Home Blog Page 412

100 days of Modi govt 2.0: Kashmir cited as the biggest achievement

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said that past hundred days of the BJP government have been days of development, trust and big changes in the country. He was speaking at a rally in Haryana. Modi said that in the past 100 days of the government at the Centre, the world and country had seen that India was now capable of “challenging any challenge”, be it decades old or of relating to the future.

“We know how to directly face challenges… Be it the issue of Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh or impending water crises. The 130 crore people of the country have started finding new solutions to the problems… To fulfil the aspirations of the people of Jammu-Kashmir and Ladakh we all have started working with a fresh approach,” he said.

On the occasion of 100-days of Modi government, Union Minister Prakash Javadekar addressed a Press Conference on key decisions taken by the government in the first hundred days of its second term.

“Modi government 2.0 in its first 100 days has made historic and landmark decisions, with speed, be it Jammu and Kashmir or decisions regarding Unlawful Activity Prevention Act or reflections on status of economy. These could be done because the preparations for these decisions began before elections,” Javadekar said.

He added that the theme of the government, he said, is to empower the poor, farmers, labourers, Dalits and all those who did not get their share of development.

Union Minister Nitin Gadkari has said that the government under the leadership of Prime Minister Modi has been working in a decisive and transparent manner, with the vision of development and with the goal of making India a super-economy in the world. He said that the 100 days of the government has been just the beginning, and that many more decisive actions and bold initiatives are going to be made in the coming years. The Minister said this, while addressing a press conference on 100 days of the Government, in Mumbai today.

Javadekar also released a booklet ‘Jan Connect’ and inaugurated an Exhibition on ‘Furthering India’s Development – 100 days of Bold Initiatives & Decisive Actions’. The Booklet contains a compendium of key decisions of the government in hundred days.

Philosophical and Historical Foundations of American Secularism 1 – Knowing History and Making History

Dr. Herb Silverman is the Founder of the Secular Coalition for America, the Founder of the Secular Humanists of the Lowcountry, and the Founder of the Atheist/Humanist Alliance student group at the College of Charleston. He authored Complex variables (1975), Candidate Without a Prayer: An Autobiography of a Jewish Atheist in the Bible Belt (2012) and An Atheist Stranger in a Strange Religious Land: Selected Writings from the Bible Belt (2017). He co-authored The Fundamentals of Extremism: The Christian Right in America (2003) with Kimberley Blaker and Edward S. Buckner, Complex Variables with Applications (2007) with Saminathan Ponnusamy, and Short Reflections on Secularism (2019).

Here we talk about the beginnings of American secularism.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: Herb, you made American history for the secular communities. This remains the fact of the matter. In the secular world, you exist as an icon and, in fact, a beloved one, as a mild-mannered liberal Jewish Yankee mathematician atheist who found his way, ironically, into the world of politics of Republican owned South Carolina. What is the feeling in the latter half of life in reflection of these facts, these achievements? When did American secularism start? What founding philosophy set this forth? Before America existed as a bounded geography, what Native American traditions seem to reflect secular ideals?

Dr. Herb Silverman: Thank you so much for your kind words. I don’t think of myself as an icon, just someone who stumbled into an unusual situation. When I learned in 1990 that our South Carolina Constitution prohibited atheists from holding public office, I spoke to a lawyer at the American Civil Liberties Union to see how this unconstitutional provision could be changed. He told me that an atheist would need to mount a legal challenge by running for governor, and he said that the very best candidate would be me. There was no competition, so after giving it some thought, I agreed to be the Candidate Without a Prayer. Finally, in 1997 the South Carolina Supreme Court ruled unanimously in my favour, nullifying the anti-atheist clause in the South Carolina Constitution.

All the credit for my Supreme Court victory belongs to my lawyers. I was just having fun giving talks and writing about my experiences. I also learned about and became engaged with the secular movement, leading me to help organize what became the Secular Coalition for America.

I’m optimistic about the future. The secular movement is growing, both formally through secular organizations and informally through “nones.” The “nones,” those who don’t subscribe to any faith, are the fastest growing “religion” in the United States, especially among young people. Some of the “nones” got fed up with their conservative religion that was anti-LGBTQ, anti-women’s rights, and anti-science, with little emphasis on loving their neighbour. Pedophilia has also discouraged people from maintaining their church affiliation.

On the other hand, religious fundamentalists continue to flourish during this period of increasing secularization. Influence of religion at the highest levels of government under Donald Trump has never been stronger. It is up to secularists working with all who favour separation of religion and government to counter the influence of religion in government.

