Home Blog Page 305

Balochistan: 480 went missing, 177 killed in 2020

The Human Rights Council of Balochistan revealed the details of “enforced disappearances” and “extrajudicial killings” that were carried out in Balochistan in 2020. The numbers are shocking – 480 individuals were “forcibly disappeared” and 177 were killed and their dead bodies were thrown in the wilderness. The rights group added that these “conservative” numbers were derived from the information accessible to them from various areas of Balochistan. The actual toll might be higher.

The rights group said that 2020 was no different than any other year in Balochistan – human rights violations were carried out as usual. As the pandemic raged on, academic institutions throughout Pakistan were shut off and the Baloch students studying in these institutions had to travel back home. Many of these students were either “forcibly disappeared” or shot dead in broad daylight.

The speakers then detailed the story of several individuals who were subjected to the “cruelty” of the Pakistani forces. Hayat Baloch, a young student at the University of Karachi, was shot dead in front of his parents in broad daylight in Turbat by the Frontier Corps (FC) soldiers. Murad Jan, a resident of Mashkay, was beaten to death by the security forces for his inability to communicate in Urdu. Javed Gohram, a native of Mand, was detained by the Pakistani forces and subsequently beaten to death.

The speakers said that 2020 was also not a particularly good year for women. In May of that year, a gang of bandits breached into a house for the purposes of a robbery. The materfamilias of the house – Malik Naz – was shot dead when she resisted the burglars. Her four-year-old daughter Bramsh was wounded in the attack. One of the burglars was cornered by the neighbours who then found a military card in his pocket. He confessed that his gang abducts and kills political activists on the behest of the Frontier Corps. In return, the FC has given them a free hand in the area.

Another woman named Kulsoom Baloch was killed by two burglars in front of her children. The culprits were later identified but never apprehended. In October of 2020, a woman named Asiya Bibi was shot dead by police personnel – the culprit is yet to be prosecuted.

Shaheena Baloch, a journalist, artist and women’s rights activist, was killed by her husband Mehrab Gichki in Turbat in the name of honour. Despite the heavy presence of the Pakistani security forces in almost every city of Balochistan, Mehrab somehow managed to escape and has not been arrested since. The forces have not even tried to trace him down and apprehend him.

The rights group also mentioned several incidents where minors were killed by the security forces. 14-year-old Hamza was among the seven people who lost their lives to a devastating air operation in Panjgoor. In Turbat, the forces fired several shots on a vehicle, and a 17-year-old boy named Imam Sher was shot twice. He was dragged to a nearby check post and left on the road to bleed to death. Haneef Mehran and Ameer Baksh – 7 and 16 years old respectively – were abducted when they were on their way to Turbat. Their mutilated dead bodies were found a day later.

The speakers said that Baloch dissidents and activists, who had fled Balochistan after threats on their lives, were hunted down and killed in foreign countries. Sajid Hussain, a Baloch journalist and writer, went missing in Sweden in March of 2020. A month later, his dead body was hauled out of a river. A similar fate befell Karima Baloch, a human rights activist and the former chairperson of the BSO-Azad, who went missing in Toronto and her dead body was found in a river a day later.

The rights group said that per the information accessible to them, 480 individuals went missing and 177 were killed in Balochistan in 2020 alone. 17 of the missing 480 were women who were later released and a considerable number of them are students.

The speakers said that some missing persons were also released during that period, but the rate of disappearance vastly outstripped the rate of recoveries. The security forces conducted numerous large-scale operations during the year throughout Balochistan. As a result of these operations, hundreds of individuals have whisked away, houses were set ablaze and possessions were looted. Countless Baloch families had to relocate as a result of these atrocities.

The rights group said that human rights violations have not ceased in 2021. Only a few days ago the Counter-Terrorism Department of Pakistan executed five Baloch missing persons in a fake encounter, labelling them as “terrorists.” The CTD also tried to coerce the elderly mother of the missing Rashid Hussain to sign a false and misleading statement, and when she refused to comply, the forces locked her up in a room.

The speakers concluded by saying that for the past several years, Balochistan has become a hotbed of the grave human rights violations of the Pakistani state. They said that if these “oppressive” policies are not repealed or replaced, the violence and conflict will only increase in Balochistan.

27 March, 1948: Black Day when Pakistan forcibly occupied Balochistan

When the Baloch nation gained its independence from British colonial rule and was keenly maintaining the independence of their nation state at all costs, Jinnah turned towards Balochistan for the fulfilment of his evil intentions.

On February 5, 1948, Jinnah met Khan of Kalat in Dhadar and tried to persuade him to merge Balochistan into the unnatural and corrupt Pakistani federation. Meanwhile, Mir Ahmadiyar Khan informed Jinnah of the opinion of the Parliament as both the Houses of Parliament of Kalat (Balochistan) had rejected the proposal of the annexation of Balochistan with Pakistan by an overwhelming majority.

On February 21, 1948, the Parliament of Balochistan held another session to discuss the issue of annexation with Pakistan, but the proposal of the annexation was once again rejected unanimously. Disappointed, Jinnah handed over the affairs of Kalat State to the Foreign Office and informed Khan Kalat about this in a letter dated March 9, 1948.

However, Jinnah succeeded in deceiving Jam Ghulam Qadir (Jam of Lasbela), Nawab Ghulam Khan Gichki (a member of the upper house) and Nawab of Kharan, Mir Habibullah Noshirwani (a member of the upper house) on 17th March 1948, after which they announced accession to Pakistan by neglecting the will of the majority.

