Home Blog Page 384

Heartbreak tales in sports & the medal on podiums

So let’s start this one with some hardcore facts. A good (read best) book on sports is the one which persuades readers — who hate statistics like me — to empathize with players and their lives. Those are readers who are just looking for a darn good story. That, in short, means the book has worked wonders with readers who loved such heartbreak tales of players, and their wonder victories on the podium. That also means the book has fit the bill as one of those rare gems in the Indian publishing market. And the authors have successfully transported readers inside the boxing ring, they have made readers watch the shuttle with complete concentration inside a badminton court, they have dropped readers inside a shooting range with some brilliant detail by brilliant detail.

No, I am not telling you the whole story, I am merely saying why you need to pick up a copy of Dreams of a Billion: India and the Olympic Games by Boria Majumdar and Nalin Mehta. These two brilliant sports historians and authors, if let loose, could run wild like Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid and transform Indian sports and its management with their brilliant ideas. But that has not happened, the babus and politicians have refused professionals to run sports in a billion plus nation. So Majumdar and Mehta write books and offer ideas to those in the business of sports, both are always on the podium and every time on television channels to discuss sports, sports persons and the business of sports. They are a unique Bikash-Krishanu combo. If you have not understood about the Bikash-Krishanu combo, replace it with a MacFish-Coke. You will have your fill. That’s all about the authors.

So let’s return to the book, a wonderfully reported glimpse of sports stars and their coaches and how they act and react before the big, prestigious games, the big arena Olympics. The book has worked because the authors understand sports and constantly mingle with sports stars, coaches and managers of the game. So they have a first hand idea of how successful sports stars survive tension-ridden moments before walking into the court, and more importantly, what coaches do to turn ugly into bad and eventually good moments. Majumdar and Mehta knew their book will be read by a WhatsApp generation, both offered recent examples of such success stories in the world of Olympics.

The book has broken barriers, shattered myths in a nation where many — till recently — believed India only dominated in hockey in the Olympics some four decades ago and now only a handful of sports persons are bringing Olympic laurels. And that India is far away from the Olympic dreams. That’s not the case, the book tells us. The book — in my opinion — tells me of the sleeping dragon in the mythical Shangri-La. It tells me India’s sporting potential is immense, actually immense. And it is high time the government grants more cash to the sports ministry while finalising the annual budget. The book tells me why Niti Aayog and even the PMO must discuss sports and not only cross border diplomacy and internal security. The book has showcased stars who have done exceptionally well, the book is a reminder for the government if funds are allocated well, India can – actually — be among the top ten nations in the Olympics.

Mary Kom, India’s boxing superstar from Manipur

Let’s start with the MC Mary Kom story. The diminutive boxer is from Manipur, a state in news more for soldiers with guns and bullets, drug addicts and routine violence. It is a state where the routine is horrible and the horrible routine. Yet, Manipur is home to some of the top boxers, footballers and hockey players. Mary Kom, say the authors, is mother superior of the state. Mary Kom, defied norms at 36, winning the gold medal in the Gold Coast Commonwealth Games, at the Asian Games and also at the World Championships in Delhi. And then, the authors found her as the face of the Tata Mumbai Marathon where she sang on the stage and brought the whole audience to its feet. SheThePeople, a lovely television channel run by the affable journalist, Shaili Chopra, quoted her as saying the following: “People have 72 dreams of a billion and started to expect the gold medal from me in Tokyo (Olympics). What people don’t realize is that I will yet again have to fight in the 51 kilogram category with boxers who are taller and stronger. But I am not saying this as an excuse. All I am trying to say is it will not be easy to make it to Tokyo and win a second Olympic medal.” If Bengal’s most celebrated sports writer, Moti Nandy, was alive, he would have said: Fight, Mary, fight.

The book says boxing was not easy for Mary Kom. She was born in a lower middle-class household, walked miles to attend classes and was beaten by her father for wanting to pursue boxing and was racially vilified ever since she came to Delhi. She braved taunts of chinki — a shameless term coined by North Indians for girls from the northeastern states for their Tibeto-Mongoloid features — and beat Nikhat Zareen, fourteen years younger, at the Indian Open in May 2019 and won gold at a World Championship preparatory event two months later.

Pullela Gopichand, former Indian badminton player is Chief National Coach for the Indian Badminton team.

Write the authors: “A similar issue arose between the two over representing India at the Tokyo Olympics. Zareen, known for having won a bronze medal at the 2019 Asian Championships, made an impassioned plea to the sports minister and the Boxing Federation of India for a trial bout. Abhinav Bindra sided with her, saying that as athletes you are always judged in the present and not by what you have accomplished before. Hence, it was a matter of time before a trial was organized. The federation, while initially reluctant, did eventually give in, saying that the same rules should apply to everyone. This controversy should never have been allowed to fester. Their selection trial was scheduled for December 2019, by which time this book would have already gone to press. Mary, who had publicly opposed the trial match, wasn’t pleased with the outcome but was left with no option but to accept the ruling. Frankly, this is the best way forward.”

Do you know that the life of MC Mary Kom is not just medals but also loads of blood and sweat? She is the best boxer in her category in India. She proved this at the World Championships by becoming the first-ever boxer in history to win a record eight medals, surpassing Cuban legend Felix Savon.