Religious fundamentalists often claim that America is a Christian nation. It is, in the same way that America is predominantly a white nation. The majority of Americans are both white and Christian. However, we are not now, nor have we ever officially been, a white nation or a Christian nation. Those who believe America was once a Christian nation may be hearkening back to the first Europeans who settled here, before America became a nation.

Those Pilgrims and Puritans were religious dissenters from Europe who sought freedom of worship in America for their own religion, but most definitely not for other religions. They had no use for religious liberty. Most of the early colonies made blasphemy a crime, an offence that could be punishable by death. Those colonies were mostly theocracies, where people who believed in the “wrong” religion were excluded from government participation and persecuted. For example, the Puritans, who established the Massachusetts Bay colony in 1630, required all Massachusetts citizens to pay a tax to the Puritan Church. This church-state union led to the Salem witch trials of 1692, based on the biblical mandate: “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.”

In the American Revolution that started in 1776, political leaders began to construct a new federal government. The soon-to-be United States of America not only declared independence from England, but also declared something even more radical—that “Governments are instituted among men deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” Americans rejected kings crowned by bishops, who had been supposedly vested with a God-given authority to rule through “divine right.”

The framers of the U.S. Constitution wanted no part of the religious intolerance and bloodshed they saw in Europe. They wisely established the first government in history to separate religion and government. James Madison, affectionately known as the Father of our Constitution, said, “The purpose of separation of church and state is to keep forever from these shores the endless strife that has soaked the soil of Europe in blood for centuries.” Our founders understood the devastating nature of holy wars. They wisely established a secular nation whose authority rests with “We the People” (the first three words of the U.S. Constitution) and not with “Thou the Deity.”

Our founders were products of the Enlightenment. We can consider many of them freethinkers who felt that humans should not be governed by faith in the supernatural, but on reason and evidence from the natural world. Some were deists, believing in Nature’s God who set the laws of nature in motion and then retired as deity emeritus. Before Darwin and what we know of modern science, I, too, might have been a deist at that time.

The founders wrote the Constitution as a secular document, not because they were hostile to Christianity or religion but because they did not want the new federal government to have authority over religion or to meddle in it. Government must not favor one religion over another, or religion over non-religion. That’s why there are only two references to religion in the Constitution, and both are exclusionary. One is Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution: “No religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” The other is in the First Amendment to the Bill of Rights: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.” This guarantees American citizens freedom of conscience, the right to practice any religion or no religion.

No one’s religious liberty should feel threatened when the wall of separation between government and religion is kept strong and high. There is only one “religious liberty” Americans lack: The freedom to enlist the government to force others to acknowledge or support specific religious ideas. Unlike what many religious fundamentalists think, government neutrality is not government hostility toward religion. Our secular laws are based on the human principle of “justice for all,” and our civil government enforces those laws through a secular criminal justice system. 

Sinclair Lewis, the first American to win the Nobel Prize in literature, might have foreseen what could happen if the religious right were to triumph in America. In 1939, he made this chilling statement after spending six months observing Hitler’s rise in Germany: “When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the American flag carrying a cross.” 

Beginning with Christopher Columbus, many Native Americans (then called savages) were enslaved and forced to convert to Christianity. They lost their land and were later forcibly put onto reservations, leaving the rich land they had lived on to Christian settlers ready to work for God and Country. The majority of Native American tribes, many of whom were agricultural, had no concept of dominion over the land.

Most Native American religions did not distinguish between the spiritual world and the natural world. Few Native American religions were considered absolutely unchangeable. Traditions varied from group to group, making their spirituality much less rigid than Christianity. What I like about Native American religions is that they don’t try to convert anyone. They accept that people have the religious freedom to believe and practice whatever they want. That’s also true of some religions today, but the most troublesome religious denominations are those that feel they deserve special rights and that they are obligated by God to convince everyone else of their one and only “truth.”

Jacobsen: Thank you for the opportunity and your time, Dr. Silverman.

Photo by Luke Stackpoole on Unsplash

Student films from 17 countries to be screened in Campus Film Festival in Delhi

With 41 student films from 17 countries participating in the 3rd edition of U-Special International Campus film festival, it’s going to be a visual treat for film lovers in Delhi. To be screened at multiple campuses in Delhi-NCR, the festival will also conduct masterclasses and workshops on filmmaking.

It is worth noting that U-Special International Campus film festival is India’s only global campus film festival, promoting student film.  The festival was launched in 2016 by Kirorimal College alumni and journalist Rao Narender Yadav, to provide a credible platform to student filmmakers from all across the globe. The 3rd annual edition of the festival will be organised from September 20th to November 8th, 2019 at several campuses across New Delhi. According to Rao, “This fest is a creative platform for the next generation of filmmakers to tell their stories, inspire hope and provoke change through filmmaking. Providing an exciting opportunity to various genres of young filmmakers this fest is poised to become the largest congregation of young minds in India.”

