Home Blog Page 304

J&K: Governance must be result oriented and promises need to be delivered

0

In Jammu and Kashmir, security and politics are interlinked. Due to foreign sponsored terrorism and unrest, the security and law & order situation attains primacy. On many occasions political activity in Jammu and Kashmir became unfeasible due to sensitive internal security environment. On all such occasions the security forces were given the responsibility to usher an acceptable degree of peace and law and order to facilitate restoration of the political process.

It is to the credit of the security forces, and especially the Indian Army, that on all such occasions it brought in a conducive environment to kick start the political process. Sadly, the feudal, blinkered, parochial and self serving leadership of the erstwhile state failed to take advantage and allowed the situation to deteriorate time and again. This has happened too many times in the past and has caused great loss to the security forces as also to the people of the region.

The Mehbooba Mufti-led coalition government was the last such instance when a peaceful environment was allowed to fritter away. Problems escalated to an extent that BJP was compelled to withdraw from the coalition leading to imposition of Governor’s rule amid enhanced security threats. Once again the security forces led by the Indian Army set out to restore the security situation. This time the forces got full support of the Central Government and were able to contain the terrorist threat.

The resultant stability gave leverage to the government such that in August 2019 New Delhi changed the status of the region from a state to two Union Territories and also abrogate the draconian Article 370 and Article 35A.

Inimical foreign forces and their stooges within Kashmir were quick to predict a huge upswing in violence and dissension as a consequence to the changes made. These doomsday astrologers were shocked when their predictions came to a naught. The people exhibited relief and looked forward to peace and normality as a consequence of the changes. The security forces ensured that the remnants of terrorism and divisive forces were not allowed to raise their ugly heads. The region, thus, experienced a degree of normality not witnessed for decades earlier.

Once again the environment is such where political activity can take centre stage. Taking advantage of this situation is now absolutely in the hands of the people and their leaders. They have to work in concert with the central government to create a new, more vibrant political and social dispensation in the region.

There are three factors that would be involved in meeting this challenge – security, development and democratic governance. The security situation is well in control and will remain so since vigilance levels are very high and the forces are unlikely to allow it to deteriorate. A lot depends upon the cooperation provided by the people which will definitely remain forthcoming unless bad policies cause frustration and dissension yet again.

The UT government has a dynamic development agenda in place with  support coming from the centre. Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha has set out a vision of holistic and balanced development. What is of concern, however, is that J&K continued to be ranked a lowly 20 in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) index for the second time in January 2020, the first time being in 2018. This implies that the UT is lagging in all streams to include zero hunger, good health and well-being, quality education, clean water and sanitation, affordable and clean energy, decent work and economic growth. It was also low in categories of industry innovation and infrastructure, reduced inequalities, sustainable cities and communities, sustainable consumption and production, climate action, etc. The present government cannot be completely held responsible since it had started functioning a few months before the index was prepared but from the data the reason behind frustration of the people with their leaders becomes quite apparent.

J&K government constituted a high power committee of 23 bureaucrats including the chief secretary to finalise the action plan including mapping of departments and schemes for each SDG target. The action plan and its impact , however, is not in the public domain. When the change of status from State to UT was announced in 2019 it was said that 10 Union Ministries would join hands to speed up development work. The parameters and impact of this initiative is also not known.

In January 2021, the Lieutenant Governor had announced approval of a Rs. 28,400 crore industrial developmental scheme for the UT to boost the region’s economy and provide employment opportunities. Recently, he spoke of the agriculture sector in the UT getting more share of the budget component. It is hoped that the progress in these two schemes will be shared by the government at regular intervals to boost the morale of the people and give to them an indication that the promised development process is on fast track. The acid test for improvement will come when the SDG index for the year 2020-21 is declared. It is hoped that the same will show a perceptible improvement.

So far as the ushering of democratic practices is concerned the central government has given a commitment for conduct of early elections to the UT Legislative Assembly and also reinstatement of the UT as a State in due course. The successful conduct of the District Development Council (DDC) elections was a step in the right direction. It has to be built upon to carry out timely and equitable delimitation of the state constituencies and then holding of the elections to the legislative Assembly of the UT as a precursor to the change in status from UT to State.

It is not enough for the government to be committed, it has to be seen to be committed and result oriented. If promises are not kept then the faith of the people and the sacrifices of the security forces will come to naught. The ball is firmly in the court of the government.

Nuances and structure of ‘dispute resolution’ in Indo-Pak relations

Pakistan has made a strong pitch for “resolution of issues” with India. The diplomatic rhetoric commenced in early March, a little after recommitment by the Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMO) of the two countries to uphold the ceasefire agreement and protocols of 2003.

This initiative was followed by a number of  other actions that indicated movement towards a thaw. Prime Minister Imran Khan was given permission to fly over India for his visit to Sri Lanka; permission was also given to a Pakistani equestrian team to participate in the “World Cup qualifiers of Equestrian Tent Pegging Championship” being held in India. This is the first time that a Pakistani sporting team has been allowed to play in India since 2018.

