Home Blog Page 312

Protests mark ‘Kashmir Solidarity Day’ at Kotli, POK

Kashmiris came out in large numbers at Kotli, POK (Pakistan-occupied Kashmir) on Friday morning to protest against the visit of Imran Khan Niazi that was scheduled later in the day. The protesters were from a faction of the JKLF (Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front) who demanded that Pakistan put an end to her sham of mis-governance and misrule across POK, rather than organise photo op events to mark Kashmir Solidarity Day on February 5.

A red-faced Imran Khan government then quickly mobilised the local administration that along with Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) workers forced local Kashmiris to fill up the venue and hear Imran Khan Nizai’s speech on Kashmir Solidarity Day.

Kotli Superintendent of Police (SP) letter to Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) district chief asking for help. In the letter Kotli SP is pleading with the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf leader to anyhow prevent Kashmiri nationalists from coming to the venue where Pakistan PM will speak on ‘Kashmir Solidarity Day’. (Photo: News Intervention)

Pakistan celebrates February 5 as Kashmir Solidarity Day to keep the pot boiling across Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh.

However, Kashmiris in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (POK) have understood that Pakistan Army only plays upon the emotions of Kashmiris and continues to deny them the rights to a decent livelihood. Barely a month ago POK had erupted into protests over skyrocketing price of food grains

Kotli residents demanding that Tanveer Ahmed be freed from Pakistani custody.
Kashmiri journalist Tanveer Ahmed has been in Pakistani custody since August 2020. (Photo: News Intervention)

Habib-ur-Rehman former spokesperson of JKPNP said in a statement that Pakistan must accept that it’s the occupying force before it expresses solidarity with the people of Jammu and Kashmir. He explained in his statement that in 1947 private invaders of the Pakistan Army killed innocent locals under the umbrella of Pakistan Army officers, burned houses, looted property and completely destroyed financial property. They then divided the state in 1947. Habib-ur-Rehman further added that the ruling class of Pakistan always adheres to lies and deception. He reminded the elites of the Pakistani state that they only believe in oppression and barbarism, while the people suffer from hunger, poverty and slavery. “February 5 is not Solidarity Day,” said Habib-ur-Rehman.  

Later during the day protests also erupted at Nakkyal a suburban locality of Kotli. Local Kashmiris at Nakkyal raised slogans against the Pakistani misrule.

Click on the link to watch our video news report

Do Justice and Let the Sky Fall: #FreeAyazNizami, Free Abdul Waheed

Ayaz Nizami’(Facebook, Twitter)[1] ‘Allama Ayaz Nizami’[2] is a pen name or a pseudonym for Pakistani humanist Abdul Waheed who was charged with blasphemy on March 24, 2017.[3] He was charged with others. ‘Nizami’/Waheed had more than 12,000 followers on social media by most reports (probably, not Facebook).[4]

Where, Waheed’s Facebook profile lists residence in Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, with a small following of 337 people. It raises questions as to the legitimacy of claims of the threat of Waheed to the State of Pakistan.

This battle has been brewing in a number of countries with flaring in Pakistan in the 2010s against the secular and freethinker community. It’s a one-sided war with the majority of the religious population, the police, the State, the theocrats, and the legal system looking to crush, silence, and kill freethinkers.

It’s based on fear with attempts at control, where, when straight fear of loss of a connection to God or Allah through the corruption of the soul via ‘blasphemy’ fails as a psychological and social control mechanism, the State comes in to enforce ideological control through suppression of dissenters.

That’s why Waheed had to write as ‘Allama Ayaz Nizami’ or ‘Ayaz Nizami.’ As we have all seen internationally, there are continual claims to murder or otherwise harm freethinkers. It’s no mystery.

There’s a fear for livelihood or simply evading jail-time on ridiculous religious charges. Waheed has been referenced in a number of popular and obscure media over the last years between 2017 and 2020.[5]

The Federal Investigative Agency (FIA) of Pakistan, as reported in “Blasphemy crackdown: FIA arrests 2 suspects from Karachi,”[6] arrested Waheed and others. It stated:

According to FIA sources the arrested, Ayaz Nizami alias Abdul Waheed and Rana Nauman, have admitted to having contacts in Holland, USA, UK and Canada from where they got financial and technical assistance.

The suspects were using a Dutch SIM for uploading blasphemous content on WhatsApp. Cyber Crime Circle Islamabad has registered an FIR under section 7/17.

Both the suspects used to upload blasphemous content on various, reports claim.

The crackdown has been launched on strict instructions of Interior Minister Chaudhary Nisar.

Furthermore, Islamabad High Court (IHC) judge, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddique[7] has also issued orders to take immediate action against social media blasphemers.

I may be one of the Canadian contacts or the Canadian contact based on the correspondence and the efforts to collaborate via an interview to get Waheed’s views out to more audiences. I provided zero financial or technical assistance. Therefore, on the Canadian claim to “financial and technical assistance,” it’s a State lie.

Ironically, the Pakistani authorities have made more press for Waheed & company’s case than ever dreamed for the international secular communities. His and a number of others’ cases have exploded into the international rights scene.

Nonetheless, these orders from 2017 were newer because of the absurd nature of online blasphemy. They exist in cyberspace, not Pakistani territorial space. Yet, as will be discussed, these charges against Waheed and others eventuated in death penalties, as I have been urging for more coverage because of the urgency of impending death with more than 1,400 days in jail.[8]

Waheed is a religious scholar. His specialties are Fiqh, Hadiths, Tafsir, and their principles. He has a particularly potent admixture with expertise in the Arabic language, its grammar and terminology. He was admitted to a religious school after a regular education.

The allegations are that Waheed published translated materials critical of Islam into English from Urdu. Alyan Khan, a Pakistani political author, exposed this. Following this, the social media account material was deemed overwhelming to the sensibilities of the public, according to Pakistani authorities, and then the account was shut down.

Hurr Ali Naqvi in “When Atheism becomes Terrorism in Pakistan” said, “Aftermath of Islamabad High Court ruling on social media blasphemy proved disastrous for Pakistani atheist minority. Hundreds of ‘un-Islamic’ websites were blocked in Pakistan. Several social media pages, groups and accounts of ex Muslim [sic] atheists have also been suspended. Pakistani authorities are warning [the] public to refrain from ‘blasphemy’ in cyberspace or they could face [a] death sentence for ‘insulting’ Islam.”

He described how Waheed never stated anything disrespectful about Islam on social media, so concludes Waheed was jailed for “organizing Pakistani Atheists.”[9][10] That’s an astute point. The issue is an organized front against the theocratic vested interests as represented by the State.

Naqvi made an important point: 40,000 Pakistanis have been killed by terrorism between 2000 and 2016.[11] This seems to make charging and crushing freethinkers as a sideshow from the real travesty of religious fundamentalist killing of Pakistanis, religious and secular alike[12], rather than critical words in Urdu, Arabic, or English critical of Islam online.

“Nobody in my country demands ‘public hanging’ for convicted terrorists, murderers, rapists and pedophiles but they believe that ex Muslim [sic] atheists should learn harsh ‘lessons’ for criticizing Islam. Blasphemy law is often used to victimize minorities and influential religious people use it to settle their personal matters. When someone tries to bring reforms in these controversial and inhuman laws, he also becomes the victim of Islamic extremism,” Naqvi astutely, though bluntly, noted, at the time.

If any writing needed international activism and prevention of a death, then Waheed’s is one now – no question, as my last contact was March 21, 2017, with him.[13] We were to conduct an interview together, which never materialized with responses.[14]

The reason for the non-materialization of the responses/answers to the interview for publication isn’t positive. Between March 24, 2017, and January 8, 2021, he was formally charged with blasphemy in Pakistan, and then, eventually, sentenced with the death penalty alongside others.[15]

There is an international assault on the rights of freethinkers now. It’s a one-sided global war and, in the international freethinkers’ communities’ interests of self-defence, should be made two-sided as a matter of ethical necessity and existential reality.

In spite of being fellow citizens, it continues. In spite of having the same paper and proclaimed rights, it is ongoing. In spite of the declarations by national, regional, and international agencies, organizations, and leading intellectuals and human rights activists, to cease and desist in the maiming, jailing, and killing, the injustice keeps apace.

In spite of the unfairness and injustice of it, even simply violations of common decency, it doesn’t stop. In spite of the open threats of harm and violence, real ones, against freethinkers, it will not halt. Do not expect it as a matter of long-term evidenced principle, internationally, as it has not come for centuries and even recent decades increasing to an extent, the international fundamentalist communities and sympathizers have made themselves clear as their God’s purported voice in the Old Testament.

If we, the global communities of freethinkers, wish for justice and fairness in unjust and unfair circumstances, then we have to make the injustice and unfairness cost those who wish to enact them. Most of the world is a hostile place to us, not by accident, but by conscious choice, i.e., people choose to take us as a threat by mere heartbeats and brainwaves, existence.

If any State, party, or individual, wishes to make an act of human rights violation, as against Gulalai Ismail and Saba Ismail, Mubarak Bala, Zara Kay, Abdul Waheed, Sanal Edamaraku, Rishvin Ismath, Madalyn Murray O’Hair, Junaid Hafeez, Ahmed Rajib Haider, Avijit Roy, Faisal Arefin Dipan, Ananta Bijoy Das, Oyasiqur Rhaman, Niloy Chatterjee, Waleed Al-Husseini, Jaime Augusto Sánchez, Alejandro Gaviria Uribe, Miguel Lorenzo Trujillo, Álvaro Ariza and Jaquelina Ardila, Sergio David Urrego Reyes, Jesús Sánchez, Diego Hernández, Pedro Luís García, Narendra Dabholkar, Govind Pansare, M.M. Kalburgi, H Farook, Alexander Aan, Mashal Khan, Aslam alias Saeen Achhu, Fauzia Ilyas, Carlos Celdran, Naomi Coleman, and countless others, then make it cost them, proportionately.

Bear in mind, some of the above-mentioned are dead now. Which is to implore, make it hurt, while only using physical violence as a last resort in self-defence: That is, make it cost them, at a minimum, something proportional to the human rights violation. If it’s a State, they hate bad international press and pressure from international rights organizations.

That’s one pressure point. Fundamentalists hate being exposed for the absurdity of the beliefs undergirding the claims to moral superiority. That’s another one. Then you can do this repeatedly, over a long period of time, proportionately escalated with their escalations until it stops. This will take coalitions, solidarity, national and international campaigns, and fervent adherence to universalist visions of the Commons.