Prominent universities which will be having their films in the festival includes Rochester Institute of Technology, New York, Sri Aurobindo Centre of Arts & Communication, University of the West of England – UWE Bristol, National Institute of Design, Symbiosis Centre for Media & Communication (SCMC), Whistling Woods International, Kyoto University, Sussex County Technical School, Central Washington University, Scottsdale Community College, School of Art and Design Kassel, Curtin University, University of Portsmouth, Marmara University, DePaul – College of Computing and Digital Media, New York Film Academy, University of Gothenburg, Napier University, University of Music and Performing Arts, EICAR, The International Film and Television School of Paris, Beijing Film Academy, Istanbul Sehir University and Iranian Youth Cinema Society.

The festival organisers have recently appointed 30 Campus Ambassadors to make it a youth driven and owned film festival. For this, U-Special team has entered into a collaboration with Vivekananda Institute of Professional Studies (VIPS), which is affiliated to Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University.

Prime Minister Lauds the efforts of India’s Space Scientists

Even as the Chandrayan 2 Mission lost its communication with the Control Centre at the ISRO headquarters, Prime Minister Narendra Modi who was witnessing the descent of the Chandrayan 2 along with the ISRO Scientists at Bengaluru said “India is proud of our scientists! They’ve given their best and have always made India proud. These are moments to be courageous, and courageous we will be!”

In a personalized effort to boost the morale of the scientists, Prime Minister said “The country is with you, I am with you. The effort was worth it and so was the journey “

“You are those people who work for Mother India’s victory and struggle for it and have a grit and determination to make her proud. “

“I could feel and sense your despondency and emotions last night. I was amongst you when the communication from the Vehicle was lost. There are several unanswered questions but I am sure you would find the answers. I know there was hard work behind.”

“We might have faced a small setback in our journey but this would not let down our zeal and enthusiasm to achieve our goals”

Our resolve strengthens now.

“The whole nation was awake last night in solidarity with our scientist sisters and brothers. We came very close to the surface of the moon and that effort is highly laudable. “

“We are proud of our space programme and scientists, their hard work and determination has ensured a better life not only for our citizens but also other nations. It is their outcome of their innovative zeal that several people got better quality of life including better health care and education.”

“India knows that there would be many more proud moments to rejoice.”

“When it comes to space programme the best is yet to come.”

“There are new frontiers to discover and new places to go. We will rise to the occasion and scale newer heights of success. “

“To our scientists I want to say, India is with you. True to your nature, you ventured into a place where no one had never gone before.”

 “You have gone as close as you could. I can proudly say the effort was worth it and so was the journey

Our team worked hard and travelled far, and those teachings will always remain with us”

“The learning from today will get us a stronger and better tomorrow”

“I thank the families of our space scientists. Their silent but valuable support remains a major strength in our effort.”

“Sisters and brothers, resilience and tenacity are centre to India’s ethos. In our glorious history we may have faced moments that could have crushed us but we never gave up. This is the reason our civilization stands tall.”

In our glorious history we may have faced moments that could have crushed us but we never gave up. This is the reason our civilization stands tall.”

 “We have made historical achievements. I know that ISRO also does not failures to let it down”

“There will be a new dawn and a better tomorrow. Without worrying about results we go ahead and that is our history.”

I have confidence in you. Your dreams are higher than mine. And I am fully confident on your hopes.

I am meeting you to get inspiration from you. You are a sea of inspiration and a living evidence of inspiration

I congratulate you all and wish you all the best in your endeavours.

Negative reviews fail to dent Saaho’s box office collections; Crosses 370 Cr

Despite widespread criticism, multilingual film Saaho continues to mint money at the box office. The film has currently crossed Rs. 350 crore worldwide. One of the major reasons for the film’s success is that is has been a trilingual release. It was shot simultaneously in Hindi, Tamil, and Telugu.

The Hindi version of Prabhas starrer has earned Rs 116.03 crore. Saaho makers UV Creations on Friday took to Twitter to share, “Setting Box Office on Fire #Saaho collects whopping 370 Cr+ gross & Counting in 7 days worldwide!” Taran Adarsh shared on Twitter, “#Saaho has an excellent Week 1… Is the fourth highest *Week 1* grosser of 2019… Fri 24.40 cr, Sat 25.20 cr, Sun 29.48 cr, Mon 14.20 cr, Tue 9.10 cr, Wed 6.90 cr, Thu 6.75 cr. Total: ₹ 116.03 cr Nett BOC. #India biz. #Hindi version.”