Majumdar and Mehta — throughout the book — persuade readers to empathize with the players. They write that the actual event may last a few minutes, or at the most, for an hour. But fame is permanent, it is never short-lived. The book shines because it sheds light on several untold aspects of the Olympics involving Indian sports persons. Sadly, there are very few books about Indians and their participation in the Olympics.

Why Mary Kom, why not discuss the struggle and success of single arm, double Paralympic gold medalist, Devendra Jhajharia who battled against the odds to win his Paralympic javelin gold in 2004? Read this part, and you will realise how tough life is for sports persons in India. Says Jhajharia: “When I went to the Athens Paralympics in 2004, all I had was a pair of spikes that cost me Rs 400 and a javelin priced at Rs 300. That’s all I had. I paid for the trip myself, (I) was one of the twenty-five athletes who represented India in Greece.”

“Every other athlete participating in Athens would come to the stadium with his personal coach, trainer, physio and support team. They had better javelins, which were very similar to the ones we use now. But for me, it was never about facilities. It was never about the quality of my javelin or spikes or coaching. It was always about hard work and more hard work. Working the hardest was my weapon against adversity and I am glad it worked for me.”

Want more? Jhajharia lost an arm at the age of eight when he accidentally touched an electric cable while climbing a tree. He was depressed when he returned from hospital and did not leave his house. His mind was weighed down with a huge sense of inferiority and peer pressure. Eventually, it was his mother who motivated him to go out and play. His mother was confident in her son. Indian mothers are different, they can gauge the world even if they rarely step out of their kitchen and bedroom.

Majumdar and Mehta’s reporting is fresh and has some solid, meticulous archival digging. There are heavy sections, there are light sections, there is hope, there is despair, and there is hope again. The book tells me why the Olympics have the ability to bring the world together and why every sports person wants an Olympic medal in his trophy chamber. I remember how in 2018 North Korea and South were drawn together, albeit only for a brief time. In A Team Of Their Own: How an International Sisterhood Made Olympic History, Seth Berkman — claims The New York Times — offers an insider’s look at what happened when North Korea and South Korea unexpectedly combined their women’s hockey teams to play on a unified squad at the Pyeongchang Olympics. Majumdar and Mehta’s tome is also unique, the  behind-the-scenes opportunity shows in the duo’s clear storytelling, their passion for the subject is also clear. They weave the back stories of the sports persons in a larger examination of culture and identity, extremely important for the current generation in South Asia. What a wonderful book.

Pakistan’s atrocities in occupied Balochistan continue in 2020: Dil Murad Baloch

Dil Murad Baloch, Central Information Secretary of the Baloch National Movement (BNM) has said that year 2020 has begun with innumerable state atrocities by Pakistan on Balochistan. The security forces of Pakistan carried out more than 30 military operations and raids across Balochistan in the month of January and 67 persons were arrested and were forcibly “disappeared” during these operations. Approximately more than 50 houses were looted and 30 houses were burnt down.

Thirty one persons were killed in the month of January; whereas the cause of 23 persons’ death remained undetermined. The other 8 Baloch were killed by the security forces of Pakistan. Essa Shah Zaman Bugti who was previously abducted by security forces on 14th January was killed in a fake encounter by the military. Similarly another person was killed in a fake encounter by Levies force. One person, a resident of Sodd, Jahoo district Awaran was killed by the state sponsored death squad. And five others laid their lives in fighting against the state security forces.

Forty three persons were released from Pakistan secret cells in the month of January. Among them, two had been forcibly disappeared since 2013, two since 2014, one since 2015, six since 2016, ten since 2017, twelve since 2018 and ten since 2019 by the security forces of Pakistan.

Dil Murad Baloch stated that since the last two decades the atrocities of Pakistan had been increasing with every passing year. This reveals the intentions of Pakistan for carrying out the genocide across Balochistan. Not a single place in Balochistan is spared from the atrocities of Pakistan. From every nook and corner of Balochistan people had not only been abducted but also houses were set on fire. Spy agencies of Pakistan and the Pakistan Army had been abducting people, looting houses and livestock on a daily basis. The proxy terrorist organizations and death squads of Pakistan have turned Balochistan into a hell for Baloch people. Security forces pick up the young children in front of their helpless parents. Some of these relatives could be seen in the protests and hunger strike camps for the recovery of their loved ones for years. But rarely does anyone gets released from the clutches of Pakistan Army.

“…this is crystal clear that the atrocities of Pakistan in Balochistan have taken the shape of a humanitarian crisis. The victims’ families are going through an unbearable situation and the situation is even getting worse. Hence for the last several months, it can be clearly perceived that a parliamentary party has been using the problem of ‘missing persons’ as a political means of securing political benefits from the army and has thus been directly involved in bargaining with the state; though the problem of enforced disappearance of the people by the Pakistan Army and spy agencies are linked with the slavery of the people,” he explained.