No law in the world endorses the fact that a country can forcibly occupy another nation by violating their laws, constitution and bypassing their democratic institutions. But Pakistan committed this illegal and offensive act with the collaboration of British generals and Jinnah.

The Baloch state opposed this illegal move and wrote remonstrance letters to the Pakistani state, but the Islamabad’s government run by Punjabi elite overwhelmed with power was not willing to listen to any complains what so ever.

The world kept silence on this illegal act of Pakistan, and on March 26, 1948 the Pakistan Army marched on district Kech and Panjgur. On the other side, the Pakistani navy took control of the coastal areas. And Pakistan finally completed its occupation of Balochistan through various tricks, excuses, greed and coercion.

Meantime, Khan Ahmadiyar Khan was in Karachi to raise his voice against this illegal move, where he was forced to sign the Kalat State accession with Pakistan. Despite this the Pakistan Army invaded and seized control of Kalat city, the capital of Kalat state on March 27, 1948 by use of brutal force. And since March 27, 1948 Balochistan continues to be under illegal occupation of Pakistan.

The month of March is significant in Baloch history, on March 27, 1948 the Pakistani state occupied the Baloch land and subjugated the Baloch nation. The 73 years of slavery has seen the blood of thousands of Baloch people, thousands of Baloch innocent civilians have been disappeared at the hands of Pakistani security forces. These disappeared Baloch people have remained missing for decades, and millions of Baloch became IDPs (internally displaced persons). But 73 years of slavery could not subdue the Baloch nation and couldn’t obstruct it from the dream of obtaining an independent Balochistan.

As the political and armed struggle against occupier Pakistani forces have intensified, thousands of Baloch have been targeted and killed in custody. There were thousands of enforced disappearances and more than 200,000 people have been forced to flee from their homeland and become IDPs (internally displaced persons).

During this 73 years struggle against subjugation, the Baloch nation has faced many up and downs. After 2002, for the first time, the struggle for independence of Balochistan began to take shape on a permanent and organizational basis.

The Baloch nation has long fought and struggled against slavery, sacrificed its generations and continues to do so to gain its national identity. This is why the Baloch nation is known today as a living nation.

Martyred Ghulam Muhammad Baloch, the chairman of the Baloch National Movement (BNM), for the first time, conveyed the historical significance of 27th March to the people in every city, town and village of Balochistan through a brochure of BNM in 2005.

Earlier, full details of Pakistan’s occupation of Balochistan had not reached the general public, though the educated and political activists were aware of the importance of this day.

Today, 73 years of long slavery has consolidated the Baloch struggle on an ideological and political basis, a sign of the survival of any nation. This day is considered every year all over Balochistan as a Black Day. This 27th day of March reminds the young generation about how Pakistan forcibly occupied Balochistan at the behest of the British government.

Ceasefire in Kashmir: Mediation or Dictation?

A major apprehension of our military brass as well as sections of the civil society is that the ceasefire agreement between two militaries that arrived on 25 February 2021 may meet with a fate not different from that of the 2003 truce agreement. The Pakistani forces had violated ceasefire 5,100 times in 2020 with an average of 14 cases a day. These had resulted in the loss of 36 lives including 24 security personnel; 130 were injured. Fifteen soldiers died along the LoC in the Jammu region.

Clashes, firing, shelling or clandestine tunnelling across the LoC or International Border by Pakistan matches her declared state policy of “inflicting a thousand cuts on India’s body”, or the “unfinished task of partition” or “the jugular vein of Pakistan” or “the extension of the Great Asian Game of the heyday of the British colonial power”. The non-state actors in Pakistan have been fed with an inexhaustible fund of anti-India propaganda. Is Pakistan able to de-activate scores of her armed non-state actors and outfits?  

In Pakistan no regime can survive if it deviates from it’s cast-iron anti-India policy. When Rajiv Gandhi-Benazir Bhutto bilateral talks made some progress, ISI clipped Madam Bhutto’s wing. When Vajpayee and Nawaz Sharif began soft-paddling on Kashmir, the Pak Army chief ostracized his prime minister. In these conditions, a sudden breakdown of the current truce cannot be ruled out. Foreign office spokesman was right in saying that the truce does not mean lowering the vigil on the LoC against infiltration.

Many reasons, mostly hypothetical, are given for Pakistan agreeing to a ceasefire. We cannot buy sensational stories of some irresponsible sections of the press. Neither the Pak defence establishment has gone weak on Kashmir nor are the non-state outfits in that country faced with a shortage of manpower. Commentators knowledgeable about the deep state know that charitable words like “Pakistan and India must resolve the long-standing issue of Jammu and Kashmir in a dignified and peaceful manner as per the aspirations of the people of Jammu and Kashmir”, uttered by General Bajwa while addressing the Pakistan Air Force Asghar Khan Academy in Risalpur of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa on 3 February, are the reflection of a borrowed statement and not an expression of conviction. 

Pakistan interprets the word ‘peace’ quite differently. She wants peace along the border so that her numerous jihadi outfits and the volunteers of other jihadi groups prepare for making the geography of the grand Islamic Caliphate from the Dardanelles to the Straits of Malacca in which Kashmir occupies the central place. Pakistan wants peace along her western border so that she can dig tunnels, raise bunkers, reinforce manpower, mobilise war machine all along the LoC and continue the surveillance of villages and habitats close to the border on the Indian side to be targeted for shelling and firing.