Prabhas and Shraddha Kapoor are riding the high tide with their first project together. Celebrating the achievement Prabhas took to Instagram to thank fans. In the post, he stated, “This film is what it is because of the sheer appreciation and incredible response you all have given. Lots of love to you all!”

Though Saaho is enjoying a good earning, the film’s story has been criticized by many for being dull and to be fuelled only by action sequences. Critics have pointed out weak story and a confusing screenplay, making it exhausting to watch the film.

Meanwhile, Director Sujeeth, in his Instagram post, asked the audience to give Saaho a second chance.

He wrote, “Made my first short film when I was 17 years old. No money, No team but had lot of support from Orkut and family. I edited, shot and directed 90% of my short films. I learned from my mistakes and criticism was always like extra boost for my journey. Travelled very long way and faced many hurdles but never gave up. TODAY MANY PEOPLE saw SAAHO – some expected more from it, but many loved it! Thanks to all for watching the movie 🙂 Please watch it again if you missed anything. I am sure you’ll enjoy even more. #Saaho.

Remove restrictions, but strengthen security in Kashmir

A month has gone by since the process of reorganisation of the state of Jammu and Kashmir was initiated in the Indian parliament and the legislation passed with a vast majority. Nothing has changed on ground since the decision is to be implemented on October 31, 2019. The matter, however, has elicited considerable reactions from various quarters at the local, national and international levels.

The prediction of widespread unrest in the state, especially in Kashmir Valley, has come to a naught. It seems that the people had anticipated that something of this sort would happen, revocation of Article 370 being an election promise of the ruling NDA dispensation. The people of Kashmir have a long term plan that revolves around getting financial and other benefits from the government instead of following the path of agitation. 

It is also quite obvious that the people are quite happy at the prospect of ridding themselves of the local leadership that is restricted to a few families of the Kashmir region. The space is now open for new leaders. They, however, will need to be honest, accountable and responsible if they wish to survive. The people are unlikely to repeat the mistakes of the past.  

New Delhi, on its part, is determined to weed out corruption from the state. The conduct of Panchayat and local bodies’ elections to ensure devolution of power at the grass roots and direct transfer of subsidies and aid to the beneficiaries are two major steps taken in this direction. Good governance will be the predominant buzz word in the “Naya (new) Jammu and Kashmir.”

At the national level, the decision created a frenzy, as was expected. Political parties, media houses, non-government organisations, intellectual circles fell over each other to get their voices heard. Quite clearly lots of “lobby fees” exchanged hands and, on this basis, positions and postures were adopted. The vituperative rhetoric against the move failed to break the resolve of the government, nor could it gain public support.

Now the inevitable “Kashmir fatigue” has set in. The so-called liberals have excused themselves from their pay masters with a “we tried our best” narrative. Political parties that depend on mindless opposition to survive are looking for other matters to hound the government with. For them, the “economic recession” narrative has come up as an apt alternative to keep their trade going and they have taken to it like fish takes to water. Kashmir stands relegated to the deep recesses of public memory.

The international community has, since long, decided to desist from wasting valuable diplomatic time and money on the flips flops that mark the Kashmir imbroglio. They were quick to term it as an “internal issue” and move on without getting engaged. Even US President Donald Trump has realised that he had created a problem for himself by offering to “mediate on the Kashmir issue” and has extricated himself from the mess.

The worst affected by the course of events is the political leadership of Pakistan. Prime Minister Imran Khan is in a very difficult situation indeed. He has built his political career on anti-India, pro-Kashmir rhetoric and now holds his position only on the goodwill of the Pak Army, which in turn, owes its survival to the “K” issue. Imran Khan needs to do something fast but is terribly devoid of options. He has received no assistance from the international community except some good words from China; he is not in a position to influence Prime Minister Narendra Modi to get some concessions; he cannot get into open conflict against India due to financial and military wherewithal constraints. In frustration, Imran Khan is making wild statements ranging from threat of nuclear war to downright knee-bent requests to start a dialogue process. It seems that Imran Khan will be the only casualty in the script being played out in Kashmir.

It is time for the government of India to pragmatically reassess the situation and carry out policy corrections in wake of the developing circumstances. Security should continue to remain centre stage in the evolving policy; local terrorism needs to be contained and eradicated in the shortest period of time. Pakistani attempts to increase the threshold of terrorism by infiltrating trained cadre and warlike stores, especially rifles and ammunition, has to be nipped in the bud. Effective counter-terrorism operations in the hinterland and counter-infiltration operations along the Line of Control, therefore, should be at the crux of the government’s policy.

Fortunately, the Indian Army is well poised and confident of playing out this role to the hilt. In a recent press conference, the General Officer Commanding at the Srinagar-based Chinar Corps said that two Pakistani nationals have been captured and many more killed while attempting infiltration. This has come as a morale booster and has sent a clear message to Pakistan that it will not succeed in its nefarious designs.