Dil Murad Baloch further explained that Pakistani state lacks all human and international values and it dishonours to its own constitution. “That is why for the last two decades thousands of Baloch are illegally and for indefinite periods of time in the torture cells of security forces of Pakistan. But the state lacks obligation to its own constitution and courts and is unable to produce a single person among these thousands of “forcibly disappeared” persons before its own court. This scenario puts thousands of Baloch in a state of decay and death. But they are fully aware of one fact that their children are bearing these illegal detentions for the great cause. There is not a single case where the family members of the missing persons bowed before the state and made a compromise for the release of their loved one. But unfortunately, a parliamentary political party has been exploiting this humanitarian crisis and using it brazenly for its political game. It is already clear that it has secured two to four seats in the parliament by secretly dealing with the Pakistan Army, which became clearer by their supporting the Army Act; and as a result of this only some people were released,” he added.

Dil Murad Baloch added, “We are going through a historical transition; where history on one side will remember the atrocities of the state; on the other side the submission of the so-called political party before the enemy will never be forgotten. The humanitarian crisis of the enforced disappearance and playing with the emotions of the victims’ families through bargaining with the enemy forces is tantamount to being an equal partner of Pakistan in its war crimes. On one hand a few missing persons are being released from torture cells and being handed over to this party in order to cover the war crimes of Pakistan Army; on the other hand a greater number of people are being forcibly disappeared and the number of the missing persons is increasing enormously.”

“A few people among thousands of missing persons are being released from the torture cells of army, and they are being handed over to the central and local level of leaders of this political party; they are equally answerable along with state that where had been these missing person for years? For what crime they were detained? And what sort of ordeals they had to suffer? Those political parties surely know about the fate of thousands of missing persons and what sort of deal they have made or will make with the state regarding the missing persons? Sooner or later the Baloch nation and the history will hold them accountable for this,” Dil Murad Baloch questioned.

He added, “The illegal abduction of the people is a big crime. No law of the world, not even the constitution of Pakistan permits it, but this inhuman act is being fully exercised in Balochistan. This is a clear war crime. And Pakistan would have been held accountable for this war crime, but Pakistan has been exonerated at the expense of the emotions and helplessness of the people. As history will punish Pakistan, characters like those of the parliamentarian groups will also never be free from history’s penalty.”

VBMP will highlight Balochistan’s plight during UN Secretary General’s Pakistan visit

The Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP) will organize a protest demonstration outside the Karachi Press Club at 3 PM (local time) on 16th February 2020 to draw attention of the United Nations Secretary General Mr Antonio Guterres to the grave human rights violations in Balochistan, Mama Qadeer Baloch, vice chairman of the VBMP, said in a video message that was released on social media.

For the last eighteen years, Pakistani security forces have been actively involved in the enforced disappearance and extra-judicial murders of students, political activists and human rights defenders in Balochistan with impunity. In most cases, they have tortured the victims and thrown their mutilated dead bodies at desolated places, explained Mama Qadeer Baloch.

Mama Qadeer Baloch, Vice Chairman of Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP) in this video message explains that VBMP will organise a protest outside Karachi Press Club to
draw attention of the United Nations Secretary General Mr Antonio Guterres about grave human rights violations in Balochistan

According to data gathered by the VBMP, thousands of Baloch people including children, elderly and women have been picked up by the Pakistani security forces outside the purview of law. Even the judiciary has failed to offer any remedy and the perpetration of crimes against humanity continues in Balochistan with no help in sight.

UN Secretary General Mr Antonio Guterres is expected to visit Pakistan from 15th February, and will be accompanied by a 14 member delegation.

The VBMP appealed to marginalized religious and ethnic minorities to participate in their protest to remind the UN Secretary General about Pakistan’s failure to live up to its pledge of respecting the UN conventions it has ratified, and to request Mr Guterres’ personal intervention in resolving the humanitarian crisis facing the people of Balochistan.

BLF describes reasons for attack on Pakistan Army at Awaran

Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) spokesman Major Gwahram Baloch claimed responsibility for the attack on the death squad’s hideout, including a check post and a checkpoint of the Pakistani Army in Awaran.

Maj. Gwahram Baloch told the media from an unknown location that the freedom fighters of Balochistan attacked the Pakistani military check post at Labach Dansar area of ​​Awaran district at around 4 AM (local time) on Wednesday morning with rockets and automatic heavy weapons. Three Pakistani military personnel were killed and two were injured in the attack.

Maj. Gwahram Baloch added that a military outpost located at Kor-e-Dot in Awaran District was hit by rockets and heavy weapons at around 4:30 PM (local time) killing two army personnel and injuring two.

He said the death squad personnel Barkat’s hideout was also attacked in Labach area of ​​Awaran district. The hideout of the aforementioned state-sponsored death squads was targeted with rockets and automatic heavy weapons. The Death Squad established under the patronage of the state of Pakistan is involved in several crimes, including kidnapping, murder, and intimidation of the Baloch and is equally involved in the Baloch genocide by the Pakistani Army.

He said that attacks on the occupying state forces and their assistants and facilitators would continue till the independence of Balochistan.

Hat-trick for AAP in Delhi Assembly Elections

In a splendid electoral performance, the Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) has won 62 seats while the BJP has won eight seats in the 70-member Delhi Assembly. AAP’s landslide win in the Delhi assembly election, for the third time, has left BJP stunned.

“This is the victory of every family in Delhi who treated me like their son. This is the victory of every family of Delhi that has started getting 24-hour electricity supply, whose children have started receiving quality education, and whose members have started getting good health services in hospitals of Delhi,” Kejriwal said after winning the election.