If things are done above-board through some legitimate secular legal or human rights mechanism, then utilize the institutions and international documents inhering individuals of conscience with particular rights to freedom of expression, and freedom of belief and religion.

It will never stop until it’s forcefully drawn out into the public and made openly ridiculous and untenable, indefensible, which will require international solidarity seen in the likes of Zara Kay’s case, or Mubarak Bala.[16]

Similarly, we have a large contingent of ex-religious organizations, including for ex-Muslims alone: “Central Council of Ex-Muslims, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, Central Committee for Ex-Muslims, Former Muslims United, Ex-Muslims Initiative, Ex-Muslims of Austria, Ex-Muslims of Switzerland, Atheist Republic formerly Orkut, Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, Council of Ex-Muslims of Singapore, Muslimish, Ex-Muslims of North America, Council of Ex-Muslims of France, Council of Ex-Muslims of Morocco, Ex-Muslims of Scotland, Association of Atheism, Faith to Faithless, Humanistisch Verbond: Ex-Muslims of Norway, Atheist Alliance of the Middle East and North Africa, Council of Ex-Muslims of Sri Lanka, Ex-Muslims of Maldives, Alliance of Former Muslims, Council of Ex-Muslims of Jordan, Iranian Atheists & Agnostics, Iranian Humanist Atheists & Agnostics, Council of Ex-Muslims of New Zealand, Central Committee for Ex-Muslims of Scandinavia,” Ex-Muslims of Kerala, and many others.[17]

There have been moves toward a unified front under the spokesperson, Halima Salat, for the International Coalition of Ex-Muslims.[18] It’s a push out of the Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain web domain, which remains headed by Maryam Namazie who has been a pillar in the ex-Muslim communities for years.

Other examples include bringing the case as a question to the European Parliament.[19] Also, Humanists International[20] covered the case of Ayaz Nizami in “Humanists at Risk: Action Report 2020.”[21] They stated:

Ayaz Nizami is the pseudonym of a humanist blogger currently detained in Pakistan under ‘blasphemy’ allegations. In January 2017, he was among several bloggers and activists accused of atheism or blasphemy that were forcibly disappeared, apparently by state security services.96 When they were released, some reported having been tortured in detention. Nizami and another blogger Rana Noman were accused of Highlighted Cases Ayaz Nizami spreading ‘blasphemy’ online in March 2017. While there were protests to release the ‘disappeared’ activists and bloggers, many others protested against them. Nizami’s arrest was greeted by the trending hashtag ‘#HangAyazNizami’ on social media The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom lists his case.[22]

It’s on the humanist and freethinker radar via annual reportage. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom covered the case too, which is important coming from them because of the bipartisan and national nature of the organization. Their profile of Waheed states:

Abdul Waheed (pename [sic]: Ayaz Nizami), a Pakistani blogger, theological scholar, and member of Atheist and Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, was arrested on March 24, 2017 in his country for the crime of blasphemy and now faces the death penalty. Waheed was kidnapped by Pakistan security services.

Pakistani media reported that authroities [sic] arrested him for “uploading offensive content on social media,” linking him to sites including “realisticapproach.com, The Free Thnkrz, AAAP, truth.com, CEMB,” and describing them as “admins of the social media pages on which they were both uploading blasphemous content.” The link to his pen name (which was previously anonymous) has now been widely circulated in traditional media and online.This [sic]ensures a risk to Abdul Waheed’s life from extremists prepared to kill to settle “blasphemy” accusations.[23]

Waheed has ample coverage from a number of internationally respected organizations. He is listed as a humanist and sits in Central Jail Rawalpindi.[24] The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom representative for Waheed, Johnnie Moore, stated:

In Pakistan, the freedoms of religion and expression are severely restricted. Anything published or shared that is deemed blasphemous could result in imprisonment and even the death penalty. The case of Abdul Waheed, a Pakistani atheist blogger who penned his views under the alias of Ayaz Nizami, is a prime example of how Pakistan’s laws curtail these fundamental rights.

Nizami faces the death penalty for allegedly uploading blasphemous content on social media about atheism. Dozens have been murdered through mob violence and societal attacks over similar blasphemy allegations. Shortly after Nizami’s was arrested in 2017, the hashtag #hangayaznizami was trending on Twitter, reflecting the lack of tolerance fostered by the government in Pakistani society.

When this first emerged, there was a campaign wishing for his death, specifically hanging, on social media, internationally, which became #HangAyazNizami. The #hangayaznizami Twitter trend happened simultaneously alongside the campaigns in support of him with #FreeAyazNizami and #SaveAyazNizami, too.

Thus, those wishing for his death with #HangAyazNizami may get their wish in the presumed end result of the January 8, 2021 death penalty decision.[25] For writing and the claim of blasphemy, so a religious ‘crime’ charged against a secular individual, he is a political prisoner and a secular writer.

The allegations centred on the translation of material in English to Urdu for www.realisticapproach.org critical of Islam.[26] A website founded by him about irreligiosity. He was the Vice President of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan.[27]

This was confirmed in correspondence with Waheed and in an interview with the President of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, Fauzia Ilyas.[28] Ilyas noted this was the first organization for atheists, agnostics, and ex-Muslims, in Pakistan.[29]

A nation whose religious demographics are less than 1% Buddhist, Folk Religions, Jews, Other Religions, and Unaffiliated, 1.6% Christians, and 96.5% Muslims, circa 2020.[30]

She stated, “Ayaz Nizami was Vice President of AAAP.​ H​e is a blogger​ who​ translated materials critical of Islam in English to Urdu for publishing.​ ​Nizami founded the website realisticapproach.org, a website in Urdu about irreligon[sic].”[31] There you have it.

Much reportage claims ‘allegedly served,’ and things like this, about serving as the Vice President of Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan. However, I have on the single best authority the fact of the matter, Fauzia Ilyas, or the President of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan.

Their Facebook page states, “We are FIRST Pakistani organization for Ex-Muslims, Atheists. Affiliated with Council of Ex-Muslims (CEMB) & The International Humanist and Ethical Union[32].”

So, Ilyas founded Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan in 2012 with her partner. Things became heated with the founding and operations of the organization. She had to leave the country.

While, for Waheed, he was arrested for blasphemy along with three others, where three received the death penalty and one got 10 years’ imprisonment.

Ilyas explained, “When this organization was established, there was a lot of criticism, threats to life, and compromised security. We’re approached by law enforcement authorities. The blasphemy cases were initiated against me and my partner. It left us with the only option to leave Pakistan, so we left and now we’re in The Netherlands.”

All articles and encyclopedic listings can clarify the position as a past tense ownership of “Vice President of AAAP.” ‘Nizami’/Waheed was the Vice President of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, which means the first vice president of an organization of its type in a 96.5% Muslim dominated society with an in-place, active, and recently utilized blasphemy law.

Fauzia explained, “He was arrested in 2017 by the Federal Investigation Agency of Pakistan because of his views and thoughts over Islam. He used to talk about equality, freedom, and fundamental rights, which is not wrong; but in a state like Pakistan, it’s a crime.”[33]

In the interview, I raised the issue of the prominent and internationally known Ismail family – Saba Ismail (Co-Founder of Aware Girls), Gulalai Ismail[34] (Co-Founder of Aware Girls), Mohammed Ismail (Gulalai’s and Saba’s father)[35], and so on. Ilyas made the point: Criticism of religion isn’t a problem. Human lives are more important than religion.

“They should raise their voices in favour of those who’re in prison and taken just because of their expressions towards Islam. There’s a long list of these people. Not only Ayaz Nizami but also Junaid Hafeez and many others. So people should realize if they won’t stand up for their own rights, no one would ever realize it that how important those rights are,” Ilyas said.[36]

We discussed the other cases of Asia Bibi, Mashal Khan, a “Christian couple… set on fire,” and the problems of Islamists and violent mobs.

Saba Ismail, one of the co-founders of Aware Girls, on ‘Nizami,’ in reaction to the judicial decision in Pakistan, said, “I condemn the decision made by the Pakistani authorities. As a humanist I demand the Pakistan authorities to set Ayaz Nizami free.”

Even a Belgian-Israeli philosopher colleague who has a specialty in metaphysics, Dr. Christian Sorensen, in an interview devoted to cases such as Mubarak Bala, Gulalai Ismail, Zara Kay, ‘Ayaz Nizami’/Abdul Waheed, and others, around the world concluded the interview declaring, “I hope that this interview, contributes at least as a grain of sand, to stirring up the indolent and lethargic consciences of human rights organizations, for the promptly liberation alive of Ayaz Nizami.”[37]

On blasphemy laws, which is the heart of the ‘crime,’ Sorensen said:

I think that just as there are countries, that have blasphemy laws, because in practice generally follow what for me, is a kind of pantheism without explicitly recognizing it,  since everything that’s  touched, they believe that it has a divine breath, although actually, it may be  something of secular matter, and therefore, absolutely devoid of any religious nature, they’re others as counterpart, who tend to recognize themselves, as liberal and democratic, since explicitly, this countries do not have blasphemy laws, although in general, they act  like religious pantheists, and  consequently in practice, they implicitly live, according to blasphemy laws. Therefore it could be said, that in their own way,  they make freethinkers suffer, social death sentences, without giving them any chance to escape, and consequently by exerting progressive stress,  through emotional saturation,  they end up transforming them into living dead.[38]

The reactions to the story are grounded in a narrative years in the making. In the original article published on Waheed as ‘Nizami,’ I wrote on the narrative in finding out about the further case for Waheed. It turns out. There was a significant issue facing him, which came to a life or death context for him, entirely religious against a freethinker:

Earlier yesterday morning, in Pacific Standard Time, I saw an update via social media about an Ayaz Nizami, a blogger, or writer, jailed for blasphemy and placed into custody in an anti-terrorism cell. What is the criminal charge? Did Mr. Nizami murder someone? Did Mr. Nizami rape someone?

It seemed suspicious. The common knowledge in the educated secular community is bloggers with critiques of religion or religious patriarchs, or practices, can be killed, given lashings, or stigmatised and ostracised in their communities.

So the answer to the latter two questions: no, and no. Answer to the former query: as far as I can tell, he existed as a non-believer, especially an ex-Muslim, with self-confidence rather than acculturated diffidence and spoke out on religion and Islam, and with highly educated, scholarly authority in the relevant subject matter. It was taken as terrorism and blasphemy.