With a tight grip on the terrorist activities the centre can look at easing the restrictions soonest. It is appreciated that the government wishes to showcase this changeover as having been conducted without a single casualty, but, this requirement also needs to be balanced with the negative fallout of the discomfort being faced by the people. The opening up of movement and landline facility has greatly eased the situation; it has also indicated that a surging disruption and agitation is not likely. Under the circumstances, confinement and checks, especially curbs on communication can be done away with since they are causing avoidable friction and abrasiveness. It may be better to open up, allow the few disruptive incidents that are inevitable to take place and get it over with. The leadership that is known to create dissension can be kept under detention.

It is very clear that the changed status in Jammu and Kashmir is there to stay and the same has been accepted by the people. The next step should be to ensure that it accrues to the people the peace and prosperity that they crave for. Only then will it be accepted as a good and positive move.

India Pavilion at 44th Toronto International Film Festival 2019 Inaugurated

High Commissioner of India to Canada Vikas Swarup recently inaugurated the India Pavilion at the 44th Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) 2019. The Inauguration of India Pavilion at TIFF 2019 will provide a platform to showcase Indian Cinema in the overseas market and facilitate new business opportunities.

The Ministry of Information & Broadcasting, Government of India, in collaboration with Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) is participating at the ‘Toronto International Film Festival’ from 5-15 September 2019 in Toronto, Canada. The Indian Delegation includes Chaitanya Prasad, Additional Director General, Directorate of Film Festivals and Dhanpreet Kaur, Deputy Secretary (Films), Ministry of Information & Broadcasting.

A key highlight of the inauguration related to the Golden Jubilee Edition of IFFI to be held in Goa later this year. IFFI 2019 poster and brochure were also released. Participants evinced keen interest regarding the various programming verticals, retrospectives, masterclasses, & in-conversation sessions in the Festival. A number of them expressed their keenness to come to Goa as Cine Appreciators & participants for the technical sessions to be held in IFFI.

Speaking on the occasion, Vikas Swarup said, “Indian movies have created new benchmark in film making globally. Every Film Festival today acknowledges the enormous potential of India’s soft Power. TIFF provides the ideal platform for the global outreach of the 50th International Film Festival of India (IFFI) 2019. Film-makers of the Global Film Fraternity have got an opportunity to understand the key elements of the Festival and the impact of the Indian Cinema on film making globally.”

Around 60 eminent personalities from the Film-making sector & Film Festivals, participated at the Inauguration Ceremony of the India Pavilion. Some of the eminent persons present included Geoff Macnaughton, Director of Industry, Toronto International Film Festival; Hannah Fisher, Senior International Program Consultant, Heartland Film Festival, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA; Roger Nair, CEO, Lionheart Production House;  Jana Wolff, Head – Marketing, European Film Market; Brittany Allan, Senior Coordinator – Industry, Toronto International Film Festival among others.

Discussions were held on a wide range of topics which included Participation in the Golden Jubilee edition of IFFI, 2019 including details regarding the nature of the programming during the Festival. A number of participants showed keen interest in understanding the policy framework on matters related to Co-production Agreements and Ease of Doing Business in the domain of Indian Media & Entertainment Industry. Stakeholders were also informed about the initiatives undertaken by the Government related to Single Window Clearance for filming in India. 

Sports and Religion: A New Challenge?

Annie Sugier, president of the League of International Women’s Law, calls upon the Organizing Committee of the Paris Olympics 2024 to strictly apply the letter of Olympic Charter. She is ably supported by several eminent personalities and associations in her tribune to the “World”. 

The interference of religion in sports is undoubtedly a current issue that is embarrassing both for public authorities as well as for sports leaders. A revealing example: The actions of “civil disobedience” in a Grenoble public swimming pool by some fifteen burkini-clad women, claiming the right to swim there in ultra-modest bathing suits. This was formally forbidden by the bylaws.

Reacting to this situation, the environmental mayor of Grenoble calls on the President of the Republic to decide: “Does the government want public swimming pools to be, like schools, sanctuaries protected from religions, and thus with an attitude contrary to the present position of national institutions such as the Observatory of Laicity (secularism) and the Defender of Rights?”

Similarly, the reporters of the Parliamentary mission on “public services, faced with radicalization,” mention a proposal inspired by the French Law forbidding religious symbols in public schools: “…there might be therein a line of approach even if the possibilities for regulating religious behavior (even ostensible) seem limited in privatized sports structures (…)”.

The terms of the debate are thus set: On the one hand, an official vision of Laicity (a form of secularism with narrow vision), on the other, the promotion of an educational value of sport allowing more strict rules. 

