Home Blog Page 411

Rationalize taxes to boost tourism in India

Can you think of a country that is rich in natural beauty and history but has not been able to prioritise tourism? India is an example.

In 2018, just about 10 million foreign tourists arrived in India. In 2015, the number was 8 million. Compare this with other Asian giants. According to reports, China recorded 30.54 million foreign visitors in 2018

Thailand, a country which is about six times smaller than India, received over 38 million tourists. The industry accounted for about one fifth of the country’s GDP. Malaysia, despite registering a 3% drop in the number of inbound tourists, received about 26 million tourists in 2018.

These numbers speak volumes.

At a time when India is battling economic slowdown leading to job losses and shrinking investments, it needs to focus more on developing the tourism sector. This would mean intertwining the transport sector comprising roads, aviation, railways with hospitality – hotels and food and beverages.  

Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who celebrated his 69th birthday on Tuesday said that the 11 month old Statue of Unity in Gujarat has attracted an average of about 8,500 tourists per day.

However, this year has brought little cheer to the tourism industry. Political uncertainty has risen since the Pulwama attack in February, which killed over 40 Central Reserve Police Force personnel. Tension between India and Pakistan has been mounting since then. However, bilateral relations worsened after August 5, when India abrogated Article 370 and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two union territories — Jammu and Kashmir with an assembly and Ladakh without one. Since August 5, the Kashmir Valley has been shut for visitors and blacking out of information by the government has further drawn widespread criticism from across the globe.

Not just that. One must also remember that the sudden demonetisation of high value currency notes in one stroke and the subsequent implementation of the Goods and Services Tax which left many confused in the initial phase have also had a role to play in dampening the sector. The GST rate applicable on luxury hotels with tariffs of over Rs 7,500 — categorised as “sin goods” is 28%.

These decisions, some of which have been sudden and implemented without any well thought out strategy, have only made things worse.

Countries such as Thailand, Malaysia and Sri Lanka have extremely competitive rates and India loses not only foreign tourists but even domestic tourists have preferred opting for international destinations because of their pricing.

Besides, a poll by global experts ranked India as one of the most dangerous countries for women. Reports suggested that crimes against women have significantly risen.

An industry insider, wishing anonymity said that such reports have dented the image of India. “Incredible India” – the campaign aimed at promoting tourism in India was launched in 2002. It has remained just a campaign.

According to India Brand Equity Foundation, the travel and tourism sector in India accounted for 8% of total employment in 2017, providing jobs to about 41.6 million people. This is one sector, which not only provides direct employment to people but has the potential to generate thousands of indirect jobs especially for those in the unorganised sector.

While the Narendra Modi government has underlined the need to boost this sector and worked towards easing issuance of visa, it has to do much more.

India and its policy makers must understand the real issues that plague the sector. The government has indeed reduced visa fees while facilitating e-visas but it needs to look beyond.

Safety for women across the country, stability and certainty in political moves besides improvement of tourism infrastructure will be critical. And it goes without saying that pricing is one area that needs immediate attention. After all, in today’s day and age, staying in a luxury hotel cannot be perceived as “sin”. Taxes have to be brought down.

Arizona and More Wedding Cake Challenges and Legalized Discrimination

0

E.J. Montini in the Arizona Republic reported on the Arizona Supreme Court move to attempt to use religion as a basis for “bigotry and discrimination.” Within the state Court of Appeals, the notion got rejected. However, the Supreme Court could turn either way at the time. Governor Doug Ducey stacked the Arizona Supreme Court with judges more in line with the individuals who prefer his ideology and temperament.

Jessica Boehm, from the Arizona Republic, stated that artists who make cakes do not have to make cakes for LGBTI+ couples because these could convey a message against the cake-makers’ deepest convictions, i.e., Christian beliefs stand against messages for equality in marriage of the LGBTI+ community.

Apparently, there was an ordinance for the city of Phoenix, Arizona, in which discrimination in the “providing [of] goods or services at places of public accommodation based on race, color, religion, sex, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, or disability” is expressly illegal.

