Pakistan struck once again at Harnai in occupied Balochistan, killed four family members and have forcefully abducted two other men from this family. Sources in occupied Balochistan told News Intervention that Pakistani security forces raided the house of Qaisar Chilgari Marri at Nishpa in Harnai on Monday and murdered Qaisar along with his daughter, daughter-in-law and the 6-year old grand daughter Naz Bibi. The family’s two other men, Mohammad Ali Marri and Gul Dad Marri were then forcefully abducted and taken to an undisclosed location. There whereabouts are still unknown.
Local Baloch residents said that the entire family has been wiped out and there is no one left to provide further details.
While it’s still not clear what sparked the raid but activists and human rights organisations allege that civilians are targeted by Pakistani forces whenever they are attacked by the Baloch armed revolutionaries.
A local activist, on condition of anonymity said that collective punishment has been a routine in Balochistan and Pakistani security forces’ “callous and senseless brutality” at Harnai is just another addition to the long list of human rights violations and brutal raids on the Baloch people.
The Central Spokesman of the Baloch National Movement (BNM) condemned the barbarism of the Pakistani Army in Harnai and said that the Pakistani Army attacked Qaiser Chalgari’s house in Nishpa area of Harnai. In the attack, Qaiser Chalgari and two children got martyred, including his six year old granddaughter Naz Bibi. Apart from this, two young sons of Qaiser Chalgari have also been forcibly disappeared by the army.
The brutal raid of Pakistani security forces was was widely condemned on social media and many activists urged international groups to intervene.
Condemning the brutality at Harnai in occupied Balochistan, Dr Allah Nazar Baloch the leader of Balochistan’s independence struggle said: “Pakistani barbarism and brutalities continue unabated in Balochistan.”
Pakistan Army and its intelligence agency ISI have inflicted a rein of terror across occupied Balochistan in order to crush the independence movement of Baloch people. Forced abductions, late night raids, targeted killings, enforced disappearances, kill and dump the Pakistani deep state is trying everything to suppress the independence struggle in Balochistan. Over 30,000 Baloch people have gone “missing” due to Pakistan’s forced abductions and more than 10,000 Baloch people have been killed in cold blood. Monday’s attack on a hapless family at Harnai was just a continuation of Pakistan’s policy. This will continue till the international community takes note of these atrocities by Pakistan on occupied Balochistan.
Khalil Baloch, Chairman Baloch National Movement said: “The martyrdom of Qaisar Chalghari & his six-years-old granddaughter & the disappearance of his two young sons at the hands of the Pakistan Army are continuation of the atrocities. The Baloch are being collectively punished & the silence of int’l Orgs is causing an increase in it.”
“This is neither the first nor the last because we are occupied by a state whose history is full of oppression and violence against subjugated nations. Pakistan wants to rule over our land forever by eradicating the Baloch people through genocide and pogroms but history has shown that nations cannot be annihilated in this way,” said the Central Spokesman of BNM (Baloch National Movement).
The BNM spokesman further explained that the Pakistan Army has been pursuing an aggressive strategy of collective punishment for many years. “In this policy of collective punishment, on the one hand, the occupying army is directly targeting the people, on the other hand, it is creating new tactics of oppression through its Death Squads across Balochistan. Hundreds of incidents like that of Dannuk and Dazin are happening. The Harnai incident is the continuation of the same barbarism. The only difference between the two incidents is the Death Squads in military uniforms and without uniforms. In Dannuk and Dazin, Death Squads killed Malik Naz and Kulsoom, while in Harnai, the army shot and killed an old Baloch and a young girl in front of their family.”
The BNM Central Spokesman added that Pakistan was strictly adhering to the policy of collective punishment across Balochistan. “Tasneem Baloch, who was martyred at the Karachi Stock Exchange last week, his three brothers and father have been abducted from Dasht and two brothers of Shaheed Siraj from Shapak have been forcibly disappeared. These are the worst examples of collective punishment. In this regard, it is the responsibility of the international community to curb this rogue and terrorist state and play its role in preventing human tragedy and humiliation in Balochistan.”
On 6 July 2020, His Holiness the Dalai Lama, turned 85. I scanned the entire Net looking for mention of this extremely important event – but in vain! There was mention of the birthday of actor Ranveer Singh (who ?) – But absolutely nothing about the Dalai Lama and Tibet.
Does India and the BJP government of Narendra Modi understand the extreme importance of that event? The Dalai Lama may be the last chance for India to regain a friendly border between herself and the Chinese enemy – and the time is running out. You do know, I hope, that out of the 40,000 or so km of border with China, nearly 3300 belongs to Tibet! Tibet was always a friendly and peaceful buffer between the two giants of Asia. When Jawaharlal Nehru allowed China to take over this tiny nation, he committed one of his biggest blunders – and India is still paying the price for it.
The Chinese, who are most ruthless and intelligent, are just waiting for the Dalai Lama to die, to nominate their own puppet Dalai Lama, the way they named a Panchen-Lama. Then it will be not only the end of the possibility of free Tibet, but from a geostrategical point of view, India will have to face in the coming decades not only a hostile border with China, without the buffer of Tibet, but also the disadvantage of China swooping down from the heights of Tibet onto India’s valleys as it did in 1962. Did you also know that according to the CIA, China has placed many of its nuclear warheads in Tibetan caves, where they escape the scrutiny of satellites and that many of them are pointed towards Indian cities? We also know that most of South Asia great rivers are born in Tibet and that China is building many dams upon them, depriving India and many other countries of this precious water.
Thus the importance of a free Tibet has never been so crucial to India – specially at the time of extreme tensions with China on many fronts, whether Ladakh, Bhutan, Arunachal Pradesh, Kashmir, or even on sea, in the Indian Ocean. But do you think that the bureaucrats of India can understand that? No, not at all. Their minds are frozen in the Nehruvian thinking that one must compromise with China at all costs! It was so in the 50s, it was in the 60s, 70s, 80s, 90s and unfortunately it is still true even today. They have not learnt that the Chinese always pretend to negotiate, while preparing for war.