Reasserting the boundaries of laicity (secularism), guides have been developed to help supervisors manage such conflicts. The UFOLEP (the first multi-sport federation in France) published “the C.O.D.E. of sport and laicity“, followed by the Ministry of Sports, with its “Laicity and religion in sports“.

Impotence dominates

From the start, the Ministry of Sports states: “The ambition of this guide is to demonstrate that the expression of religion and laicity (secularism) are not, in themselves, incompatible in the field of sports“. The UFOLEP is even more specific; it quotes Pierre Tournemire, an administrator of the Ligue de l’Enseignement (League of Education): “Our society is multicultural sustainably. Identity claims or religious practices must be legitimately expressed in the public space without constraint or suspicion, only on the conditions specified for public space”.

These guides propose a simple message: Laicity (secularism) applies only to professionals in the status of public officials. Where practicing religious people are concerned, their freedom to show their convictions and beliefs must be protected on the condition that public order is not affected. The authors immediately add that the idea of public order must be dealt with carefully, since “it might hide a potential discrimination for a religious purpose”. This caveat ignores the fact that the religious motivation itself masks sexist discrimination.

In short, there’s a serious lack of any political analysis of the societal functions of sport, and what dominates is impotence. Should we really accept that?

Nicolas Cadène, General Rapporteur of the above mentioned Observatory of Laicity in an intervention annexed to the Sports Ministry’s guide, reasserts the limits of Laicity (secularism), but proposes an interesting solution: “Here, in reality, it is not laicity (secularism) that is concerned.  Forbidding proselytism stems from the values of sport, recalled in particular in Rule 50 of the Olympic Charter as well as in Law 4 of the FIFA, concerning football”.

This view is consonant with the Belgian association, the Brussels Wallonie Panathlon, the armed branch of the Belgian Olympic Movement for ethics in sport. On the initiative of its President, Philippe Houssiaux, three symposia were organised with representatives of sports, religions and laicity (secularism), which resulted in the declaration: “Sport, the Spirit of Humanity” where primary element is the following: “Whereas each person engaging in sport possesses their own rich values and philosophies of life or of belonging, he/she accepts that once they cross the threshold or enter the sporting arena, they will agree, with no exceptions, to adopt and conform to the rules of sport in the widest sense, without promoting their philosophical convictions in an ostentatious or intolerant fashion, in any way whatsoever.”

With this same concern in mind, the League of Women’s International Rights, supported by over 100 organisations and more than 360 personalities, appealed to the Organising Committee of the 2024 Paris Games (COJO) demanding the application of the Olympic Charter and punishments for failures to comply.  Among the offenders are Iran and Saudi Arabia, both of which submit their women athletes to strict sexual apartheid (participation only in such disciplines judged to be “Quranic”, bodies covered from head to toe and “women only” sports). Because these Games are mirrors of our societies, Paris must be exemplary. Let us recall that over 50 metropolises in the world upheld our candidacy saying that: “Paris has the necessary assets and the will to give a new vigour to Olympic values”. If Paris refuses to apply the Olympic Charter to sex-based discrimination in the same way that it has in the past applied it to racial discrimination, then its inconsistency, far from being a protection against discrimination will become an egregious example of it. 

Also, sports must be governed by the same rule for all. Only thus will sports remain a space for learning the respect of the one Olympic rule.

The tribune was first published in French in the newspaper Le Monde. Given below is the link to the tribune and in it the first 380 signatories of the Paris 2024 petition

LeMonde.fr/idees/article

Noose tightens around ‘Kingpin’ Chidambaram

The corruption cases involving senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, who is also a sitting member of the Rajya sabha and influential member of Congress Working Committee (CWC) have been in the limelight ever since CBI (Central Bureau of Investigation) and ED (Enforcement Directorate) officials arrested him from his residence on August 21 night. In a dramatic turn of events CBI officials had to scale the walls of Chidambaram’s Jor Bagh residence to arrest him as he made himself unavailable for the first 27 hours after his anticipatory bail plea was rejected by Delhi High Court saying that the INX media case was a “classic case of money laundering” and the facts prima facie reveal that Chidambaram is the kingpin and the key conspirator in the case.

Chidambaram is facing charges of corruption in a 2007-08 case related to FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board) approval for foreign funds to the tune of Rs 305 crore. CBI is probing corruption angle in the INX Media case and ED is investigating charges of money laundering.

