Home Blog Page 367

Guru Ka Langar is a revered institution in Sikhism, imbibes its philosophy and culture

Guru Ka Langar, a community kitchen also referred to as Langar, is one among the most revered institutions of Sikh religion, philosophy and culture. Based on the concept of “Garib Da Muh, Guru Di Golakh” (mouth of the poor is filled by treasury of the Guru), it calls upon all Sikhs to feed the needy before they feed themselves.  

Guru Nanak Dev Ji, when he was quite young, was given a sum of 20 Rupees by his father and told to visit the market to buy items for trade purposes. His father asked him to do a good “Sauda” (business). It needs to be noted that Rupees Twenty was a very big sum in those days. On his way to the market, Guru Nanak Dev ji came across a large group of Sadhus (Ascetics) who had been hungry for days. Young Nanak Ji used the entire amount in feeding the Sadhus. When accosted by his very angry father he said that according to him feeding the Sadhus was the best business of all — a Sacha Sauda. The concept of Langar evolved from then onwards.

Guru Nanak Dev Ii feeding a group of Sadhus (ascetics). This was his Sacha Sauda that gave birth to Langar in Sikhism.

Once he settled down in Kartarpur Sahib and established a Sikh Gurdwara, Guru Nanak Dev Ji then gave three edicts to his followers – “Naam Japo; Kirat Karo; Vand Chhako (meditate the name of God, work hard and share what you eat). Thus, the Guru laid maximum importance on sharing and partaking of food together in the Langar. 

The second Sikh Master, Guru Angad Dev Ji, paid special attention to the concept of Langar and developed it as an essential part of Sikh community life. The Sevadars (volunteers) of the Langar were told to look upon it as a place of rest and refuge, apart from provisioning food; they were told to remain always polite and hospitable to all visitors.

By establishing this practice, Guru Angad Dev Ji found unrelenting support from his wife, Mata Khivi Ji. She personally looked after those who ate at the Langar. Her devotion to the cause continued even after Guru Angad Dev Ji passed away, right up to the times of Guru Arjan Dev Ji, when she finally left this world at the ripe old age of 76. Her dedication to the Langar finds mention in the Guru Granth Sahib.

The third Sikh Master, Guru Amar Das Ji, with active support from Mata Khivi Ji strengthened the Langar by converting it into a 24×7 community service and establishing the concept of “Pangat and Sangat,” that called upon everybody wanting to meet the Guru to first share a meal at the Langar. The idea behind this was to firmly embed the concept of “Raja-Raank Barabari” (The rich and poor are equal in eyes of Almighty God). One who could not leave behind his ego would not get to meet the Guru.

There are instances of several Kings and even Emperor Akbar having adhered to this practice before meeting the Guru. Emperor Akbar was so impressed that he offered to the Guru revenue from several villages to run the Langar. The Guru respectfully refused saying the divine power would run the service through offerings of devotees.

The tenth Sikh Master, Guru Gobind Singh Ji, before passing away at Nanded Sahib, directed his followers to keep the Langar ever open. In the Dasam Granth (scripture of Guru Gobind Singh) the Guru writes “Deg Tegh Jag Me Dou Chalai,” (The cooking utensil (Langar) and sword will together run the world). Accordingly, the first Sikh coin minted in the eighteenth century carried the Guru’s maxim, “Deg Tegh Fateh” (May Langar and Sword be ever triumphant). Even today, Sikhs seek blessing from the almighty for, “Loh Langar Tapde Rahan,” (May the fires of the Langar remain ever lighted).  

The soldiers of the Khalsa Army had a tradition, wherein, once the Langar was prepared, they would give a call “Guru Ka Langar Tayaar” (food of the Guru is ready). Even enemies were welcomed to partake the Langar before the Khalsa had it himself, sometimes the Khalsa went hungry since no food was left.  

The Sikh Emperor of Punjab, Maharaja Ranjit Singh, granted Jagirs (lands) to Gurdwaras’ for the maintenance of Langar. Similar endowments were created by other Sikh rulers as well. Today, practically every Gurdwara has a Langar supported by the local community.

A Guru Ka Langar, therefore, has been and continues to be a Sikh tradition in which the community takes great pride and maintains with great devotion. The famous Sikh litterateur and scholar, Bhai Kahn Singh Nabha had said that sharing of food and Langar is in integral part of the Sikh culture and values.

In the running of a Langar, no distinction is made among those who wish to contribute materially or by Seva. The preparation is made by Sevadars who do selfless service free of cost. Only simple, hygienic vegetarian food is served. Those making food do not wear shoes and also cover their heads and mouths. Gurbani (holy words of the Guru) is recited all through the preparation and distribution process. Langar, therefore, is a Prasad (Sacred Food).

In order to partake in the Langar, people sit in rows without knowing who the person sitting alongside is, what is his/her caste or creed. Food is served by Sevadars and utensils are then washed and kept in a designated place by the person who has partaken the holy food. Guru Ka Langar has thus demolished caste barriers and gender prejudices in their entirety.

The institution of Guru Ka Langar instills in the Sikhs a feeling of humbleness and humility. It helps them join together as a community, in line with the dictum that “the family that eats together stays together.”  It has ensured that the caste system does not creep into the Sikh religion to play havoc yet again. Langar is also an education in compassion, a true example of the Sikh philosophy of “Sarbat Da Bhala” (May the whole world be prosperous).The dedication towards Langar is such that families book a slot in their Gurdwaras months and years in advance and then get together from across continents to take part in the Seva (service).

In recent years feeding the needy during times of calamity and crisis has become synonymous with the Langar of the Sikh community. Sikhs establish Langar in areas that have been afflicted by political turmoil and violence, natural disasters, accidents or a catastrophe. They also provide food to the needy on a regular basis.

Such has been the visibility of this gracious service that governments have started requesting for assistance in the distribution of food when some critical situation like the recent pandemic of COVID-19 comes up.

The concept of Langar is now being studied as a shining example of social service. ScoopWhoop, has carried a special article on Langar titled, “Here’s the Rich History of Langar,” in which it has described the activity as, “the Sikh tradition of selflessly feeding thousands of people.”

Harvard University, in a paper titled, “Langar: The Communal Meal” says that, “…the Langar strengthens the Sikh sense of community. Visitors and guests are readily and warmly included in the great hospitality of the Sikh tradition. It assails the inner core of inequality and symbolises a Sikh’s personal rejection of prejudice.”

The Huffington Post writes: “Langar is the Sikh tradition of serving free meals, and all Canadians are invited. It is so because the millions of Canadians who face food insecurity even in normal times get to eat in the Sikh Langars.” In countries like Canada that have got a large and prosperous Sikh community, Langars are being served on the streets to help the needy.

Providing food to the needy, many times under very difficult circumstances, is undoubtedly a very humane, courageous and noble act which truly exhibits the spirit and character of a Sikh. That is being done worldwide and receiving appreciation is something to be proud of. However, to mix philanthropy with the sacred ritual of Guru Ka Langar deems further study and reflection.