Whether or not the statements are true or not, and whether or not you’re religious or not – and especially if you’re religious take the parable of the hypocrite and the Golden Rule into account, ask, “Should someone be imprisoned on blasphemy or terrorism charges – even threatened with a hashtag hanging campaign (#HangAyazNizami) based on belief, in particular non-belief, in the public arena?”[39]

This line of reasoning seems to hold firm to me. It inspired some other writings.[40] Even Humanists International (formerly the International Humanist and Ethical Union, or IHEU) was able to bring part of its reportage to the United Nations General Assembly in A/HRC/36/NGO/143, they stated:

On 22 March 2017, Waheed – a blogger and theological scholar (who had published his views that Abrahamic faiths are not divine, but “a mere creation of the human brain and a bi-product of culture and civilisation in the world.”18) – was kidnapped by Pakistan security services.19 Around the same time, another blogger Rana Noman was also arrested. National media reported that two had been arrested for “uploading offensive content on social media,” linking them to sites including “realisticapproach.com, The Free Thnkrz, AAAP, truth.com, CEMB,” and describing them as “admins of the social media pages on which they were both uploading blasphemous content.”

The IHEU understands that the Federal Investigation Agency (FIA) may have verified the pen name and attempted to gain access to his accounts by pressuring Abdul Waheed during “interrogation”. The link to his pen name (which was previously anonymous) has now been widely circulated in traditional media and online. This ensures a risk to Abdul Waheed’s life from extremists prepared to kill to settle “blasphemy” accusations. The hashtag “#HangAyazNizami” trended on Twitter for some days after his arrest, and continues to date. Ayaz Nizami’s page on the AAAPakistan website is not currently available.[41]

These death penalties and imprisonment charges have an intrinsic absurdity and unfairness about them. Syed Umarullah Hussaini in “ATC Hands Death Penalty To Nasir Sultani, 2 Others In Blasphemy Case” reported on the Anti-Terrorism Court on Rana Norman, and Nasir Sultani, who received the death penalty with Waheed.

A fourth individual, Professor Anwaar Ahmed, received 10 years’ imprisonment and a fine of Rs 100,000. Ahmed was convicted based on Section 295-A of the Pakistan Penal Code, for “disseminating controversial and blasphemous views during a lecture at the Islamabad Model College, where he was a teacher in the Urdu department, according to Dawn.[42] This was from the court judge, Raja Jawad Abbas, verdict.

Malik Asad in “In a first, three get death for ‘cyberspace blasphemy’” reported on this as being three men sentenced to death “for committing blasphemy in the cyberworld.”

The accused had “disseminated blasphemous material on social media, while Nasir Ahmad uploaded blasphemous videos on a YouTube channel.” That’s the interesting case, digital or cyberspace blasphemy. It’s new, apparently.

Congratulations to Islamabad ATC Judge Raja Jaawad Abbas for furthering the realm of absurdities religious law can extend and evidencing religion destroying more lives in the process, fundamentally, the legal system violated the human rights of Waheed, Noman, Sultani, and Ahmed.

The case was registered on March 19, 2017, to the Pakistani FIA, which means two days before our last contact.

The First Information Report or FIR stated, “There are several unknown people/groups disseminating/spreading blasphemous material through internet using social media i.e. Facebook, Twitter, websites, etc. through alleged profiles/pages/handles/sites etc… and several others wilfully defiled and outraged religious feelings, belief by using derogatory words/remarks/graphic designs/images/sketches/visual representations in respect of the sacred names.”[43]

19 witnesses testified on the case. On September 5, 2020, the ATC reserved its verdict on the bail plea of Waheed, Noman, Sultani, and Ahmed. The claimed crime was the “uploading of blasphemous material on social media.” Waheed and Noman presented four witnesses.

Asad concluded the recent article:

The judge clarified that “the purpose of explaining the above process and authentication of the digital evidence is to determine whether the International best practices and techniques had been adopted in this case by the forensic expert while analyzing the hard-disk of CPU and Laptops, Mobile phones and other gadgets belonging to accused persons Abdul Waheed and Rana Nouman Rafaqat”.

In the light of the evidence the “accused persons Nasir Ahmad, Abdul Waheed and Rana Nouman Rafaqaat are liable to be convicted under Section 295-A, 295-C, PPC and Section 7 (g) of Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 respectively … and sentenced to DEATH”, the court ruled.

The verdict, however, is subject to confirmation by the Islamabad High Court.

Accused Anwaar Ahmad was convicted under Section 295-A of the Pakistan Penal Code and sentenced to 10-year rigorous imprisonment with a fine of Rs100,000. Under ATA, Ahmed was sentenced five-year imprisonment.

The court issued perpetual arrest warrants of absconding accused Faraz Pervaiz, Pervaiz Iqbal, Tayyab Sardar and Rao Qaiser Shehzad Khan.

To any and all freethinkers with an orientation to writing and campaigning on human rights, the way out may be the Islamabad High Court with an international campaign vigorously pursued for dropping the death penalty charges for Ahmad, Waheed, and Rafaqaat, and the 10 years’ imprisonment for Ahmed.

Footnotes

[1] These hyperlinks come directly from correspondence from ‘Nizami’ or Abdul, where Abdul identified as the Vice President of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan. This amounts to one confirmation of the positions. Others exist in reliable sources.

[2] Worley (2017).

[3] Gyaanipedia (2021).

[4] RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty (2017).

[5] End Blasphemy Laws (2017), Mrleibniz (2018), Mehta (2017), Kabir (2018), StupidVision (2017), MuhammadTheAtheist (2017), Filosofi I Skolen (n.d.), Nixon (2020), National Secular Society (2017), Hodgart (2017), Javed (2017), Werner (2017a), Werner (2017b), Werner (2019), Werner (2020), Sultan (2018), Gannon (2017), The Associated Press (2017), Wikiwand (n.d.), IndraStra (2017), Shultan (2017), Fuller (2017), and Geling (2017).

[6] The Nation (2017a).

[7] The Nation (2017b).

[8] Jacobsen (2017), Jacobsen (2018), Jacobsen (2019a), Jacobsen (2019b), and Jacobsen (2021).

[9] “’Ayaz Nizami’ Needs Far More Attention” stated:

These are environments for cyber-dissidents. These are the lives some will live. Some will be killed. Others imprisoned for years or even life. Still others, they will not see the light of day due to mob justice, as we found in some of the cases of the Bangladeshi bloggers. This is the world in which the Internet provides a space for freedom of expression and a furtherance of the destruction and emaciation of the lives and livelihoods, respectively, of those in difficult circumstances. Lives of the arbitrary precarity of health and wellbeing. This can be stopped. It has to start one at a time, to show how these cases can pass, how the authoritarian efforts and regimes are, in fact, fragile, and, therefore, can be overcome.

This is why ‘Ayaz Nizami’ deserves a whole lot more attention now and into the future until he is released.

Jacobsen (2019b).

[10] Naqvi (2017).

[11] Ibid.

[12] The same appears to have happened in the case of Mubarak Bala in Nigeria.

[13] Jacobsen (2017).

[14] In full, and for the first time, the interview question set sent via email to him, rather innocuous:

An Interview with Ayaz Nizami

Vice President, Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan

Scott Douglas Jacobsen

Conatus News

Tell me some of your family background regarding agnosticism or atheism.

Either a singular moment makes, or a trend towards becoming, an atheist or an agnostic – or both – comes out in origin stories for members of the atheist or agnostic communities. What was the trend or moment for you?

What is the best argument for atheism or agnosticism that you have ever come across?

What is the general treatment and perspective of atheists and agnostics in Pakistan? For example, some countries’ populations don’t care because they’re integrated in their acceptance of them. Others express open vitriol and prejudice. Others simply don’t know what those terms mean, so don’t know who those fellow citizens in their respective general populations.

You are the vice president of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan. What tasks and responsibilities come with this station? What inspired its founding?

What are the demographics of the alliance? What is the most likely demographic to be an atheist or an agnostic?

How does the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, if at all, advocate and promote the freedom to be an atheist and agnostic in the public sphere?

What are some of the more touching stories of people coming out as atheists or agnostics for you?

What have been some of the main campaigns, initiatives, and provisions of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan on behalf of its constituency?

In the Manifesto of the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, there is specific mention of ex-Muslims. Are there unique problems for the atheist ex-Muslim sub-population not faced by others in the general atheist and agnostic? What are they? How can secular-, atheist-, agnostic-oriented Pakistanis help out?

Who are some of its most unexpected allies for the advancement of atheism and agnosticism – or at least the equal and fair treatment in society – in Pakistan, or in the region?

In general, what are the perennial threats to atheism and agnosticism in Pakistan?

People can reach you on Twitter and Facebook, or through the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan. How can people get involved with the Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, even donate to it?

Any closing thoughts or feelings based on the discussion today?

Thank you for your time, Ayaz.

Personal correspondence from March 21, 2017.

[15] AhmadiyyaFaceCheckBlog (2021).