How then did the ‘miracle’ of ceasefire happen? Responding to the question of a reporter Moeed Yusuf, Pakistan’s Special Assistant for National Security Affairs to the PM broke the diplomatic protocol by counter-questioning him, “Do you think this could happen without efforts or pressure, something which India has not agreed to all these months and years?” Yusuf went on to say, “So, this is our success, the success of diplomacy and god willing more roads will open in the future, so that the resolution of Kashmir that we want, the way we want will happen”.

Now, firstly, the crux of Yusuf’s narrative is (a) sustained efforts, and (b) pressure (on India). Those who made sustained efforts were Pakistan and her lobbyists; and those who brought pressure on India could be none other than the Americans and their lobbyists. Secondly, in the words of Yusuf, Pakistan considers the ceasefire as its success because India was neither prepared to talk nor agreed to mediation before the infiltration by the jihadists and fighting in Kashmir stopped.  She agreed to talk only after Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire. She agreed to a third-party role only after the US condemned and rejected cross-border infiltration. In international relations, things do not happen in a vacuum. Resolution of chronic logjams are done partly by mediation and partly by dictation. General Bajwa was re-telling only the dictation part of the narrative.

About the question of mediation, the Biden administration has chalked a different road map. It bluntly told Crown Prince Salman that the US will no more support the war in Yemen as it causes senseless bloodshed. Further, the US has banned sale of arms to the Saudis. Washington suspects that these arms ultimately find their lodgement in the armories of the Afghani/Pakistani Taliban which leads to the acceleration of Taliban attacks on Afghan government forces and thus increases their potential for derailing the elected government in Kabul. The Biden administration has reversed Trump’s decision of withdrawing American troops from Afghanistan. It will not allow the democratic process in Afghanistan to be undermined. It is a forceful warning to Pakistan also that the US will not tolerate clandestine cross-border infiltration.

Kashmir is closely linked to the strategic scenario unfolding in the Pak-Afghan region with ramifications reaching as far as Riyadh, where an influential Kashmiri Sunni Muslim lobby is adroitly positioned. Knowledgeable sources have revealed that in the recent conference of Afghan Taliban and Pakistani leaders in Islamabad, the setting up of a Kashmir-centric Afghan Taliban base force was also discussed on the sidelines. Biden administration has raised an eyebrow at the so-called peace agreement signed in Doha. Biden has criticised it.

Most notable is the reaction of the State Department on ceasefire along the LoC in Kashmir. Talking to reporters, its spokesman Ned Price said, “Obviously, Pakistan has an important role to play when it comes to Afghanistan and what takes place across its other border. So clearly we will be paying close attention, and we urge the Pakistanis to play a constructive role in all of these areas of mutual interest, including in Afghanistan, including with Kashmir, including with our other shared interests”, Without specifying any action the US intends to take, Mr Price succinctly articulated that “the general U.S. position is a reduction in tensions and a condemnation of cross-border terror as well as a dialogue on Kashmir and other issues”.

Without over-emphasising the preliminaries of the ceasefire process we think the mediators and negotiators have been seriously engaged in discussing and analysing the possibility and range of resolving the festering sore of Kashmir. The fundamental inferences one can deduce from these discussions appear to be (a) To ensure peace in the region, Pakistan must completely reverse its ideology of raising and exporting religion-based extremism or extremist elements and tools across its borders east and west (b) Pakistan’s dubious role in Afghanistan is hindrance to regional peace. (c) India and Pakistan both must take the people of their respective parts of J&K on board.

Grant of a larger measure of autonomy for a specific number of years to each part of the State might have been in the mind of interlocutors. However, it is somewhat difficult to articulate precisely on that aspect of the parleys. But India certainly holds the trump card. The question is will she use it and how best. That trump card is the five lakh internally displaced people from Kashmir Valley where ethnic cleansing and genocide have taken place in 1990.

Why Javed Iqbal must be removed from Pak’s Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances?

Family members of Missing Persons demand that Justice (retd.) Javed Iqbal must be removed as the head of Pakistan’s Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances. The relatives of Missing Persons appear in front of this commission and present formal evidence of the Enforced Disappearance of their loved ones. Despite the evidence about how security agencies forcibly disappear innocent people from their homes or public places the Commission shows no interest in recovering them. However, the Commission of Inquiry on Enforced Disappearances tries to deceive the world by propagating that the families of Missing Persons do not appear before the Commission and that they have resolved most of the cases. Watch our short video report to understand this issue.

Click on the YouTube link to watch our news report

Pakistani regime continues to fool families of Baloch Missing Persons

Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan continues with the policy of earlier Pak regimes to fool the family members of Baloch Missing Persons.
Watch this video report to understand the whole issue.

Click on the YouTube link to watch this news report.

Truth behind BLA attack on Pak Army’s Kotri Post in Balochistan

A recently published article [‘Inter Services Public Relations’ Not So Subtle Art Of Story Telling’, News Intervention, 17 March 12, 2021, convincingly exposed Pakistan Army’s media wing Inter Services Public Relations [ISPR] proclivity for peddling lies. The incident in question relates to a press release of 27 December, which mentions that the Frontier Corps [FC] post in Sharig, Harnai, Balochistan had been subjected to a “fire raid” the previous night in which seven Frontier Corps soldiers were killed while “repulsing raiding terrorists”. However, a video of this incident subsequently released by Baloch Liberation Army [BLA] reveals that this post was physically overrun by Baloch freedom fighters and many Pakistani soldiers could be seen abandoning the post after it came under attack.