Guru Nanak Dev Ji enjoined “Naam Japo; Kirat Karo; Vand Chhako” as a complete entityand not in isolation. The person receiving the food needs to meditate the name of the Almighty (Naam). Also, a person who shuns work (Kirat) and looks for a free meal does not find favour with God. There is a need to ensure that these caveats are met while serving Langar.

Langar is linked to the concept of “Pangat and Sangat.” In the present context visiting a Gurdwara and listening to holy Gurbani constitutes Sangat since the Holy Guru Granth Sahib is a living Guru for the Sikhs. The act of establishing a Langar should, along with Pangat also cater for Sangat. Therefore, imbibing Gurbani is essential as partaking Langar. This does not seem to be happening during mass delivery on streets.

When food is distributed in the streets people simply take it and go away, hence, the very concept of eating together gets negated. There would be many who do not take the name of their own God while taking the food what to talk of paying homage to the Sikh faith. The process, thus, loses its spiritual sheen.

Food served in Guru Ka Langar being sacred cannot be wasted. The last morsel has to be eaten and if something falls out of the plate it too has to be picked up and eaten. When packets are given to people it is not known whether they eat it all or throw it away and thus break Maryada (sanctity) of the holy Prasad.

The Sikh community is now being typecast with the responsibility of “establishing Langar” for the needy.  Governments are shedding their responsibility to Sikhs and people are out for free lunches while being indifferent to the merits of the community. For a community of only 30 million, taking on such a huge responsibility across the world needs to be given due thought. Should help not be coming in from non-Sikh avenues that can help?

Sikhs are a highly intelligent, financially powerful and vibrant community worldwide. They need to assume their justified leadership role rather than be looked upon as food service providers. The community has the resources to outsource mundane service activity while personally engaging in the intellectual, sociological, ideological and executive management domain. The community should take its rightful place in showing the way during times of crisis.

It is, by no means, being suggested that the distribution of Guru Ka Langar to the poor and needy be stopped. What is more appropriate is to do so within the precincts of Gurdwaras and after the recipients have adhered to all rituals prescribed by the faith. If food has to be distributed to needy as social duty, by all means it can be done but without involvement of the Langar rituals. Let us not mix philanthropy with religion.

Life after COVID-19: Survey shows people ready to embrace change

Amidst lockdown and the increasing cases of COVID-19 in India, people feel that normalcy would be restored only by 2021. This has come out in a multi-city ‘Perception Study on COVID – 19 Lockdown’ conducted by CMSR Consultants, a leading research organization in the country, to understand and capture public opinion about the nation-wide lockdown. The study also tried to understand the impact of the lockdown on people’s lives. In the sample, more than one fourth of the respondents felt they have to live with the virus for more than a year, while 28% respondents felt that people will have to survive with the virus at-least for a year.

The study sought the opinion of 1000 people spread over cities/states including Delhi/NCR, Bangalore, Pune, Mumbai, Thane, Indore, Bhopal, Raipur, Patna, Muzaffarpur, Chennai, Bhubaneshwar, Jaipur, Jodhpur, Alappuzha, Calicut, Palakkad, Ranchi, Lucknow, Hyderabad and Vijayawada.The sample survey ensured the participation of both, male (60%) and female (40%) respondents. Maximum respondents were from 18-45 years of age group (69%). In terms of educational background, most of the respondents seemed to be well qualified as more than 90 percent of them were either graduates or above.

Key Highlights:

  • In the study, nearly 72% respondents perceived lockdown as a very effective measure to combat the virus,while one fourth of the population viewed lockdown as an effective tool but only to some extent. Close to 66% respondents had strongly agreed with the fact that lockdown in India was announced on time, while another 20% somewhat agreed to it.
  • 97% respondents stated their support for the government if the lockdown extends further. Of those who echoed in support of the lockdown, 39% of them would like to see some relaxations with the lockdown restrictions. Nearly 3 percent respondents did not want the lockdown to be extended anymore.
  • Around 95% respondents were seemed to be satisfied (fully satisfied-50%, somewhat satisfied-45%) with the enforcement measures taken by their respective states to implement the lockdown. Only one third of the sample population had experienced some problems in getting the delivery of essential goods.
  • Most of the respondents (61%) believed that, even after the lockdown, a sense of fear will prevail among people while meeting the others. About 60% respondents felt that people will try and avoid the public transport as much as possible for commuting.
  • Most of the sample population was not in favour of lifting the ban from rail and flight travels. If at all government decides to lift the ban, it should be done cautiously. 58% respondents stated that ban on domestic flights should continue for more some more period.

Economic challenges ahead

65% respondents opined that lockdown will affect the job market badly, while 33% felt that job market will be affected but only to some extent. Of those who stated the effects of lockdown on job markets, a little over half of the sample respondents felt that manufacturing/production will bear the maximum hit, followed by the service sectors (25%). Nearly 9% respondents believed that construction field will also be affected by the lockdown. Only 6% respondents opined that lockdown will negatively impact the agriculture sector. 35% respondents shared about already feeling the financial crunch.

When asked about the adequacy of the social relief package offered by the government, 46% respondents felt it was inadequate considering the needs of the people. According to 28% respondents, the relief offered by the government was sufficient to meet the needs of the deserving people. Around 26% respondents had no clue about this package and they did not know about this.  

Work from home and changing work culture

Respondents felt that one positive outcome of the lockdown has been that, both employers and employees have realized that ‘work from home’ is also a viable option and this could be encouraged to avoid the rush on roads. Another important takeaway is the increased awareness among people about social distancing and usefulness of wearing mask.

BLF valiantly defended occupied Balochistan from Pakistani forces in April: Major Gwahram Baloch

Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) is striving for a free Balochistan since its inception. The core reason for establishment of BLF has always been to reinstate the separate Baloch identity and regain motherland’s sovereignty from the occupier Pakistan. Since inception, the BLF along with its armed struggle, began to create political and ideological awareness about Baloch nation and has endeavored to bring Baloch people from all walks of life together to join the armed freedom struggle so that the masses consciously, politically and ideologically get involved in the resistance. This is because the struggle for independence is impossible without the participation of masses.

On the fundamental principle of freedom for occupied Balochistan, BLF is educating the Baloch nation to be ideologically and politically aware. Ideologically motivated BLF fighters, along with their armed resistance are expanding the struggle with political awareness across Balochistan.

Baloch nation is destroying occupying Pakistani state’s army and responding in a befitting manner to the parliamentarian tools, death squads, religious extremists including countering the occupying state’s propaganda machinery and its fake narrative.

Organization’s fundamental principle is to ensure vetting and educating BLF fighters enough so that the weapon in their hands must remain a weapon in the hands of a revolutionary and their steps may never waver while defending motherland. 

Today, across the length and breadth of occupied Balochistan, BLF’s brave fighters are present on the ground with their revolutionary weapon in defense of their country against Pakistan’s regular army and other security forces.