In recent days, there is a lot of buzz within media and strategic circles that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) is playing a big role in brokering peace between the two Nations. In end- December, 2020, a visit by Indian Army Chief, General MM Naravane, to Saudi Arabia and UAE came as a surprise to all. Now the strings can be tied to a larger picture that is emerging. In later months, UAE Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed is known to have held parleys with foreign ministers of the two countries and even visited India recently to discuss, “all regional and international issues of common interest and exchanged views on them.”

Now that the ceasefire seems to be holding, it will be reasonable to assume that the two countries will attempt to reinstate diplomatic relations that broke down in 2019 when Indian changed the status of the state of Jammu and Kashmir and abrogated Article 370 and Article 35A. Pakistan had no reason to take the extreme step of breaking diplomatic ties since the Indian actions were valid as per the Constitution of the country and did not merit any foreign interference. If Pakistan now agrees to get out of its sulk and re-establish diplomatic relations it would be a step in the right direction.

Affirmative steps including establishment of diplomatic ties are expected  to pave the way for the more complex negotiations. Before discussing the structure and nuances of dialogue it is important to understand its need.

Pakistan has very low credibility in international circles. Earlier, the country was isolated for being the “nursery of terrorism and fundamentalism”, now, financial crisis has added to its woes. The country is, however, aware that it can go on being tolerated by the US due to the Afghanistan factor and by China due to CPEC. The need is to make a good impression on the US and other powers. This is possible only if it can project a somewhat moderate face for which a working relationship with India becomes most important.

So far as India is concerned, the incumbent government of India has in place an ambitious plan for poverty eradication and development which can be best applied only if peace in the neighbourhood is ensured. It also has to face up to Chinese belligerence which is best met by an undisturbed western border. India therefore has a lot to gain by normalised ties with Pakistan.

Pakistan has already laid down “Kashmir” as the focal point for any discussion aimed at normalisation of ties between the two countries. The same has been said in no uncertain terms by Prime Minister Imran Khan and General Qamar Bajwa. India is very clear about the status of Jammu and Kashmir as an integral part of the country in which Pakistan has no role to play. Hence, there is nothing to talk so far as Kashmir is concerned except handing over to India the territories of the erstwhile princely state that are in forcible occupation of Pakistan. With such divergent perceptions Kashmir cannot remain the focal point of the resolution process.

A better idea would be to speak about reopening of trade between the two countries. This would go a long way in addressing Pakistan’s financial woes. India can help in shoring up the food security sector of the country that is presently in tatters. A line of credit can be set up for the import of  wheat, sugar, spices, tea, pulses that Pakistan is presently getting at exorbitant rates, spending more than $8 billion annually that it can ill afford. Then there are items like cell phones and other electronics that India can provide. Also, the life threatening water scarcity issue in Pakistan is something that India can help surmount.

One way of looking at the entire game plan is that peace will ensure less expenditure by Pakistan on defence acquisition and the money thus saved will assist in building a robust trade with India, leading to a classic win-win situation.

By insisting on the “K” word Pakistan will only reinforce its lack of seriousness so far as peace is concerned. One hopes that this rigid position taken by the political and military leadership of the country is an attempt to sit on the negotiating table on a moral high ground and also to placate the opposition that thrives on anti-India rhetoric and it will find moderation with time. General Qamar Bajwa has spoken of “burying the past” and the most debilitating past is Pakistan’s obsession with Kashmir. Any leader of the country who is able to rise above this obsession (or bury it) will create history as a true statesman.

India would do well to approach the resolution process with positivity and firmness. Any sign of duplicity and double speak on the part of Pakistan would require an immediate response and pressure to bring in course correction. By so doing India can ensure that the process stays on course.

QUAD: India rises in stature yet the Chinese threat looms large

On 26 December 2004, a Tsunami in the Indian Ocean region caused unprecedented devastation and a humanitarian crisis. Hundreds of thousands were killed and millions displaced. Major democracies to include India, Japan, Australia and the United States got together to put up a concerted response to the crisis. The cooperation was given the name “QUAD” and was basically meant to tide over the crisis. It, however, survived beyond and has slowly emerged as a significant alliance. 

China did not want any such grouping emerging in its backyard and used every trick available to derail the same. In 2008, Australia walked out due to pressure from China. The US too was not very interested since it did not consider China to be a strategic threat to its superpower status and had vital trade relations with the country. India too preferred to remain cautious since none of the other members have contiguous borders with China, although Japan does have a territorial dispute over a few islands.

The QUAD got a big boost when Quad 3.0 was organised on 12 March 2021, as a virtual summit. It was attended by Prime Minister Narendra Modi; US President Joe Biden; Prime Minister Scott Morrison of Australia and Prime Minister Yoshihide Suga of Japan. The meeting is seen as a major step in politically consolidating this group.

There are a few parameters that make this summit significant. First, President Joe Biden accepted to be a part of these talks within a few months of taking over thus giving a clear message of his commitment to the Indo-Pacific region. Second, issuing of a joint statement; in the earlier two meetings the countries gave out separate statements. 

The joint statement speaks extensively about  core issues that QUAD is seized with like the climate change, health, challenges posed by emerging technologies etc. The crunch comes at the point where it speaks of a “shared vision for an Indo-Pacific region that is free, open, resilient and inclusive, accessible and dynamic, governed by international law and bedrock principles such as freedom of navigation and peaceful resolution of disputes… to advance security and prosperity and counter threats to both in the Indo-Pacific and beyond.” It is the end word “beyond” that drastically increases the scope of the QUAD. There is also an indication that select partners in ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) and Europe will be invited to work together with the QUAD in the future.