In the last week of February, a few news portals published the news of Pakistan Army’s Kotri post in Kahan area of Balochistan being attacked by BLA freedom fighters. This news item was based on statement issued by BLA, [which took responsibility for this attack and shared information of the same], and ISPR’s inexplicable failure to reject this claim obviously raised suspicions. As there is no mention of this incident in ISPR’s official ‘Army Press Release Archive ascertaining veracity of this news became difficult because while on the one hand the BLA was making very specific claims, on the other hand, ISPR was maintaining a stoic silence.

However, since armies are considered to be the epitome of credibility, so it could be natural for many to assume that BLA spokesperson Jeeyand Baloch is making fantastic claims about their fighters “capturing the Kotri post entirely”, and thatseven Pakistani soldiers were killed and five wounded in the attack, while several personnel of the cowardly army dropped their weapons and fled”, as some kind of fabrication. Similarly, the Pakistan Army would like the world to believe that BLA spokesperson’s revelation that “seven Pakistani soldiers were killed and five wounded in the attack, while several personnel of the cowardly army dropped their weapons and fled,” is too farfetched.

So let’s first give the benefit of doubt to Pakistanis. Firstly, the Pakistanis would say that the very mention of a security force post being overrun by BLA sounds downrightly absurd. Secondly, they would claim that well-armed and trained soldiers protected by formidable field fortifications fleeing the scene on being attacked by a ragtag force of irregulars, seems ridiculous. Thirdly, they would point out that seven soldiers being killed in a single action during peacetime is no mundane occurrence. Hence, it’s inconceivable that Pakistan Army would be so inconsiderate to brush this humungous human tragedy under the carpet and thereby deprive fallen soldiers the honour and respect they rightly deserve. However, there’s also a flip side to this line of thought.

For a minute one may be tempted to think that BLA is guilty of exaggerating the number of casualties inflicted on Pakistani security forces, but it’s certainly not known for making out rightly fallacious claims. However, the same can’t be said about Pakistan Army because it has a proven history of delving in untruth ever since its very inception. After all, didn’t it try to pass-off army personnel as “tribals” during the 1947 invasion of Kashmir [Operation Gulmarg], as “razakars” (civil volunteers) during the 1965 war in Kashmir [Operation Gibraltar] and “mujahideen” during Kargil intrusions in 1999 [Operation Badr]? Is it not a fact that just in order to prevent loss of face, Rawalpindi went as far as disowning dead bodies of its soldiers killed during the 1999 Kargil war? So, to take the ISPR’s words [or even silence] on its face value, just because it is part and parcel of the army, would be a grave misnomer.

But even before the ink on the Sharig, Harnai post attack exposé could dry, BLA uploaded another video on social media on 13 March 2021, containing graphic details of a daring daylight attack on the Kotri post. Titled Baloch Attack on Pakistan Army post, 7 Pakistan army casualty, Balochistan (BLA),”, it mentions the date of attack as 17 February 2021 and time, “about 5.15 PM.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W2vtZKzyV5g
BLA freedom fighters capture Pakistani Army post at Harnai on February 17, 2021

The Kotri post attack video, not only exposes ISPR’s obsession with falsehood but also reveals some very disturbing facets:

  • 4.51 minutes into the video, a BLA fighter can be seen confidently walking right upto the protective stone wall of the post and after placing his rifle on the ground, taking out a grenade and pulling its pin. That this fighter [who being in the open is fully exposed] is in a perilously situation becomes evident at 5.01 minutes when a Pakistani soldier appears from behind the wall, just above the place where the BLA fighter is standing and starts firing. However, rather than running  for safety, the BLA fighter maintains his composure and lobs the grenade at the soldier firing at the attackers.
  • From 5.41 minutes onwards, BLA fighters can be seen swarming the post and at 5.49 minutes, a BLA fighter can be seen approaching a heavy machine gun, which despite being an extremely potent weapon to neutralise attackers, is surprisingly unmanned.
  • Though BLA fighters can been seen firing and lobbing grenades, but from their confident body language and the calm demeanour, it appears that resistance offered by the soldiers in the post isn’t very effective, which is by any account, baffling. 

Based on the vast extent and defensive layout of Kotri post as seen in the video, as well as the huge cache of weapons seized by BLA [nine Heckler & Koch G3 rifles, one Dragunov sniper rifle, one Rheinmetall MG 3 machine gun, one 81 mm mortar and one 12.7 mm heavy machine gun and even a type 63 rocket launcher whose 107 mm rocket has devasting effects], a conservative assessment is that this post was manned by atleast 20 soldiers.

So, with BLA claiming that seven soldiers were killed and five injured in the attack, eight soldiers [out of the 20 soldiers present in the post] remain unaccounted for, and this lends credence to BLA’s claim that “several personnel of the cowardly army dropped their weapons and fled”. In fact, overall lack of aggressiveness displayed by those present at the post [as evident from the video] could well be the result of the determined lot expectedly being demoralised after seeing their comrades abandon their battle stations and flee!