Brush & Nib in Phoenix designs custom wedding invitations. On the case, Montini provided a concise and astute observation, “It’s a shame this is even a issue. We can hold any beliefs we want. But discrimination is discrimination. “Heterosexuals only” is the same as ‘whites only.’ Every other argument is smoke and mirrors. The state’s highest court fell for the phony argument in a way that lower courts had not. Brush & Nib is like any other public accommodation. A gas station. A grocery store. A barber shop. A restaurant.”

If the denial of service to African-Americans on the basis of Christian beliefs with the same argument, based on the argument as to what message this will send to the public, and based on their deep religious convictions, we come to the, rather obvious, conclusion of the discrimination against the African-American population in wedding cake services. Similarly, one need merely apply the same argument form with different, LGBTI+, content to make the point more explicitly.

Montini concluded, “The owners and employees of such businesses are free to hold whatever beliefs they wish, and they are free to express them. Denying service is another thing, however. It’s a sad day when the state Supreme Court doesn’t recognize that. Because if it’s okay to discriminate against same-sex couples by claiming some devout religious beliefs then anyone can make similar claims to justify discriminating against … anyone.”

Photo by Diana Akhmetianova on Unsplash

Philosophical and Historical Foundations of American Secularism 3 – Idealism Above, Realism Below

1

Dr. Herb Silverman is the Founder of the Secular Coalition for America, the Founder of the Secular Humanists of the Lowcountry, and the Founder of the Atheist/Humanist Alliance student group at the College of Charleston. He authored Complex variables (1975), Candidate Without a Prayer: An Autobiography of a Jewish Atheist in the Bible Belt (2012) and An Atheist Stranger in a Strange Religious Land: Selected Writings from the Bible Belt (2017). He co-authored The Fundamentals of Extremism: The Christian Right in America (2003) with Kimberley Blaker and Edward S. Buckner, Complex Variables with Applications (2007) with Saminathan Ponnusamy, and Short Reflections on Secularism (2019).

Here we talk about the drafts of the American Constitution and personal beliefs behind it.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: During the writing of the American Constitution in its first drafts, and after its completion after the Declaration of Independence, when considering the histories of the framers, what statements in these documents contradicted the personal beliefs or the individual biographies of the framers? 

Dr. Herb Silverman: The religious faith of our founders is irrelevant because they erected a wall of separation between religion and the government they created in our founding documents, the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution. However, since you ask, and since there is curiosity about the personal beliefs of our founders, here are some interesting tidbits.

Many of our founders were anti-Catholic. John Adams called Catholicism “nonsense, a delusion, and dangerous in society.” Thomas Jefferson called Catholicism “a retrograde step from lightness to darkness.” (I agree with these founders and would add, as Thomas Paine did, all the other religions.) John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, drafted language for the New York Constitution proposing tolerance for everyone except Catholics who refuse to renounce papal authority. At the time of the American revolution only about 1.6 percent of the population in the colonies were Catholic. It wasn’t until the immigration waves of the nineteenth century that Catholics began arriving in America in large numbers. This led to the aptly named “Know Nothing” party, formally called the American Party, an anti-Catholic and anti-immigrant party formed in 1850. I was raised in Philadelphia, home of the 1844 “Bible riots” where both Catholics and Protestants were clubbed to death over which version of the Lord’s Prayer should be recited in public school. Protestants won the political battle, and Catholics responded by forming Catholic schools nationwide by 1860.

In a letter to John Adams in 1823, Thomas Jefferson said: “And the day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter.” He told his nephew in 1787 to “question with boldness even the existence of God.” Jefferson considered reason and science, not superstition and supernaturalism, to be his guides. He wrote his own version of the Christian Bible, leaving out miracle stories and including only what made sense to him. Jefferson referred to what remained as “Diamonds in a dunghill.”