Certainly, fighting on various fronts at once against Pakistan Army, federalists, local agents, informers, death squads, drug dealers and religious extremists is difficult. But at every given moment, BLF fighters are sacrificing their lives and vigorously leading the Baloch national struggle on the principles of the organization towards the ultimate goal of freedom for Balochistan.

Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) is the embodiment of its martyrs and nation’s unaccounted sacrifices. God willing, the Baloch freedom struggle, with BLF’s principles and values will reach the destination.

The journey is certainly long and difficult, but the destination of this revolutionary war is independent Balochistan upon which depends the Baloch’s survival and their national identity.

BLF pays homage and offers tribute to Martyr Zahid and Martyr Hammal Baloch

Lieutenant Zahid, alias Murad of the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) attained martyrdom on 25th April 2020 while fighting the Pakistani forces.

On 25 April 2020, Zahid and Hammal Baloch were shot dead by the operatives of Pakistani intelligence agencies. Martyr Zahid alias Murad was a network commander and held the rank of a Lieutenant in BLF. He was fighting against the enemy for twelve years from the platform of BLF for an independent Balochistan. Martyr Hammal Baloch alias Fazal Baloch was serving the movement through BLF’s platform for the last ten years.

Sepoy Hammal Baloch alias Fazal Baloch of the Balochistan Liberation Front (BLF) attained martyrdom on 25th April 2020 while fighting the Pakistani forces.

BLF pays homage and offers tribute to the Martyrs of Paroom

On 25 April 2020, at around 3 AM, the Pakistani military and its death squads surrounded the Baloch freedom fighters in Yar Mohammad Bazar in Kallag Kaur area of district ​​Panjgur, Balochistan, where a battle began between the occupying army and BLF freedom fighters that went on for at least 12 hours. The next day, at around 1 PM, after the retreat of Pakistani ground forces their military’s combat helicopters began shelling and martyred four of our fighters. Major Noora, son of Sher Dil alias Peerak, Lieutenant Nawaz son of Haji Ghulam Hussain, Abdul Malik son of Haji Ghulam Hussain resident of Parom and Momin son of Muhammad Azeem resident of Buleda Salo were martyred in the assault. The occupying army was assisted in the clash by the local death squads. Several members of the Pakistan Army and death squad were killed and wounded during the clash.

Balochistan Liberation Front Spokesperson Major Gwahram Baloch released the report about BLF’s freedom fight during April 2020

During the month of April 2020, eight (8) attacks were carried out by the BLF on Pakistani forces. More than ten (10) Pakistani soldiers were killed and a dozen more injured were injured. Six (6) BLF fighters embraced martyrdom defending their motherland.

BLF freedom fighters attacked the camp of Pakistani military backed death squads and blew up a mobile network tower. They attacked and burnt two trucks loaded with mineral resources that were looted from occupied Balochistan. BLF freedom fighters also attacked the Gwadar National Airport.

Chronology of BLF attacks on Pakistani establishment in April 2020 across occupied Balochistan

3rd April  2020 – BLF attacked and burnt down two trucks loaded with chromite near Jahani Kaur in Wail Patt area of Bela district Kech, Balochistan.

7th April  2020 – BLF Snipers attacked Pakistani military check-post twice in Rodan area of Gawak, Mand district Kech, Balochistan and killed two Pakistan military personnel.

8th April  2020 – BLF Snipers attacked Pakistani military check-post in Mehi area of Mashkay, district Awaran, Balochistan and killed one Pakistan military personnel.

11th April  2020 – BLF attacked Pakistan military check-post with rocket launchers and automatic weapons in Gawak area of Mand, district Kech, Balochistan. Two military personnel were killed and two other were injured in this attack.

21st April  2020 – BLF Fired two 107 mm rockets on Gwadar National Airport in Gorandani area of district Gwadar. Both the rockets landed inside the airport due to which deaths of military personnel were reported and heavy causalities were inflicted within the construction site.

23rd April  2020 – BLF attacked Pakistani military check-post with  automatic weapons in Bagzo area of Mand, district Kech, Balochistan. Several military personnel were killed and injured in this attack.

30th April  2020 – BLF attacked Pakistani military check-post with  automatic weapons in Sheraz area of Mand, district Kech, Balochistan. Two military personnel were killed and one was injured in this attack.

COVID19 and Snake Oil Salesmanship in Nigeria

By Leo Igwe

As the world grapples with the coronavirus pandemic, and the search for a vaccine continues, many people are gullible and are easily swayed by peddlers of cures or solutions. There is so much fear and uncertainty in the communities. People are hoping for some miracle or magical remedy. However, charlatans are having a field day in places such as Nigeria. They are marketing all sorts of concoction and treatment even as scientists are still trying to understand the nature of the virus. Quacks are mining people’s desperation and vulnerability. Snake oil salesmanship is pervasive. Incidentally at the forefront of the health care fraudulent schemes are pastors and churches, and other marketers of spiritual solutions.

Recently, a pentecostal pastor, Apostle Suleman, claimed that he could heal COVID19 patients. He appealed to the government to allow him into the isolation centers so that he could exercise his faith healing powers. Apostle Suleman has been challenged to demonstrate his faith healing abilities. He has been asked to heal a COVID19 patient and get five thousand dollars. However, this pastor has yet to accept the challenge to heal a patient under agreed medical and scientific conditions.

Meanwhile, another Pentecostal pastor has come out with a spiritual solution to the pandemic. This pastor goes by a Facebook name, Goodheart Val Aloysius, also known as My Father My Father. Aloysius is marketing an anti COVID19 oil which he claims would provide people with spiritual immunity against the virus. Aloysius, who is also the owner of the Father’s House International Church in Calabar, Cross River State, is a witch hunting pastor. On his Facebook, Pastor Aloysius declares: “THE SOLUTION IS HERE!!!” Then he goes further to say: “Get this COVID-19 PREVENTION OIL and gain spiritual immunity to the deadly pandemic with a seed of faith of 100 USD (100$)”.  A hundred US dollars is about forty thousand naira.

Faith healing claims are forms of medical quackery. They undermine evidence-based efforts and guidelines for the management of the coronavirus and other health problems. In the case of the coronavirus pandemic, faith healing propositions confuse and misinform the people, and get them to conduct themselves as if there are cures and solutions when none exists. As in the case of My Father My Father, these faith remedies are not free. They cost money. In fact, these spiritual goods are devices that these charlatans use to extort money from desperate individuals. NCDC should take all necessary measures to check the proliferation of faith healing schemes and help bring these snake oil salesmen to book.


Image Credit: Nandip Bongfa Vongwap.

We Are All Atheists

By Leo Igwe

It is now over two weeks since police detectives arrested Nigerian atheist, Mubarak Bala in Kaduna in Northern Nigeria. His arrest was in connection with posts that he made on Facebook. The petitioners said that the posts insulted the prophet of Islam, Muhammad. Mr. Bala was transferred to Kano the following day but since then his whereabouts are unknown. He has been held incommunicado without access to a lawyer and family members. The police have not charged him in court. 