Also of importance is the message given with respect to the joint effort to administer COVID vaccine in the region. India has already given more than about 23 million doses of the vaccine to poor countries and emerged in the forefront of this initiative. QUAD has committed to work in partnership to ensure that vaccines are administered throughout the Indo-Pacific region by 2022. A decision to manufacture US vaccine in India to provide one billion doses to the Indo-Pacific region has also been put on the table.

Interestingly, the situation in the Eastern Ladakh along the LAC between India and Pakistan was also discussed. President Joe stressed on “the commitment to ensure that the region is governed by international law and is free from coercion.”

That China is disconcerted by the turn of events can be gauged by the statements emanating from the country’s propaganda machinery. “India will become cannon fodder for the US”, said their primary propaganda vehicle, Global Times, adding, “It seems India has failed to understand China’s goodwill. It is in fact, carrying out a kind of strategic blackmail against China”.

The statement is a classic case of “pot calling the kettle black”. The fact is that India has consistently attempted to build a healthy relationship with China while China has always responded with belligerence. Apart from its misadventures along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) it is known to look for alliances with countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iran, etc., that are directed against India. Now that India is paying back in the same coin, China is not liking it one bit.

QUAD has taken long to come but it has come with a bang. Earlier it was consumed only by issues of well being but post the meeting of QUAD 2.0 in 2017 there was a significant upsurge in joint military and naval exercises and working on what was termed as a “peaceful world order based on international laws including economic and humanitarian cooperation.” Now, with QUAD 3.0 it has taken a new, more dynamic dimension.

QUAD provides to India an opportunity to emerge as a significant force in the multilateral order of the world but it does not really address the existing security concerns of the country so far as China is concerned. However, India has been dealing with a recalcitrant and abrasive China since much before QUAD came into existence. Despite the QUAD 2.0 protocols being in place China went for the eastern Ladakh misadventure and India was able to not only contain its belligerence but also compelled it to agree to a withdrawal to status quo ante. India will need to remain ready for similar confrontations in coming times. The US and QUAD may be depended upon to intervene to curb expansionist designs of China but issues like the long standing border dispute between India and China will need to be resolved bilaterally.

It can be said in conclusion that earlier India was reticent in reaching out to such forums due to the need to not ruffle China’s feathers. It did not pay much dividend since China did not relent from its malevolent activities. Now India has chosen to move on her international affiliations independent of Chinese pressure. QUAD has added to the power that India wields in the international forum. The wording of the Joint Statement is such that will put some restraint on the expansionist designs of the communist country. However, India needs to remain very alive to the fact that when push comes to a shove so far as China is concerned, she will be on her own. Hence the need to stay alert and militarily ready.

Pak Army kidnaps three women from Gichk, occupied Balochistan

The Pakistan Army on Thursday arrested and disappeared three women in Gichk, district Panjgur as it unleased a fresh wave of terror across Pakistan-occupied Balochistan (POB).

On Thursday morning the Pakistan Army soldiers in battle fatigues raided a house in Toba area of ​​Gichk at Panjgur. The soldiers looted houses and then took three women into custody. The Baloch women who have been abducted and forcibly disappeared by Pakistan Army have been identified as Raj Bibi (daughter of Pindok Baloch), Nazal (daughter of Musafir Baloch) and Kapot (daughter of Awaz Baloch).

Over the last several days Pakistan Army has been conducting raids in Gichk and its surrounding areas Toba, Soler, Wadi Mashkai and Jhaoo.

Balochistan attained its independence from British rule on 11 August 1947, four days before Pakistan and India attained their independence on 15 August 1947. Thereafter Pakistan under Mohammed Ali Jinnah deceitfully and illegally captured Balochistan on 27 March 1948. Baloch nationals have been fighting for their independence since that time. Pakistani regime and Pakistan Army use brute force on unarmed Baloch nationals including women and children to suppress the Balochistan’s freedom struggle.

Pak’s Peace Proposal: Myths and Realities

Pakistan is smoking the peace pipe, yet again, and the doves in India are going into raptures as usual, insisting that India should immediately respond in a positive manner and move forward to “resolve all issues.”

Let us first see the manner in which peace initiative is being played out by Pakistan. “With India, it is very unfortunate that we have tried to resolve our issues through dialogue like civilised neighbours, but it has not worked out. Our only issue is basically over Kashmir,” stated Prime Minister Imran Khan on the subject. Any person even remotely knowledgeable about the art of diplomacy would be appalled by the obtuseness of this statement. He is insinuating that India is uncivilised while Pakistan is the very embodiment of moderation. Is this how a peace overture is made? He has further given a single point agenda of Kashmir. Pray what is there to resolve in Kashmir? It is an integral part of India and an internal affair of the country so how can it form a part of dialogue with Pakistan or any other country in the world?

