labia minora, or labia majora, sometimes through stitching, with or without removal of the clitoris (clitoridectomy). Type 4: This includes all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non- medical purposes, e.g. pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterizing and genital area.

There are more than 200 million girls and women in the world that are victims of female genital mutilation and another 15 million girls are at risk of experiencing it by 2020 in high prevalence countries. It is practiced in Africa, the Middle East and Asia and among several immigrant communities in Europe, North America and Australia. It is mostly carried out on young girls sometime between infancy and age 15, safely before puberty. A ceremony is organised in private amongst women. The little girl is held down amid singing and shouting, to celebrate the transition from “girlhood” to “womanhood”. The girl need to stay with her legs tied together for several weeks, urination and (later) menstruation are challenging because of the pencil-pint opening left by the operation. The immediate complications can include severe pain, haemorrhage, sepsis, urine retention. The long-term consequences can include: cysts, infertility, an increased risk of childbirth complications, new-born deaths, and painful sexual intercourse.

The procedures are normally carried out by older female tribal leaders and midwives, they see it as their role to protect their children from all harm and ultimately responsible for their wellbeing. They view the circumcision as a path to be accepted in the society and an integral element of a women’s rite of passage from childhood to adulthood, which prepares them for their adult responsibilities as women. In this view, the social harm of not cutting outweighs any physical, psychological, or legal risk.

The Women’s Body and Patriarchy.

The underlying factor of female genital mutilation is not religion, rather an act of a dominant patriarchal culture, to control women’s bodies and sexuality. The practise is deeply rooted in a strong cultural and social framework. It is endorsed by the elders in the community and supported by parents with what is believed to be the best interest of their daughters.

Female genital mutilation can only be understood within its cultural context, a manifestation of unequal relations between women and men with roots in extremely entrenched social, economic and political conventions.  A practice born from patriarchal culture about curtailing a women’s sexual desire – to prevent her from being “oversexed”. Female genital mutilation is practiced in societies where virginity is an absolute pre-requisite for marriage, it enhances a woman’s chastity, honour and the necessary sexual sensitivity and thus a “virgin’s” parents collect more dowry. In the community it is believed that a girl should remain shy and virtuous: Uncircumcised are unclean and should be avoided and those who are not mutilated are un-marriageable and sexually loose. Female genital mutilation is also closely associated with family honour, which is of vital importance. If a woman loses her honour, the entire family is dishonoured. The most dishonourable experience for a man in these communities is the sexual impropriety of a female member of the family, to lose her virginity before marriage would disgrace the male family members. A disgrace that cannot be restored.

Societies that are considered more inclined toward patriarchy are usually lacking in substantial women’s rights. Africa and Asian countries and parts of the Middle East have higher instances of female genital mutilation. In many of these societies, men dictate what is considered the virtuous and acceptable female image, the control is accepted because women are solely dependent on men: their fathers and husbands, for safety and economic support. A woman’s virginity symbolises a high price for her dowry that means social and economic security for the woman.

There are no cultural attempts to mark the male body as virginal or not, this has no importance. It is as though there is no need for restrictions of the male sexuality. Men obtain their status by controlling women, in a society depriving them of their self-confidence, because the whole patriarchal system is based on controlling the women’s freedom.

It is also believed that female genital mutilation promotes fertility and a narrowed vaginal opening is believed to enhance a man’s sexual desire and the challenge of penetrating a tight opening is considered to be linked to a man’s virility.  A man will commonly refuse to marry an uncircumcised woman, and in some cultures, women may request to be re-infibulated after childbirth for fear that they will not sexually satisfy their husband, or that he may take another younger “tighter” wife.

Female genital mutilation is practiced to satisfy the desire of a patriarchal family structure, but in reality, the men distance themselves from the procedure of practice, maintaining a domination presence in the “background” and are not concerned enough with the consequences to stop inflicting this depravity onto their daughters. It allows women across the world to torture other women to accommodate and appease an ideology of distorted history of male supremacy.