[16] You can see the list of some of the signatories in support of Kay from the international freethinker community:

Signatories

A C Grayling, Philosopher, UK
Aaron Yandell, USA
Abir Ahmed Raihan, Author and Ken Fiklow Prize Awardee, Canada
Adriana S.Thiago, Communications Officer, European Network of Migrant Women, Belgium
Ahmad Nasser, ExMuslim TV, UK
Ahmedur Rashid Chowdhury, Editor in Chief and Publisher, Shuddhashar, Norway
Prof. Alan Davison, University of Technology Sydney, Australia
Albert Beale, Pacifist Activist, UK
Ali A. Rizvi, Author of The Atheist Muslim and Co-host, Secular Jihadists for a Muslim Enlightenment podcast, Canada
Ali Malik, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain Refugee and Asylum Project Manager, UK
Ali Utlu, Human Rights Activist, Germany
Aliaa Magda Elmahdy, Women’s Rights Activist, Sweden
Alice Carr, Advocate, Progressive Atheist Inc., Australia 
Alliance of Former Muslims, Ireland
Amardeo Sharma, President, The Gesellschaft zur wissenschaftlichen Untersuchung von Parawissenschaften, Germany
American Atheists
Ana González, Solicitor, UK
Andrew L. Seidel, Constitutional Attorney and Author, USA
Andrew Rawlings, Former President, Progressive Atheist Inc., Australia
Angkatan Murtad, Malaysia
Anissa Helie, Professor, Algeria/USA
Anna Zobnina, Coordinator, European Network of Migrant Women, Belgium
Annie Laurie Gaylor, Co-founder, Co-President, Freedom From Religion Foundation, USA
Anthony McIntyre, The Pensive Quill, Ireland
Arash Hampay, Refugee Rights Activist, Greece
Arif Rahman, Secular Humanist Blogger, Bangladesh/UK
Armin Navabi, Founder, Atheist Republic, Canada
Arsalan Nejati, Activist, Turkey
Arzu Toker, Internationaler Bund der Konfessionslosen und Atheisten, Germany
Ashanour Rahman Khan, Ex-Muslim Blogger, Sweden
Ashkan Rosti, Activist, Ex Musulmani d’Italia
Atheism UK 
Atheist & Agnostic Alliance of Pakistan
Atheist Iranian Community
Atheist Refugee Relief
Atheisten Österreich
Atheists for Liberty
Atheists In Kenya Society
Atika Samrah, Activist, Conseil des Exmusulmans de France, France
Avinash Patil, Executive President, Maharashtra Andhshraddha Nirmulan Samiti (MANS) And Vice President, Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations (FIRA), India
Azam Khan, Ex-Muslim Blogger, Switzerland
Barry Duke, Editor, The Freethinker, UK
Beatrix Campbell, Writer, UK
Betty Ibtissame Lachgar, Founder, M.A.L.I. (Alternative Movement of Individual Liberties, Morocco), Morocco
Bread and Roses TV, UK
Cadmeus Cain, Representative, Atheist Muslims South Africa, South Africa
Carl Russ-Mohl, Filmmaker, UK
Catherine Dunphy, Author, Canada
Cemal Knudsen Yucel, Leader, Ex-Muslims Of Norway, Norway
Central Committee of Ex-Muslims in Scandinavia
Centre for Secular Space
Chris Cooper, Representative, Atheist Muslims South Africa, South Africa
Chris Street, President, Atheism UK, UK
Christa Compas, Director, Humanistisch Verbond, The Netherlands
Cinzia Sciuto, Journalist, Italy
Community Women Against Abuse
Conseil des Exmusulmans de France
Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain
Council of Ex-Muslims of New Zealand
Council of Ex-Muslims of Singapore
Council of Ex-Muslims of Sri Lanka
Craig Michael Chatfield, UK
Dagfinn Eckhoff, Leader, Norwegian Atheists, Norway
Dan Barker, Co-President, Freedom From Religion Foundation, USA
Dario Picciau, Co-President, EveryOne Group, Italy
David P. Kramer, South Africa
David Rand, President, Libres penseurs athées, Montréal, Canada

Signatories Cont.

De Balie Centre for Arts and Politics, The Netherlands
Didarul Islam, Ex-Muslim Blogger, Greece
Djemila Benhabib, Collectif Laïcité Yallah, Belgium
Dustin Krinzer, Chairman, Atheisten Österreich, Austria
E.A. Jabbar, Yukthivadi Organisation, Kerala, India
Eddie Goldman, Journalist, USA
Eldridge Alexander, Information Security Engineer & Speaker, USA
Eric Weinstein, Host of the Portal Podcast, USA
ExMuslim Somali Voices, Netherlands
Ex-Muslims of India
Ex-Muslims of Netherlands
Ex-Muslims of North America
Ex-Muslims of Norway
Ex-Muslims of Tamil Nadu, India
Ex-Muslim Support Network of Australia
Fabian van Hal, Activist, The Netherlands
Faithless Hijabi
Fariborz Pooya, Producer, Bread and Roses TV, UK
Fauzia Ilyas, Atheist & Agnostic Alliance of Pakistan, The Netherlands
Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations (FIRA), India
Federico Galanetto, Italy
FEMEN
Freedom From Religion Foundation
Freethought Lebanon
Geoff Cooper, Author, USA
George Broadhead, Secretary, Pink Triangle Trust, UK
Gita Sahgal, Spokesperson, One Law for All and Founder, Centre for Secular Space, UK
Glenys Robinson, Co-President, EveryOne Group, Italy
Gulalai Ismail, Human Rights Activist and Founder, Aware Girls (Pakistan), USA
Haafizah Bhamjee, Representative, Atheist Muslims South Africa, South Africa
Halaleh Taheri, Executive Director, Middle Eastern Women and Society organisation-MEWSo, UK
Halima Salat, Founder,, Ex-Muslim Somai Voices, The Netherlands
Harris Sultan, Author and Ex-Muslim activist, Australia
Harrison Mumia, President, Atheists In Kenya Society, Kenya
Harsh Kapoor, South Asia Citizens Web, India
Hassan Radwan, Agnostic Muslims & Friends, UK
Helen Pluckrose, Writer, UK
Hemant Mehta, Editor, Friendly Atheist, USA
Hina Hasan, Co-Founder, Ex-Muslims of India, India
Houzan Mahmoud, Women’s Rights Activist, Germany
Humanist Union of Greece
Ian Bellis, USA
Ibn Warraq, Author and Researcher, USA
Imal Senevirathna, Irreligious Community of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
Inna Shevchenko, FEMEN, France
Internationaler Bund der Konfessionslosen und Atheisten (IBKA), Germany
Istishion Blog, Bangladesh
Izzy Diab, Community Support, Faithless Hijabi, Jordan
Jaan Dillon, Public Officer, Faithless Hijabi, Australia
Jahid Hasan, Ex-Muslim Blogger and ICORN Scholar, Norway 
Jalil Jalili, Activist, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, UK
Jan Bockma, Contributing Editor, Vrij Links, The Netherlands
Jane Donnelly, Human Rights Officer, Atheist Ireland, Ireland
Jason Frye, CEO, Secular Policy Institute, USA
Javed Anand, Human Rights Defender, Journalist and Convener, Indian Muslims for Secular Democracy, India
Jay B. Kohnson USA
Jean-Pierre Sakoun, Chairman of Comité Laïcité République, France
Jenny Wenhammar, FEMEN Sweden, Sweden
James Gavitt, USA
Jill Nicholls Film-maker, UK
Jimmy Bangash, Spokesperson, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain, UK
Jimmy Snow, YouTuber USA
Johanna AGA Browne, Melbourne Australia
Jorick-Yzaak Mallette, Canada
Julie Bindel, Journalist, Author and Feminist Campaigner, UK
Kacem El Ghazzali, Secular Essayist and Activist, Switzerland
Kareem Muhssin, Spokesperson, Alliance of Former Muslims (Ireland), Ireland
Karen Ingala Smith, Women’s Rights Campaigner, UK
Karrar Al Asfoor, Humanist Dialogue Forum, Germany
Kat Parker, Secular Rescue Case Manager, Center for Inquiry, Australia 
Katha Pollitt, Poet and Essayist, USA
Keith Porteous Wood, President, National Secular Society, UK
Kenan Malik, Writer, UK
Khadija Khan, Journalist, UK
Kifriazrin Ahmad Kapli, Malaysia
Komal Ali, Netherlands
Lawrence M. Krauss, Physicist and Author, USA
Leo Igwe Humanist Association of Nigeria, Lagos, Nigeria
Libres penseurs athées – Atheist Freethinkers, Montréal, Canada
Lisa-Marie Taylor, Feminist Activist and CEO, FiLiA, UK
Ludovic Mohamed Zahed, Director, CALEM Institute, France
Mahaarah
Maharashtra Andhshraddha Nirmulan Samiti (MANS), India
Marea Magazine
Marek Łukaszewicz, President, Kazimierz Lyszczynski Foundation, Poland
Mariam Aliyu, Founder and Executive Director, Learning Through Skills Acquisition Initiative, Nigeria
Marieke Hoogwout, Writer and Editor, Vrij Links, The Netherlands
Marieme Helie Lucas, Founder, Secularism is a Woman’s Issue, Algeria
Markus Wollina, Co-founder LAG Säkulare
Linke Berlin, Germany
Maryam Namazie, Spokesperson, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain and One Law for All, UK
Maryam Shariatmadari, Women’s Rights Activist
Meredith Tax, Writer and Feminist Organizer, USA
Mersedeh Ghaedi, Iran Tribunal London, UK
Michael Nugent, Chairperson, Atheist Ireland, Ireland
Milad Resaeimanesh, Spokesperson, Central Committee of Ex-Muslims in Scandinavia, Sweden
Mimzy Vidz, Youtuber, Counsellor, Lifecoach UK
Mina Ahadi, Founder, Zentralrat der Ex-Muslime in Deutschland, Germany
Miriam Therese Sofin, Ex-Muslim Women’s Rights Activist and Blogger, Germany 
Mo Jones, Cartoonist Jesus & Mo, UK
Mohamed Amara, Critic of Islam, Sweden
Monica Lanfranco, Editor, MAREA magazine, Italy
Mouvement alternatif pour les libertés individuelles Morocco
Muhammad Syed, President, Ex-Muslims of North America, USA
Muslimish
Nada Perat, Center for Civil Courage, Croatia
Nadia El Fani, Filmmaker, Tunisia/France
Nahla Mahmoud, Sudanese Atheists, UK