Pakistan Army Chief, General Qamar Bajwa, has attempted to give a strategic sheen to the idea. While describing stable Indo-Pakistan relations as “the key to unlock the potential of South and Central Asia,” he said that “unsettled disputes” were dragging South Asia back to poverty and underdevelopment. “The Kashmir dispute, obviously, is at the heart of this problem,” he adds rather grandly.

One would like to explain to the General that the obsession of his Army with Kashmir has, for the last seven decades plus, been responsible for hurtling HIS country into an abyss of “poverty and underdevelopment.” The rest of South Asia may have its own problems and challenges but Kashmir does not figure among them. India in particular had progressed despite Pakistan’s perfidious attitude towards Kashmir and evolved as a powerful, financially vibrant, democratic nation. In fact, Kashmir is a million times more developed and secure than Balochistan, Sindh and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa that continue to be exploited by Pakistan’s Punjab province and not to speak of Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (POJK) that is in a dire state with no formalised political identity to speak of. 

General Bajwa may be able to impress the very poor, semi-literate, uninformed people of his country with his high sounding “strategic expositions” but they fall flat when analysed logically. Surely he needs to get his ideas more in tune with reality.

What exactly does Pakistan mean by “resolution of the Kashmir issue?” It can be surmised from the many statements made over time that Pakistan would look for this “resolution” in three stages. First, reinstatement of statehood and Article 370/Article 35A in Jammu and Kashmir giving full power to the Pakistani stooges to resume their loot of the region as earlier. Second, derail the Shimla agreement and take the matter to the international forums especially the United Nations. Lastly, project India as an aggressor in Kashmir.

For Pakistan, an honest way to open dialogue would be to offer discussion on the status of POJK. The dialogue should then move forward with the objective of ushering lasting peace based on mutual economic and cultural benefit. If Imran Khan had hinted towards something like this the two countries would have been on the negotiating table by now. But this would make him easy prey to his political opposition and also the militant warlords who are responsible for his elevation to the top post in Pakistan, hence, there is no chance of his going along that route. Where then lies any scope of talks?

Pakistan knows well that it cannot wrest Kashmir away from India. The latest “peace initiative” has been engineered only to take the attention of the public away from the socio-economic crisis that the country is facing and also to counter the pressure emanating from the US and many other important European Nations. The idea is to portray India as rigid and uncooperative and Pakistan as moderate and accommodating.

The entire world and Pakistan’s own countrymen are well aware that disastrous policies adopted by General Bajwa and Imran Khan have created a mess within their country and outside of it. Instead of playing around with words and so blatantly exposing their lack of political and diplomatic acumen, they should work out some concrete steps to change the situation.

The Indian Foreign office has given a very mature response to this pseudo-diplomatic move by Pakistan. “India desires good neighbourly relations with Pakistan and is committed to addressing issues, if any, bilaterally and peacefully. However, any meaningful dialogue can only be held in a conducive atmosphere and the onus is on Pakistan to create such an atmosphere,” said Indian Foreign Secretary Harsh Shringla on the subject. The statement leaves no doubt about India’s position.

Indian Foreign Minister is soon to attend the Heart of Asia Regional Conference on Afghanistan to be held in Dushanbe, Tajikistan on March 30. There is a possibility of his interaction on the sidelines of the conference with his Pakistani counterpart, Shah Mahmood Qureshi. It is unlikely to make much difference since Qureshi is a bigger hawk with a larger ego than both Imran and Bajwa joined together. There is, however, no harm in hoping for the best.

India is sensitive to the fact that peace within the neighbourhood is both important and desirable. Talking even with an adversary does pay dividends. It is for this reason that India has responded with cautious optimism leaving all doors open. However, the road to peace cannot run roughshod over national interest. If Pakistan stops supporting myths and attempts to approach the negotiating table with a realistic agenda then talks can progress very fast. If it opens dialogue without putting the “K” word centre stage there is some hope, otherwise the initiative will be relegated as another example of the fatuous and abrasive diplomacy being pursued by the country.

Why India must deport Rohingyas to their homeland

A three member Supreme Court bench comprising of Chief Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde and Justices A.S. Bopanna and V. Ramasubramanian is seized with a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) plea seeking directions for the “release of so-called Rohingya refugees” who have been detained in the Jammu region of the Union Territory (UT) of Jammu Kashmir under the Foreigners Act since early March this year. On completion of formalities, these refugees would be deported to Myanmar, their country of origin.

It can be noted here that on 7 March 2021, close to about 160 Rohingya refugees living in Jammu were detained and sent to a “holding centre” under the Foreigners Act as they did not hold valid travel documents. The detention has been done in the Hiranagar sub-jail of district Kathua of the UT. The move was a part of a larger verification process designed to further the deportation process.

The application to stall the legitimate process of deportation has been filed in the Honourable Supreme Court by a non government organisation (NGO) association for democratic reforms represented by Mr Prashant Bhushan; quite clearly its intention is to stall the government’s efforts towards sending illegal immigrants back to their parent countries!

Rohingyas are a Muslim community of Myanmar;  thousands of them arrived in Jammu from 2007 to 2015 and spread out to 22 locations across the city, including Narwal, Bhatindi, Channi Himmat, Bhagwati Nagar. Their settlement was actively supported by the PDP-Congress and National Conference-Congress led governments of those times, despite the fact that even Indian citizens were not allowed to settle in the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir due to provisions of Article 370 and Article 35A.