Deism was a rational challenge to orthodox Christianity. Deists believed that the world was the work of a non-intervening Creator. Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and other founders expressed religious views that were strongly deistic. Many founders reflected Deist language in their writings. Thomas Paine, in The Age of Reason, argued that Deism should replace all revelation-based religion. Most of our Founding Fathers were religiously liberal for their time, and thought of the new country as an experiment in secular democracy. Producing a God-free Constitution showed their disdain for intermingling religion and government. George Washington refused to take communion (even though his wife did), reflecting his Deistic tendency to avoid supernatural ritual. He did make some religious gestures to conform to the religious expectations of the times, though he refused to have a priest or religious rituals at his deathbed.

Christian Deism stressed morality and rejected the orthodox Christian view of the divinity of Christ, often viewing him as a sublime, but entirely human, teacher of morality. Instead of accepting the entire Bible as divinely inspired, many believed that reason was the ultimate standard for determining which parts of the Bible were legitimate revelations from God. 

The Declaration of Independence was a call for rebellion against the British Crown. It does mention a higher power four times, as in Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God, Supreme Judge of the world, Creator, and divine Providence. In each case it is an appeal to human dignity. It emphasizes people having inalienable rights. No appeal is made in this document to a god that has authority of any kind. No powers are given to religion in the affairs of man. The founders never cited biblical principles during the Constitutional Convention and ratifications. Both the Declaration and the Constitution source the legitimacy of political rule exclusively in the consent of the governed. Benjamin Franklin, a co-author of the Declaration of Independence with Thomas Jefferson, decried Christian church services for promoting church memberships instead of “trying to make us good citizens.”

Benjamin Rush, a signer of the Declaration of Independence, believed that the Christian religion should be preferred to all others, and that every family in the United States should be furnished, at public expense, with a copy of the Bible. The founders rejected this idea. Orthodox Christians among the Founders include the Calvinistic Samuel Adams, John Jay (who served as president of the American Bible Society), Elias Boudinot (who wrote a book on the imminent second coming of Jesus), and Patrick Henry (who believed in Evangelical Christianity and distributed religious tracts while riding circuit as a lawyer).

As a member of the Constitutional Convention, George Mason strenuously opposed the compromise permitting the continuation of the slave trade. Although he was a Southerner, he called the slave trade disgraceful to mankind. “God” stayed out of the Constitution, but slavery remained in order to keep the Southern colonies as part of this new nation.

The forces opposed to adoption of the Constitution argued that the “no religious test clause” would lead to Catholics, Jews, Mahometans (Muslims), and pagans obtaining office. That is the point of including the clause.

The phrase a “hedge or wall of separation between the garden of the church and the wilderness of the world” was first used by Baptist theologian Roger Williams, founder of the colony of Rhode Island. It was later employed by Jefferson as a commentary on the First Amendment and its restriction on the legislative branch of the federal government. Thomas Jefferson refused to issue Proclamations of Thanksgiving sent to him by Congress during his presidency. After retiring from the presidency, James Madison argued for a stronger separation of church and state, opposing the very presidential issuing of religious proclamations he himself had done, and also opposing the appointment of chaplains to Congress. James Madison said, “Religion and government will both exist in greater purity the less they are mixed together.”

The absence of an establishment of religion did not necessarily imply that all men were free to hold office. Most colonies had a Test Act. Charles Carrol from Maryland, the only Catholic signer of the Declaration, guaranteed full rights to Protestants and Catholics, but not to Jews, Freethinkers, or Deists. He said, “When I signed the Declaration of Independence I had in mind not only our independence of England, but the tolerations of all sects professing the Christian religion, and communicating to them all equal rights.” Several states had these religious tests for a short time. In my state of South Carolina, Protestantism was recognized as the state-established religion. This stood in contrast to the Federal Constitution, which explicitly prohibits the employment of any religious test for federal office, and which, through the Fourteenth Amendment, later extended this prohibition to the States.

There were many attempts by state ratifying conventions to amend the Constitution and subvert the intent of the preamble by declaring that governmental power was derived from God or Jesus Christ, but the proposed religious amendments were defeated.