“Kaam ki rajneeti bhari padi (The politics of work overshadowed everything). We will decide the swearing in date and inform everyone soon,” he added.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi also congratulated Kejriwal. “Wishing them the very best in fulfilling the aspirations of the people of Delhi,” he tweeted.

All prominent AAP leaders have been able to retain their seats. AAP’s prominent faces Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, Satyendra Jain, Gopal Rai, Imran Hussain, Kailash Gahlot, and Rajendra Pal Gautam, retained the New Delhi, Patparganj, Shakur Basti, Babarpur, Ballimaran, Najafgarh, and Seemapuri constituencies respectively. AAP’s Pawan Sharma also kept his Adarsh Nagar seat, defeating BJP’s Raj Kumar Bhatia by over 1,500 votes. Ambedkar Nagar, a reserved constituency, was retained by AAP’s Ajay Dutt by a margin of over 28,000 votes. Chatarpur’s Kartar Singh Tanwar, Deoli’s Prakash Jarwal, Saurabh Bhardwaj from Greater Kailash, Nangloi’s Raghuvinder Shokeen and Mangolpuri’s Rakhi Birla also retained their seats.

AAP’s Atishi also won her debut Assembly polls. One of the most popular faces of the Aam Aadmi Party, had a tough fight. She bagged the seat with over 11,000 votes defeating BJP’s Dharmabir Singh, who got 39,438 votes against Atishi, who polled 46,775 votes.

As many as 44 sitting MLAs including two from the BJP retained their seats in the high-pitch Delhi Assembly elections. The two BJP MLAs — Vijender Gupta from Rohini and OP Sharma from Vishwas Nagar — retained their seats with comfortable margins of over 12,000 and over 16,000 votes respectively. Anil Kumar Bajpai, former AAP MLA from Gandhi Nagar, retained his seat not from AAP but BJP.

Aam Admi Party’s Raghav Chadha, the 31-year-old chartered accountant-turned-politician, won from central Delhi’s Rajinder Nagar by defeating BJP veteran Sardar RP Singh by nearly 20,000 votes. This is the first time that the young AAP leader contested an assembly election. He had last year unsuccessfully contested the Lok Sabha election from South Delhi.

AAP also won all 12 seats reserved for SC candidates

BJP needs to introspect how & why it lost Delhi to AAP

0

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) has lost Delhi state elections and it’s certainly time for the BJP leadership to do some serious introspection on why after sweeping win in the Lok Sabha elections in mid-2019, they have not received the same support at state elections in Delhi. BJP had won all seven seats of Delhi in the 2019 General Elections.

It is worth thinking about why Delhi’s electorate changed its mind in less than a year. The BJP leadership at the state level in Delhi should do some serious introspection and compare the results of 2015 and 2020 elections. After an incredible Lok Sabha victory in 2014, they lost badly in 2015. The story is no different between 2019 Lok Sabha elections and the 2020 Delhi State elections. Of the 70 Delhi Assembly seats Arvind Kejriwal-led Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) won 62 seats and BJP could manage to win in only 8 constituencies.

Clearly, the electorate knows their mind and they know what they want from their politicians at the National level and at the State level. Yes, the people have huge expectations from Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his team for the country. They have similar expectations from their local leaders, but in matters that affect their daily lives.

They want the infrastructure in their community and town to be as they expect. They want their local politician to address and resolve these challenges. Mr Kejriwal and his party did a lot of work for Delhi over the past 5 years and this did not go unnoticed. Running down or challenging achievements in education and healthcare was a poor strategy of the BJP. The electorate did not believe the BJP leaders.

Let us look at some reasons why the BJP is consistently losing elections in most of the states.

National Issues are different from State Issues

National Security is critical and every step taken by the Prime Minister has been supported and applauded by the people. At the state elections, people do not want to hear about Pakistan bashing or the achievements of the country in international arena.

Matters like the revocation of Article 370 and Article 35A are important for the nation. However, these are not for discussion at the state level.

State Politicians need to deliver

The central government needs the support of states. Politicians at the state need to deliver in their constituencies. The BJP leadership at the state level must learn to win elections on their own and stop relying only on the senior most leaders. State politicians must realize that they are fighting the assembly elections and not for the Lok Sabha. Therefore, they need to depend on their work and not that of the central government. The state leaders must work to strengthen the hands of the Prime Minister and not constantly look for a free ride. They should bring in the big guns for support and not to win the elections.

If people want good health and good education, is it unreasonable? If they want a pollution free Delhi, they expect work to be done. If the electorate wants free electricity and free water, then so be it.

The electorate understands the capabilities of the Prime Minister and his team. However, when they hear their local leaders wax eloquent on national issues without bothering to talk of local issues, they know these politicians are simply not delivering what is expected of them.

Alliance Partners of the NDA must be taken into confidence in every election even if it means that the BJP has to lose a battle to win the war. The alliance partners know that the BJP is a strong party and yet they also know that they play a vital role in BJP’s plans at the state level. Alienating alliance partner just before state elections can never be a wise strategy and this normally starts with the bravado of the local state level leaders of the BJP.

Unless the BJP can carry its partners, they will continue to bite the dust as is evident from Maharashtra.