Who will then grasp that the 85 year old Dalai Lama, a Nobel Peace Prize recipient, is India most powerful weapon against China? Firstly, his very name makes the Chinese shake with anger and they lose — for once — all common sense; secondly, India should respond tit for tat: China says that Kashmir is a disputed territory; China claims Arunachal Pradesh; China has taken over swaps of Indian territory, whether the Aksai Chin or bits and bits here and there in Assam, Ladakh, Sikkim or Bhutan. Then why the hell can’t India say that Tibet is a disputed territory??? Why cannot the BJP government of Narendra Modi allow for instance the Dalai Lama to do a teaching in Ladakh, where he has thousands and thousands of followers – right under the nose of the Chinese?
Indeed, India without knowing it, has with his Holiness, not only a friend, but also a Yogi, the spiritual and temporal head of Tibet, as an important ally – and its high time that the Prime Minister Modi uses that dharmic weapon against China. We may quote here Sri Aurobindo, India’s great revolutionary, poet, philosopher and avatar who was also a prophet who wrote in 1949: “The significance of Mao’s Tibetan adventure is to advance China’s frontier right down to India and stand poised there to strike at the right moment and with right strategy… We must burn it into our minds that the primary motive of Mao’s attack on Tibet is to threaten India as soon as possible.
Happy Birthday your Holiness. May God grant you a long life! May Tibet become free again, so that India regains a peaceful neighbour and that will be a buffer between her and the Chinese dragon. Are you listening Mr Prime Minister?
Deng Xiao Peng, the architect of modern China, speaking at the special session of the United Nations on 10th April 1974, said: “China is a socialist country, and a developing country as well. China belongs to the Third World. Consistently following Chairman Mao’s teachings, the Chinese Government and people firmly support all oppressed peoples and oppressed nations in their struggle to win or defend national independence, develop the national economy and oppose colonialism, imperialism and hegemonism. This is our bounden internationalist duty. China is not a superpower, nor will she ever seek to be one. What is a superpower? A superpower is an imperialist country which everywhere subjects other countries to its aggression, interference, control, subversion or plunder and strives for world hegemony. If capitalism is restored in a big socialist country, it will inevitably become a superpower. The Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution, which has been carried out in China in recent years, and the campaign of criticizing Lin Piao and Confucius now under way throughout China, are both aimed at preventing capitalist restoration and ensuring that socialist China will never change her colour and will always stand by the oppressed peoples and oppressed nations. If one day China should change her colour and turn into a superpower, if she too should play the tyrant in the world, and everywhere subject others to her bullying, aggression and exploitation, the people of the world should identify her as social-imperialism, expose it, oppose it and work together with the Chinese people to overthrow it”.
These are important words by Deng Xiao Peng to think about, given the positioning China in the world today.
President Xi Jinping, who has positioned himself in the same exalted status as Chairman Mao and Deng Xiao Peng, should be a worried leader and under serious pressure.
His traditional play book strategies are not working. The world leaders are not bowing down to his pressure tactics. World’s citizens are willing to shun the Chinese products like never before. The carefully crafted image of the man and his machines is beginning to tarnish rapidly. China is left with their all-weather ally Pakistan and North Korea, both of whom will do as their master instructs.
Over the past year, there have been a series of challenges faced by the Chinese economy. 1. Wuhan Virus (Kung Flu as per President Trump), that has created devastation in the world. No one knows how many people have died in China. 2. The Chinese economy is in trouble partly because of the shut down and partly because of the anti-China sentiment among buyers around the world. 3. Challenges within the CCP, especially after Xi’s “President for Life” amendment of their “constitution.”
The other significant
piece of the equation is Xi’s dream project, the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)
which is the cornerstone of his policy of economic colonisation using debt as a
major tool. Almost every country that signed up with China for the BRI has now
found out that there is nothing in it for them. China’s cheque book diplomacy
is facing serious resistance.
One major section of the BRI goes through Balochistan (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor–CPEC), which is in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir. The rebels in Balochistan will do whatever it takes to ensure that this CPEC project is not completed. This will hurt both China and Pakistan.
The most well accepted form of diverting attention, from time immemorial, is to start a war / create trouble with neighbours to draw attention away from internal problems, in the hope that nationalistic feelings will divert the attention of citizens. This is what we see to be happening with all 14 countries that have borders with China or with those that share international waters with China. From Bhutan (for an animal reserve) to Russia (for the entire Vladivostok region), from Mongolia to Japan, from Australia to Myanmar. China has reopened old issues everywhere.
All countries, affected by China, are now speaking up. South East Asian countries too, that have traditionally kept quiet, have now spoken up against China for the South China Seas.
India has had a long-standing dispute with China on our 3488 km long border. The British had defined a border between India and Tibet in 1914 called the “McMahon Line” which is called the Line of Actual Control (LAC). After annexing Tibet, China refused to recognise this agreement. Therefore, China keeps claiming various parts of India including the entire North East of India (7 states of India) as its own.
In the past, Indian
politicians supported by their able bureaucrats, for various reasons, did not
challenge China but preferred to “let things lie” in the hope that somehow,
good sense would prevail. They knew that China was incorrigible, but it is
always easier to sweep uncomfortable situations under the carpet. This led to
large land areas of India being taken over by China and now claimed as their
own. India has supported Hong Kong and Taiwan at the UN and is asking for an
investigation into the cause of the virus. It should be a matter of time before
India raises the matter of the autonomy of Tibet.