Meanwhile, there have been reports that a list of atheists, to be arrested and arraigned alongside Mr. Bala, is being compiled. There is an ongoing witch hunt for atheists, especially in Northern Nigeria. One source said that these were atheists who had allegedly made comments that insulted Muhammad or posted comments that annoyed Muslims. 

Some atheists have received calls from strange numbers or from unknown individuals who tried to confirm their identities. Most atheists in Nigeria are in the closet due to fear of being persecuted or killed by extremists. The situation is worse and more dangerous in Northern Nigeria where sharia law is in force in most states. Until recently, the atheist movement in the region has been underground. However, there has been growing visibility of atheism in Northern Nigeria since Mubarak came out as an atheist in 2014. 

The emergence of atheism in the region has worried Muslim leaders. And last year an Islamic institute organized a seminar to discuss the disturbing trend of Atheism and Social Media.

Following the arrest of Mubarak Bala, there have been numerous threats to expose and deal with other atheists. But those Muslims who are trying to clamp down on the atheist movement have not thought it through. It may not have occurred to them that they too are atheists. n this piece, I argue that we are all atheists because atheism entails a lack of belief in a god or gods. And everybody is an atheist in relation to one god or another. My submission is that if we are all atheists, why are some Muslims in Northern Nigeria persecuting fellow atheists? Why do they want to deny other atheists their rights to life, freedom of conscience, expression, and association?

First, let’s establish how Muslims are atheists or unbelievers. Muslims believe in Allah and in that sense, they are theists. They are believers. There is no doubt about it. However Muslim relationship to the god idea does not end with the belief in Allah. In Islam, there is this saying: “There is no other god but Allah”. Take note, “no other god”. This statement is an affirmation of belief in god as well as a declaration of disbelief in other gods. So concerning other gods, Muslims are atheists. Muslims are “unbelievers”. They are infidels. Like atheists, Muslims do not believe in the Christian god. They do not have faith in Zeus, Vishnu, Osiris, Amadioha, Sango, Ogun, Urim, Tsumburburra, Haptu, and thousands of other gods that human beings have worshipped throughout history.  The difference between Muslims and other atheists is that other atheists go one god further in their disbelief. They do not believe in the Allah-god. So all Muslims are atheists, even though all atheists are not Muslims. And to make a clearer distinction between Muslims and other atheists, Believers in the Allah-god will be described as Muslim atheists. n Nigeria, Muslim atheists exercise their rights to freedom of belief and unbelief- their freedom to believe in Allah/prophet Muhammad and to unbelieve in Urim and Ogun. Muslims exercise their right to freedom of expression including their right to express their belief in Allah and their unbelief in other gods such as Odin and Krishna. In declaring their unbelief in other gods, Muslims atheists make and could make statements that others could consider to be insulting, provoking and annoying. n seeking to penalize Mubarak and other atheists for statements and sentiments, posts, and comments that they made on Facebook, Muslim atheists are trying to deny other atheists the same rights that they enjoy. That is not fair. Is it? This inequity has been central to the entrenched Islamic privilege in Nigeria. This injustice has escaped the minds of those who are persecuting Mubarak Bala and other atheists in the region. Blinded by their theism, and forgetful of their atheism, Muslims who are threatening to kill and deal with atheists need to realize that atheists are human beings and the rights of atheists are human rights. More importantly, Muslims in Nigeria need to know that they are atheists too; that they belong to the family of unbelievers and infidels.

Yes, we are all atheists!

Photo by Marcos Paulo Prado on Unsplash

Pakistan continues to suppress its minorities with rapes and murders

One can only look back with nostalgia at the promise made by Muhammad Ali Jinnah to the people of Pakistan at the time of partition. “You are free; you are free to go to your temples, you are free to go to your mosques or to any other place of worship in this State of Pakistan. You may belong to any religion or caste or creed — that has nothing to do with the business of the State,” Jinnah had said.

Today, a stage has come where the Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) has noted that widespread social and economic marginalisation has left the weakest segments of society invisible and unheard in the country. HRCP has termed Pakistan’s human rights record in 2019 as ‘greatly worrisome,’ adding that the ongoing global pandemic, ‘…is likely to cast a long shadow on prospects for human rights.’

According to the HRCP report, Pakistan has failed to protect its most vulnerable. Children of minority communities are being made to work in the mines of Balochistan and also being sexually abused. News of children being raped, murdered and dumped has become frighteningly common. Women continue to bear the brunt of ‘honour’ killing. Prisoners in overpopulated jails live in subhuman conditions; a large number are from minority communities, languishing for years on end without a fair trial.  People reported ‘missing’ is a common occurrence even as “internment centres” continue to be operated without any justification.

Religious minorities are unable to enjoy the freedom of religion or belief guaranteed to them under the Constitution; their places of worship have been desecrated. Forced conversion of young women continues to be common place and constant discrimination in access to employment exists. Journalists face prosecution for speaking against the government and many publications have been banned arbitrarily.

The matters referred to in the HRCP (Human Rights Commission of Pakistan) report have been substantiated by those who have fled from Pakistan and taken refuge in India. They give very sad firsthand accounts about their lives in the country. They confirm the point made by the HRCP that, in Pakistan, minorities live like slaves without any well defined rights as citizens. In the schools, minority students, notwithstanding their religious belief, have to respond during roll call by saying “Allah ho Akbar.” The minorities do not have right to unhindered worship in public places. Most of the age old Hindu Temples, Gurdwaras and Churches have been destroyed. As a result, religious ceremonies are carried out within the confines of the houses and these too are inhibited in times of religious festivals for fear of riots.

To cremate their dead they have to take permission from the police. In the eventuality of being given, they have to find some place in a far flung jungle for the mortal remains to be consigned to flames. Quite often the cremation is done in one’s own house under secretive conditions.

Their women are forcibly converted to Islam and then married to Muslims. When the abduction of a girl from a minority community is carried out, the Police does not take cognizance of complaints by the parents and relatives and no investigation is undertaken. Meanwhile, the girl is made to sign the conversion papers which are then presented in the court that accepts them with great alacrity and declarers the process of conversion and marriage to be valid.

Persecution of Muslims belonging to sects other then the majority Sunnis is rampant. Ahmadiya Muslims were declared non-Muslim in 1974 and were further deprived through an Anti-Ahmadiya Ordinance in 1984. They vote as non-Muslims and are denied equitable job opportunities; there are severe restrictions to their entry in professional institutions which hampers their right to education. Sections 298-B and 298-C of the Pakistan Panel Code debars Ahmadiyas from calling their place of worship a Masjid.

Shia Muslims across Pakistan and especially in the occupied areas of Gilgit-Baltistan have been subjected to massacres and bombings of religious places/congregations, economic deprivation, curbs on right and liberties, restrictions on freedom of speech etc. Law enforcement agencies have extraordinary powers that are used to suppress the people. The authorities can detain anyone without due process of law, engage in electronic surveillance, conduct search and seizures and use military force wherever deemed necessary. Several local leaders are facing terrorism charges.  Innocent people are being framed under Schedule 4 of the Anti-terrorist Act even as actual terrorists are free to create mayhem.