More Signatories

Nao Behache, Founder, Asociación de Exmusulmanes/as de España, Spain
National Secular Society
Network of Women in Black Serbia/Mreža Žena u crnom u Srbiji
Nicholas Forbes, Secretary, Faithless Hijabi, Australia
Nick Fish, President, American Atheists, USA
Nidhal Gharsi, President, INARA Association, Tunisia
Nina Sankari, Editor, Atheist Review and Vice-President, Kazimierz Lyszczynski Foundation, Poland
Norwegian Atheists
Nur – E – Emroz Alam Tonoy, Ex-Muslim Journalist, Contributor – Muktomona blog, Columnist – Dhaka Tribune, South Asia Monitor and South Asia Journal, Frankfurt, Germany
Nur Nabi Dulal, Writer, Hamburger Stiftung für politisch Verfolgte and Editor, Istishon, Germany
Obaid Omer, Podcaster, UK
One Law for All
Panayote Dimitras, Spokesperson, Humanist Union of Greece, Greece
Parisa Pouyande, Human Rights Activist, The Netherlands
Peter Tatchell, Director Peter Tatchell Foundation, UK
Pragna Patel, Director, Southall Black Sisters, UK
Progressive Atheist Inc. Australia
PZ Myers, Biologist, USA
Rahila Gupta, Writer, UK
Rana Ahmad, Founder, Atheist Refugee Relief, Germany
Ratan Kumar Samadder, Author and ICORN Scholar, Norway 
Rebecca Durand, Feminist Dissent, UK
Reginald Bien-Aime, Haitian Freethinkers, Haiti
René Hartmann, Chairman, IBKA, Germany 
Richard Dawkins, Scientist, UK
Ridvan Aydemir, Creator, Apostate Prophet, USA
Rishvin Ismath, Council of Ex-Muslims of Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka
Rivka Leah Goldstein, Kent Community Secular Alliance, USA
Rob Sellars, Manchester, UK
Roberto Malini, Co-President, EveryOne Group, Italy
Robyn E. Blumner, President and CEO, Center for Inquiry and Executive Director, Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason & Science, USA
Rohit Balakrishnan, Author and Human Rights Activist, India
Rokaya Mohamed, Program Coordinator, Faithless Hijabi, Egypt
Rumana Hashem, Founder, Community Women Against Abuse, UK
Saadiq Samad, Ex-Muslims of Tamil Nadu, India
Saba Ismail, Activist, USA
Sadaf Alvi, Women’s Rights Activist and Columnist, Pakistan Affairs, Pakistan
Saff Khalique, Activist, UK
Safwan Mason, Council of ex-Muslims of New Zealand, New Zealand
Saif Ul Malook, Advocate, Pakistan
Salil Tripathi, Journalist, USA
Sami Abdallah, Freethought Lebanon, Germany
Samint, Artist, France
Sanal Edamaruku, President, Rationalist International, Finland
Sarah Haider, Executive Director, Ex-Muslims of North America, USA
Sarah Taylor, Researcher, Australia
Savalan Sultan, Co-Founder, Ex-Muslims of Netherlands, The Netherlands
Scott Homan, Witness Underground
Secular Policy Institute
Seth Andrews, Secular Activist, Author, Podcaster, USA
Seyyid Hanif, Ex Muslim Activist, Faithless Hijabi, Canada
Shabana Rehman, Født Fri, Norway
Shaheen Hashmat, Writer and Activist, UK
Shahin Mohammadi, Atheism Campaign, Sweden
Shakila Taranum Maan, Artist/Filmmaker, UK
Shaparak Shajarizadeh, Women’s Rights Activist, Canada
Shelley Segal, Singer-Songwriter, Australia
Shirin Shams, Founder of Women’s Revolution (of Iran), Sweden
Sikivu Hutchinson, Writer and Founder, Black Skeptics Los Angeles, USA
Sohail Ahmad, Reason on Faith, Canada
Staša Zajović, Activist, Belgrade, Serbia
Stephen Evans, Chief Executive Officer, National Secular Society, UK
Stephen Knight, Podcaster, UK
Stephen Law, Philosopher, UK
Steven Lukes, Professor of Sociology, NYU, USA
Subrata Shuvo, Atheist Blogger, Sweden
Sudesh Ghoderao, National General Secretary, Federation of Indian Rationalist Associations (FIRA), India
Sunny Hundal, Journalist, UK
Susanna McIntyre, President & CEO, Atheist Republic, USA
Taslima Nasrin, Writer, India
Teresa Giménez Barbat, Writer and ex-MEP, Spain
The Secular Party of Australia
Thomas Sheedy, President, Atheists for Liberty, USA
Thomas Westbrook, Media Producer & Conference Organizer
Ufa M. Fahmee, Freethinker and Social Activist, Maldives
Usama al-Binni, Arab Atheists Network and Manaarah, USA
Veedu Vidz, Youtuber, UK
Victoria Gugenheim, Body-Artist, UK
Wissam Charafeddine, Muslimish, USA
Women in Black Belgrade, Serbia
Yasmin Rehman, Human Rights Activist, UK
Yasmine Mohammed, Founder, Free Hearts, Free Minds, Canada
Yoeri Albrecht, General Director, De Balie Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Zehra Pala, HumaSecuLa, Turkey
Zihni Özdi, Author, Former Member of Dutch Parliament, The Netherlands
Zoheb Hasmani, Tanzania 

Faithless Hijabi (2021).

[17] Jacobsen (2019c) & Wikipedia (2021).

[18] It’s comprised, at the time of writing, of Ateizm Dernegi (Turkey), Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, Atheist Iranian Community, Council of Ex-Muslims of Jordan, Council of Ex-Muslims of Morocco, Council of Ex-Muslims of Singapore, Ex-Muslim Somali Voices, Ex-Muslims of India, Ex-Muslims of Sri Lanka, Ex-Muslims of Tamil Nadu, India, Freethought Lebanon, MALI – Mouvement Alternatif pour les Libertés Individuelles – Maroc, Manaarah Initiative, Atheist Refugee Relief, Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (CEMB), Council of Ex-Muslims of France, Council of Ex-Muslims of Germany, Council of Ex-Muslims of Scandinavia, Ex-Muslims of Norway, Ex-Muslims of the Netherlands, Council of Ex-Muslims of New Zealand, Ex-Muslim Support Network of Australia, Ex-Muslims of North America, and Muslimish. See Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain (2021).

[19] “Subject: VP/HR — Pakistan and GSP+: detention of blogger Ayaz Nizami” stated:

On 24 March 2017, Pakistani blogger Ayaz Nizami, a member of Atheist and Agnostic Alliance Pakistan, was arrested in his country for the ‘crime’ of blasphemy and now faces the death penalty. To date, information has emerged regarding the conditions under which he is being held.

According to NGOs, since 1986 some 1200 people have been arrested under blasphemy laws. These laws have been used as a pretext to persecute anyone who criticises Islam, and to persecute Christians and members of other religious minorities. Pakistan has one of the worst records in the world when it comes to the persecution of Christians.

Freedom of expression is a fundamental principle enshrined in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, one of 27 international conventions that countries taking part in the EU’s GSP+ scheme must ratify.

Despite this blatant persecution, justified by blasphemy laws, Pakistan still enjoys GSP+ status. Against this background, can the EEAS say what action has been taken to secure the reform of Pakistan’s blasphemy laws?

What is it doing to secure the release of Mr Nizami?

What steps has the Pakistani Government taken to protect religious minorities?

European Parliament (2018).

[20] Some of the main people to contact for Humanists International on these cases of humanists at risk are Chief Executive, Gary McLelland, and Humanists At Risk Coordinator, Emma Wadsworth-Jones.

[21] I have contributed to this particular report.

[22] Humanists International (2021b).

[23] United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (2021).

[24] Ibid.

[25] Gyaanipedia (2021).

[26] Realistic Approach (2021).

[27] Awan (2017).

[28] Jacobsen (2019a).

[29] Ibid.

[30] Pew-Templeton: Global Religious Futures Project. (2021).

[31] Jacobsen (2019a).

[32] International Humanist & Ethical Union has become or been rebranded as Humanists International. See Humanists International (2021a).

[33] Ibid.

[34] Gettleman (2019a) & Gettleman (2019b).

[35] Gettleman & ur-Rehman (2021)

[36] Jacobsen (2019a).

[37] Sorensen in the interview discussed a number of human rights, religious, and ethical quandaries seen in the cases of ‘Nizami’ and others from the view of an independent metaphysician and philosopher. Jacobsen (2021).

[38] Jacobsen (2019a).

[39] Jacobsen (2017).

[40] Werner (2017a).

[41] United Nations General Assembly (2017).

[42] Asad (2021).

[43] Asad (2021).

References

[MuhammadTheAtheist]. (2017, March 26). Voices of moderation and #HangAyazNizami. Retrieved from https://www.theexmuslim.com/2017/03/26/voices-moderation-hangayaznizami/.

[Mrleibniz]. (2018). Anyone has any information regarding pakistani blogger Ayaz Nizami?. Retrieved from https://www.reddit.com/r/exmuslim/comments/7fu40w/anyone_has_any_information_regarding_pakistani/.

AhmadiyyaFaceCheckBlog. (2021, January). Nasir Ahmad Sultani (an Ahmadi) has been given the death penalty in Pakistan for blasphemy. Retrieved from https://ahmadiyyafactcheckblog.com/2021/01/12/nasir-ahmad-sultani-an-ahmadi-has-been-given-the-death-penalty-in-pakistan-for-blasphemy/.

Asad, M. (2021, January 9). In a first, three get death for ‘cyberspace blasphemy’. Retrieved from https://www.dawn.com/news/1600504/in-a-first-three-get-death-for-cyberspace-blasphemy.

Awan, M.U. (2017, March 29). Who is Ayaz Nizami? Triggering the Blasphemous Spark, Again!. Retrieved from www.usmanawan.com/ayaz-nizami-story-behind-this-blasphemy-act/.

Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain. (2017, March). Details on the cases of Ayaz Nizami and Rana Noman. Retrieved from https://www.ex-muslim.org.uk/2017/03/details-on-the-cases-of-ayaz-nizami-and-rana-noman/.

Council of Ex-Muslims of Britain. (2021). International Coalition of Ex-Muslims. Retrieved from https://www.ex-muslim.org.uk/intl-coalition.

End Blasphemy Laws. (2017, April 13). Student murdered by other students for “blasphemy” in Pakistan. Retrieved from https://end-blasphemy-laws.org/2017/04/student-murdered-by-other-students-for-blasphemy-in-pakistan/.

European Parliament. (2018, June 15). Subject: VP/HR — Pakistan and GSP+: detention of blogger Ayaz Nizami. Retrieved from https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-8-2018-003247_DE.html?redirect.

Faithless Hijabi. (2021). #JusticeForZaraKay. Retrieved from https://www.faithlesshijabi.org/justiceforzarakay/.

Filosofi I Skolen. (n.d.). ayaz-nizami. Retrieved from https://filosofiiskolen.no/livssynshumanisme/trosfrihet-ytringsfrihet-toleranse/attachment/ayaz-nizami/.

Fuller, H. (2017, March 27). Save Ayaz Nizami! For Freedom from Religion!. Retrieved from www.howiescorner.blogspot.com/2017/03/save-ayaz-nizami-for-freedom-from.html.

Gannon, K. (2017, March 24). Pakistan: More bloggers charged, cleric’s rally blocked. Retrieved from https://www.seattletimes.com/nation-world/pakistani-police-prevent-clerics-rally-against-blasphemy/.