Though there was some debate about possibly including “God” in the congressional oath, the nation’s first lawmakers instead decided on strictly secular language. It was signed into law by George Washington on June 1, 1789, making it the first law passed by the new United States government.

Jacobsen: Thank you for the opportunity and your time, Dr. Silverman.

Photo by Aaron Burden on Unsplash

Indigo leaves behind check-in baggage of entire flight

Several times in the past Indigo has attracted negative publicity and people’s ire due to unprofessional behavior of its ground staff and unwarranted delays in flight operations. Adding one more incident to that list, the airline has now set a new low in passenger services by leaving behind the luggage of an entire aircraft. Recently, IndiGo, which was flying the passengers to Istanbul, left behind the luggage of the entire aircraft back in Delhi. Twitterati attacked indigo mercilessly for this misadventure and the hashtag #ShameOnIndiGo was trending on Twitter.

Several Twitter users shared that they received a piece of paper when they were waiting for their luggage at the belt.

Twitter user Chinmay Dabke, who was on this Delhi-Istanbul flight, took to his account to share the details of the incident.

About the whole incident an IndiGo spokesperson said, “We upgraded our aircraft and adjusted the payload as long as the prevailing wind conditions remain. So, all the left behind baggage will be carried today. We regret the inconvenience caused to our passengers.”

New wargaming software for Indian Navy

Institute for Systems Studies and Analysis (ISSA) Delhi, a premier DRDO laboratory, has designed and developed a new generation Wargaming Software in collaboration with Maritime Warfare Centre, Visakhapatnam to meet the contemporary operational and tactical level wargaming requirement for the Indian Navy. The Wargaming Software was handed over by Secretary, Department of Defence R&D and Chairman, DRDO Dr G Satheesh Reddy to Vice Chief of the Naval Staff Vice Admiral G Ashok Kumar at ISSA.

The key focus has been to create a wargaming environment which enables Maritime Warfare Centres (MWCs) to train using the latest technological and computing tools. The software has versatile and user-friendly features which enable globally playable wargaming scenarios between multiple forces. It enables exercises to be conducted between geographically dispersed locations over Wide Area Network. The architecture is forward compatible and new functional and equipment modules can be developed and easily plugged in.

RTI can be filed locally in J&K, Ladakh, no need to visit Delhi: Union Minister Jitendra Singh

Brushing aside misinformation sought to be spread in certain quarters, Union Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh, who is also the MoS In-Charge Department of Personnel & Training (DOPT), which is the nodal department for Central Information Commission of India dealing with the Right to Information (RTI) appeals, said that RTI can be filed locally in  the Union territories of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, even after the new arrangement comes into existence after the 31st of October, 2019. He denounced the mischievous rumours that, because J&K will become a Union Territory, the applicant will have to travel to Delhi to file an RTI.

Following a detailed discussion on the issue with Central Information Commissioner of India, Sudhir Bhargava, Dr Jitendra Singh said certain vested elements continue to instigate different kinds of misgivings in the society, in a vain bid to  disrupt the courageous initiative by the Modi government.

As a matter of fact, Dr Jitendra Singh said, during the last five years, after Narendra Modi took over as Prime Minister, the procedures to file an RTI appeal have been immensely simplified and definite timelines have been laid down. This will apply equally as much to Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh after these become Union territories, he said. 

Giving details, Dr Jitendra Singh said, the first RTI application is made to the Public Information Officer (PIO) locally and in matters involving “life and liberty”, the time limit for the PIO to provide the information is 48 hours. For the PIO to reply to the application, timeline of 30 days has been laid down from the date of receipt of the application. For applicant to make first appeal after the receipt of PIO’s reply, the first Appellate authority  in the form of the designated officer will also be available locally, whether it is the State or Union territory.

Only in case of second appeal, Dr Jitendra Singh elaborated, the application has to be submitted to the Information Commission and even if the Information Commissioner is not available locally, in case of Union territory, the second appeal can be sent to the Central Information Commission on-line within 90 days from the receipt of the first appeal orders or from the date the orders were to be received.