Videos of both the Harnai and Kotri post attacks [on December 26 and February 17 respectively] clearly establishes the fact that contrary to ISPR’s portrayal of them as cowards, Baloch fighters appear to be highly motivated and extremely courageous. On the other hand, a perceptible lack of aggressiveness on the part of Pakistani soldiers is evident from their reactions when attacked by Baloch fighters– a view that Rawalpindi may publicly reject but cannot afford to overlook.

ISPR may keep trying to obfuscate reality by claiming that Baloch fighters are working at the behest of India for pecuniary benefits. However, it can’t conceal the fact that it’s the Pakistan Army’s excesses in Balochistan that has motivated its people to retaliate in an attempt at self-preservation, even at grave risk to their lives and limbs. This is exactly what BLA has once again reiterated by saying, Today, the way the occupying enemy [Pakistan Army] is burning houses and shelters of innocent Baloch citizens, making our mothers and sisters weep in the streets, is further increasing hatred against the enemy among our youths”!

Pak gambit to maintain disquiet across Indian subcontinent

Three countries of the Indian sub-continent — India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan —- are bogged with grim disquiet whose roots lie in the exclusivist beliefs of the Islamic State of Pakistan. After actively stoking the embers of theo-fascism for more than three decades, the Pakistani deep state finds that at the end of the day the flames are engulfing it.

Kashmir, the proverbial jugular vein of Pakistani rhetoric has now turned into her Achilles heel. But that is of her choosing and no external manipulation. For quite some time Pakistani Prime Minister has been talking of third party mediation, a tantrum of peace in the region and of bilateral talks with India.

Suddenly, Islamabad agreed to a ceasefire along the LoC in Jammu and Kashmir and the two DGMOs talked to each other on the hotline and agreed to restore the 2003 peace agreement from 25 February 2021 after the lapse of eighteen years. Losses in terms of human resource on both sides are extremely painful. Lt Governor Manoj Sinha has met with the Defence Minister in New Delhi on March 10 and told him that there was no violation of the ceasefire agreement ever since agreed upon on 25 February. The border people all along the ceasefire line have heaved a sigh of relief that they can return to their homes and attend to crop cultivation in their fields without the fear of being shelled and fired at. Hopefully, the same will be true of the people on the other side.

The question very frequently asked in political and academic circles is what can be the compulsions for Pakistan to have agreed to a ceasefire so abruptly? Given the objectives and the strategy of the GHQ and its agencies, the development is somewhat bizarre and unexpected. It, therefore, merits a dispassionate analysis.

Currently, Pakistan is obliged to fight on numerous fronts, financial being the crucial one. Distressed by escalating financial stringency and the burgeoning interest in loans borrowed from different sources, GHQ is eager to buy time to minimize the pressure. FATF will not let her off the hook and the Covid-19 is mercilessly devouring Pakistan’s limited resources.

Contrary to Pak’s expectations, President Biden hasn’t given any indication of disturbing the multi-faceted Indo-US cooperation process in which Indo-Pacific security arrangement remains a priority. Biden called the first summit of the Quad on 12 March and has spoken of “the importance that we (the US) place on close cooperation with our allies and partners in Indo-Pacific” wrote the Dawn of 12 March.

A few Democrat Congressmen whom Islamabad had cultivated to counterbalance pro-India lobbies have not proved effective in taking Pak out of the fire. Pakistan had some expectations that Washington would compliment her on what she considers her positive role in Afghanistan taking into view how Islamabad had successfully managed to bring the Afghan Taliban to the negotiating table in Doha. Islamabad’s disappointment is not only that the Biden administration has given cursory recognition to her self-styled “positive” role in Afghanistan but also it has dampened her resolve of fighting for the Kashmir cause indefinitely.

The cast-iron determination and stellar resolution with which India stood with an eyeball to eyeball stance against Chinese expansionist designs in Eastern Ladakh, and finally a negotiated resolution of the issue that made the Chinese forces dismantle their illegally raised camps and return to pre-conflict positions, has come as a big blow to Islamabad’s Kashmir utopia. It has opened their eyes to the military might of India. GHQ somehow began to believe in its lie that India was going to launch a blitzkrieg on PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan to redeem the pledge of India. That is why Pakistan had deployed missiles across its border with India.

Pakistan had raised the Kashmir mediation tantrum during the Trump administration. India had rejected it outright. Pakistan’s hope that Biden might reopen the subject and bring pressure on India has proved a damp squib. Rather the entire Kashmir narrative has taken a different direction. Moeed Yusuf, Imran Khan’s Security Advisor has been pressing into service his Washington clout for the resolution of the Kashmir tangle. He had visited India in 2015 and was reported to be silently carrying forward the Track II diplomacy.

Knowledgeable circles believe that Moeed Yusuf expects Pakistani leadership and the deep state both to be realistic and forget the utopia that it has built around Kashmir. Breaking the protocol of international diplomacy, Yusuf asked the media person whether a ceasefire along the LoC could come from a vacuum. Precisely such big decisions do not fall from the sky, he had added. It has now trickled down the columns of print media that Moeed Yusuf and his Indian counterpart Ajit Doval had met in a third country and talked at length on Kashmir and Indo-Pak relations. They would not do so without remote consultations and guidance from home governments.