Loudmouths of the BJP need to be told to shut up before every election. The people are tired of the unnecessary rhetoric from some BJP leaders. They need to be told to stay quiet if they do not have anything constructive to say. Negative statements are not supported by anyone (though the politician who makes such statements may get some applause from the community they are addressing).

Abusive language is not respected by anyone in India. Why do junior BJP politicians not see and learn from the dignity of their senior leaders? Such loud mouths do more harm than good to BJP’s campaign.

BJP’s Communication must improve. Traditionally, the communication of BJP has been very poor. The spokespersons are the same for national issues and state issues who keep pushing the national agenda in all debates without understanding the challenges. If the discussion is about the state elections, the BJP spokespersons will try and manoeuvre the debate to a national issue. BJP needs a separate set of leaders who will address national issues and state issues. The BJP cannot have the same set of spokespersons on every channel on every issue.

Citizens Amendment Act (CAA)

The CAA has cleverly been morphed into National Population Register (NPR) and the National Register of Citizens (NRC), and BJP has not been able to communicate the difference clearly. Varying comments from central leadership is also being used very effectively by the opposition leaders who have very successfully managed to confuse the masses.

For the moment, the BJP can take some comfort from the fact that their vote share has increased in the Delhi elections but unless they change fast, the next round of state elections will have a similar sad story for the BJP.

The Prime Minister spoke of the report card of his government during the Lok Sabha elections and he was given a resounding mandate. What applies at the centre applies equally at the state.

BJP’s state leaders must show their report card and not that of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi or that of the BJP Government at the Centre.

Unless the BJP is in power in States, they will find it increasingly difficult to implement their plans and policies. 

The harsh truth is that no one remembers who came second.

Hmm… Pakistan Army helped terrorist Ehsanullah Ehsan escape

It was The Sunday Guardian that on January 18, first broke the news that former Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) and Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (JA) spokesperson Ehsanullah Ehsan had escaped. Ehsan had been kept under detention by the Pakistan Army. But since there was no mention of this ‘breaking news’ in the Pakistani media, this report generated no debate or discussion. Au contraire it was treated with such scepticism that people overlooked the fact that the otherwise very hyperactive Director General Inter Services Public Relations (DGISPR) Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor didn’t even come out to rebut this report that appeared in an Indian newspaper and openly ridiculed the professional abilities of Pakistan Army.

But now that an audio tape purportedly released by Ehsan has emerged in which he has confirmed his escape, the question which arises is that how did this high-profile terrorist manage to escape from military custody? Please remember, Ehsanullah Ehsan belonged to the group that targeted Malala Yousafzai, besides being involved in numerous other terrorist attacks in Pakistan including the despicable Army Public School (APS) Peshawar massacre of innocent school children.

Nobel Laureate Malala Yousafzai. She was shot on her head by Ehsanullah Ehsan in October 2012.

The answer reveals shocking laxity on the part of Pakistan Army. Quoting “sources in Pakistan,” Daily Times has confirmed that Ehsan had “escaped from a safe house where he was detained along with his wife and two daughters” and that “The Pakistan Army got to know about his escape on January 12.”

That Ehsan not only managed to escape with his entire family but also succeeded in fleeing the country raises serious doubts about the Pakistan Army’s sincerity regarding its war on terror. Even though DG-ISPR vehemently denied it, but right from the time of his so called ‘surrender’, there were deep suspicions that Pakistan Army had struck some sort of a secret deal with Ehsan. These fears were strengthened when the army (which otherwise boasts about its professionalism and efficiency), failed to file a charge sheet against him even after an year and the degree of suspicion of complicity was so intense that the distraught parent of an Army Public School, Peshawar victim even approached Peshawar High Court to ensure that the Pakistan Army doesn’t manipulate the system to get clemency for Ehsan and thereby facilitate his release!

Now that Ehsan has escaped, those who have lost their near and dear ones in the numerous terrorist attacks carried out by Tehreek-e-Taliban (TTP) and Jamaat-ul-Ahrar (JA) would obviously want to know why didn’t the Pakistan Army incarcerate a hard core terrorist like Ehsan in a high security prison and instead put him up in a “safe house” where he could enjoy the company of his wife and children? How could Rawalpindi be so casual is something that Pakistan Army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa has to explain to the people and ensure stern action against those guilty of omissions and commissions that allowed Ehsan to escape and flee the country. Not filing a charge sheet in itself is a clear indication of premeditated reluctance on the part of Pakistan Army as regards bringing Ehsan to justice is concerned and his escape only further reinforces suspicions of organisational complicity.

In his audio message Ehsan has confirmed that he had surrendered to the Pakistan Army in 2017 under “an agreement.” This revelation confirms that the Pakistan Army was being economical with the truth while announcing his “surrender” and explains why it never charge sheeted him. But this is just the tip of the iceberg and more skeletons from Rawalpindi’s cupboard will come tumbling out as the former TTP and JA spokesperson has said, “I will also mention on whose approval this accord (to surrender) was made with me. And what were the terms and conditions of the agreement and which prominent figure had assured me that the agreement will be implemented.”