With the recent clash on June 15, 2020 in the Galwan Valley, the Chinese had thought that they would keep “creeping” towards India like they had done in the past. Under PM Narendra Modi, this was not only stopped but rebuffed as well. While 20 Indian soldiers were killed, I have heard senior officials that over 75 Chinese soldiers were killed by an enraged India Army who sought retribution after they saw their Commanding Officer killed. Stories of one Sikh soldier killing 12 people with his “kirpan” before being martyred are doing the rounds. This is how myths are born, and rightly so.
The Chinese are not
used to being pushed back.
They have survived with their self-created myth of being the world’s largest and most powerful Army. Can an Army, which is probably being run by the power of the gun and Communist ideology battle against the world’s best trained Indian Army who treat their land as their mother and are willing to happily sacrifice their lives to defend it?
In the past, our politicians had tied the hands of the Indian Army behind their backs. Prime Minister Modi has given freedom to the Army to respond as they deem fit. Mr Modi’s comment in Ladakh, that India knows how to play Lord Krishna’s flute and knows how to use His Sudarshan Chakra clearly indicates the complete change in India’s foreign policy vis-à-vis China. Not only do we know how to make an aggressor dance to our tune, we also know how to use the deadliest weapons to protect ourselves.
It is interesting to see how most countries have come out in support of India. France has also offered to send their ground troops to support India! Russia is expediting the delivery of 21 MIG-29 and 12 Sukhoi aircraft as well as the world’s most advanced S-400 surface-to-air missile systems. USA has positioned 3 aircraft carriers in the waters around India to Japan and is expediting the dispatch of helicopters on priority.
Opening up so many flanks at the same time is either a well-crafted strategy of President Xi Jinping or this could be regional satraps within China starting to flex their muscles independently. If the latter, then the world needs to worry. Whether this would lead to the balkanisation of China, similar to USSR is anybody’s guess?
Are the days of
President Xi numbered? Will he be given a face saving exit? Is there another
group of ambitious and aggressive young leaders within the party who are
plotting to claim the “Dragon Throne”, to give a different direction to the
country?
Is it time for the leadership of China to go back to the prophetic words of Deng Xiao Peng and learn to live with the World instead of trying to control it?
The old saying about there being no smoke without a fire stands vindicated because the continuous flow of news trickling from across the bamboo curtain regarding ongoing religious persecution of ethnic minorities that has ultimately galvanised the otherwise reticent international community to complain against Beijing’s highhandedness. The major area of global concern were reliable reports that Uighur Muslims of Xinjiang Autonomous Region (XAR) were being interned in ‘detention camps’, of infants being separated from their parents and how besides being physically and mentally abused, the detenues were also being forced to do things that were proscribed in Islam.
There are credible reports of how Uighur Muslims are being forced to eat pork and consume alcohol; about men not being allowed to keep beards and women prohibited from wearing hijab (head covering worn in public). Fasting during the holy month of Ramzan is discouraged and the Chinese national flag and portraits of Xi Jinping are required to be displayed in mosques and every Muslim household. Forced sterilizations and insertion of contraception implants against the victim’s will as well as reports of Uighur women being lured to marry Han men through material inducements are rampant. Even a simple thing like usage of the term ‘Halal’ (permissible under Islam) labelling for food products is criminalised.
So, in July 2019, when a statement signed by 22 countries submitted a notice to the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) expressing concerns over widespread surveillance and repression in China and called upon Beijing to “refrain from the arbitrary detention and restrictions on freedom of movement of Uighurs, and other Muslim and minority communities in Xinjiang” many believed that China would be forced to end repression of its minorities. But as is its wont, Beijing not only refused to oblige but instead, displaying its characteristic arrogance, decided to brazen it out by going on the counter-offensive.
Playing the
game by the same ground rules, Beijing countered the complaint against it by delivering
a powerful riposte. After just four days, it handed over a letter to OHCHR
that mentioned China’s “remarkable achievements in the field of human
rights”. Signed by 37 countries, this communication went on to state that “Now
safety and security has returned to Xinjiang and the fundamental human rights
of people of all ethnic groups there are safeguarded.” But even though Qatar
subsequently withdrew its support, Beijing was busy adding more signatories in
its favour.
When this letter was resubmitted during the same month, 13 new states as well as the Palestinian Authority had come out in support of Beijing, bringing the total number of signatories to a whopping 50! But the irony here is that none of the 22 signatories who had demanded justice for the persecuted Muslim Uighurs were Islamic nations, but amongst the 50 countries that abandoned the oppressed people of their own faith by giving Beijing a ‘clean chit’ included almost two dozen states that boasted being Islamic nations or had a predominantly Muslim population.
The most shocking part is that the list of Beijing’s supporters also included self-proclaimed leaders and heavy weights of the Islamic world like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan; the two countries that keep waxing eloquence about their unconditional and consummate dedication to alleviate the suffering of ‘ummah’ (entire community of Muslims bound together by ties of Islam)! But this comes as no surprise because both the international community (in general), as well as Muslim countries (in particular) are well aware of this duplicity that plagues the ‘House of Saud’ and ‘Land of the Pure’ on this issue!
Three months later, another letter signed by 23 countries was
handed over to OHCHR, which called upon China to “uphold its national and
international obligations and commitments to respect human rights,” as
well provide international monitors access to Xinjiang. But once again, Beijing
had the last laugh when its ally Belarus came out with a statement on behalf of
54 countries that concluded with the “appreciation that human rights are
respected and protected in China in the process of counter-terrorism and deradicalisation.”
Though the Belarusian statement claims support of 54 countries, its text includes the names of only six states. But while this may have been necessitated by a need for brevity, the order in which these names appear in the text are “Pakistan, the Russian Federation, Egypt, Bolivia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Serbia.” Listing Pakistan first is intriguing as it doesn’t make any sense, either from the alphabetical indexing or international standing status point of view. But diplomats don’t make careless mistakes and a bit of correlation does provide a plausible reason for this.