Geling, J. (2017, April 2). Ayaz Nizami: vrijdenker in gevaar. Retrieved from https://www.humanistischverbond.nl/ayaz-nizami-de-nieuwe-raif-badawi/.

Gettleman, J. (2019b, September 19). Gulalai Ismail, Feminist Hunted by Pakistan’s Authorities, Escapes to U.S.. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/19/world/asia/gulalai-ismail-pakistan-activist.html.

Gettleman, J. (2019a, July 23). In Pakistan, a Feminist Hero Is Under Fire and on the Run. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/07/23/world/asia/pakistan-gulalai-ismail-.html.

Gettleman, J. & ur-Rehman, Z. (2021, February 3). She Escaped Pakistan. Now Her Father Has Been Thrown Into Jail.. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2021/02/03/world/asia/pakistan-gulalai-ismail-father.html.

Gran, E. (2017, March 29). Online campaign to kill religion-critical Pakistani bloggers. Retrieved from https://fritanke.no/nettkampanje-for-a-drepe-religionskritisk-pakistansk-blogger/19.10456.

Gyaanipedia. (2021). Ayaz Nizami. Retrieved from https://gyaanipedia.fandom.com/wiki/Ayaz_Nizami.

Hodgart, K. (2017). #HangAyazNizami is What Comes of Caving in to Clerical Rule. Retrieved from http://www.atimes.com/article/hangayaznizami-comes-caving-clerical-rule/.

Humanists International. (2021b). Humanists at Risk: Action Report 2020. Retrieved from https://humanists.international/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/3098_Humanists-International_Humanists-at-Risk-Action-Report_Amends-V2_LR.pdf.

Humanists International. (2021a). Humanists International. Retrieved from https://humanists.international/.

Hussaini, S.U. (2021, January 8). ATC Hands Death Penalty To Nasir Sultani, 2 Others In Blasphemy Case. Retrieved from https://www.bolnews.com/pakistan/2021/01/atc-hands-death-penalty-to-nasir-sultani-2-others-in-blasphemy-case/.

IndraStra (2017, March 25). NEWS | Three More Pakistani Bloggers Face Blasphemy Charges. Retrieved from https://www.indrastra.com/2017/03/NEWS-3-More-Pakistani-Bloggers-Face-Blasphemy-Charges-003-03-2017-0079.html.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2019b, November 15). ‘Ayaz Nizami’ Needs Far More Attention. Retrieved from https://newsintervention.com/nizami-jacobsen/.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2019c, March 26). An Immodest Proposal: International Coalition of Ex-Muslims (ICEM). Retrieved from https://newsintervention.com/immodest-jacobsen/.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2018, August 7). Ayaz Nizami Still Needs Help in Pakistan. Retrieved from https://medium.com/humanist-voices/ayaz-nizami-still-needs-help-in-pakistan-e30a53069ce5.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2019a, November 24). Interview with Fauzia Ilyas – President, Atheist & Agnostic Alliance Pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.canadianatheist.com/2019/11/ilyas-jacobsen/.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2017, March 27). My Recent Correspondence with ‘Ayaz Nizami’ – #FreeAyazNizami. Retrieved from https://uncommongroundmedia.com/free-ayaz-nizami/.

Jacobsen, S.D. (2021, January 25). On Justice and Fairness: Ayaz Nizami & International Company. Retrieved from https://newsintervention.com/nizami/.

Javed, J. (2017, March 30). #FreeAyazNizami. Retrieved from https://altleftjournal.wordpress.com/2017/03/30/in-defence-of-ayaz-nizami/.

Kabir, G. (2018 October/November). Escape To Exile. Retrieved from https://secularhumanism.org/2018/09/escape-to-exile/.

Mehta, H. (2017, March 26). With #HangAyazNizami, It’s Clear the Anti-Atheist Sentiment in South Asia is Getting Worse. Retrieved from https://friendlyatheist.patheos.com/2017/03/26/with-hangayaznizami-its-clear-the-anti-atheist-sentiment-in-south-asia-is-getting-worse/.

Naqvi, H.A. (2017, April 3). When Atheism becomes Terrorism in Pakistan. Retrieved from https://extranewsfeed.com/when-atheism-becomes-terrorism-in-pakistan-8e4b5d486bce.

National Secular Society. (2017). Pakistani Twitter Users Call for Hanging of ‘Blasphemer’. Retrieved from https://www.secularism.org.uk/news/2017/03/pakistani-twitter-users-call-for-hanging-of-blasphemer.

Nixon, A.G. (2020, February 10). ‘Non-Religion’ as Part of the ‘Religion’ Category in International Human Rights. Retrieved from https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/11/2/79/htm.

Pew-Templeton: Global Religious Futures Project. (2021). Pakistan: 2020. www.globalreligiousfutures.org/countries/pakistan/.

RadioFreeEurope/RadioLiberty. (2017, March 25). Pakistan Detains Three Bloggers On Blasphemy Charges. Retrieved from https://www.rferl.org/a/pakistan-bloggers-charged-blasphemy/28390360.html.

Realistic Approach. (2021). Realistic Approach. Retrieved from https://realisticapproach.org.

Shultan, S. (2017, April 10). Blasfemilovgivning på villspor. Retrieved from https://antirasistisk.no/blasfemilovgivning-pa-villspor/.

StupidVision. (2017, March 27). I am Ayaz Nizami. Retrieved from https://stupidvision.wordpress.com/2017/03/27/i-am-ayaz-nizami/.

Sultan, H. (2018). The Curse of God: Why I Left Islam. Retrieved from https://books.google.ca/books?id=ogd_DwAAQBAJ&pg=PT19&lpg=PT19&dq=ayaz+nizami&source=bl&ots=VrQt5fMOK6&sig=ACfU3U3_wnVcFyY-wbPDEB-zfdiOCGzClA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjes-iHuMruAhXlITQIHV1lB-44PBDoATAHegQICBAC#v=onepage&q=ayaz%20nizami&f=false.

The Associated Press. (2017, March 24). Pakistan: More bloggers charged for blasphemy; radical cleric’s rally blocked by security forces. Retrieved from https://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/pakistan-more-bloggers-charged-for-blasphemy-radical-cleric-s-rally-blocked-by-security-forces/story-DfgmrC7Tz8jvh6sVq9Xa7H.html.

The Nation. (2017a, March 24). Blasphemy crackdown: FIA arrests 2 suspects from Karachi. Retrieved from https://nation.com.pk/24-Mar-2017/blasphemy-crackdown-fia-arrests-2-suspects-from-karachi.

The Nation. (2017b, March 22). Prophet’s (PBUH) respect more important than Facebook: IHC. Retrieved from www.nation.com.pk/national/22-Mar-2017/is-facebook-more-important-than-prophet-s-pbuh-respect-ihc-judge.

United Nations General Assembly. (2017, September 7). A/HRC/36/NGO/143. Retrieved from https://humanists.international/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/A_HRC_36_NGO_143_IHEU-WS-Pakistan.pdf.

United States Commission on International Religious Freedom. (2021). Abdul Waheed. Retrieved from https://www.uscirf.gov/religious-prisoners-conscience/forb-victims-database/abdul-waheed.

Werner, H. (2019, December 29). Akademik Junaid Hafeez byl v Pákistánu odsouzen k trestu smrti za rouhání. Retrieved from https://www.osacr.cz/2019/12/29/akademik-junaid-hafeez-byl-v-pakistanu-odsouzen-k-trestu-smrti-za-rouhani/.

Werner, H. (2020, July 31). Protirouhačský fanatismus v Pákistánu nebere konce. V Paňdžábu zakazují “blasfemické knihy”. Retrieved from https://www.osacr.cz/2020/07/31/protirouhacsky-fanatismus-v-pakistanu-pokracuje-v-pandzabu-zakazuji-blasfemicke-knihy/.

Werner, H. (2017b, April 16). Univerzitní studenti v Pákistánu ubili k smrti svého spolužáka obviněného z rouhání. Retrieved from https://www.osacr.cz/2017/04/16/univerzitni-studenti-v-pakistanu-ubili-k-smrti-sveho-spoluzaka-obvineneho-z-rouhani/.

Werner, H. (2017a, March 29). V Pákistánu byl za rouhání zatčen Ayaz Nizami. Urazil islám a hrozí mu trest smrti. Retrieved from www.osacr.cz/2017/03/29/v-pakistanu-byl-za-rouhani-zatcen-ayaz-nizami-urazil-islam-a-hrozi-mu-trest-smrti/.

Wikipedia. (2021). List of ex-Muslim organisations. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ex-Muslim_organisations.

Wikiwand. (n.d.). Blasphemy in Pakistan. Retrieved from https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Blasphemy_in_Pakistan.

Worley, W. (2017, March 31). Pakistani Christians accused of lynching ‘offered acquittal’ if they convert to Islam. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/pakistani-christians-islam-lynching-trial-muslims-convert-youhanabad-lahore-church-bombings-a7659721.html.

Photo by Kamran Ch on Unsplash

Farmers’ agitation: A movement for and by sharks, political opportunists & the educated illiterates

For little over two and half months, farmers’ agitation has brought normal life and business activities in and around Delhi to a standstill. On January 26, they indulged in unprecedented violence in parts of NCR (National Capital Region) and even pulled down the national flag on the Red Fort but no one talks about this shameful act any longer. Their only concern is why barricades have been raised on roads and cases are being registered against rioters.

Parliamentarians are upset that they are not being allowed to meet the protesting leaders. Someone should tell them that thousands of daily commuters are feeling the same pain and frustration that squatters are inflicting on them by blocking roads. It was never meant to be a protest to seek removal of infirmities in the three laws through constitutional and legal means because it was led by a deadly cocktail of rich farmers who did not want to lose their financial control over procurement of farm produce, opposition political parties and dumb-wits like Rakesh Tikait who are incapable of understanding the significance of a transformational initiative.

It is jarring music to ears when these protesters call themselves ‘Annadatas’ as if they give grains for free out of piety. These so-called ‘Annadatas’ of Punjab, Haryana and western UP believe that India will become a mortuary for starved people if they stop growing grains. Someone should remind them that they produce just 61 million metric tonnes, whereas the remaining 223 million metric tonnes comes from other states which is more than enough to feed Indians. And, what about million others who are creating wealth in the country and also helping them to grow more through their scientific and market interventions.