Apart from the Shias of Gilgit-Baltistan, Pakistan is home to about one million Shiite Hazara Muslims residing mainly in Balochistan. This hapless community is being specifically targeted by terrorist groups like Lashkar-e-Jhangvi and Sipah-e-Sabah and is suffering immeasurably.

The Nehru-Liaquat pact had promised rights to minorities in Pakistan as also a guarantee of safeguards. Despite this, four million Hindus from Pakistan have relocated in India between 1951 and 1970 due to persecution in the country. The Hindu population in Pakistan has fallen from 22% in 1951 to around 2% presently. Millions of people have simply vanished in thin air and the remainder continue to seek refuge in India.

Pakistan is determined to exist as an Islamic State comprising only of Sunni Muslims. The unwritten policy to attain this objective is to exterminate the minorities through terror attacks and pogroms or force them to migrate, mainly towards India. Stringent laws that suppress the minorities are being passed and applied with regularity.

The world needs to take cognizance of the genocide that is taking place in Pakistan. Pakistan needs to be compelled to stop the systematic and organised campaign of violence that is specifically targeting minority communities. Pakistan also needs to be stopped from tinkering with the culture, identity and way of life of the minorities. Reversing the established trend will require restructuring of the relationship of the state with its non-Muslim citizens and the role of Islam in governing public lives. Once atrocities are stopped then the issue of the constitutional rights of the people can be arbitrated. These, however, are areas that remain contentious and even hazardous to engage politically.

Did the slain Pashtun leader Sardar Arif Wazir ignore murder signals from Rawalpindi?

Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) leader Sardar Arif Wazir, who had been detained by Wana police on April 17 must have been really very happy on being granted bail just 10 days after his arrest, because  such speedy judicial relief isn’t very forthcoming in Pakistan, especially when one stands accused of having made an “anti-Pakistan speech during his visit to Afghanistan.” He must also have been quite relieved that despite former Director General (DG) Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor directing his foreboding “their time’s up” threat at the PTM during a press conference a year ago, nothing untoward had happened.

Wazir may have dismissed DG-ISPR’s menacing remark believing it to be merely an attempt at intimidating PTM to stop raising issues of military excesses against Pashtuns. But as is their wont, many analysts are now pointing out that the DG-ISPR’s warning was clearly so serious that it shouldn’t have been ignored and are citing numerous cases of how activists in Pakistan whose activities embarrass or expose the Pakistan Army end up either being dead or simply disappear. They also say that since Wazir had already lost 17 male members of his clan in as many years, he should have been more careful, especially when the DG-ISPR’s warning had been very explicit. Most importantly, how could Wazir overlook the fact that Pakistan Army is not into the business of issuing empty threats.

In addition to his ‘time’s up’ warning, Maj Gen Ghafoor’s went on to say that “We are refraining from taking action because we are taking into consideration the people being provoked, otherwise it’s not difficult to deal with you.” In a democracy, for an army man to so brazenly threaten brother citizens may be something unheard of, but it’s not so in Pakistan. Here it’s the Pakistan Army that’s the sole judge of what’s good for the country. So, by accusing PTM of clandestinely receiving funds from spy agencies of Afghanistan and India without furnishing any proof, Maj Gen Ghafoor made it clear that as far as Pakistan Army was concerned, PTM was an anti-national organisation and hence ‘enemy’ of the state. Period.

But Arif Wazir may have also been lulled into complacency as DG-ISPR had also stated that the orders he had received from Pakistan Army chief Gen Qamar Javed Bajwa on dealing with PTM was ‘Do not use a harsh hand with them.” In addition, his assurance that “… the instructions of the army chief will be fully followed; people will not face any sort of problem and neither will any unlawful path be adopted,” may have convinced Sardar Arif Wazir that the ISI wouldn’t order a ‘hit’ on him. Furthermore, he may have interpreted his getting bail in a record time of just 10 days as a sign of Pakistan Army adhering to DG-ISPR’s promise that “Everything will be done lawfully.”

In the last 26 months of his life, Wazir had been detained six times and had cumulatively spent more than 13 months under detention on a series of charges. So, his family too must have been very happy that he had been released on April 27, which was also the fourth day of Ramadan. But in what appears to be a tragic coincidence, exactly on the fourth day after his release (May 1), Wazir was grievously injured in an attack carried out by vehicle borne gunmen while he was strolling outside his house in Ghwa Khwa area of Wana in South Waziristan and succumbed to his injuries the next day. That Sardar Arif Wazir died on his 38th birthday was the cruelest coincidence!

Lack of any official communication indicating Islamabad’s concern regarding this assassination raises suspicion that there’s an official attempt to avoid giving publicity to this incident. Could this be to make it easier to pass off this premeditated murder as just ‘another killing’ linked to some personal or tribal rivalry, which is a common feature in restive South Waziristan? Perhaps that’s why Amnesty International (AI) in its tweet has called upon Pakistani authorities to “carry out an independent and effective investigation” into the murderous attack on Arif Wazir and has demanded that “The suspected perpetrators must be held accountable.”

What will immediately attract attention of even the most casual reader is the unusually stern wordings used by Amnesty International in its tweet. By calling for “an independent and effective investigation,” Amnesty International has clearly expressed its well-founded apprehensions about the obvious attempt by Pakistan’s deep state to scuttle the inquiry so that the perpetrators aren’t brought to book! With the former DG-ISPR’s ‘Time’s up’ threat followed by his boast that “it’s not difficult to deal with you (PTM),” it’s but natural for the needle of suspicion to point directly towards Rawalpindi!

This suspicion is further accentuated by the fact that Wazir had been targeted earlier in 2018 by a so called ‘aman’ (peace) committee. But a report carried by Pakistani newspaper Daily Times mentions that “A senior journalist hailing from North Waziristan, speaking on condition of anonymity, said his sources confirmed that the attack was orchestrated by Mullah Nazir group.” Readers would recall that the Wana-based Mullah (or Maulvi) Nazir group comprises the Ahmadzai Wazir tribe and ever since Maulvi Nazir signed a peace accord with Pakistan Army in 2007, it is considered ‘good’ Taliban by Pakistan Army as it does all the ISI’s ‘dirty work’.

If Wazir really had any personal or tribal enmity of a magnitude that could prove to be ‘life-threatening’, then he would have surely taken precautions, as he had already been targeted earlier. But it appears that he fell for the former DG-ISPR’s false assurances that “Everything will be done lawfully,” and this naivety cost him his life. In the end, while the Pakistan Army and ISI may be guilty of orchestrating Wazir’s extrajudicial ‘execution’, but you can’t blame Rawalpindi for not cautioning him- after all, wasn’t Sardar Arif Wazir told a year ago that “Time’s up”?