Ehsan’s claim of having made some sort of an “accord” or “agreement” with Pakistan Army officials doesn’t appear to be farfetched as Rawalpindi has a long history of making Faustian deals with terrorists and one is reminded of former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s observation about Pakistan keeping ‘snakes in its backyard’ and US President Donald Trump’s tweet about “lies & deceit” that Islamabad has been peddling for the “last 15 years.” The international community has turned a blind eye to Rawalpindi’s perfidy in regards to going soft on certain terrorists for too long and in order to make the world a safer place to live in, concerted action for compelling Pakistan to cease patronising terrorist groups is the crying need of the hour.

Tailpiece– Since Ehsan has ‘confessed’ working at the behest of Indian spy agency Research and Analysis Wing (R&AW), Pakistan Army’s decision to keep him in a ‘safe house’ is in itself highly suspect. So, if Rawalpindi continues to hold that Ehsan is a R&AW operative, then it has to admit that by executing the successful ‘covert extrication’ of its ‘asset’, R&AW has outwitted Pakistan’s Inter Services Intelligence (ISI). But if this isn’t the case, then it’s obvious that that his so called ‘escape’ has been clandestinely orchestrated by certain influential and powerful elements within the Pakistan Army for whom Ehsan was proving to be a hot potato?

A Kashmiri Youth recollects how Militants shot dead his Mother

0

My life changed forever during a visit to my native village Sogam Lolab in Kashmir Valley. This was 17 years ago, and I was an excited 8-year-old boy. We were visiting after a long time. From Srinagar, we had traveled to north Kashmir’s Kupwara to reach the village.

Upon arrival, my mother decided to visit my uncle’s house and spend the night. She insisted that I stay with her but I didn’t listen. I went to another uncle’s place to have fun, as I hadn’t met them in a long time. Little did I know, it was going to be the last time I would speak to my mother.

To my surprise, at around 6 PM that day, all the neighbouring houses in the village switched off their lights. I asked my cousin about it, and he said, “Militants make routine visits to the houses in the village, and people offer them food and other things. Nobody has the guts to say anything to them. Whatever they say, everyone follows.”

At around 7 PM, while I was playing carrom with my cousins, we heard some gunshots. Initially we thought it to be an encounter between security forces and militants, because militancy was far too common in the Valley back then. After a few minutes, upon hearing loud cries from outside, we rushed to the gate to find my aunt weeping. When we entered the house where my mother was staying for the night, we saw blood stains on the walls. My elder sister fainted, and my brother and I had no idea what was going on.

The following day, people started gathering at our house. I saw two lifeless bodies lying on the bed — one was my mother and the other was my uncle.

There was a cotton roll full of blood in my mother’s right eye.

Eight-year-old me kept asking everyone why was my mother lying on the bed and why nobody was speaking to her or asking her to talk. I could only think of her being angry at me for not staying with her the previous night. Then I saw my father crying and realised something was wrong. Nobody responded to my questions; everybody was crying.

In the evening, I was told to see my mother’s face for the last time before the burial. I also went to the graveyard and filled her grave with my hands. It was all a blur, and I was absolutely clueless about the goings-on.

So what really happened that fateful night to my mother? The story goes, the militants had come knocking on my uncle’s door, and asked my mother for water. When she returned with water, one of them shot my uncle in the chest, while another shot my mother in the eye. Both of them died on the spot, and the militants fled.

Those militants not only killed two people – they rendered seven children motherless in the blink of an eye.

Seventeen years have passed, but the incident remains fresh in my memory. I still recall my last moments with my mother. 

As per the central government’s data, there has been a 40% decline in the recruitment of militants in 2019 since the previous year. After the crackdown on Jamaat-e-Islami and the Hurriyat, stone-pelting has reduced. The Hurriyat has also faced opposition and rejection rejected from different sections of the Valley because of their failed Kashmir policy.

But the youth in south Kashmir, especially Tral, Pulwama, Shopian, continue to join militant outfits. They tend to easily fall for the ideals of jihad, after systematic brainwashing. They have no idea what they are up to, but they seem to prefer death over life.

Militant outfits succeed in this indoctrination mainly by using social media for their propaganda.

It’s believed that (late) Hizbul commander Burhan Wani heralded the use of social media to recruit Kashmiri youth into militant ranks.

The fear of the gun in Kashmir is the only reason people don’t want to raise their voice against militancy and violence. In the past, we have witnessed the fate of those who have spoken against gun culture and violence in the Valley. Nobody dares to question the militants in such an atmosphere.

Where do we go from here?  

Yes there’s a historical basis for the CAA in India

Independent India’s Citizenship Laws can be traced back to 1955. The Citizenship Act provided citizenship to those born in India and offered two ways for non-Indians to obtain Indian citizenship: People from the rest of undivided India would become eligible to apply for citizenship after seven years of residency in India whereas those from countries other than undivided India would become eligible after twelve years of residency in India. The Citizenship Act was amended in 1985 in the aftermath of the Assam Movement and then subsequently in 1992, 2003, 2005 and 2015. The 2003 amendment, in particular, introduced the notion of “illegal immigrants” (defined as those without proper travel documents or those who had overstayed the term of their Indian visas) into the Act and made them ineligible to apply for citizenship through registration or naturalization. These illegal immigrants could be deported and/or jailed. The 2003 Amendment also made it mandatory to ultimately compile a National Register of Citizens (NRC) – a move that was then supported by the Congress and Left parties. The latest amendment to the Citizenship Act came into being on 12th December 2019. The text of this amendment can be read here.

