Home Blog Page 361

Satire: Speed Breaker Country!

Have you ever seen an Indian walk? Well, they walk with a peculiar jerk (not insinuating anything but merely describing our gait) which is unusual, but unique to each region. Strangely this jerk is less prevalent on rural folks who are sans vehicle. I have always wondered why, then it hit me the way a speed breaker does that, it’s because of the permanent fixture of speed breakers (also called speed bumps/humps) at frequent but irregular intervals in all roads of India, be it urban or rural which we drive on.

‘Build speed breakers and bung in a road’ seems to be the administrative policy on roads. People dealing with this business such as the surface transport ministry officials, local civil authorities and traffic police attend specialised capsules with only the top of their batch getting selected to attend. Even contractors who build roads on speed breakers are looked at with awe and given special privileges when awarding contracts. They can charge twice a year for maintenance due to heavy tear and wear (naturally not much compassion is shown to the vehicle owners or victims of accidents!).

In India anybody can create a speed breaker, one just needs a little mud, stones, tar or cement (even big pipes or uneven grilled structures will do), which can be obtained/or stolen from a contractor. People will willingly help like we do with anybody who wishes to build a place of worship; but that is another story altogether.

The intensity, ferocity and periodicity of vertical and numerous 3D jerks is directly proportional to the frequency, height, inclination, composition, health of road including number of potholes, and whether the speed breaker is marked or unmarked. Multiple jerks of varying intensity due to multiple or multi-layered speed breakers is common (will call them breakers hereon, for sake of simplicity and truth). There are a group of people however, who promote it passionately like the orthopaedics specially spine surgeons, physio-therapists, quacks who quickly seize upon this back-breaking opportunity and lastly the Godmen and pandits whom people turn to when everything else fails. I will not be surprised if India has the maximum back and muscle ache population and consequently the healers.

Like we attribute a particular cuisine, habit, language, slang, diction to a specific region or city, like dosa to Tamil Nadu or colourful topi to a pahari, we possibly could attribute a particular type of jerky walk to a region like the Calcutta or Kanpur jerk, or fix his residence close to the national highway if the jerk frequency is low. Experts may even venture to guess if state of road has improved or deteriorated by a person’s walk!!!. ‘Has the state of roads in Ferozepore / Tanjore improved, or the number of speed breakers increased’ may be a query after identifying his typical walk with minor variation. So do we arrive at a natural deduction that every Indian is a jerk!

Police Commissioner (Traffic) rather than taking offence about people taking matters of speed into their own hands feels honoured. It will not surprise me to hear them boasting to each other about the number of breakers in their jurisdiction or putting up signposts like ‘Maximum Speed Breakers Street’, such as San Francisco proudly proclaims ownership of the ‘World’s Crookedest street’ with maximum hairpin bends. Soon our cities, towns and villagers will try to outdo each other to establish more and more breakers. Their structures have no consistency, and the more brutal they are the more credit the locals get. The fact that these structures have actually caused more accidents even death, and breakdown of motor vehicles is a cause for attributing more accolades and celebrations to the proud locals and justifies tougher to negotiate breakers.

It is a matter of principle that they will never be marked, lit up or warning boards put up, so that drivers are surprised violently. Delight is expressed if it catches more drivers unawares, more accidents occur and more people die, both in and out of the vehicle. This leads to more breakers of course and the vicious cycle continues. Another interesting trait observed is that the person who most vociferously protests against speed breakers is the first to demand a speed breaker outside his home/office. To make it more exciting breakers are thrown in for good measure along national highways specially after lulling drivers into supine, jerkless journeys causing mayhem and pileups especially in inclement weather and poor visibility conditions.

Post accidents/pile up reports and media have never blamed speed breakers for the horrific accidents, since remedial measures ‘make no news’. It is highly probable that the term ‘Breaking News’ came from speed breaker accidents like ‘Breaking News- 100 cars and 1000 bones broken in yet another pileup along NH 1’. In fact, penchant for higher percentage of breakers in some states or towns is born out by the fact that there are more ‘break ups’ between couples in those areas, and some even travel interstate to traverse such roads to signal their intent and literally break the news to their unwary partner. 

When some locals have had enough and protest strongly for a breaker audit, immediately a committee is set up which strenuously debates every technical and traffic detail. It is a fact that their report starts by strongly condemning speed breakers, and after detailed analysis recommends at least 50% more speed breakers but with different structures, dimensions and potency which can demolish any vehicle (I fear even tanks) on one traverse of the road. The committee even puts up notices on all new breakers proclaiming their ingenuity and degree of difficulty construction them. This one product is truly ‘Made in India’ and will soon be exported world-wide due its tremendous success and innovative-ness.

Could this speed breaker syndrome be an Indian trait? The cautious Indian hates innovation, ingenuity, excellence and meritocracy and consequently adores mediocrity, hates speed/ progress/ development, and loves speed breakers in life. Maybe, not in his own but in all other people’s lives. ‘Sharma ji is doing much better than me and contributing in all spheres, let’s throw a breaker at him’ is a common refrain. Rarely would you find a speed breaker-less road or an Indian, thus making it a road less travelled! Not surprisingly, it has been mastered into a fine art by our politicians to gain/or retain power, who don’t work for national interests and party political goals, but focus on throwing breakers on opposition party routes without realising that it slows down their own and national aspirations.

So fellow citizens and netizens, arise and remove the speed breakers in your roads and minds and see our ‘India Flying’. Zoom India is a better choice, but under present circumstances may not be appropriate!.