Tailpiece: There’s no need to wait for police investigation results or an inquiry committee’s findings on this cold-blooded murder as the outcome can easily be foretold. No evidence of any direct or even indirect involvement of Pakistan Army or its intelligence agency (ISI) will be found and after determining that this killing was due to ‘personal enmity’, the case will be closed. This has been happening all along, and so there’s no reason to believe that it won’t happen again this time too!

Why Shahdad Baloch chose armed struggle? Ask Pak Journalists. Well, here’s the Answer

The question “Why did Shahdad Baloch choose armed struggle?” was raised by Riaz Sohail, a prominent Pakistani journalist working for BBC Urdu Service, in his Urdu article shared by BBC’ News website on May 6, 2020. The background of opening this discussion was that two prominent Baloch youths Shahdad Baloch and Ehsan Baloch attained martyrdom on Friday, May 1, 2020 in an encounter with the Pakistan Army and its locally armed mercenaries in Paarod, a mountainous area between Kalat and Kharan regions of Balochistan. According to a statement of the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) spokesperson Jeehand Baloch, both Shahdad and Ehsan had joined BLA about one year ago.

Shahdad Baloch, after completing his master’s degree in Defence and Strategic Studies at Quaid-e-Azam (QAU), Islamabad was enrolled in the M.Phil program at the National Institute of Pakistan Studies. Whereas, Ehsan had completed his master’s degree in Gender Studies from the same QAU, Islamabad. He also had a master’s degree in English Literature from Turbat University, Kech Balochistan. So it’s evident that martyrs Shahdad and Ehsan were well educated and decent young men.

However, the circumstances suggest that Shahdad and Ehsan were not widely known because of their being highly educated or ex-students of the Quaid-e-Azam University (QAU) Islamabad, a prestigious educational institution of Pakistan. Rather, Shahdad and Ehsan attained popularity and were discussed due to their patriotism, political thoughts, student and social activism, and for their personal integrity.

The cold blooded murder of Shahdad and Ehsan arouses comparatively a wider discussion on social media platforms about both of them touching the current situation in Balochistan and Baloch freedom movement. Such painful incidents in occupied Balochistan are rampant and happen every day but usually are discussed and condemned only by pro-independence Baloch political parties, Baloch human rights organizations, socio-political and media activists, and by the exiled Baloch online media. Pakistan’s political parties, mainstream media, and civil society organizations usually don’t bother to discuss incidents related to the armed conflict in Balochistan.

Shahdad Baloch and Ehsan Baloch’s murder, after a long time, drew the attention of a comparatively larger segment of Pakistan’s intelligentsia and mainstream media towards the long-standing armed conflict in Balochistan. Pictures and videos of Shahdad Baloch and Ehsan Baloch have been going viral on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and other social media platforms since the heart-pinching news of their death was publicized. People expressing their grief, sympathy, concerns and anxiety over their early and violent martyrdom are mostly their ex-colleagues, fellow students, teachers, left-oriented intellectuals, human rights activists, some politicians, and journalists.

Prominent journalist and anchorperson at Geo news Mr. Hamid Mir also took the issue in a Talk Show where he replayed a short video clip of an old seminar held in QAU, Islamabad in 2018. In the video clip Shahdad Baloch can be seen asking a question to Ahsan Iqbal, then a minister in Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s cabinet. “…there was Saindak gold and copper project, there was Rekodik gold and copper project, natural gas had also been discovered in the early 1950s in Sui and Dera Bugti areas of Balochistan but those huge projects could not change the fate of Baloch people then how could you say that China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC ) will change our fate?” Shahdad Baloch posed this pointed question to minister Ahsan Iqbal. This video clip is being widely watched and shared across social media platforms. Link of that talk show is given below–

A picture of Shahdad Baloch is also being widely shared by social media users. In that picture martyr Shahdad Baloch can be seen bleeding from his head. This picture pertains to an incident of assault when Shahdad Baloch and many other Baloch and Pashtun students were badly beaten by the members of Islami Jamiat Talaba, the student’s wing of Jama’at Islami, Pakistan Army’s old political vassal.

In that attack by the Islami Jamiat Talaba (IJT), Shahdad Baloch and many other Baloch and Pashtun students received injuries but Punjab Police, instead of arresting the IJT culprits, arrested the victims. Shahdad Baloch and dozens of other Baloch and Pashtun students were among them.

Like numerous other Baloch students, political and human rights activists, Shahdad Baloch was also once abducted, kept “missing”, and tortured by the ISI in Pakistan Army’s illegal dungeons in 2015.

Some points are common in most of the tweets, Facebook, Instagram posts, articles, and blogs shared by the people from Pakistan’s intelligentsia and media. They are expressing their feelings of grief, sympathy, anxiety, and concerns. They acknowledge that both of them were active, sensitive, and vocal critics of Pakistan’s repressive politico-economic policies, army, and intelligence agencies’ brutal operations in Balochistan.

Both Shahdad and Ehsan were unhappy with Pakistan’s persistent policy of plundering Balochistan’s natural resources and its way of ruling Balochistan as a colony. All of Pakistan’s intelligentsia seem to agree on Pakistan’s injustices in Balochistan yet most of them were puzzled over Shahdad and Ehsan’s joining the armed struggle, as both were remarkably brilliant Baloch youth.

They are asking “Why did Shahdad Baloch choose armed struggle?” The answer is very simple. In the light of Pakistan’s forcible occupation of Balochistan in 1948, the Baloch people repeatedly tried to regain their independence from Pakistan. The current worsening situation of Balochistan makes it very easy to understand why Shahdad Baloch and Ehsan Baloch joined the ongoing armed struggle of Baloch people for the independence of their homeland.

Their short story, their curtailed lifespan of peaceful political, social and human rights activism suggests that they saw and felt concerned about fellow Baloch students, leaders, political and human rights activists, intellectuals, journalists and general people being abducted by Pakistan’s Army and intelligence services, who then go “missing” for uncertain periods, being extra-judicially “killed and dumped”. Both had tried for years to pursue peaceful democratic means of struggle for raising their voice against Pakistan’s state terrorism and atrocities but they were responded by Pakistan’s security forces and Punjabi supporters, with extreme hate, violence, and humiliation.

It seems that it was the Pakistani state’s response to their peaceful democratic activism that rightly helped them to choose the armed struggle. By studying history and their own experience, they knew that armed struggle was the more effective means of struggle for getting rid of Pakistan’s subjugation and achieving the independence of Balochistan. The history and nature of Balochistan and Pakistan’s relationship provide enough reasons for a patriotic and prudent person of the oppressed Baloch nation to do what Shahdad and Ehsan did.

Most of Pakistani intelligentsia and media that discussed the issue seemed to avoid honoring the way of struggle that Shahdad and Ehsan chose against Pakistan’s repression. Hamid Mir even termed their joining of Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) as their being misled by BLA. Such comments amount to maligning the political wisdom and conscience of highly talented martyrs. It also amounts to a grave injustice and dishonoring the great sacrifice of our young freedom fighters.