What makes this latest amendment stand out is that it, for the first time, permits people from the Hindu, Sikh, Jain, Jewish, Zoroastrian and Christian communities, originally from Pakistan, Bangladesh or Afghanistan to apply for Indian citizenship if these people had arrived in India before 31st December 2014, i.e., they had been living in India for five years. The Act specifically excludes Muslims. The constitutional validity of the Act has been challenged in India’s Supreme Court. 

Sections of the media (including international media) and some countries have objected to this Act. Some people (particularly academics) have initiated signature campaigns against this Act. In India several rallies (some violent) have been held against this Act. These rallies have largely been instigated by some political parties and fringe groups. It is not always clear what these groups are agitating for – denial of citizenship to minorities from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan or award of citizenship to Muslims from Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. Before passing judgment on the Act it would be necessary to understand its rationale.

In April 1950 the then Prime Ministers of India and Pakistan (consisting of East and West Pakistan since Bangladesh had not been born then) entered into an agreement to protect minorities in their countries. The Nehru-Liaquat Pact (NLP) enjoined both countries to honour and protect the democratic, political, religious, cultural and economic rights of their minorities. This Pact had become necessary because although the partition of undivided India in 1947 was done along religious lines (whereas India opted for secularism, Pakistan became an Islamic Republic) both countries had significant religious minorities. The 1937 and 1945-46 elections in India had been conducted with separate electorates for different communities. The 1937 election did not have the creation of Pakistan as an objective of the Muslim League whereas the 1946 election specifically had this objective. The contrast between the results of the two elections was stark. For example, the Muslim League failed disastrously in the 1937 elections, but in 1946 it won 75 of the 85 Muslim seats in Punjab.

In contrast the Congress Party (mostly representing Hindus) won 58.23% of the total seats and 91 of the non-Muslim vote whereas the Muslim League won 26.81% of the total seats. It captured all Muslim constituencies in the central assembly as well as most of the Muslim constituencies in the provincial legislatures. More than anything else, this vote led to the formation of Pakistan. But, this could not obfuscate the fact that significant sections of the population in areas now in Pakistan voted for the Congress and significant sections of the population now in India voted for the Muslim League. In the mayhem and carnage of the partition not all Indian Muslims migrated to Pakistan nor did all Hindus and Sikhs in Pakistan migrate to India. Using comparable Census data from India and Pakistan the proportion of the population with Indian religious persuasions (Hindu, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists) was 84.4% in 1941, 87.2% in 1951 (immediately after the partition) and 85% in 1991. The share of Muslims in India’s population was 13.3% in 1941, 10.4% in 1951 and 12.5% in 1991. By way of contrast in Bangladesh 29.6% of the population were Hindus, Jains, Sikhs and Buddhists in 1942, which fell to 22.8% in 1951 and subsequently to 11.3% in 1991. In Pakistan the population of Hindus, Sikhs, Jains and Buddhists fell from 19.6% in 1941 to 1.6 % in 1991 whereas the share of Muslims rose from 78.8% in 1941 to 96.7 % in 1991. (For details see chapter 2 of vol. 1 of Raghbendra Jha, Facets of India’s Economy and Her Society, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.) These disparities have grown further since 1991. The share of Muslims in India’s population was 13.4 % in the 2001 Census and 14.2% in the 2011 census. Comparable figures are not readily available for Pakistan and Bangladesh.

This factual narration lays out the gross violation of the Nehru-Liaquat Pact by Pakistan and Bangladesh. Particularly in Pakistan, media has reported large scale kidnappings, conversions and forced marriages of young women. In India, the Muslim population has grown steadily and its mean per-capita expenditure is not very different from that of the Hindu population. (For details see chapter 9 of vol. 2 of Raghbendra Jha, Facets of India’s Economy and Her Society, Palgrave Macmillan). India has had Muslim Presidents, Vice Presidents, Governors, Chief Ministers, Chief Justices of the Supreme Court and the like. It is very hard to make the accusation of systematic discrimination against Muslims in India stick on.

By way of contrast, members of the minority community are facing dire conditions in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan. They fear for their safety, dignity and livelihood and, except for small pockets, are not economically prosperous. Their forefathers did not participate in India’s freedom struggle for their progeny to end up in such hardship. Major leaders of India including Mahatma Gandhi had promised to give these people Indian citizenship should they ever choose to move to India. Some of these minority groups have fled to India, given that India has had a long history of providing refuge to persecuted minorities (Chapter 9 of vol. 2 of Raghbendra Jha, Facets of India’s Economy and Her Society, Palgrave Macmillan, 2018). 

The CAA does not take away any Indian’s citizenship. On the other hand, it provides refuge to persecuted minorities. This should be seen as a humane gesture. With a population of 1.3 billion India does not have the capacity to absorb other persecuted groups. In any case, there are many other Muslim countries where persecuted Muslims from other counties could go. The path to Indian citizenship is open to Muslims from any country, including Pakistan, Bangladesh and Afghanistan.

Finally, the Act needs to be seen as positive discrimination much like the affirmative action policy of the US and the reservation for Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/ST) in India. Those who are agitating against the Indian CAA should perhaps pay heed to how much SC/ST and other deprived groups have benefited from such positive discrimination. 