The cryptic remarks by Ned Price, the spokesman of the State Department, and also what Yusuf told a press reporter, sum up how the Biden administration aims at a comprehensive outreach to the Kashmir issue. To the US think tanks, Kashmir terrorism and Afghan Taliban combat, both have roots in Pakistan’s jihadist ideology. The jihadist superstructure raised by Pakistan has become the main source of disruption of peace and normal life in the entire Indian sub-continent. That is the reason why both Price, US State Department spokesman and Moeed Yusuf, Security Advisor to the Pak Prime Minister stated in no ambiguous words that Pakistan has to put an end to cross-border infiltration, be it Afghanistan or Kashmir, and adheres to the universally accepted norms of good neighbourly relationship. It has also to be noted that both of them have hinted that after the ceasefire stabilizes, talks will be carried forward to address other aspects of the Kashmir issue so that a resolution to the satisfaction of the stakeholders is found.

Pakistan agreed to a ceasefire with definite purposes. The first is to monitor whether this goodwill gesture (ceasefire) will have a salutary impact on the Democrats in Washington and ultimately on the Biden administration. The second is that Pakistan would like to play the double game with China. Pakistan accepted ceasefire only after the Sino-Indian logjam in Ladakh ended. By doing so, she would want to convey a message to China that Pakistan will have to rethink her dependence on China in the areas of military and strategic planning. What has prompted Islamabad to bring in the China element is what the grapevine says about India and China engaged in a behind-the-curtain dialogue aimed at reducing border tensions and continue the dialogue for a lasting solution to the border dispute. Ladakh episode has forced Pakistan to concede the futility of solving the Kashmir issue through muscle power. The immediate impact of the ceasefire in Kashmir will be twofold: The funding sources will dry up faster and so will the manpower that sustained insurgency in Kashmir all these years. 

In the wide-ranging strategic scenario summarized above, the Pakistan Army feels that a respite in firing and shelling along the LoC in J&K could become the prelude for its face-saving. At the same time, adhering to peace initiative in the sub-continent would convince Washington of Pakistan’s “honest” intentions about the return of peace in Afghanistan. Thus, if Pakistan is the epicentre of unrest and turmoil in the Indian sub-continent, there is no better chance for her than the one in hand to reconstruct her relations with her neighbours on the east and the west, and through that process begin a new chapter of relationship with the western and the Islamic world. That is the way how a disquiet Indian sub-continent will turn a new leaf in its contemporary history and become strategically crucial to intentional peace and tranquility.

Pakistan’s peace talk means a change in its war strategy against India

General Bajwa says India and Pakistan must live in peace and dialogue is the only way. In recent months this is the third time he has spoken of peace in the region. It sounds bizarre. Pakistan Army that initiated three wars with India with the fourth an ongoing proxy war believing that it has to inflict a thousand cuts on the body of India. And now Gen Bajwa wants to abandon war and seeks peace. Is this posture real or fake?

The Pakistani Prime Minister also speaks the same language. Pakistani press gives it wide coverage. The foreign press is excited about the “peace around the corner”. Even some Indian national papers exuded mirth over a prospect in which border dwellers along LoC (Line of Control) and IB (International Border) in J&K would return to their habitats and resume the normal activity of life without the fear of bullets being fired and shells dropped to destroy their homes and crops and cattle.

Peace idiom from the other side of the border has become repetitive. The behaviour is unprecedented and, therefore, merits in-depth analysis. Columnists have written copiously on how come Pakistan has agreed to a ceasefire after keeping it broken for nearly 17 years. The baseline of dealing with Pakistan is that for seven long decades Pakistani think tanks have brainwashed the masses so deep that they cannot think about India as anything other than a deadly enemy of Islam and Muslims. They are not told that the population of Muslims in India outnumbers those in Pakistan and how can India be an enemy of the Muslims or Islam?

The truth behind accepting ceasefire is that ISI is now convinced that it has fully established the base headquarter of Kashmir-centric Theo-fascist outfits in parts of the valley, particularly in South Kashmir where locals have been fully brainwashed and trained in hidden camps in deep recesses of forests. They have established a secure and dependable line of communication besides deep-rooted moles in the local population. They are regularly briefed on the location, movement and manoeuvring of the security forces’ communication facility whom they take on conveniently and of their choosing. They are provided with necessary logistics like food, night shelter, intelligence, roadmap, mobiles and communication facility etc.

The terrorists have spread out over other parts of the valley like Baramulla, Sopor, Uri, Rafiabad, Hamal, Handwara, Kupwara and the Shamsbari slopes and habitats. The ever-increasing number of OGW (over ground workers) shows that the insurgent movement has become widespread. Kashmir Valley leaders have been insisting on India-Pakistan talks but never even once appealed to the terrorists to lay down their arms and join the massive effort of reconstruction of Kashmir.

Both Imran Khan and Gen Bajwa have asserted that the initiative for peace in the region and Indo-Pak meltdown should come from India. This one sentence exposes their claim to peace and tranquility in the region. It is so strange that Pakistan, the country that launched a well-calculated attack on India in October 1947 wants India, the aggrieved country, to take the initiative. Again Pakistan, the country that launched Operation Topac in 1990, asks India to take the initiative. Surprisingly Pakistan, whose intelligence agencies have been instrumental in planning and implementing the so-called freedom movement in Kashmir and simultaneously subjecting the valley to massive ethnic cleansing should ask India to initiate peace talks.

Why does not General Bajwa tell the ringmasters of the world’s most dreaded terrorist organization stalwarts to disband their organizations, handover arms to security forces of Pakistan, dismantle their camps and return to their homes to run normal life and let the people of Pakistan, nay the entire sub-continent, live a life of peace and comfort? How can there be peace in the sub-continent as long as these cobras and scorpions lay hidden in the grass? Terror and peace talks don’t go together.