Background

CBI in its probe found that there were irregularities in the grant of FIPB clearance of INX Media. INX Media was owned by media entrepreneurs Peter Mukerjea and his wife Indrani Mukerjea who are currently in a Mumbai jail for killing Sheena Bora, Indrani Mukerjea’s daughter from her ex-husband. In March 2007, INX Media had approached the finance ministry for issuing 14.98 lakh equity shares and 31.22 lakh convertible non-cumulative redeemable preference shares. Each share was to be priced at Rs 10 a piece and was to be owned by three non-resident investors under the FDI norms. The finance ministry approved the request in May 2007. Back then Chidambaram was the finance minister. This implied that INX Media was allowed to receive foreign fund of Rs 4.62 crore. But the company went on to receive foreign funds to the tune of Rs 305 crore from three Mauritius-based firms. INX Media also invested money in INX News which is another violation of the FIPB order. Thus this media group managed to flout the conditional FIPB approval and received foreign funds of Rs 305 crore against the approved inflow of Rs 4.62 crore. CBI probe reveals that the foreign firms bought each share for Rs 862.31 that was at a price more than 86 times of the face value.

His son, Karti Chidambaram, is also accused in this case as he is the founder director of Chess Management Services — the company which was engaged by INX Media to settle the matter amicably with finance ministry when income tax department, ED and financial intelligence unit raised questions and sought clarification from INX media.

Karti is said to have used his influences in his father’s ministry in 2008 to favour INX Media, and P Chidambaram was party to all this fraud. This has been backed by a statement from Indrani Mukerjea, who has turned approver in this matter on July 4 this year. Indrani Mukerjea has said it clearly that INX Media got a favourable deal after she had a meeting with P Chidambaram seeking FIPB clearance in 2008.

The Questions

In his defence, Chidambaram has said that FIPB decisions were taken by Finance Ministry officials and the FIPB. Now the question arises as to why the board members and ministry officials would have a soft corner for INX Media group without any motive. Were they bribed? Were they pressurised by the then finance minister P Chidambaram? Or Chidambaram simply connived with them? In either of the case, it points to culpability of the then finance minister Chidambaram.

CBI even called Sindhushree Khullar, former CEO Niti Aayog, to confront her with Chidambaram to cross check his claim. Khullar was additional secretary in the Department of Economic Affairs when Chidambaram was finance minister.

Definitely there are layers and layers of concealing and involvement of the then finance minister which cannot be denied outright. But Chidambaram and his son have accused government of running a vilification campaign against them to demonize and humiliate them. Karti called it a political witch hunt and went on to say that outrageous media leaks are the preferred tactics of Enforcement Directorate. P Chidambaram too has been evasive and non-cooperative in his replies during his questioning and has even objected to ED handing over the investigation material to the court in a sealed cover.

How were the anomalies detected

In January 2008, the financial intelligence unit of the finance ministry found an anomaly in money flow from three Mauritius-based firms into a media venture called INX Media. As it involved foreign funds, the Income Tax Department in Mumbai forwarded this case to the Enforcement Directorate (ED), which began probing the flow of funds to see if money was laundered. The ED investigation pointed towards large scale corruption with involvement of powerful people. The ED then referred the matter to Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI), which registered an FIR in INX Media case on May 15, 2017. Last year, ED too lodged a separate case of money laundering. Chidambaram has been booked under Sections 420 and 120B of IPC (Indian Penal Code) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. His son, Karti was also arrested by the CBI on Feb 28, 2018 for 12 days. Last year in May Chidambaram had moved to the courts seeking interim protection fearing arrest in the case, and had been enjoying interim protection against arrest for the past 13 to 15 months. The big point is that no common man enjoys such protection for so long. And still he cries vendetta politics.

Probe findings

In its probe against Chidambaram in money laundering case, ED found that financial intelligence unit has given specific inputs that former finance minister and his co-conspirators had accounts or valuable properties in Argentina, Austria, British Virgin Islands, France, Greece, Malaysia, Monaco, Philippines, Singapore, South  Africa, Spain and Sri Lanka. ED also told the Supreme Court that persons with “close” links to Chidambaram had set up a web of shell companies in India and abroad to launder money. The shell companies have been created so as to make it difficult for law enforcement agencies to track the money trail. According to the ED, accounts of one of the shell companies has been closed and another account has been opened by a co-conspirator. All this to fool the agencies. Chidambaram and his co-conspirators have changed the share holding pattern of shell companies and have made changes in directors so as to distance himself and his family from the money already laundered and invested. ED claims that 17 benami foreign bank accounts have been found through which money is laundered.

The ED in its response to the apex court said that it has found, “Two individuals ….acted as agents of Chidambaram and interacted with the parties applying for FIPB approval including INX Media as well as collected the proceeds of crimes on behalf of/at the behest of petitioner- accused”. CBI sought Chidambaram’s custodial remand only after the triple test of flight risk, non-cooperation and tampering got satisfied. According to ED, Chidambaram and his co-conspirators not only tampered with the documents but also influenced the witnesses.