To make the procedure much simpler, Dr Jitendra Singh said, we made use of the modern technology and in a major breakthrough, during the Modi government, provided the facility of making second appeal before the Central Information Commission through portal, which, in other words, means that an RTI applicant does not have to wait for the office hours and can file his appeal even from his mobile phone anytime during the day or night, at his convenience, and even while sitting at his home or anywhere else.

After the reorganization of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, Dr Jitendra Singh said, contrary to some of the unsubstantiated misgivings being spread, the citizens’ participation will increase manifold and various provisions in public administration will become far more citizen-centric with the extension of uniformed central laws, as applicable in the rest of the country.

Can Imran Khan win the biggest match of his life?

Being the prime minister of a country like Pakistan is not easy even under the best of circumstances. It involves walking a tight rope in a situation where your decision making ability is severely restricted by a number of forces, mainly the all powerful Pakistan Army and close on its heels the very powerful Islamic fundamentalists and militant warlords. The tenuous administrative structure marred by endemic corruption does not provide any succour. A war prone neighbour like Afghanistan on one side and an economic giant like China on the other, ready to devour the country in its lust for money creates a massive diplomatic challenge. The self destructive tension with India, the only neighbour that actually bears no ill will against the country, draws on all energy that could be well utilised in other spheres that need more attention.

If you throw in this quagmire a brilliant cricketer and international playboy like Imran Khan, who took to politics as a means to fight his mid-life identity crisis and then propel him to the position of prime minister, it is quite obvious that nothing good will come out of it. Where very powerful families failed that have been in politics for generations, how would a political greenhorn succeed?

Even after becoming prime minister, Imran Khan is viewed as a novice in politics by the well entrenched political establishment of the country, he has failed to garner even minimum acceptance as a leader from the parliamentarians in Pakistan, let alone a universal recognition.

It is, therefore, no wonder that Imran Khan, within one year of becoming Prime Minister Pakistan finds himself in political wilderness with the proverbial “Sword of Damocles” hanging over his head. The talk of an ignominious ouster at the hands of the very Army that propelled him into the position is gaining momentum.

So where did Imran Khan go wrong? There are some issues not of his making and others in which he has erred. They all join together to create a cocktail of misgovernance, wrong decision making and lost opportunities.

On top of the list is the face-off with India which has come as a big jolt to the already rocking boat that Khan is sailing in. He had barely emerged from the embarrassment caused by the successful Balakot air strike by India when the reorganisation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir left Pakistan in doldrums. The all important “jugular vein” of Pakistan has been cut.

Imran Khan is least prepared or competent to deal with a political development of this magnitude. He has been doing blindly what his advisors and his boss, General Qamar Bajwa, have been telling him to do. Pakistan left no stone unturned to raise the issue with US President Donald Trump, UN Security Council, IOC, UNHRC and several countries, but all in vain. At the behest of the army, Imran gave a nuclear threat to India but ended up being mocked. The contradictions that have come up as a result of this haphazard diplomacy have exposed him as a blubbering fool rather than a strong leader.

The stunned Pakistan Army is feeling helpless due to complete absence of support from the Pakistani leadership on the government’s policy on Kashmir. Pak Army’s hierarchy is also upset over not getting help from any other country. The attempts to escalate the violence threshold in Kashmir by enhanced ceasefire violations and pushing of terrorists have also come to a naught. The violent reaction by local Kashmiris’ that could have given Pakistan the leverage to move international and domestic opinion has also not been forthcoming. The Pakistan Army is, quite naturally, on the lookout for a fall guy and Imran Khan tops the list. 

The very critical economic situation of the country comes next in his list of failures. In the last calculations released in July this year, the federal government’s debt in Pakistan has jumped up to Rs. 33 trillion with a net addition of Rs. 1.23 trillion in just one month. Milk is costlier than Petrol in Pakistan and other essentials like onions and tomatoes are becoming unaffordable even for the middle class, what to talk of the poor. Khan is following the well tested route of blaming India. He has gone on record to state that India is trying to bankrupt Pakistan and to push it on the blacklist of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) and exert pressure from the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The people, however, are not ready to accept that India is the reason behind the sky rocketing prices.