Readers would recall that just a week before the ‘Belarus statement’ was issued, Pakistan Prime Minister Imran Khan, while delivering his UNGA address took upon himself the onerous task of speaking up against Islamophobia on behalf of the global Muslim community. His passionate and lengthy discourse probably gave him the halo of what he subsequently referred to as “enlightened moderation” and so, putting Pakistan’s name even before the Russian Federation while expressing solidarity with Beijing makes sense, because the leading light of the Islamic world backing China adds ‘weight’ to the statement!
But it was Khan and his government’s crafty ‘A-B-C’ (A-avoid, B-bypass, C-confuse) approach towards the religious persecution of Uighur Muslims that proved to be his undoing. During an interview with Financial Times on March 28, 2019 when asked about China’s ill-treatment of Uighur Muslims, Khan simply chose to “avoid” the question by saying, “Frankly, I don’t know much about it.” Even when the interviewer reminded him that Pakistan’s close ally Turkey had termed Chinese atrocities against Uighurs as a “great shame on humanity,” Khan once again avoided answering by saying, “If I had enough knowledge about it, I would comment, but I don’t.”
In September 2019, there were news reports that during his meeting with Chinese Ambassador to Pakistan Yao Ping, Pakistan’s Federal Minister for Religious Affairs and Interfaith Harmony Noorul Haq Qadri told him that “The placement of restrictions (on Uighur Muslims in Xinjiang) increases the chances of an extremist viewpoint growing in reaction.” However, just two days later, Qadri too showed his great ability to “bypass” the Uighur ill-treatment issue, when he quashed all speculation by saying that “This (topic) was not discussed.”
But ultimately, it’s Khan’s three-in-one ‘ABC’ response to
the Uighur crisis given to Foreign Policy Magazine in January this year that
takes the cake. When asked why he’s hyper about ill-treatment of Muslims in
India and elsewhere but completely silent on the persecution of Uighur Muslims,
Khan avoided, bypassed and finally confused the question. He ‘avoided’ the
query by saying, “frankly, I don’t know much about it,”; then, by adding “whatever
issues we will have with China, we will deal with them privately. We will not
go public,” he ‘bypassed’ the reply, and finally, by opining that “it (the
Uighur crisis) is nothing compared to what is happening in Kashmir,” Khan cleverly
‘confused’ the whole issue.
However, by saying “China came to help our government when we were at the rock bottom. So, we are really grateful to the Chinese government,” Khan has made it amply clear that his pain for the oppressed ‘ummah’ isn’t all-pervasive. Au contraire, it’s highly subjective and completely subservient to Pakistan’s ‘sweeter than honey’ friendship with China, and since the cricketer turned politician doesn’t dare rock the boat, he wants the world to believe that all is well with the Uighur Muslims of Xinjiang!!
Several impostors have begun to lay claim over the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) in their desperate effort to derail the Balochistan’s freedom movement. One of them is Hyrbyair Marri who is making bogus claims about BLA.
It
was Monday, June 29, when news first poured in about the attack at Pakistan
Stock Exchange in Karachi. This was ‘Breaking News’ and was promptly flashed
across all television news channels, portals and news agencies. But in a zest
to race ahead of their competitors, journalists across the world, especially those
in India made a blunder. Even before there could be any confirmation about the
perpetrators of Karachi attacks the headlines started screaming: “Terrorists
attack the Karachi Stock Exchange,” followed by similar tweets, memes and Facebook
posts, all of which said that terrorists have turned against their masters in
Pakistan.
A
few hours later it emerged that the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) had attacked
the Karachi Stock Exchange to protest against the daily killings, enforced disappearances
across occupied Balochistan. With this attack the BLA wanted deaf Pakistan Army
Generals sitting at Rawalpindi to hear Balochistan’s plight and to tell the
world about ongoing Pakistani atrocities and human rights violations across
occupied Balochistan. However, even after BLA took responsibility of attacks
the headlines about “terrorists” striking the Karachi Stock Exchange stayed on
and tweets continued to be floated all around. In fact, ‘terrorists attacking
Karachi’ was Pakistan’s narrative that the gullible media had quickly bought in.
This narrative could have sailed through if not for timely intervention on
social media and new media platforms that wrote detailed analysis about the
basic purport of BLA’s attacks and the freedom struggle for Balochistan from
Pakistan’s illegal occupation.
A
large number of Baloch people, the Baloch diaspora and revolutionaries
intervened with their side of the story that the Karachi attack was on
Pakistani and Chinese establishments and that the attackers were revolutionary
freedom fighters who had taken the extreme step to sacrifice their lives for
Balochistan’s freedom movement.
But
then Pakistan’s propaganda machinery remains quite strong. It pulled its
strings and a group of people sitting pretty at London came out openly against
the Karachi Stock Exchange attack. They made bogus claims that they “own” the
Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and that the BLA was not involved in this attack.
One of them is Hyrbyair Marri.
Unfortunately, rather than question the likes of Hyrbyair Marri about the basis of his statements, a large section of media remained blindfolded, bought his story and walked straight into the propaganda trap laid by ISI.
Hyrbyair Marri is the son of Late Nawab Khair Baksh Marri. However, due to Hyrbyair Marri’s dubious activities the Late Nawab Khair Baksh Marri broke all ties with him and said that Hyrbyair Marri is no longer a Baloch revolutionary.
The
world must know. The struggle for Balochistan’s independence is going on since
March 27, 1948 when Pakistan illegally occupied and annexed an independent
nation– Balochistan. The current phase of Baloch freedom struggle gained
momentum since 2002. And now after the BLA’s June 29 attack on Karachi Stock
Exchange, Balochistan is at least being talked about across the world.