The father-son duo are also facing charges in another case of controversial FIPB clearance of Rs 3,500 crore which is related to Aircel-Maxis deal of 2006. Only the Cabinet Committee on Economic Affairs was empowered to clear it but P Chidambaram, one of the most powerful ministers in erstwhile UPA government Okayed it in his capacity as finance minister as his own son was party to it. The ED is also probing money laundering angle in the Aircel-Maxis deal.

With the ongoing probe by CBI and ED, it is sure that what has so far been seen is just the tip of iceberg. Much will be revealed in the upcoming days.

New Motor Vehicles Act provides for very strict penalties

The new Motor Vehicles Act laws that came into effect from September 1, 2019 are draconian in nature, to say the least. The automobile industry is in the midst of a crisis, and the new law may be a severe deterrent to its progress. While, some provisions of the law like enhancement of compensation for road victims, protecting good samaritans, fixing responsibility of contractors and road safety boards are in public interest, but many other provisions are quite cumbersome. Why a fine of Rs 100 to Rs 500 has to be increased ten-fold? The rationale has neither been explained nor have the social conditions been taken into account.

The new law has peculiar provisions like penalizing guardians of juveniles and even putting them in jail, cancellation of registration and suspension of driving licence. These are not only superfluous but also against the basic concept of empowering citizens. These apart, it would mostly be used as coercive extortive tactics by the law-enforcement agencies. Instead of solving the problem, it adds to it.

Even today all over the country, millions of impounded vehicles are parked at every police station. These have become junks. Neither the owner is prepared to take these back nor can authorities dispose it off being case properties. These are tremendous wastage of wealth. The law has not respected the concept that a car is a private property and the state cannot on any ground except severe criminal culpability impound it. Moreover impounding of vehicles only compounds the problem. Unnecessary provisions need to be scrapped.

Then levying fines for over speeding have been increased to Rs 1000 to Rs 2000. It is too heavy. Most drivers are fined for driving 2 to 4 km above the 50 km limit. This should better be given up as in normal circumstances even a speed of 80 km is safe. It has not taken into account that modern vehicles zoom to 70/80 km even without pressing the accelerator. Rash driving is a different issue. It entails a fine of Rs 5000. But would that stop it? It has been observed that rash drivers often skip notice and not prosecuted. But a sober one crossing the limit by a km is penalized. Jumping a signal costs Rs 5000.

Another problem is with the insurance. As per law it is already a compulsion. The new provisions have not taken into account that insurance charges have been increased manifold. Higher the charges higher would be default. The rates must be affordable and the law must ensure it.

Overall, the basic tenet of the law is not adhered to while drafting and enacting this law. Mere inducing fear among people by imposition of severe penalties is not a solution. It does not reduce incidence of violation but empowers the enforcers to coerce and extort. The law is apparently a creation of such people.

While enacting this kind of law one forgets the adage that more stringent a law more is the corruption. The powerful are not subjected to law. They skip with their clout. Others skip it if they can grease the palms. But could any lawmaker tell the nation how many have the capacity to pay a fine of Rs 10,000 or more?

Entire effort seems to be revenue realization for an administration that is crying hoarse of its increasing expenses and shortfall in revenue. The practice is to extort the maximum from the common man even to his ruin. This is a prescription for disaster.  

The country forgets that one improper environmental dictum ushered by the National Green Tribunals of junking ten-year-old working vehicles is playing havoc. The NGT’s quixotic order has put a brake on car sales, new and old. Many had alleged that the NGT had issued such orders to boost car sales. It is also an example of NGT’s concern for the environment! It does not apparently know that manufacturing a new car is more polluting than the one in use. The US and the West encourages buying one-year old cars and pushes resale as a new car pollutes more and allows these to ply for 40 years. The resale industry is in jeopardy here. Since resale is difficult, new car sales are affected. The reduced demand is affecting the automobile sector. Sales have come down drastically by over 30 percent or more. The new MV Act would add to the problem.

The new law seems to create more problems than solving it. The law that was aimed at weeding out corruption and improving road safety is likely to do the contrary. The Yamuna-type expressways are badly designed where tyre bursts are common due to faulty grid-marks. The loops are also inappropriate. But instead of the road operator, drivers are being penalized.

Let the nation and the lawmakers rethink. It calls for immediate review of the law. Like the Delhi rent control act that was passed over decades ago in a jiffy, it needs reconsideration. The new law needs to be sent back to the standing committee for detailed review. It should also follow a public debate. The need is for a simpler law imposing more responsibility and least fear. Such laws should not be designed for revenue generation.