The settlement soon became a tinder box as far as Jammu was concerned creating critical law and order and security problems for the local people. However, the governmental support continued and ensured that the community of illegal refugees continued to mushroom in and around Jammu only. What was particularly galling was the fact that these refugees were not being sent to Kashmir where they had closer religious affinity to the people, but were being settled down in the Hindu majority areas of Jammu. 

They were, in fact, supported financially by many Kashmiri philanthropic organisations that ensured that the settling down and rehabilitation process was smooth for them. With time they were also facilitated with necessary documentation like ration card, voter card, Aadhar card and even state subject so as to make them permanent residents of the state.

By turning a blind eye to the rules and regulations the state governments of those times created a problem of critical dimensions. It was seen by the people of Jammu as a well planned conspiracy to negatively impact the security of the region and also an attempt to start a process of changing its demography.

The action or “relative inaction” of the governments of those times created significant law and order issues in the places where the Rohingya settlements came up since the members of the community were not averse to committing crime and causing harm to the public as well as private property. The security forces expressed serious reservations at the prospect of having foreigners of dubious antecedents so near to their many sensitive installations in the areas where the refugee camps came up. The fact that the Rohingya have, for long, been on the payroll of Pakistan’s notorious Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) for operations in Bangladesh and Myanmar added a very critical dimension to the security threat posed by these settlements.

The move naturally led to massive protests and demonstrations in the Jammu region but the same fell to deaf ears. PILs were also filed in the local courts that gave orders for deportation proceeding to be initiated at the earliest. These orders had no effect on the governments.

The government of India, in 2018, set about a process to identify the Rohingya refugees in India (said to be more than 40,000 in number!) with the intention of initiating their deportation to their parent country. All states were asked to identify the Rohingyas and collect their biometric details for further sharing with the government of Myanmar. The process was initiated in the Union Territory of Jammu and Kashmir too and as a continuation to the same, the detention process was instituted in March, 2021.

The government has, very rightly, stated its position that such citizens of Myanmar who are staying in India as illegal migrants will be deported once their nationality is confirmed by their parent country. Despite the established legality of the process of deportation and the irrefutability of the fact that the Rohingyas cannot stay in Jammu or in any other place in India in perpetuity, there are many bleeding hearts out to represent against the legal recourse being taken by the government.

The voices raised on their behalf from among the leadership in the UT of Jammu Kashmir are more for political reasons. There are many regional parties that have all intention of converting these people into a vote bank resource. Such illegal activity has grave security repercussions anywhere in the country; in frontier regions like Jammu it gains critical proportions. It is for this reason that the malevolent intentions of those who support the continued presence of the Rohingyas in the region need to be exposed and nipped in the bud. It is sad to note that some people are ready to compromise on security in a sensitive border area like Jammu for the sake of vested political considerations.

There are many international norms and caveats that are used to ensure that people are not repressed by their own governments and countrymen. Once the government of Myanmar accepts its people back it will be honour bound to look after them, it is also better for them to get back to their homeland. The action being taken by the J&K government with active support from New Delhi is not only legal, it is also justified and necessary.

Is the Institution of Justice Alive in Pakistan?

A nation is made of the political system, justice system, security system, religious system, media or information system, economic system and various social systems or organisations. With growth of the country from the time of inception, these systems start taking the shape of institutions and keep getting stronger. If the political system adopted by the country is democratic and its constitution lays down strong rules for overall governance, then all the institutions flourish.

In case of Pakistan, the Army, in conjunction with its intelligence agency ISI took to the centre stage through a series of coups and kept eroding all other institutions in favour of itself. Over last seven decades, different Chiefs of Army Staffs played with the basic structure of Pakistan’s constitution and created alternative structure by penetrating all the institutions overtly or covertly. Army either exercised direct control over other institutions or encroached into their key appointments by placing serving or the retired Generals.

Justice system depends on the laws enacted, freedom to lodge complaints by victims, investigation, and finally the delivery of verdict by courts. Overall erosion of justice system means erosion of all of them individually. Consider a high profile case like Daniel Pearl’s who was abducted and murdered in 2002. Killers of Daniel Pearl were acquitted by Pakistan’s Supreme Court on 28 January 2021 putting the blame on ‘lack of evidence’. This is the outcome of justice in Pakistan when the native state of Daniel Pearl wielded so much power and put pressures on Pakistan government to ensure justice.

Who are those that Pakistan’s justice system has saved or saving over the decades? Earlier, scores of instances related to the perpetrators of Mumbai attack, Pathankot attack, APS Peshawar attack, and so on have brought to fore the anomalies that plague Pakistan’s justice system. Pakistan’s justice system has brazenly supported whatever formed part of the narrative of Pakistan Army, even when it amounted to going against the very basics of justice. While some may say that Pakistan government was passively supporting the terrorists through its silence, reality is that entire state machinery was actively engineering all these acts of terror and providing safe havens to terrorist Tanzeems operating from its soil.

In the case of Daniel Pearl, prime accused Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh was made to languish in jail for over a decade so that evidences get destroyed, world attention goes away from it and judiciary can quietly give a judgement that’s favourable to the establishment.