Apart from the Punjab Province, and that too partially, all others provinces and people of the country are up in arms against the federal government. The situation is almost at the level of a civil war. Protests by Balochs, Pashtuns, Mohajirs, Gilgit-Baltistanis, Sindhis and all other communities are increasing by the day. The government is in paralysis, unable to even reach out to the people let alone assuage their feelings. The slogan of “Naya Pakistan” (new Pakistan) is now grovelling in the dust.

In the domain of foreign policy, under Imran Khan, Pakistan has been unable to give an assertive posture. It continues to have strained relations with all of its neighbours with the exception of China, the country that it should be most wary of. Bending to woo Saudi Arabia and the UAE over the past year in an attempt to stabilize the economy has brought little relief.

In Pakistan, its army has a complete say in choosing the country’s prime minister. Any prime minister facing revolt or protest is usually sidelined by Pakistan Army. It is no wonder that speculations are rife in the Pakistani media over the removal of Imran Khan and that too as early as October this year. The only way Imran Khan can face up to this challenge is by adopting an approach that looks more to internal issues than the external environment. He needs to shed his preoccupation with Kashmir and understand as to where his priorities should lie. It remains to be seen whether he is up to winning this biggest match of his life.

US fines Japan Airlines USD 300,000 over long flight delays

There have been several instances in India where passengers have been trapped inside a plane for hours and yet no action has been taken against the airlines. However, setting a precedent, the US government is fining Japan Airlines USD 300,000 for delays that trapped passengers on two grounded planes for hours.

Under an agreement with the Transportation Department, the airline gets credit for USD 60,000 spent compensating passengers, and USD 120,000 will be waived if the airline avoids similar incidents for one year.

The department says that after bad weather forced a January 4 flight from Tokyo to New York to land in Chicago, airline staff needed to help passengers off the plane didn’t show up for more than four hours.

On May 15, a Tokyo-New York flight diverted to Dulles Airport near Washington, where passengers were stuck on board for five hours because of refueling and crew members reaching the end of their shift.

The airline blamed the delays on weather-related airport congestion. If a similar approach is adopted in India, airlines would be more careful while keeping passengers as ‘hostages’ inside their planes

Air Pollution: Odd-even scheme to be implemented in Delhi from November 4 to 15

Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has announced that the odd-even road rationing scheme will be implemented in Delhi from November 4 to 15.

Kejriwal said the move was aimed at combating high levels of air pollution in winters when crop burning takes place in neighbouring states.

However, just minutes after Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal announced that the odd-even car rationing scheme will be reintroduced in the capital to combat pollution, union minister for road transport Nitin Gadkari said there was no need for it right now.

“There is no need for it now….in next 2 years, Delhi will be pollution free. It’s their decision, let them do whatever,” Gadkari said.

Kejriwal announced the odd-even scheme as part of the seven-point ‘Parali Pradushan’ action plan that also includes mass distribution of anti-pollution masks, mechanised sweeping and water sprinkling on the roads, tree plantation, and special plans for 12 pollution hotspots in the city.

During the 12-day scheme, vehicles will ply alternately on odd and even dates as per their registration numbers. In the previous two experiments in January and April in 2016, a fine of Rs 2,000 was imposed on the violators of the rule.

Kejriwal said the details of the scheme will be shared with people in coming days.

In the past, two-wheelers and female commuters were exempted from the rule.

According to the graded response action plan (GRAP) devised by the Central Pollution Control Board, the odd-even scheme for private vehicles is implemented when the pollution level at ‘severe plus’ category persists for 48 hours or more.

The air pollution level in Delhi remains low in 11 months of a year but picks up in November due to stubble (parali) burning in the neighbouring states. Dense cloud of smoke covers Delhi, which becomes a gas chamber, the chief minister said.

“The Centre, and governments in Punjab and Haryana are making their efforts to prevent crop burning and the Delhi government will extend all possible help to them,” he said.