I don’t like to sound judgmental. I can understand why people avoid appreciating the political wisdom of Shahdad and Ehsan, their bravery and their way of struggle. I can also understand why people avoid showing sympathy and support for their noble cause of freedom. No doubt it is Pakistan’s Army and intelligence services’ fascist and chauvinistic approach that shapes the minds and people like intellectuals, journalists, teachers, students, political and human rights activists are as susceptible as the Pakistani masses.

The reaction of the Pakistani state and its supporters towards the demand for independent Balochistan has left no room for peaceful and democratic struggle and activism. The prevailing situation of state terrorism in Balochistan offers a sufficient and self-explanatory reason for understanding Shahdad and Ehsan’s decision of choosing the armed struggle.

Shahdad and Ehsan were neither the first nor will be the last. The persistence of the Baloch freedom movement for the last more than twenty years is indicative of the fact that the ongoing Baloch freedom movement is led by a collective leadership of politically enlightened, educated, highly conscious and committed leaders. Like the many others, their martyrdom is enough to falsify Pakistan’s old dirty propaganda portraying Baloch freedom movement as a resistance of certain anti-development tribal chieftains who allegedly aim to blackmail the authorities for securing some petty interests.

Instead, the martyrdom of Shahdad and Ehsan proves that the Baloch freedom movement is a true indigenous national movement having its firm roots in the masses and drawing leadership, freedom fighters, support, and sympathy from all segments of Baloch society across the occupied Balochistan.

Some people often try to argue that armed struggle is not acceptable to the world powers. They usually argue that armed struggle is against prevailing world order and international laws. They, with malafide intentions try to mingle the Baloch national freedom movement with Islamic jihadist militancy. They try to label Baloch armed struggle for freedom as terrorism. But such efforts and notions are baseless having no legal, practical, and historical foundation.

If Abraham Lincoln, George Washington, Ho Chi Minh, Ahmed Bin Bella, Frantz Fanon, Subhas Chandra Bose, Nelson Mandela, and numerous other freedom fighters cannot be called as terrorists then how can the Baloch freedom fighters be labeled as terrorists?

The United Nation’s Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and People (UN General Assembly’s resolution number 1514, adopted on 14th December 1960) and UN Resolution Number 55/146 adopted by the United Nation General Assembly in 2000, on the occasion of 40th anniversary of UN Resolution Number 1514 that declared 2001-2010 as the “Second International Decade for the Eradication of Colonialism” provide a legal foundation for Baloch freedom struggle against Pakistan’s forcible occupation and colonial rule and plundering of Balochistan.

Under the umbrella of the United Nations, the US-led armed interference of NATO in Afghanistan, Libya, and Iraq, their support and military partnerships with anti-Taliban, anti-Saddam, anti-Gaddafi armed militias, and American alliance with Kurdish freedom fighters of YGP against the so-called Caliphate of ISIS are recent international practices. Are people, who oppose Baloch armed struggle for freedom, not living on this planet?

Pashtun boy-soldiers sent forcibly to Balochistan war zone are committing suicide

The strategy of deploying Pashtuns in war zone of occupied Balochistan by Pakistan’s Punjabi Generals has begun to backfire. The young Pashtun boys who are forcibly sent to the inhospitable terrains of Balochistan live in a constant fear of sniper attacks by the Balochistan Sarmachars (freedom fighters) and suffer ill-treatment at the hands of their seniors. This has turned them into emotional wrecks. In their desperation these Pashtun soldiers are committing suicide.

Over the past few days two junior officers of the Pakistan military committed suicide in Kech district of occupied Balochistan. Local sources told this reporter that one Pakistani soldier committed suicide at Gomazi Bunpir area of Kech and another killed himself at Tump in Kech district.

This could have major ramifications for Pakistan’s political stability and can soon snowball into a serious political issue in Pakistan’s north where the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) is gaining momentum with each passing day. Ali Wazir, a prominent leader of the Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) and member of the Pakistan Quami Assembly minced no words and wrote on the micro-blogging platform Twitter that young Pashtun boys of tender age are being recruited in the Frontier Corps and forcibly sent to dangerous areas of occupied Balochistan amidst an ongoing war between Baloch freedom fighters and Pakistani forces. Ali Wazir also shared the photograph of a young Pashtun boy who committed suicide in the Quroai, Dera Ismail Khan region who was on duty on occupied Balochistan.

“Young children are being recruited to the FC (Frontier Corps) and sent to areas of Balochistan where regular fighting is taking place. Yesterday, an FC man on duty in Quroai Dera Ismail Khan committed suicide in Balochistan,” Pashtun leader Ali Wazir tweeted.

A Pakistani police officer speaking strictly on condition of anonymity told this reporter that incidents of suicide has increased amongst Pakistani soldiers posted in Awaran, Bolan, Panjgur, Kech and Sibbi. The police officer added that they have been highlighting these suicide incidents in their “internal reports” being sent to the higher authorities in Islamabad. “We have clearly written that tremendous stress is one of the primary reason for suicides. But there has been no reply,” the police officer said. “…the Baloch Sarmachars (freedom fighters) have changed their combat strategy. They now carry out sniper attacks with precision, which means all Pakistani soldiers posted in Balochistan have a continuous threat to their lives. A large majority of these are Pashtuns who are unable to cope with the stress of war… and due to this extreme stress they are resorting to suicides,” the Pakistani police officer explained.

There has been a marked increase in the sniper attacks by Baloch freedom fighters in Kech, Awaran and Panjgur and several dozens of Pakistani soldiers have lost their lives during the last few months.

The occupied Balochistan consists of extremely difficult inhospitable terrain and comprises vast swathes of rocky mountainous topography where these young and ill-trained Pashtun boy-soldiers are forcibly sent. These soldiers remain under continuous threat of falling prey to a sniper bullet whenever they step out of their bunkers. And so they have to live in a constant state of fear and mental stress of being killed by Baloch Sarmachars (freedom fighters). And it does not end here. Once these hapless boy-soldiers from Pashtunistan come to the dangerous war zone in occupied Balochistan they are made to stay in the inhospitable terrain for several months and denied leave to visit their family in Pashtunistan. Their leave gets cancelled or is delayed for several months apart from being denied other facilities that the Punjabi soldiers enjoy in Rawalpindi.

A mid-rank military officer in the Pakistan Army who spoke strictly on condition of anonymity explained that Punjabi Generals of Pakistan Army deploy a large number of Pashtuns only in those areas of Balochistan that are dangerous and where intense war is on. “Around 90% soldiers being deployed in high combat zones are Pashtuns,” the mid-rank Pakistan Army officer said. He corroborated all that was said by the police officer (quoted above) about stress-related suicides amongst Pakistani soldiers.

In fact, a look at the ethnic profile of Pakistan Army does prove that its creamy layer comprises only of Punjabi Generals who exploit the foot soldiers and use them as cannon fodder, a large segment of whom are Pashtuns that hail from Waziristan.

It’s just a matter of time when Pashtuns turn against the Punjabi Generals of Pakistan Army and revolt. Pashtuns will then fight for their own community, an independent identity and an independent nation. The rapid rise of Pashtun Tahafuz Movement (PTM) across the northern frontiers of Pakistan in Waziristan point towards this impending outcome.