Entire machinations shaped as the content of judgement says “in this case, regarding each and every piece of evidence, the doubts are emerging from the mouth of the witnesses,” thus using the space so created, to pronounce that “benefit of doubt” has rightly been given to Sheikh considering that the evidence furnished during the trial against him was fraught with factual and legal defects.” This judgement is a landmark judgement as many others to prove that all anti-terrorist trials will follow the sequence of well orchestrated sham by judiciary, yet showing to the world that it has ‘zero tolerance’ to terrorism. Let us examine the machinations of Pakistani justice system through this case.

Daniel Pearl, an American journalist working for Wall Street Journal, was kidnapped and later beheaded on February 12, 2012. On February 12 the same year, Ahmed Omar Saeed revealed before a Karachi court that he had initially surrendered to the Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) a week earlier in Lahore. During hearings he refused to defend himself, and the court, after one of the quickest trials awarded death sentence. Same terrorist, who had refused to defend his case at lower court, appeals in higher court. At this stage, the case is delayed for 18 years and based on some confessions at Guantanamo Bay by another inmate Khalid Sheikh Mohammad’s confession, the murder charges are quashed by Supreme Court of Pakistan and Sheikh is awarded jail term of seven years for kidnapping Daniel Pearl. The verdict was a huge shock to those in US seeking justice.

Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in captivity of Pakistani terrorists.
Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl in captivity of Pakistani terrorists. (File photo)

What a mockery of justice. Entire justice system including investigators to the court beautifully orchestrated the evidence and the murder charges get reduced to kidnapping charges. This is one of the most blatant manifestation of Pakistan’s strategy for dealing with terrorist’s cases. Lower court speedily indicts the terrorist (to cool the tempers) while higher court delays it for two decades and pronounces judgement after altering the entire case. Hence, manufacturing the “scenario of lack of evidence” is the art displayed by Pakistani courts repeatedly. May it be the 2008 Mumbai attacks, 2019 Pulwama attacks or any other. 

Political analyst Ms. Ayesha Siddiqa’s apt summation that “Historically, cases against certain terror suspects are deliberately kept weak to provide them relief later on. It is not necessarily the court’s fault but that of the prosecution,” says it all. When the world says that terrorism is practiced by Pakistan as an Instrument of State Policy, it means involvement of entire state machinery from breeding, training, tasking, controlling and preserving the terrorist organisations and terrorist cadres. ISI, has deep rooted connections and networks in various countries of the world to exploit the terrorist force to achieve leverage in its international relations.  At different times in last five decades, Pakistan has used this machination in support of Washington to oust Russians from Afghanistan, in support of China to manage Uighur problem and against India to balance its conventional disparity.

For many decades, acts of Pakistan didn’t seem painful to US and it kept turning a blind eye to Pakistan acting as breeding ground of terrorists. Attack at World Trade Centre changed all that and suddenly Pakistan became a partner of US in Global War on Terror. It took many years for US to realise and acknowledge what Pakistan was actually doing. Now China is partnering Pakistan because it wants to achieve it’s own ends. Whatever may be the consequences for the rest of the world, time is not far when this demon breeding policy of Pakistan that has subverted all the systems in the country will lead to disintegration of Pakistan as a country.

Mama Qadeer’s nephews among five Baloch ‘forcibly disappeared’ by Pakistan

Five youngsters including the two nephews of renowned Baloch human rights activist Mama Qadeer Baloch have been “forcibly disappeared” from Soorab in Balochistan. The Pakistani security forces cordoned off the main market of Soorab on Thursday morning, then they raided a shop and arrested five Baloch youth.

The arrested youth have been identified as Mohammad Asif (son of Shabeer Ahmed Reki), Alla-ud-Din (son of Shabeer Ahmed Reki), Mohammad Irfan (son of Mohammad Hakeem Reki) and Zulqarnain (son of Haji Fareed Reki). The identity of fifth individual has not been ascertained yet.

All five detainees have been taken to an undisclosed location and have not been heard of since their detention.

Mohammad Asif and Alla-ud-Din are nephews of Baloch human rights activist Mama Qadeer Baloch, who has been campaigning against enforced disappearances for more than a decade.

Mama Qadeer Baloch, is vice chairperson of Voice for Baloch Missing Persons (VBMP), and has attended UN sessions and various international conferences to raise awareness about the issue of missing persons. He also led a long march that travelled more than 2500 kilometre on foot from Quetta to Karachi and then to Islamabad.

Mama Qadeer Baloch’s son Jaleel Reki, a political activist, was also forcibly disappeared from Quetta in 2009. His bullet riddled dead body was found three years later from Mand, Balochistan.

BLF rocket attack damages Gwadar International Airport; Pak soldiers killed

The Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) fired two BM-12 rockets at the Gwadar International Airport on Friday which landed right in the middle of under construction airport causing serious damages and halting all development activities. This is a new International Airport at Gwadar that’s being constructed by a Pakistani company FW in collaboration with Chinese firms. Baloch sarmachaars (freedom fighters) have been fighting against blatant Chinese colonization of Gwadar coastal area and have attacked Chinese installations at Gwadar in the recent past too.