Talking about the impact of odd-even scheme, Kejriwal said studies have shown that it could reduce air pollution by 10%-13%. The scheme was criticised by some sections including experts on the ground that effect on air quality was limited.

“We will utilise our experiences of implementation of odd-even schemes twice in the past in Delhi,” he said when asked about overcharging by cab aggregators after the scheme is implemented.

Kejirwal said under the long-term plans to improve air quality in the city to “good” category, the government will soon announce its bus aggregator and e-vehicle policy.

Kejriwal said over 1,200 suggestions were received from the people regarding ways to combat air pollution in Delhi during winters. He also received feedback of environmental experts and resident welfare associations based on which the action plan was prepared.

“The Delhi government will make large-scale procurement of around 50-60 lakh ‘best quality’ N-95 anti-pollution masks which will be distributed among the people in October month before the spike in air pollution in next month due to parali burning,” he said.

Sprinkling of water and mechanised sweeping of roads will be undertaken to curb dust pollution. Twelve major pollution hotspots will be dealt with special plans and measures, he said.

Burning of waste and garbage will be checked through deploying two ‘environmental marshals’ in each ward. Besides, the government will engage RWAs and people to prevent the practice.

Also, a “Delhi Tree Challenge’ campaign will be started by the government in which saplings will be home-delivered to people, he said.

A war room will be set up to deal with complaints on air pollution. Awareness will be created among schoolchildren and they will be roped in to motivate their parents to help in efforts to curb pollution, the chief minister said.

COP14 concludes with an ambitious statement of global action by each country

The 12-day long 14th Conference of Parties (COP14) to United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD) concluded with thought-provoking discussions on land management, restoration of degraded land, drought, climate change, renewable energy, women empowerment, gender equality, water scarcity and various other issues. India was the proud host of UNCCD COP14,which witnessed widespread participation from over 9000 participants from all across the globe at India Expo Centre & Mart, Greater Noida from 2nd to 13th September 2019.

Speaking at the Press Conference today on the outcomes of COP14, Union Minister for Environment, Forest and Climate Change (MoEF&CC), Prakash Javadekar exuded confidence that all three Rio conventions will work in synergy.

In an unprecedented global campaign to save productive land, country parties have agreed to make the Sustainable Development Goal target of achieving land degradation neutrality by 2030 a national target for action.

Javadekar reiterated India’s commitment to achieving land degradation neutrality by2030. He also committed to provide an effective leadership to the UNCCD during his two-year tenure of Presidentship.

Countries will address insecurity of land tenure, including gender inequality in land tenure, promote land restoration to reduce land-related carbon emissions and mobilize innovative sources of finance from public and private sources to support the implementation of these decisions at country-level.

The framework used for reporting action will be improved to ensure it captures key issues, such as gender equality, drought response and the influence of consumption and production patterns and flows on land degradation. Through the Delhi Declaration, ministers expressed support for new initiatives or coalitions aiming to improve human health and well-being, the health of ecosystems, and to advance peace and security. The Environment Minister stated “Delhi Declaration is an ambitious statement of global action by each country on how to achieve Land Degradation Neutrality”.

 “To my mind, this was the COP where we put people at the heart of what we do,” said Ibrahim Thiaw, Executive Secretary of UNCCD, with Parties adopting a breakthrough decision on land tenure rights and drawing on the unique voices, experiences of youth and women.

COP 14 also adopted a landmark decision to buttress global efforts to better mitigate and manage the risks of drought and to build resilience.

Thiaw also highlighted the contribution of COP 14 to the Climate Action Summit, stressing that land restoration, at scale, is one of the cheapest solutions to address the global crises of climate and biodiversity loss.

Attention was also drawn to the role, the private sector play in land restoration going forward, including through promoting sustainable value chains, as well as the incentives that will draw them in, such as the regulation in support of innovation for sustainable land management and rewarding conservation, restoration and sustainable use of resources.

COP14, ended today after 11 days of meetings, 11 high-level, 30 committee and over 170 stakeholder meetings, 145 side-events and 44 exhibitions.