It is still a mystery what these farmers were going to gain by taking a tractor rally to Delhi on a Republic Day? Storm the parliament, gherao the President and Prime Minister, keep them as hostages and force them to repeal the laws on the spot? Or, was it to paralyse the city until their demands were met? The purpose could never have been to hold dialogue for an amicable resolution of the issue because the means they were using for it were a rampaging mob and tractors that were used as tanks against hapless policemen. It is becoming clearer by day that they neither have specific proposal to rectify or improve upon the existing laws, they have no faith in courts nor they are sure of mobilising public opinion to force PM Modi to quit and have a government that buys their insane demands.

Overwhelming majority of agitators including Rakesh Tikait, BKU leader and his comrades are not educated enough to comprehend the nuances of the Acts. Their simple mind can look at things only in black and white. No wonder, they insist that APMCs must remain, MSP must have the backing of law and three ‘Black Laws’ must be withdrawn. The reasoning given is also simple: The Acts will ruin their agriculture income forever, and their lands will be swallowed by crony capitalists (whatever that means.) For all one knows, Rakesh and his gullible supporters may be unaware that chakka jams and trampling of tricolour are not the legally recognized instruments for redressing grievances.

The agitation has done lot of good to Rakesh Tikait, in particular. A non-entity till the other day, he has emerged as a powerful voice of rioting farmers. No wonder, every opposition leader is making a beeline to pay obeisance to the man. Western media and phoney international celebrities have gone gaga over him. But before it is too late, he should realize that he is actually a pawn in the hands of political parties who want to milk him to garner votes and Sikh farm leaders who have changed gears after facing a backlash for the tricolour insult and have instead been propping him up to keep the stir alive.

The reactions by Modi baiters to January 26 mayhem are bizarre. They want us to believe that BJP had infiltrated goons to provoke riots so that Kisans get discredited. They are giving undue credit to BJP for possessing a skill that they do not have to fine tune the nature and extent of violence to such minutest details. If they want to give credit, they should credit them for foolishly hoping that protesters would abide by the guidelines agreed earlier with Delhi Police.

The question is why did the police not prevent unruly protesters and tractors from forcing their entry in Delhi. The reason is obvious. Police did not have enough forces to stop them. The only available option was to ask protesters to leave not before 11 AM and follow designated routes, so that by the time they enter Delhi, there would be enough forces released from 26 January parade to handle the crowd. But protesters proved smarter. They left at 8 AM and rushed to Delhi around 11, catching the thinly deployed policemen with their pants down. What happened subsequently, we have all seen.

As usual, intelligence failure has been blamed for what happened on January 26. The government actually had all the intelligence about the ring leaders, their real intent to violate police guidelines and cause widespread violence and presence of miscreants. But the question was whether to carry out preventive arrests of leaders on the previous day and be ready to open fire should the crowd offered violent resistance. It was felt that opening fire would be an inevitability since there was not enough force (about a lakh) to physically hold back the farmers who were equipped with lathis, spears and swords. The only option left was to avoid at any cost turning the protest sites into killing fields when Republic Day function was only a few hours away. Imagine the relish with which Rihannas, Trudeaus, Manish Tiwaris, liberals, communists and their likes would have taken seeing agitators fall in heaps to bullets. The government denied them of this pleasure and turned to Delhi policemen to take the hit on themselves with maximum restraint.

This tamasha is not going to go away soon. Opposition leaders have smelled blood in the farmers’ protest. With state elections lined up in the next two years and parliamentary elections in 2024, they are desperate to keep anti-Modi tempo alive to take shine off his development armour. They have already red-flagged their intent. They boycotted the President’s address to the Budget session of the parliament and since then, they have been staging walk-outs and disrupting proceedings in both houses. They will now go all out to join the farmers in all forms of protest in various parts of the country. Now that police have swung into action against rioters and their leaders, we will also hear of repression of farmers and assault on freedom of speech and protest. They are adamant on keeping the agitation protracted until PM gives in. But they forget that no PM from any party or alliance can afford to set a precedence that encourages protesters to get their demands met by resorting to violence rather than taking recourse to legal means.

Adhatiya (farming commission agent) attacking policemen with swords.
An Adhatiya (farming commission agent) attacking policemen with swords.

The only way forward for farmers is to give up their blind approach of “my way or high way” and engage in discussing provisions that they think hurts farmers’ interest and suggest specifically what amendment they would like the government to make to the laws and why. This is possible only if they keep off politicians out of their discussions and harness services of agriculture economists who can take up their cause in their interest. Can they do it? It is doubtful.        

Bitter smokes at a cigarette major

Exclusive

They are calling it smokescreen developments. A bitter succession war has hit the Rs 3,000-crore Godfrey Phillips India between Bina Modi, wife of late KK Modi, and her two sons, Samir Modi, and Lalit Modi.

Samir is based in the Indian Capital and was recently named CEO of GPI while the mother was named the chairperson of the group. For the records, Samir is also a director in the family-run Modi Enterprise.

The other son, Lalit, a fugitive, is based in London and battling Indian investigative agencies probing him on money laundering charges because of his alleged financial misappropriation in the Indian Premier League, cricket’s richest tournament.

Samir Modi was recently in the news after an alleged bitter fight broke out between him and his wife, Shivani. Company insiders say Shivani allegedly was asked to leave the ancestral home of Sameer Modi without any financial help. 

Samir Modi

On Wednesday, February 3, 2020, officers of the Income Tax searched the farm house and offices of Samir Modi, whose group’s interests range from tobacco to home care chains that operate round the clock in Indian cities.

Samir Modi, Sammy to his friends, was questioned for over 20 hours, claimed a top source in the office of Income Tax. The raids happened just before the company’s annual general meeting slated for February 4, 2020.

“The investigations will continue,” said the source.

Company insiders told News Intervention that troubles started in GPI after Samir Modi made his intention clear to be the successor of his father, the late KK Modi who ran the show for over five decades.

But now there is an all-out war in the family.

What is also interesting is that Samir Modi has found a great ally in Lalit Modi, now based in London. Lalit Modi has not returned to India, claiming his life was under threat from the dreaded underworld that mostly operates out of Mumbai.

Recently, Lalit Modi tweeted furiously that income tax raids had hit the group and the officers must expand their probe. 

The Economic Times reported last November 2020 that in a separate filing that GPI stood behind its managing director Bina Modi and called allegations of illegality in her appointment, by her grandson and company’s director Ruchir Modi, as “completely misconceived, motivated and baseless”.

“This matter has been extensively dealt with by the company in submissions made in the past to the stock exchanges and the SEBI,” the daily quoted the filing.

According to the daily, GPI called the suggestion of alleged violation in the corporate governance practise in the functioning of the company under Bina Modi’s leadership as “completely devoid of any substance” and “motivated”.

New Farm Laws protect farmers from middlemen

0

The middlemen or the farming commission agents have exploited farmers over the last seven decades. These middlemen purchase farm produce at dirt cheap rates and then sell at a huge price to the end consumer. The new farm laws aims to change this and thence being resisted by the middlemen also known as Adhatiyas or farming commission agents.

Big Media projecting Adhatiyas as Farmers

0

Adhatiyas are farming commission agents who buy a farmer’s produce at cheap rates and sell at hefty profits. These commission agents are responsible for farm distress in India.

Farming middlemen attack Delhi policemen with swords

0

Farming commission agents aka the adhatiyas/middlemen attacked Delhi Police personnel with sharp swords during their protests against farm bills.

Khalistani separatists run amok at Red Fort

0

Khalistani separatists and Adhatiyas (farming middlemen) caused mayhem at Red Fort on Republic Day, January 26 in the garb of farmer protests.

682 Pak Army operations, 200 killed, 705 missing, 1100 homes burned across Balochistan in 2020

The year 2020 proved to be a difficult year in Baloch national history, where Pakistani ground and air military operations continued even till the last sunset of year 2020. This year, as every year, Sangar Media Group compiled statistics on serious human rights violations and war crimes across Balochistan by the Pakistan Army. These statistics are obtained from Balochistan’s official print media, social media and local sources, and are verified.

According to data obtained by Sangar, the Pakistani military conducted 682 operations across occupied Balochistan during the year 2020 and 705 Baloch went kidnapped by the security forces and are now missing. Two hundred (200) dead bodies were recovered.

One hundred twenty two (122) Baloch were martyred by the Pakistani military, intelligence agencies and state backed death squads. According to statistics, the motive for killing 60 dead bodies could not be ascertained and 18 bodies could not be identified.

Pakistani forces set fire to the forests in Kech, occupied Balochistan. (Photo: News Intervention)
Pakistani forces set fire to the forests in Kech, occupied Balochistan. (Photo: News Intervention)

During the year 2020, Pakistan Army looted more than 2,200 Baloch homes, looted the valuables and set more than 1,100 homes on fire. Available data also reveals that the Pakistani forces set up 60 new outposts in Balochistan. During their operations, more than 4,000 cattle were killed and more than 2,000 were taken away as spoils of war.

In the same year, Pakistan Army unleashed a new rein of terror through the burning of natural forests throughout Balochistan that included forests in Dasht, Buleda, Parom, Zamuran, Mand, Jhao Gichk, Mashkay and Bolan.

Pakistani state forces also burnt three schools in Buleda Tehsil in Kech district.

In the year 2020, 106 missing persons were recovered from the Pakistani torture cells; most of which had gone missing in different months of the same year.

Mother and Father of Hayat Baloch crying over the body of their son. Hayat Baloch was murdered in cold blood by the Pakistani security forces in occupied Balochistan.
Mother and Father of Hayat Baloch crying over the body of their son. Hayat Baloch was murdered in cold blood by the Pakistani security forces in occupied Balochistan.

The year 2020 was devastating for the Baloch nation from its beginning till the end such that the year began with state bombings and military operations, the assassination of journalist Sajid Baloch at Sweden in April and the martyrdom of Karima Baloch in December, adding another bloody year to the Baloch national history.

After the disappearance and assassination of Sajid Baloch in Sweden, the assassination of pro-independence leader Karima Baloch in Canada shook the Baloch nation. Social and human rights activists, including oppressed nations around the world, continue to protest. Since Karima Baloch was an effective voice for Balochistan, she was martyred under a special and organized strategy. However, there was hardly any area of ​​occupied Balochistan that did not was no protest against the brutal murder of Karima Baloch by Pakistan.