By accepting ceasefire along the LoC, Pakistan wants to convey a message to the international community and organizations, particularly the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) that she has taken a major step in curbing terrorist and radicalist funding. It will be noted that incidents of terrorist attacks in Kashmir are showing an upward graph. This is what suits Pakistan the most. Pakistan goes around the world propagating that she cannot be falsified in asserting that in Kashmir there is an indigenous freedom movement fought by the Kashmiris, and Pakistan has no hand in it. India can no more accuse Pakistan of sending jihadists clandestinely across the border under the cover of fire. Acceptance of ceasefire by Pakistan is clear and irrefutable proof that she has built up a very strong terrorist superstructure in the valley and has involved a large chunk of the local population in their designs. Unfortunately, this aspect has not been taken care of by the Indian policy planners when they decided to agree to the ceasefire along the LoC. Pakistan is very shrewdly making international capital out of it.

What is the way forward? This is the vital question we should deal with. Signing of ceasefire agreement whether by the DGMOs of the two sides or by seniors in the government on both sides is meaningless and untenable because it is nothing beyond eyewash. The hardcore jihadist outfits on Pakistani soil are intact. Scores of jihadist camps along the LoC remain fully functional. Radical jihadist leaders of these armed groups are enjoying the freedom of movement, speech and action. The army and ISI are not only in close liaison with them but are their patrons and prime fundraising agencies. And they never make a secret of the aims and objectives of their mission in which they are working in cahoots with known Theo-fascist movements like ISIS and the Islamic Caliphate, Islamic Brotherhood, Al Qaeda etc.

Peace in Kashmir means resolution of Kashmir issue. The issues are (a) restoration of PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan to India, the rightful country and, (b) homeland for the victims of ethnic cleansing in Kashmir valley.

India has been trapped in signing a ceasefire. It is now learnt from reliable sources that Turkey and her secret agencies have taken over from ISI the mission of Islamization and radicalization of Kashmir Valley. Indian intelligence agencies should issue a statement that exposes the full activities of Turkey in creating an anti-India atmosphere in Kashmir through a subtle mechanism in which the Turkish embassy in New Delhi is directly involved. The sooner these anti-India designs are exposed the better.

Lastly, India should convey to Islamabad in no ambiguous terms that ceasefire becomes sanctimonious only when the outfits of Theo-fascism in Pakistan are dismantled under international supervision and the most wanted terrorist leaders like Hafiz Saeed, Masood Azhar and Rahman Lakhvi are handed over to India where they will be prosecuted under Indian law for the crimes of genocide that they have not only committed but also accepted. If these conditions are not met, no guarantee of sticking to a fragile, uneven and unjust ceasefire can be given.

Why did Pak’s Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) kill 5 Baloch youth in a fake encounter?

Pakistan’s Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) killed 5 Baloch youth in a fake encounter in Balochistan. These hapless Baloch youth were already in the custody of Pakistani security forces for the last several weeks before their fake encounter. Their family members had already reported about the enforced disappearance and feared that the Baloch youth might be killed. Their fears turned true when the Counter-Terrorism Department (CTD) staged a fake encounter on March 7, 2021.
Click on the YouTube link below to watch our news analysis to know the inside story.

Click on this YouTube link to watch the news analysis

Why is the government silent on the big copper crisis?

Is there a genuine reason for India to shy away from the war of resource nationalism? The question is gaining grounds in Delhi where the government is routinely asked about its stand, or it’s peculiar silence, on copper. 

What exactly is the crisis?

Goldman Sachs International has estimated that the prices will touch $10,000 a tonne by 2022, reported Bloomberg last December. The prices of refined copper could be in the range of $6,500-6,800 per tonne in FY2021 as compared to $5,923 in FY2020, 

India, a major exporter of refined copper till a few years ago, is now a net importer. And it has been happening for almost three years at a stretch, right after one of the world’s largest copper plants in Tamil Nadu’s Thoothukudi operated by Vedanata was shut due to environmental concerns. In 2017-18, India was among the top five exporters of copper cathodes. Copper is as important as aluminium and steel because of its widespread use in sectors such as construction, telecommunications, transportation, consumer durables, and automobiles.

The plant was operated by Sterlite Copper, Vedanta’s subsidiary. It had a production capacity of 4 lakh tonnes. It was closed in May 2018 by the Tamil Nadu government after the state’s pollution control board demanded a shutdown following violent protests by locals living close to the plant that the plant posed a health hazard to those living close by.

Independent investigations done by journalists have proved otherwise. Only a handful of locals had breathing problems, a probe by a television channel revealed in 2018. The probe also found effluents released from the plant not impacting the sea waters as claimed by the locals, who were backed by a host of NGOs. 

So what has been the outcome of the plant shutdown? There has been a huge, huge fall in India’s copper exports which has helped next door Pakistan. Islamabad, expectedly, has increased its exports to China. In short, it is a very bad signal for New Delhi and its copper economy.

(Representative photo)

Exasperated domestic copper manufacturers, it is reliably learnt, have petitioned the Ministry of Mines, seeking government’s immediate intervention to check the huge surge in copper prices in the country. In routine meetings with the bureaucrats, officials of these companies have highlighted how copper prices are now controlled by Chinese smelters, which have gained a solid grip on global supplies of copper concentrate and stocking up the metal.