Local Gwadar police have reported a few casualties due to BLF’s BM-12 rocket attack but the Pakistan Army is yet to acknowledge the deaths of its soldiers. Interestingly, Pakistan Army has now sealed the entire area and the local administration and local police are not being allowed inside the under-construction Gwadar International Airport that bore the brunt of BLF’s rocket attack.

BLF spokesman Major Gwahram Baloch said in a statement that their sarmachaars (freedom fighters) fired two BM-12 rockets at the Airport in the Gurandani area of ​​Gwadar at 6PM (local time) on Friday. “Both rockets landed inside the construction site at Gwadar International Airport.”

Since early morning on Saturday Pakistan Army’s gunship helicopters have been conducting search operations around Dasht mountains, from where the BM-12 rockets were fired by BLF sarmachaars at the Gwadar International Airport.

This new Gwadar International Airport is being built on an area of around 4,800 acres that after completion would have the operational capabilities to cater to jumbo-sized cargo aircrafts. The new Gwadar International Airport after completion will also double up as the air base for Chinese fighter jets.

Major Gwahram Baloch warned that all these schemes are part of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) project. The current Gwadar Airport is very small and is unsuitable for Chinese air base and also for CPEC’s imperialist loot of Balochistan’s resources. “BLF will continue its operations against these evil designs which are carried out without the will and intention of the Baloch nation on their motherland,” said Major Gwahram Baloch. He added that attacks on the occupying army and such imperialist designs would continue till the independence of occupied Balochistan.

Naya Pakistan is about gradual elimination of minorities

Two years ago, while speaking on the occasion to mark 100 days of his government in office, Prime Minister Imran Khan made many a boast and promises. Besides waxing eloquent on turning Pakistan into a “model Islamic welfare state,” he also hit out at his Indian counterpart by saying, “We will show the Modi government how to treat minorities.” Unfortunately, despite this bold assurance, instances of atrocities against minorities in Pakistan have increased many fold under Khan’s watch.

US Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom, Samuel Brownback has made things embarrassing for Khan by making it clear that as far as Pakistan was concerned, “a lot of their actions (against religious freedom) are done by the government.” So, it’s not at all surprising that Washington has designated Pakistan a ‘country of serious concern’ for engaging in or tolerating “systematic, ongoing, egregious violations of religious freedom.”  To make matters even more humiliating, Khan’s “how to treat minorities” barb directed at Modi boomeranged when US State Department summarily rejected US Commission for International Religious Freedom’s recommendation to designate India a ‘country of serious concern’! 

Khan wants everyone to believe that his “Naya [new] Pakistan is Quaid’s [Jinnah’s] Pakistan” in which “minorities are treated as equal citizens, unlike what is happening in India” but this claim has hardly any takers. Au contraire, in its ‘World Report 2020’, Human Right Watch [HRW] has noted that along with women and transgender people, religious minorities in Pakistan continued to face violence, discrimination, and persecution, with authorities often failing to provide adequate protection or hold perpetrators accountable. Even Human Right Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has been extremely critical about the PTI-led government’s abysmal failure in protecting minorities, which it rightly feels are “doubly vulnerable”!

Islamabad dismisses widespread international criticism for failing to institute adequate safeguards to prevent religious persecution of its minorities by terming it an ‘opinion based on disinformation’. However, in its annual ‘State of Human Rights in 2019’ report [released in 2020], HRCP has noted that “Religious minorities remained unable to enjoy the freedom of religion or belief guaranteed to them under the constitution” adding that “Both the Hindu and Christian communities in Sindh and Punjab continued to report cases of forced conversion.” It also confirms that:

  • “In Punjab, girls as young as 14 were forcibly converted and coerced into marriage.”
  • “In Sindh, the case of two Hindu girls whose families claimed they had been kidnapped for marriage and converted forcibly, drew widespread attention when the Islamabad High Court ruled that the girls were not minors at the time of marriage and allowed them to return to their spouses.”
  • “For the Ahmadiyya community in Punjab, this (religious persecution) included the desecration of several sites of worship.”

Contrary to Imran Khan’s promise to ensure that our minorities are treated as equal citizens,” the year 2020 saw an alarming swell in incidents of persecution of minority communities. The most common being the repugnant practice of Hindu, Christian and Sikh girls (some as young as 12 to 13 years) being abducted and after being converted, being forced into marriage. Even Pakistani NGOs estimate that about 1,000 such incidents occur every year and this is why no one takes Khan’s assurance of minorities in Pakistan being “treated as equal citizens” seriously!

Jagjit Kaur, daughter of a local Sikh Granthi (religious teacher) was abducted at gun point in September last year from Nankana Sahib in Pakistan. Jagjit Kaur was then forcibly converted to Islam and married to Mohammad Hasan.
Jagjit Kaur, daughter of a local Sikh Granthi (religious teacher) was abducted at gun point in September last year from Nankana Sahib in Pakistan. Jagjit Kaur was then forcibly converted to Islam and married to Mohammad Hasan.