The ongoing atrocities in Balochistan over the past two decades have been increasing with each passing month and year. There is no area left that has not been set on fire, people have not been evacuated, houses have not been set on fire. In fact, no area in Balochistan is safe from this fire.

On a daily basis, the Pakistani military and intelligence agencies pick up people and ‘disappear’ them. Homes and cattle are being looted. The parallel terrorist death squads of state forces, intelligence agencies and the army have made life a hell for the Baloch nation on their own soil.

It has become crystal clear that Pakistani barbarism has given birth to a human tragedy in Balochistan. The affected families are in an indescribable situation. This situation is getting worse day by day.

Baloch women march to protest against unlawful abductions by Pakistani regime.
Baloch women march to protest against unlawful abductions by Pakistani regime.

Disappearing innocent people is a serious crime. No law in the world allows a person to go ‘missing’ but this inhumane act is on the rise in Balochistan. This is a clear war crime. Pakistan should have been brought to book for this crime, and yet at the cost of people’s emotions, compulsions and human tragedy, Pakistan continues to be acquitted of this crime.

Pakistan, on the one hand, is in a state of disarray due to lack of foreign investment, economic and diplomatic policies and on the other hand the independence movements of subjugated nations have devastated the country even further. The people in Sindh including Muhajirs are demanding complete independence. The Pashtun nation has not given any slogan about freedom, but seeing the barbarism of Pakistan, in the days to come there is no way for them except the struggle for freedom.

The subjugated nations of the region, especially the Baloch and the Sindhis, have reached a point in the struggle of their occupied countries which will lead them towards freedom.

During 2020, where dozens of Baloch including Malik Naz were martyred, the Baloch nation also challenged the enemy against its atrocities. Similarly, Major Noora and other Sarmachar martyrs also inflicted a humiliating defeat on the occupying forces of Pakistan Army.

Major Noora's body being dragged by Pakistani vehicle in occupied Balochistan. A soldier of the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), Major Noora was martyred while fighting with Pakistan Army.
Major Noora’s body being dragged by Pakistani vehicle in occupied Balochistan. A soldier of the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), Major Noora was martyred while fighting with Pakistan Army.

The bloodshed of Shaheed Malik Naz and wounds of four year old girl Bramsh in Dannuk Kech had once again made Balochistan the center of global attention. Similarly, the young student Hayat Baloch was dragged in front of his parents by the occupying army and shot 8 times in a row.

Hayat Baloch’s martyrdom and the Dannuk incident sparked a wave of protests across Balochistan, which clearly shows that Baloch society is fed up with these state actors.

The targeted attacks by Baloch self-sacrificing squad have breathed new life into the struggle for Baloch national liberation. Certainly the sacrifices of the Baloch youth dedicated to the spirit of nationalism and national liberation are the guarantor of a bright future for the Baloch nation.

Pakistan’s economy is based on 72 years of exploitation and genocide of the Baloch nation. The of Karachi Stock Exchange is a foundation and symbol of this exploitative economy. The self-sacrificing squad of the Majeed Brigade attacked the backbone of Pakistan’s economy and conveyed a message that an economy which is being built at the cost of looting and killing of Baloch people will be targeted by the Baloch Sarmachars at all places.

Baloch freedom fighters who attacked the Karachi Stock Exchange on June 29.
Baloch freedom fighters who attacked the Karachi Stock Exchange on June 29, 2020.

Pakistan has become a nightmare not only for its neighbors, and the subcontinent but also for the world because of its war crimes. The bodies of Baloch Sarmachaars (freedom fighters) martyred while fighting valiantly against Pakistani forces are desecrated by the frustrated Pakistani armed personnel.

During military operations across Balochistan, humiliation of women, abduction of youth, sexual abuse with them, looting of houses, detention, massacre, open use of gunship helicopters, bombing etc. are common practice by Pakistan.

And yet, the neighboring countries and the world are silent on the Pakistani military’s war crimes. In occupied Balochistan, the reach of international media is completely banned. Pakistani media itself is not allowed to report, therefore the ongoing state war crimes are not exposed to the world.

The sham of Daniel Pearl’s murder trial in Pakistan

Now that Pakistan’s highest court has acquitted Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh, accused for his involvement in the 2002 abduction and subsequent decapitation of American journalist Daniel Pearl, the question on everybody’s lips is, ‘What next?’ Whereas Sindh Government says it’s filing a review petition against the supreme court’s verdict, while the federal government has pledged its “full support,” but given Islamabad’s characteristic reluctance to act against terrorists, these assurances have done precious little to allay fears of yet another hardcore terrorist going scot-free. Perhaps this is why US acting Attorney General Jeffrey Rosen has said that “The United States stands ready to take custody of Omar Sheikh to stand trial here.”

Sheikh’s case has once again exposed Islamabad’s duplicity in its much hyped ‘zero tolerance’ for terrorism, because his involvement in Pearl’s abduction and murder case wasn’t the first terrorist act, he committed. Eight years before, as a Harkat-ul Ansar [HuA] terrorist, Sheikh had kidnapped four foreign tourists [three Australian and one American national] from New Delhi. To secure their release, he demanded that ten terrorists jailed in J&K should be set free was made alongwith the threat to behead the hostages if the demand wasn’t met. Luckily, the police were able to secure release of the abducted foreigners after a bloody shootout, while Sheikh was apprehended and imprisoned.

However, in 1999, Pakistan-based terrorists hijacked an Indian Airlines aircraft and managed to secure release of Sheikh along with two other convicted terrorists in exchange for passengers of this flight. Even though Sheikh took refuge in Pakistan and made no efforts to conceal his identity or whereabouts, Islamabad didn’t consider it necessary to ensure that this terrorist guilty of abduction is brought to book. The reasons for such an irresponsible behaviour are obvious. Firstly, Islamabad’s anti-India mindset makes it believe in the ‘enemy’s enemy being a friend’ philosophy. Secondly, since HuA is one of the many terrorist groups Pakistan Army is using to wage proxy war against India, Rawalpindi has ensured that Sheikh remains beyond reach of law.

Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh captured and murdered Wall Street Journal reporter Daniel Pearl and yet he has been set free by the Pakistani courts.

This incident, which exposes Islamabad’s utter lack of seriousness in holistically combatting terrorism cannot be dismissed as mere aberration because it’s not the only instance of Islamabad looking the other way as terrorist masterminds based on its soil were running riot in neighbouring countries. Its long list of failures to bring terrorist leaders living in Pakistan to justice includes architects of 2001 Indian Parliament terrorist attack, 2002 Mumbai carnage, 2016 Pathankot airbase attack, 2019 Pulwama car bombing of a bus carrying central police force personnel, and many more such despicable acts of terrorism. In fact, anyone following what Pakistan’s leaders, generals and government officials have been saying will agree that Islamabad and Rawalpindi always had an extremely selective approach towards terrorism dictated by its self-serving interests.

While talking about terrorism during a 2014 TV interview, Adviser to the Pakistani Prime Minister on National Security and Foreign Affairs, Sartaj Aziz, made Islamabad’s stand on terrorism clear by saying, “Why should America’s enemies unnecessarily become our enemies?” Two years later, he not only admitted that Pakistan had been hosting Afghan Taliban for 35 years, but also boasted that “We have some influence over them because their leadership is in Pakistan and they get some medical facilities.” So, former US President Donald Trump wasn’t at all wrong when he tweeted that “The United States has foolishly given Pakistan more than 33 billion dollars in aid over the last 15 years, and they have given us nothing but lies & deceit, thinking of our leaders as fools. They give safe haven to the terrorists we hunt in Afghanistan…!”

By admitting that “we made a mistake by joining someone else’s war…[as] we had nothing to do with 9/11 attacks,” Prime Minister Imran Khan has unwittingly exposed Pakistan’s selective approach in fighting terrorism. However, going by Khan’s view of not “joining someone else’s war,” handing over Sheikh to the Americans so that he can stand trial for the kidnapping and murder of Daniel Pearl appears to be a distinct possibility. After all, since the accused is a British national [albeit of Pakistani descent] and the victim was an American, neither the accused nor the victim have anything to do with Pakistan, so there’s legal issues involved. Moreover, as Islamabad had handed over a Kuwaiti national named Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, who was an Al Qaida terrorist and main 9/11 plotter to the US in 2003, precedent for turning over terrorists of foreign nationality to America already exists.  

However, this is not likely to happen, because even though the Daniel Pearl murder may not have anything to do with Pakistan, yet Rawalpindi will never accept a member of what it considers to be its ‘strategic asset’ to be handed over to America. It’s already ensured this in the case of Lashkar-e-Taiba [LeT] co-founder Hafiz Saeed and so, doing otherwise in Sheik’s case is unlikely. What makes such an eventuality even more improbable is the revelation by 9/11 planner Khalid Sheikh Mohammed that Omar Sheikh had sent about USD 100,000 from UEA to 9/11 hijacker Mohamad Atta on instructions from the then ISI chief Lt Gen Mahmud Ahmed!

Just two years ago, Justice Shaukat Aziz Siddiqui, a senior serving judge of Islamabad High Court went on record to say, “Today the judiciary and media have come in the control of ‘Bandookwala’ [army].” Disclosing that the “judiciary is not independent,” he went on to reveal that “In different cases, the ISI forms benches of its choice to get desired results.” Hence, the most likely out come of the Pearl trial case is that the Supreme Court of Pakistan will in all probability reverse Sindh High Court’s acquittal verdict and after rejecting the serious charges, declare Sheikh guilty on minor charges and sentence him to a jail term that would more or less be equivalent to the time he’s already spent in jail.

As Section 403 of the Pakistan Code of Criminal Procedure,1898, incorporates the universally accepted ‘nemo debt bis vexari prone et eadem causa’ [no person should be put to peril twice for the same offence] maxim, a jail sentence awarded to Sheikh will ensure that he can’t be tried in this case again. Islamabad has already used this option to ‘technically’ comply with Financial Action Task Force’s observation regarding involvement of LeT co-founder Hafiz Saeed and its present chief Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi in terror financing. By framing feeble charges against both, it has ensured that both have been awarded short jail sentences and as such, there’s no reason why Islamabad won’t follow suit in Sheikh’s case.

In this way, Islamabad and Rawalpindi will [like always] be able to both have the cake-as well as eat it too!