Apart
from BLA, the other frontline revolutionary organisations in Balochistan
include the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF), Baloch Republican Army (BRA)
and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA). These different armed revolutionary
groups have created a joint platform Baloch Raaji
Aajoi-e-Sangar (BRAS) to synergise their efforts. BRAS has carried several
attacks on Pakistan Army in the recent past. This is testimony to the unity of
different Baloch revolutionary groups.
The Majeed Brigade (self-sacrificing/fidayeen) squad
like the four Baloch revolutionary freedom fighters who attacked Karachi Stock
Exchange were from the BLA.
History of Baloch Liberation Army (BLA)
Baloch revolutionaries say that the BLA (Baloch Liberation Army) was established in 1996 by a well-known Baloch revolutionary leader Nawab Khair Baksh Marri along with other Baloch revolutionaries. Khair Baksh Marri was a very well-known Baloch nationalist during the 1960s, 1970s and 1980s who made several sacrifices along with his comrades to win Balochistan’s independence from Pakistan.
When
BLA was formed its operational activities were being handled by Khair Baksh Marri’s
son Balach Marri, while BLA’s public relations activities abroad were handled
by Khair Baksh Marri’s elder son Hyrbyair Marri. This arrangement worked quite
smoothly for some time. Later on when Balach Marri was martyred during his
operations against the Pakistan Army, then BLA’s operational activities on
ground were taken over by other Baloch leaders that included Aslam Baloch,
Hamid Shahin, Amir Baksh Lango, Ali Sher Khurd and others.
Aslam
Baloch and other revolutionaries along with Nawab Khair Baksh Marri put BLA’s
activities on a fast track but then suddenly several functionaries of the BLA
such as Amir Baksh Lango, Ali Sher Khurd, Ghaffar Lango, Hamid Shahin were
killed by the Pakistan Army. Several Baloch sources explain that this happened probably
due to the involvement of Hyrbyair Marri, who has now started speaking against
the BLA’s involvement in Karachi Stock Exchange attack.
Background of Hyrbyair Marri
It
all started in 2007 when Hyrbyair Marri was arrested in London on charges of
inciting “terrorism” in Pakistan. Hyrbyair Marri was charged with plotting terrorist
activities in Pakistan and for inciting Balochistan’s independence movement. Around
this time an al-Qaeda terrorist Rashid Rauf was also arrested by the ISI in
Pakistan. Rashid Rauf was from Birmingham and was wanted by the British
government in terrorism related charges in UK. A prisoner swap agreement was
signed between Pakistan and UK such that Pakistan would send Rashid Rauf to UK
and in return get the custody of Hyrbyair Marri.
And then the events took an unexpected turn. Pakistan suddenly announced that Rashid Rauf had escaped from their custody and the prisoner swap between UK and Pakistan was held back. A few months later Pakistan announced that Rashid Rauf was killed in a drone attack. Hyrbyair Marri soon became a free man in London. Interestingly, Hyrbyair Marri stayed back in London after this saga as a “Pakistani citizen” and thus began his second innings as “Baloch activist”. Surprisingly, Pakistan stopped pressing UK government for Hyrbyair Marri’s extradition and he soon formed a company Bolan Limited that was registered in England & Wales. The two Directors of Bolan Limited are Hyrbyair Marri and Ali Syed Gallani both of whom are Pakistani citizens as per the registration documents of the company.
Hyrbyair Marri writes his nationality as “Pakistani” in the records of his company “Bolan Limited” that is registered in England & Wales. Hyrbyair Marri continues to retain his Pakistani Passport and Pakistani citizenship even today, and his Pakistani passport is renewed promptly.
Hyrbyair
Marri still holds a Pakistani passport that is promptly renewed by Pakistan and
now has three different houses at different locations in London. It’s ironic
that the same Hyrbyair Marri who was wanted by Pakistan for terrorism charges and
inciting Balochistan’s freedom struggle can now promptly get his Pakistani
passport renewed. And then he continues to call himself a Baloch revolutionary!
This
was a shrewd move by the ISI. As per the deal Hyrbyair Marri was to anyhow
usurp the ownership of Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) and in return he could stay
back in UK on a Pakistani passport, which would continue to be renewed at
periodic intervals.
Soon
after this BLA got involved in several internal tussles as Hyrbyair Marri made
attempts to control the functioning of BLA. In 2012, concerted efforts were
made by the Hyrbyair Marri-led faction to discredit the Baloch revolutionary
movement and especially Dr Allah Nazar Baloch, the leader of Balochistan
Liberation Front (BLF). Smear campaigns were run against Dr Allah Nazar Baloch
who at that time was working to streamline the Balochistan’s freedom struggle
and spreading the freedom struggle movement to every nook and corner of
Balochistan. Dr Allah Nazar Baloch popularity was rising amongst Baloch people
and he had become an eyesore for Pakistan Army and ISI. Yet Dr Allah Nazar Baloch,
the iron man, kept up the momentum for freedom struggle and continued to rope
in common people into Balochistan’s independence movement.
Very
soon the ISI’s underhand dealings with Hyrbyair Marri were exposed and Late Nawab
Khair Baksh Marri broke all ties with his elder son Hyrbyair Marri and said
that he is no more a revolutionary.
Truth
prevailed and Aslam Baloch along with other Baloch revolutionaries further exposed
the dubious propaganda being run by Hyrbyair Marri. Aslam Baloch took the
command of BLA. This was in the year 2017. It was at this time that Aslam Balcoh
along with Dr Allah Nazar Baloch and several other comrades forged tie-ups with
other Baloch revolutionary groups and formed the joint revolutionary front BRAS
(Baloch Raaji Aajoi-e-Sangar) by stitching
together an alliance of the Baloch Liberation Army, Balochistan Liberation
Front, Baloch Republican Army and the Baloch Republican Guard in order to jointly
fight for Balochistan’s independence.