Another issue of concern is brazen desecration of holy sites of worship belonging to the minority communities. On January 3, 2020 a mob attempted to vandalise the historic Nankana Sahib Gurdwara and the entire incident was captured on video. However, Pakistan’s Foreign Office (FO) played down this incident by calling it a “scuffle” between two Muslim groups over a “minor incident” at a tea stall. In reference to New Delhi’s complaint against desecration of this holy Sikh shrine, the Pakistani Foreign Office stated that “Attempts to paint this incident as a communal issue are patently motivated.” Whereas one would have really loved to believe that this incident had no communal angle, but following facts belie the Foreign Office’s assertion:

  • If the incident was merely a minor scuffle between two Muslim groups, then how come the Gurudwara became the target of their ire?
  • In the video, a mob can be heard cheering lustily as a speaker tells them that We will ensure that there is not a single Sikh left in Nankana. And the name of this place will soon be changed from Nankana to Ghulam-e-Mustafa”. So, if this incident was just a row between two Muslim groups, then what explains the rabid anti-Sikh tirade of the speaker and its frenzied endorsement by the crowd?
  • Lastly, if it was genuinely a minor and inconsequential incident as the Foreign Office claims, then why did Khan term this incident as “condemnable’ and take all the trouble of downplaying its distinctly communal character by saying that there’s a “major difference between the condemnable Nankana incident and the ongoing attacks across India on Muslims and other minorities”?  

Besides Nankana Sahib Gurudwara, places of worship belonging to other minority communities in Pakistan were also subjected to vandalism last year. On May 9, 2020, a mob damaged the main gate and boundary wall of a church in Hakeempura area of Shekhupura district in Pakistan’s Punjab district and desecrated the Church’s Holy Cross. Once again, the authorities tried to brush this patently communal act under the carpet by terming it a property related dispute. In February, three Pakistani Christians who were constructing a church in Punjab’s Sahiwal district were assaulted and just two months later, a Pastor, his wife and son were attacked for building a wall on their own land. Once again, these incidents of intimidation of minority community members were passed off as instances of personal rivalry!

The year 2020 also saw multiple incidents of Hindu religious shrines being either destroyed or desecrated. On January 26, idols of the deities in Mata Deval Bhittani temple in Tharparkar district of Pakistan’s Sindh province were desecrated and holy texts kept inside were burnt. The police claimed that the perpetrators were minors and had broken into the temple just to steal money. What the police didn’t explain is that if their motive was only robbery, then why did the juveniles waste their time and energy in defacing idols and burning holy books?

On October 10, idols of deities inside Shri Ramdev Temple in Kario Ghanwar area of Badin district, Sindh, were destroyed, and the police once again ruled out communal angle by saying that the culprit was of unsound mind and a drug addict! Just two weeks later, a mob vandalised Nagarparkar Temple in Sindh province, damaging the idol of Goddess Durga during the holy ‘Navratri’ period. No one has been arrested. On November 2, a huge mob descended on Sheetal Temple in Karachi’s Lee Market area and destroyed idols of deities and other holy relics. This time the police sought to justify this highly communal act by terming it public reaction to blasphemous statements made by a Hindu boy!

On December 27, a mob not only vandalised and set ablaze a 100-year-old shrine housing samadhi [memorial] of a revered Hindu saint in the Karak district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. Dawn News TV quoted an eyewitness saying that the incident of desecration and arson occurred after More than a thousand people led by some local elders of a religious party held a protest and demanded the removal of the Hindu place.” Two developments make official apathy (or tacit complicity?) obvious. One, according to news reports, The locals also revealed that residents of the nearby villages had announced a protest demonstration with demands of removal of the Hindu shrine, adding that the police totally ignored it” and two, it was Chief Justice of Pakistan and not Prime Minister Imran Khan who was first to take official cognisance of this sacrilegious incident.

Once again, the police tried to obfuscate reality. The District Police Officer (DPO) refused to acknowledge that the shrine had been vandalised and instead told media that a mob “attacked and demolished the under-construction building (within temple premises).” But Federal Minister for Human Rights Shireen Mazari graciously acknowledged reality by tweeting- “Strongly condemn the burning of a Hindu temple by a mob in Karak, Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa” – which is clearly visible in videos of this incident.

But desecration of religious shrines and abduction of girls followed by their forced conversion and marriages aren’t the only problem minorities face in Khan’s ‘Naya’ Pakistan. Even their settlements are being illegally demolished, often with official patronage. In May, a HRCP tweet mentioned that “HRCP is gravely concerned at reports that houses belonging to the Hindu and Christian communities of Yazman in Bahawalpur have been demolished, allegedly by local authorities with political influence.It also stated that “evictions, the demolition of people’s houses, and land grabbing, esp. [especially] when such communities are doubly vulnerable, are highly condemnable.”

But if the administration is to be believed, then all’s well in Pakistan as far as minorities are concerned. Girls from minority communities aren’t being abducted but are of their own accord, eloping with their beaus (who at times are almost double their age). Vandalism of holy shrines belonging to minorities isn’t due to the prevailing communal frenzy but the handiwork of petty thieves, drug addicts, mentally deranged persons, or consequences of some land dispute and occasionally, ‘justified’ collective punishment of a minority community for some alleged blasphemous utterance by one of its members. Coupled with this, since Khan keeps harping on how “minorities are treated as equal citizens,” in his “Naya Pakistan,” why worry or lose sleep over this issue?