The officials, it is reliably learnt, highlighted a host of things, the most crucial point being how important copper is for the nation. Copper is badly required for electric vehicles — India aspires to be a global manufacturing hub of electric vehicles — for superior battery efficiency. For the records, an electric vehicle uses 400 per cent more copper than a fossil fuel-run vehicle.

It is not immediately known how the ministry reacted. Till date, the government has not issued any notification relating to copper.

“Domestic copper industry has been operating at almost half of its capacity since the last two financial years due to closure of Vedanta’s 400 thousand tonnes copper smelter at Tuticorin,” said Care Ratings in an 18 February report. It added that India will continue to be a net importer of copper in FY21, pending the resumption of Vedanta’s copper smelting facility.

Copper is crucial for wiring, cable, transformers and power generation. In solar power alone, 5.5 tonnes of copper is needed per MW, for cabling, wiring and setting up heat exchangers. India’s electricity network will be due for upgradation because of rising electricity demand. And if India does not have enough copper, infrastructural developments will take a back seat. 

How serious is the crisis for India? As per data available, nearly 43 percent of global copper production was consumed by China in 2019-20. A report by Care Ratings — issued in February 2021 — raised an interesting point. It says the following: “Chinese monopoly over copper is two pronged: firstly locking in long-term supply agreements to ensure its copper needs are met adequately, and secondly by leveraging high import levels to dictate the price at which copper is sourced globally.”

As a result, copper prices are shooting up in anticipation of increased demands, touching  its highest point in nine years. 

The comparison between India and China is all but obvious. Boosted by the rally of copper prices, most of Chinese mines kept high operating rates last year. Some of the mines, which had even suspended production for environmental, safety, or financing issues, recently resumed production. 

In contrast, Indian copper manufacturers continue to grapple with increased dumping and low quality output saturating the market. India, for the first time in almost two decades has become a net importer of copper, New Delhi is importing more copper than export. 

What is a very worrying factor is that the London Metal Exchange copper prices touched a nine year high in January 2021 to average $7,961 per tonne. The on-going concentrate supply issues and strong demand, particularly from China, is expected to keep copper prices elevated over the next quarter before the supply issues get resolved in 2021.

The recent Budget deepened the crisis by lowering tariffs on copper scrap, thereby allowing low quality copper to flood the market. New Delhi’s copper imports have touched an all-time high of ₹14,000 crore.

This is one side of the coin.

It stems from the burgeoning impact of Indo-Japan free trade agreement (FTA) on the domestic copper industry. Japanese copper manufacturers enjoy very low rates of interest due to the “Zero Interest Rate Policy” implemented by Tokyo. But Indian companies face some of the highest interest rates in comparison to other countries. 

Now, due to the high value intrinsic in copper, interest costs for Indian smelters comprise a significant portion of their total cost and adversely impact the domestic industry’s overall competitiveness. Removal of tariff barriers under the current Indo-Japan CEPA (signed way back in 2011) have also opened a floodgate of imports which Indian industries are unable to compete with.

The current customs duty on refined copper products from Japan is 0.5 percent, significantly lower than that of the domestic industry’s basic raw material, i.e. copper concentrate, which attracts an import duty of 2.5 percent.

So let’s put this in a focussed context: Japan currently allows its copper manufacturers to import copper concentrate at no import duty, and the Indo-Japan CEPA allows these companies to then export the refined copper to India at a minimal 0.5 percent duty. The amount paid them as tax is therefore negligible. Contrast this with the 2.5 percent duty levied simply on importing copper concentrate by Indian manufacturers, and the dichotomy becomes apparent. 

Now, this very inverted duty will progressively get worse when the duty under the treaty becomes zero by the year 2021. In 2019, the duty was levied at 0.9 percent, and has already come down to its current rate of 0.5 percent in 2020, and is heading towards 0 percent this April. There is a concessional custom duty on copper concentrate from Japan, but it is irrelevant as they do not produce the copper concentrate themselves and instead import it from other countries for refining. 

As a result, there is a huge imbalance which is dealing a crippling blow to the domestic custom smelters as well as the downstream industries dependent on their products. As a result, domestic customers of refined copper are finding it cheaper to import the material rather than purchase it from domestic manufacturers. Copper imports will continue to rise on account of the gradual reduction of the import duty. In short, it spells a foreboding future for the domestic copper industry at a time when ensuring ample access to this metal is critical for improving technology and making economic progress. 

But that is not happening and India could spend up to 30-35 percent more just to import the same level of refined copper it does today. And consequential effects on forex levels is going to be significant. 

If the plant in Tamil Nadu was operational and production doubled, planned expansion and doubling of production capacity by Sterlite Copper had gone ahead, New Delhi would have been in a position to collectively bargain for improved copper prices. Three years have lapsed without any solution in sight from either the Central or the Tamil Nadu government. Sterlite Copper had a 400,000MT of annual copper production that could meet India’s needs for the next decade. Why not push environment protection protocols and open the plant? 

India has all but given up control over copper, considered a powerful enabler metal. Everyone agrees that India needs to produce more copper.

Except, the government.

(The author was a part of a television crew which probed the alleged environment issues at the plant and conducted interviews with all the stakeholders. Everyone was on the record that the crisis at the plant was manageable and could have been easily rectified but blown out of proportion by a section of the protestors. Recently, demands are mounting on the Tamil Nadu government to open the plant. The matter is now in the Supreme Court.)