A
year later in 2018, Aslam Baloch was martyred in a suicide attack by
Pakistan-backed Taliban faction that was carried out soon after the BLA’s
attack on Chinese consulate in Karachi. After this BLA’s command was passed on
to a young leader Basheer Zeb who at one point of time was trained by Dr Allah
Nazar Baloch during his time as a student activist at the BSO (Balochistan
Student’s Organisation). Basheer Zeb is very well read and youth leader of the
BLA. As the leader of BLA, Basheer Zeb has put Pakistani Army in a tight spot
with back-to-back attacks on their facilities.
It’s
under Basheer Zeb’s able leadership that the BLA freedom fighters have successfully
carried out the attack on Karachi Stock Exchange on June 29. But the impostors
who had earlier tried to sabotage BLA and the Baloch revolution for their own
personal gains have become active once again. It’s sad that media has begun to
quote such people as the leaders of BLA.
After the success of June 29 attack, Dr Allah Nazar Baloch categorically said that the Baloch youth are sacrificing themselves to crush the colonial arrogance of the occupying enemy and not for fame and glory. “The attack on Karachi Stock Exchange was a warning to Pakistan and China to quit Balochistan. Pakistan has cheaply mortgaged Baloch lands to China. China’s presence in Balochistan has become a threat not only to the Baloch national survival but it poses a danger to the entire world. We believe that the world is still unaware of China’s intentions and that the Baloch people are the only ones fighting this modern imperialist monster. The attack on the base of Chinese moneylenders in Karachi after the attack on the Chinese base in Gwadar is a continuation of the attacks on its strategic assets. The Baloch will continue it, no matter what the cost,” Dr Allah Nazar explained with a firm determination.
BLA’s
attack on Karachi Stock Exchange struck at the Pakistan’s economy and has also taken
Balochistan’s freedom struggle to every corner of the world. People around the
globe are now discussing how Pakistan Army is running a massive military
campaign replete with heavy artillery, sophisticated machine guns and
helicopter gunships across occupied Balochistan against the common Baloch
people.
“If the deaf are to hear,
the sound has to be very loud,” said Shaheed Bhagat Singh at the trial for
bombing the Central Legislative Assembly on April 8, 1931 during India’s
struggle for independence.
BLA freedom fighters Salman Hamal, Taslim Baloch, Shehzad Baloch
and Siraj Kongar who were martyred after the Karachi attack said similar words.
“We want to make it clear to the upholders and champions of human rights like
UN, EU or US State Department that you have failed to take notice of the Baloch
genocide and exert pressure on Pakistan to stop this genocide. You have failed
to hear the voice of Baloch nation therefore we have been left with no option
but to go to this extreme,” said the BLA freedom fighters in their recorded video
message.
The world must appreciate that BLA freedom fighters who
attacked Karachi Stock Exchange did not target the innocent common people of
Karachi rather they chose to kill the immoral money lending syndicate of
Pakistani and Chinese nationals who have turned the Pakistan Stock Exchange
into their den. Just as Bhagat Singh and Batukeshwar Dutt hurled bombs to draw
world’s attention to British colonialism in India, the BLA freedom fighters have
attacked the Karachi Stock Exchange to make the world take note of Pakistan’s atrocities in occupied Balochistan.
China’s confrontation with India is not all about the boundary issue, but a POLITICAL act to offset its present challenges, and demonstrate China’s rising comprehensive national power. The Communist Party of China (CPC) leadership that increasingly relies on nationalism for its legitimacy will not find it easy to make the compromises necessary for a boundary settlement. India’s armed forces are more than capable of handling whatever the Chinese PLA (People’s Liberation Army) throws at us in the traditional ground, sea and sky domains (envisaged maximum threat) in East Ladakh.
We have planned, prepared, trained and have the combat experience, professionalism, will and resolve to ensure that the Chinese strategy of hegemonistic creeping will be defeated by causing much more attrition than China is ready to accept. China’s geopolitical, strategic and national loss will far outweigh any gains that the country makes, if at all, during the conflict. The Communist Party of China’s offensive manoeuvres will come with grave consequences of setting the world and hopefully China’s own people against it, and could start the beginning of the end of the CPC.
If China chooses to continue its belligerent actions, I would not to be wrong to predict that the Communist Party of China (CPC) will be fighting an existential battle. For this our nation and the armed forces will have to credibly demonstrate our intent, will, resolve and act to ensure that the PLA returns to the status quo ante before this crisis started, and this being NON NEGOTIABLE. Let us be clear, this is a defining moment in the history of India and our actions could well dictate our standing in the world, and this is the time, when against a stronger adversary we have to stand firm and unyielding, stand tall without brinkmanship, expect some pain but tell China by our actions that this time the red lines have been crossed. WE MUST BE PREPARED TO GO ALONE, however, assistance except in the physical/kinetic domain, from other nations could well be forthcoming, such as diplomatic, material, information and intelligence, and moral support, which will weigh heavily on President Xi Xinping, CCP and his military commanders.
Escalation would lead to a Multi-Domain War
In case China expands the present localised crisis to other sectors, and the escalatory ladder of conflict is exercised which will naturally be reciprocated, then India must be prepared to fight a Multi-Domain War (MDW). A Multi-Domain War calls for a change of thought process, ‘a transformation and not just modernisation’. Simply put, MDW envisions the military and non-military; everything from political to diplomatic, fighters to destroyers, space shuttle to submarine, cyber to satellites, tanks to attack helicopters, electromagnetic to electronic, media to information influence operations, economists to MNCs, para-military forces to think tanks, intelligence agencies to ISRO, munition factory worker to hacks— working together intrinsically as ONE, to overwhelm the enemy with attacks from all domains: Land, Sea (including sub surface), Air, Space, Cyberspace, Network, Big Data, Information including Media and Social Media, electronic and even legal. The span of operations addressed simultaneously is from the political, national, strategic and operational to the tactical domain.