(This article was first published in Australian Outlook)

Pakistan abandons its students in Wuhan to please China

If Islamabad’s decision not to evacuate its students studying in Wuhan–the epicenter of the Coronavirus epidemic, reflects sheer irresponsibility then the reasons that it has given for doing so are even more appalling. How can a democratically government that’s supposed to be “Of, By and For the People,” abdicate its constitutional responsibility in such a casual manner? How can anyone ever expect that Special Assistant to Prime Minister on Health Dr Zafar Mirza’s pontification about the weird choice of ruling out evacuation from Wuhan on the grounds that “it is in the larger interest of the region, world, country” allay the genuine fears of effected students or their distraught parents?

Dr Mirza did speak about how the “(Pakistan) government cares about its citizens just as much as their own families.” But by going on to suggest that evacuation of Pakistani students from Coronavirus -hit Wuhan would amount to be taking “an emotional decision and become a reason for the spread of this disease,” he only ended up exposing Islamabad’s complete apathy for its own citizens. It’s no secret that Pakistan can’t survive without the political and financial support that it’s been receiving so generously from China and therefore, one can well understand Islamabad’s compulsion of faithfully toeing Beijing’s line.

But then, even subservience has a limit, which is why Islamabad’s inexplicable willingness to put its own citizens in peril is something that defies logical explanation. Dr Mirza’s apologetic defence of Islamabad’s decision against evacuation of its citizens from Wuhan on the grounds that “… this is China’s policy and this is our policy as well. We stand by China in full solidarity,” is really pathetic, to say the least. Furthermore, by saying “Right now the government of China has contained this epidemic in Wuhan city,” the Prime Minister’s Special Assistant on Health has committed the unpardonable sin of officially spreading misinformation amongst the people just to please Beijing.

To coverup the absolute abdication of its constitutional responsibility, Islamabad has (like always) avoided using the ‘bullet approach’ by being specific while justifying its actions and instead, is relying on the ‘buckshot strategy’ of peppering its domestic audience of a wide-ranging array of rather poor excuses. Dr Mirza categorically ruled out evacuation by saying that “If we act irresponsibly and start evacuating people from there, this epidemic will spread all over the world like wildfire.” But Foreign Office spokesperson Aisha Farooqui said that Pakistani nationals were stranded at Urumqi airport due to a flight delay adding that “Pakistani government was making an all-out effort for its citizens,” but didn’t elaborate what these “all-out” efforts were!

Today, almost everyone in authority in Pakistan is busy giving explanations ranging from the pedestrian to the bizarre, whereas Islamabad’s plea is that since no advisory on evacuation of people has been issued by the World Health Organisation (WHO) its stance is vindicated. Pakistan President Dr Arif Alvi has invoked Islam to justify Islamabad’s decision of leaving hundreds of hapless Pakistanis in China to their own device. Consider his tweet: “Prophet’s directions regarding disease outbreaks are a good guide even 2day. If you hear of an outbreak of plague in a land, do not enter it, but if the plague breaks out in a place while you are in it, do not leave that place” (Bukhari & Muslim). One wonders whether his tweet will help those stuck in China and will be able to comfort those who are staring coronavirus in its face and begging the Government of Pakistan to evacuate them.

With Pakistan’s Ambassador in Beijing Naghmana Hashmi saying that “medical facilities in Pakistan do not meet the standards (essential for tackling coronavirus)” and Special Assistant to Prime Minister on Health countering this by stating that Pakistan is fully prepared to combat any outbreak of coronavirus, things have become even more confusing. But the truth isn’t very hard to find. Islamabad may hide behind the absence of any WHO advisory on evacuation from areas where coronavirus infection has been reported, but when other neighbouring countries like India and Bangladesh have commenced evacuating their nationals from China, Islamabad’s refusal to follow suit makes no sense. However, a clue that could decode Pakistan’s refusal to consider evacuation of its nationals can be found in Dr Mirza’s “We stand by China in full solidarity” announcement.

With Chinese ambassador to Pakistan Yao Jing thanking Pakistan for extending unwavering support by honouring Beijing’s request against evacuation of its nationals, it becomes absolutely clear that the sole reason for Islamabad’s skewed decision on evacuating its nationals from coronavirus hit areas is to ensure appeasement of its “all weather friend.” As on date, at least five Pakistani nationals in China have contracted coronavirus and since Islamabad is not considering evacuating its nationals from there, this number could grow. One only hopes that good sense prevails quickly and unconditional subservience of Pakistani leadership is replaced by a sense of responsibility towards the people so that the mental and physical ordeal of the hapless Pakistani nationals trapped in China has a happy ending.

Tailpiece—It’s high time Prime Minister Imran Khan realised that no matter how ‘weatherproof’ or ‘sweet’ Islamabad’s friendship with Beijing may be, he has no moral right to play with the health and lives of Pakistani nationals just to keep China happy. The Pakistan Army may have abandoned its dead during the 1999 Kargil conflict, but it could do so because Rawalpindi isn’t answerable to anyone. The legislature is certainly accountable to the people and so, unlike the military, Khan cannot leave his countrymen in China to their fate. Let’s not forget that come what may, humans can never be rendered disposable by ‘larger’ interests!