Balochistan has only been a money minting zone for the Punjabi Pakistani Generals who are now using Pashtuns as cannon fodder to loot the region’s rich natural resources. The Baloch Sarmachars (freedom fighters), on their part, are fighting for the independence of their motherland Balochistan. Pashtuns have begun to understand the real context of ongoing war in occupied Balochistan and are questioning the bloodshed of Baloch freedom fighters. Pashtun leaders are now getting vocal by each passing day as to why should young boys of tender age be sent to die at the hands of sniper attacks by Baloch Sarmachars.

Pashtun boy-soldiers know that they are unnecessarily sucked in this war where they get brutally exploited by the Punjabi Generals of Pakistan Army, fall prey to Baloch Sarmachar sniper bullets, and/or turn into an emotional wreck and ultimately commit suicides. Ironically, the United Nations and other international human rights organisations that are quite vocal about other conflict zones seem to conveniently forget about Pakistan’s illegal occupation of Balochistan and the decades long war that has led to the death of thousands of people.

Kashmiri Pandits and the ‘New Domicile Rules’ of Jammu & Kashmir

It is learnt through media sources that an exercise is underway at the Department of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs for framing rules, defining procedures and notifying the competent authority for issuance of domicile certificates in the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir. The exercise has begun in the wake of the J&K Reorganization order issued by the Home Ministry on March 31, 2020. It is also reported that final touches are being given to the draft rules and the task may be completed very soon.

Soon after the Home Ministry announced new domicile rules for the union territory of J&K, there was a wave of resentment in J&K civil society against some clauses of the new rules, but more particularly about the opening of recruitment to non-class IV vacancies in the government service to non-state subjects also. Even the BJP leadership of J&K lodged a strong protest so that the Home Ministry had to withdraw this controversial clause. The quick withdrawal of the contentious clause of the order within 24-hours created an impression with the stakeholders that mandarins responsible for framing the new rules are not conversant with the ground situation in J&K, and the exercise of scribing was done while sitting in the armchairs of a coffee lounge. Some observers even attributed it to the mischief of the insiders. 

Valley-based political leadership and the tendentious vernacular press consider the State Reorganization Act as “war against people” a la the Gupkar Declaration. In Kashmir, Home Ministry’s newly formulated domicile laws do not go down the throat of political dissenters.  Almost all shades of political opinion in the Kashmir Valley converge on the self-styled fiction that the BJP government intends to change the demographic complexion of Kashmir. Because of this, they consider the revised domicile rules highly reprehensible. 

The formulation of new domicile rules for the union territory of Jammu & Kashmir is a sensitive matter and needs to be handled with the utmost care, keeping in mind the historical background and a variety of identities with possible ramifications. All these aspects become more stringent owing to a far-reaching historical decision of the parliament of doing away with the statehood of J&K. 

By way of the low-key but scathing disapproval of the Reorganization Act of the Parliament, and its consequential corollaries, a malicious campaign through local print media has been unleashed by the Valley-based diehard exclusivists to discredit the Home Ministry’s progressive measure of new domicile laws not directly but by projecting Kashmiri Hindu (Pandit) minority as the sacrificial goat. The antics unfold a multi-fold attack to frustrate the Home Ministry’s decisive plans for Kashmir. It aims at creating doubts among the Kashmiri Pandit minorities about the Home Ministry’s earnestness towards their cause; it aims at denigrating the Home Ministry that despite being the “right-wing” it plays ducks and drakes with the Hindu minority community in Kashmir. And thirdly, it is also a subtle move to brainwash the youthful Kashmiri Muslim generation, and to make them believe in a distorted version of the role of Kashmiri Pandits in promoting the interests of entire Kashmiri community. 

The truth is that not only the state subject law but also the idea of a secular democratic political forum for the people of J&K with Sheikh Abdullah as its front leader was the result of the efforts the Kashmir Pandit student community in Lahore around 1920s. They were the most befriended visitors of Allama Iqbal who too was of Kashmiri origin.  

The largest religious minority of the Kashmir Valley, namely the Kashmiri Pandits (now arbitrarily and unjustly designated “migrants” and not the universally recognized category of “internally displaced people”), is that naïve as to be tricked and misled by cronies?  Of course, there are stray black sheep, but they do not make the rule. Pandits know that the reality behind the apparent silence in Kashmir political circles or the sarcastic and provocative profiling of Kashmiri Pandits the exclusivists reflects the drop scene of militancy in Kashmir. The maligning campaign initiated in the print media is the typical trait of a split personality. 

Keeping in view this new scenario, and also that the Department of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs is working hard and procedures for implementing the  new domicile law, the Home Ministry would do well to assert by making its position clear on some crucial points.

The Ministry must provide exact definitions of State Subject, Permanent Residence Certificate (PRC) and Domicile Certificate, because as these terms are making rounds in the current written and spoken discourse related to the new law. Secondly, it must clarify whether registration under new domicile rules applies to one and all in the union territory, including those who have the State Subject Certificates in their possession issued by the State authorities. Thirdly, in the case of Kashmiri Pandit migrants, it is essential to define whether (a) Those registered as “migrants” with the State Relief Commissioner also need to obtain new domicile certificate or not? (b) Whether such KP “migrants” as are registered in any other state of the country,  other than J&K and Delhi, are entitled to the status of the domicile of J&K by birth (which they are) and have they to apply for domicile certificate afresh or not. Fourthly, how will the new domicile law deal with the diaspora of the migrated minority community that had to go to distant places in and outside the country to fend for themselves and their families? The ministry of home affairs must make it clear that Kashmir Pandit Displaced Persons registered in any state of the Union of India are entitled to domicile status of the Union Territory of J&K. This is what the President of AIKS (All India Kashmiri Samaj), New Delhi said in his aid memoir to the Home Minister some weeks back and this is also precisely what the chief spokesman of the newly formed Apni Party has lucidly argued in a statement published in Outlook of May 1, 2020. The President of Kashmiri Pandit Sabha, Jammu, has already sent a memorandum to the Lt. Governor raising almost similar issues.

The Home Ministry knows that there was an ethnic cleansing of the Kashmir Valley in 1990 and the entire Kashmir Pandit community was extirpated from its ancient homeland, and is  scattered and dispersed all over the country and in other countries of the world. Their left-over houses, moveable and immoveable properties, orchards, shops, establishments, jobs and everything has been grabbed by the locals and even revenue records have been tampered with by interested parties to cut off their roots from Kashmir. In continuation of this genocidal treatment, now print media in the Valley is being used to declare them “administratively, politically and legally the pariah”, meaning the people who have lost the right right to domicile in Kashmir. This amounts to completing the cycle of ethnic cleansing of this community by their compatriots.

In view of these developments, the Home Ministry needs to clarify its position as regards the internally displaced people, the Kashmiri Pandit religious minority, while its agencies are engaged in framing the rules and procedures for of implementing the new domicile laws.