Visualization of Multi-Domain War
Here’s an illustration of how China will wage Multi-Domain War during the confrontation stage mainly using non-kinetic/cognitive domains.
1.Conduct information influence operations including psychological operations on our polity, public and Armed Forces (fake news, rumours- vast scope) to spread the bogie of the invincible Chinese dragon and fracture the social structure and political will of the country. 2. Wide ranging economic operations to further weaken our economy; for instance, during the COVID crisis hold onto pharmaceutical and other critical products like ventilators and products (the base chemicals) 3. Sudden and broad based cyber-attacks from the strategic to the border troops (tactical) to include our national media, logistics chains, air and rail communication systems. 4. Degradation of our active C5ISTAR (Command, Control, Communication, Computer, Cyber, Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) systems. 5. Attack our electro-magnetic spectrum and even satellite systems with an attempt to blind us. 6. Network and data-centric operations which paralyse our data bases, intelligence, financial and logistic networks. All or some of these actions before, during and post-conflict (mobilization and reinforcements including strategic lift would be hampered) to just name a few effects.
The above scenario may appear like Sci-Fi, but numerous countries like USA and her allies are now preparing to wage such a war and they visualise that China, their peer/ competitor/adversary (USA has officially named China as her adversary) has the capacity and capability for Multi-Domain War. In fact USA has officially stated that actions like cyber and space attacks will be constituted as an ‘act of war’. Probability of Pakistan jumping into the fray must be factored in as it could very well be part of the strategic plan. Similarly using land and maritime routes through other immediate neighbouring states cannot be ruled out.
China is waging such a war, and trying to impose its will with increasing tempo, focus and lethality just prior to the conflict to try and achieve political and military aims, without fighting. We have one of the most battle-hardened troops in the world, but the intangible effect of psychological operations and internal political and social dynamics, isolation, lack of situational awareness, operating in a degraded environment coupled with a 360-degree conflict with no front, rear and flanks will certainly impact them; we need to create better capabilities and capacities to counter and negate China’s design of conflict at the national and military level. However, just as a stalemate for India is considered a defeat if we launch pro-active operations against Pakistan, China too will aim to achieve its political and military objectives swiftly. This is where as I already stated that our political will, resolve of the people and professionalism of our Armed Forces must prevail.
While we hope that the current impasse will be resolved using all elements of DIME (Diplomatic, Informational, Military and Economic), we must concurrently start preparing for future confrontations and conflicts (two and a half front war) to wage an MDW (Multi-Domain War). War is a national effort involving all dimensions of comprehensive national power, and it is imperative that we build capability and capacity to fight and win the future confrontation/war.
India’s armed forces will remain the ultimate weapon to impose the will of a state. Capacity building across multiple domains takes commitment, time, dedication, finances, synergy, integrity and will. I wish to paraphrase Robert Palazzo from his book ‘On The Ethics of Future War’ where he wrote ‘In a world in which the effective division between the domains of war is increasingly blurred, there is less utility or need to maintain sharp distinctions between the levels of war and the organs of government. War must be undertaken as a holistic, unitary undertaking by the government, the military, and the people’. The good news is that we know how our adversaries could wage an MDW (Multi-Domain War), but we need to urgently create better structures, create synergies and train at the national, strategic and armed forces level.
Before concluding, one can’t resist observing that the conventional soldier, his section and platoon, squadron of armour or artillery battery, a fighter squadron or naval frigate will always continue to remain the final arbiter in conflict, and we must empower the ‘Soldier and Armed Forces ’ to fight a multi domain war. We have no choice but to be ready for a Multi-Domain war. Adopting and implementing the MDW concept will improve our deterrence capability and prevent wars.
Haiku is a traditional Japanese poem which consists of three short lines that do not rhyme. Dr Shahnaz has penned down a collection of Haiku poems that relates intimately with all that goes on inside the mind of a COVID-19 patient. The mind of a patient infected with novel Coronavirus is clouded with the thought of death, the fear of losing dearest ones, yet the very nature of this disease precludes the patient from sharing these emotions. Since the certainty of death occupies the imagination of the patient, he or she wishes to share few precious thoughts, convey few emotions and pass on the legacies to the survivors. Read on these Haiku poems and you will feel the depth of emotions inside a COVID-19 patient.
Will you tell them That I was brave That I did not cry That I died well
Please Place these flowers In my hand I will greet God
They told me I was ill Very ill Does it mean I have to die I could choose to live, also Allow me
I forgot to take you in my arms one last time You see We had so much in mind And I thought I will be back Soon
Tell them I loved them all I don’t have time with me anymore To waste One last breath Maybe
I hear you in my mind I see you so clear If you were here I would have lived
My swan song And you are not even there to hear it The walls will echo
Do you remember You have to Now that you will be alone How I loved you, once
If you were here You could then feel How my heart is pounding And they say Just Breathe
I have no thoughts I have no words Silent as the night sky Tomorrow they will take me away
When I am no more Sit by my grave some time Carry jasmine flowers What else would I need
The Center for Inquiry is a leading skeptic and secular humanist organization in the world based out of the United States. One of the troubling court cases coming out of America, recently, was the Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue case in which American taxpayers, generally, would foot the bill for forms of religious indoctrination, whether religious or secular Americans – clear asymmetry in the application of funding and a violation of a longstanding principle of separation of church and state in the United States of America.
This was a Supreme Court decision that forces American taxpayers to pay this. There is a gutting of protections provided by both the American Constitution and the No Aid Provisions of 3/4ers of state constitutions forbidding the taxpayer monies to use for any religious purpose.
Nick Little, Vice President and Legal Director of the Center
for Inquiry, stated, “This Court has been opening a hole up in Thomas
Jefferson’s Wall of Separation between church and state… Now they’ve built a
two-lane highway through that hole, inviting churches to raid the public
treasury and drive gleefully away with taxpayer money.”
Starting, at least, in 2015, Montana began a tax credit
voucher program for taxpayers to get credit if they gave monies to Student
Scholarship Organizations. These funded scholarships for private school
students.
Most of the private schools in Montana are religious.
This is the same across the country.
In other words, the funding is for religion. Via Article X, Section 6 of the
Montana Constitution, though, there are explicit bans for the use of taxpayer
dollars for “religious education.”
“… the Montana Department of Revenue adopted Rule 1, stating
that the vouchers could not be used to pay for religious education provided by
religious schools. Parents at religious schools sued,” CFI reported.
Based on a 2018 Montana Supreme Court decision, the support
for the religious schools violated the Montana Constitution. Thusly, the
program was “struck down; thereby “preventing the vouches being used at any
private school, religious or not,” now, “the program no longer exists.” However,
“the Supreme Court nonetheless agreed to review the ruling.”
Robyn Blumner, CFI’s President and CEO, stated, “Let’s be
clear about what just happened: The Supreme Court has decided that atheist
taxpayers are now required to fund religious schools… Members of non-Christian
faiths are now required to fund Christian education. The religious right has
gotten exactly what it wanted from Trump’s justices: the erasure of a
fundamental principle of American law, that no person shall be forced to
participate in religious expression by subsidizing religious education.”
Little continued to state the theocratic path this potentially sets forth for the United States in which this exists in contradistinction to the orientation of the Founders or the Framers of the United States Constitution, where religious activities, including education, shall not be supported by the public purse. Nonetheless, with the Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue case, there can be funding not only by choice but by compulsion.
Previously, in November of 2019, in an amicus brief by CFI
supporting the Montana
Department of Revenue the organization (CFI) support the constitutional
separation of religion and government. in upholding Montana’s
constitutional separation of church and state.
CFI concluded, “CFI is also a proud member of the National
Coalition for Public Education, which vocally opposes all forms of private
school voucher legislation in the U.S. Congress. In June 2020, CFI
joined a diverse coalition urging congressional leadership to strike
language in COVID-19 relief legislation that Education Secretary Betsy DeVos
had used to divert emergency education funds to a private voucher scheme.”
Dennis Christensen is a Jehovah’s Witnesses prisoner of
conscience imprisoned in Russia. As per some recent reportage on the violation
of the rights of the Jehovah’s Witnesses, the human rights to freedom of
religion of Jehovah’s Witnesses are being violated.
Christensen was granted parole on June 23 while USCIRF, or The
United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (Washington, D.C.)
expressed concern for the health and wellbeing of him. Prosecutor Aleksei
Shatunov appealed the decision. Christian remains in prison and will stay there
until the next hearing. This could take several weeks.
He – Christensen – is eligible for release in early 2021
based on pre-trial detention time served. However, his health has deteriorated
while in custody, which is the reason for the reportage and the concern coming
from the USCIRF. He had contracted pneumonia while his scheduled time to remain
in prison is until May 25, 2022.
USCIRF Chair Gayle Manchin stated, “USCIRF urges the Russian government
to show clemency. The ongoing imprisonment of Dennis Christensen is truly
unconscionable. This man has already forfeited his freedom for exercising his
peaceful religious beliefs; it would be an atrocity for him to forfeit his
life. Russia must free Mr. Christensen immediately.”
The Jehovah’s Witnesses reported 24 are under house arrest,
24 are in pretrial detention, and 10 are imprisoned in Russia. The USCIRF in
its annual report stipulated that Russia is a country of particular concern
based on violations of religious freedom.
With files from The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom.
Based on a new poll on climate change and political views, the National Center for Science Education or the NCSE reported on the Yale Program on Climate Change Communication new data on the registered American voters’ attitudes and beliefs towards climate change and political views. Political views can imply particular identifications on scientific lines.
This has been substantially true in the United States where
some political views can be seen as catastrophically bad for the informed
policymaking of the public. When political views impede scientific education,
are bound to scientific illiteracy, or belie a scientifically informed public,
we come to the issue of an appropriately informed public.
A scientifically informed public in a majoritarian or
democratic state is catastrophic for policymaking and voting of the public. In
terms of thinking global warming is happening, 75% responded in the affirmed with
only 11% in the negative. This is good news.
NCSE, among those answering in the affirmative, stated, “98%
of liberal Democrats, 92% of moderate/conservative Democrats, and 69% of
liberal/moderate Republicans. Fewer conservative Republicans (47%) think that global
warming is happening.”
In short, this is a politically divisive issue. On this
particular issue, the rights are far less scientifically informed than the
leftists, i.e., this aspect of reality leans liberal or is biased towards the
liberal in a manner of speaking.
Surprisingly in contrast to the colloquial notions about American citizenry, there are some interesting aspects to some parts of the data. Not in terms of if global warming is happening, but how or by which means global warming is occurring, 61% of the respondents consider global warming is “Caused mostly by human activities” while 29% believe it is “Caused mostly by natural changes in the environment.” 5% ventured both of the aforementioned as the causes and only 4% selecting neither. These are encouraging numbers. It is not the citizenry; it is the leadership not applying this will of the people to the development of scientifically appropriate and fully-informed policies.
“Opinion was politically divided, with a large majority of
Democrats but a minority of Republicans accepting human responsibility,” the
NCSE stated, “The data were ‘based on a nationally representative survey of
1,029 American adults, aged 18 and older, 911 of whom are registered to vote.
The survey was conducted April 7-17, 2020. All questionnaires were
self-administered by respondents in a web-based environment.’”
With files from the National Center for Science Education.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