Nisar Ahmad on Pakistan, Afghanistan, War, Displacement, Rzgar Hama

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: How was family life growing up for you?

Nisar Ahmad: After migrating to Pakistan due to civil war in Afghanistan, life was hard for all Afghans in general. My father started working for an NGO far from our home, and would come only once a week. My mother took care of me and my other siblings. Life became very hard when my mom passed away when I was about 9 years old. My father working far away from home and with no mother, my older siblings were taking care of me. My father couldn’t find a job nearby, and it was hard for Afghans to find jobs. So he had no option. We couldn’t move to the place he worked because the city we lived in was cheaper.  It was really hard to grow up like that. Though everyone was showing love and care to me, I felt like being pitied. I felt inferior and eager for real love and care, and not just receiving care and love for not having a mother. I felt lonely and started to avoid people even from childhood. I went to school in Pakistan, and due to being reserved, I passed my time reading books. So I was a bright introvert student since my childhood. I remained topper in almost all years of my academic life.

Jacobsen: What has been the impact of war and displacement for you?

Ahmad: I was born in war. Like literally in war, in falling RPGs and bullets! So the effect of war is in my sub-conscious whether I like it or not. We lived in Pakistan as refugees far from our home and place of birth. I never felt at home at any time of my life. In Pakistan showing the identity as an Afghan meant inviting many kinds of hate, racism and discrimination. I felt like I had done a sin that was unforgivable. Being displaced meant that I lacked something very important that would make me human.

Jacobsen: How has education been a consistent story for you? Something stable in spite of all the instability?

Ahmad: As explained in the first paragraph, I felt very lonely and started avoiding people. Though I studied in government schools in Pakistan where the education standard is negligible, I was taking interest in every book that I came across. I read books, watched TV and kind of self-educate myself. As a refugee, I was a hard worker like other refugees. The difference was, they started selling shopping bags in the bazaar, and became good business people with time, and I put my efforts in academia.

Jacobsen: How did you come to meet Rzgar Hama?

Ahmad: When I lived in the shelter, near Vancouver Public Library in downtown Vancouver, I saw an advertisement on the library notice board while searching for job vacancies. It was about storytelling. So it attracted my interest and I emailed Rzgar.

Jacobsen: Why did you accept to take part in “My Home is a Suitcase”?

Ahmad: I took interest in “My Home is a Suitcase” because I wanted my story to be heard as my story is the story of millions of refugees that the world doesn’t know about. At first, telling my story, I felt like I was self-pitying, but then it became a goal of my life to raising my voice for all the refugees in the world. 

Jacobsen: Thanks so much, Nisar.

Photo by WantTo Create on Unsplash

A sword of Damocles on Franklin Templeton

Dark clouds of suspicion are hovering over Franklin Templeton and its plans to wind up six debt funds through an e-voting process. Many are calling it just the tip of the iceberg.

Let’s re-check some facts. India’s entire mutual fund industry has investments of approximately ₹25 lakh crores from the public of which ₹12 lakh crores is in debt. Hypothetically, if other debt funds fall in the same category as Franklin Templeton, and the unit holders do not raise their voice, they would lose a minimum of ₹7.2 lakh crores out of the ₹12 lakh crores.

At the heart of the controversy is six debt schemes and why Franklin Templeton was openly legitimising the erosion of these unit holders by putting a stamp of approval on the process. In  short, there is no logic in the move because Franklin Templeton had taken a line of credit to pay the investors. Now, the interest is borne by existing investors for the outgoing investors.

Now what is interesting is that Franklin Templeton has itself said the recovery of monies will take upto five years. Given the fact that the six schemes had ₹28,000 crores worth assets under management, average loss to the unitholders — taking 20% as average realisation – would be ₹22,400 crores.

In short, the entire principal amount is wiped off.

This is serious because in contrast to the equity schemes, debt schemes are considered more secure where the principal amount of the unit-holder is almost assured like deposits in the banks. Yet, there is no commitment either from Franklin Templeton or SEBI that at least the principal amount of all Unit-holders is secure and shall be repaid.

No wonder Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has also drawn flak, the market regulator coming under pressure from many investors who took to social media to ask why it was turning a blind eye to such a huge impact on the investors. Many even reminded SEBI about its preamble: To protect the interests of investors in securities and to promote the development of, and to regulate the securities market and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto.

Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI)–the market regulator

The market regulator has initiated a forensic audit and hired Choksi & Choksi, a top chartered firm, which will submit its report within a month. There are many charges hanging on Franklin Templeton, including if a whopping ₹4000 crores was moved out a day before their fund did the closure for redemption. Many are even asking SEBI if the lost cash was mostly structured to be handled outside. If this happens actually, clients may not object as they cannot seek legal remedy due to the nature of the cash or investment running into a whopping ₹20,000 crore plus. Many schemes have largely invested in one or few companies which means the borrower and the lender knew the arrangement and also had created alternate recourse.

There are other issues as well. Franklin Templeton ran the schemes as credit risk funds, which have a majority of investments in papers with lower credit rating. It was done by fund managers only because SEBI specified the duration of the securities but not credit ratings for debt scheme papers. It is quite possible that large portions of investments in the funds in question actually consisted of bonds and securities issued by companies belonging to certain business groups. Worse, the schemes had sizable exposure to unlisted papers. Franklin Templeton managers did not take care of credit risk. And eventually, when COVID-19 hit India, Franklin Templeton was unable to sell the papers in a market that froze in the wake of COVID-19.

“We are in receipt of the audit notice from the Regulator and continue to provide information as required,” said a Franklin Templeton Spokesperson.

Choksi & Choksi is likely to investigate if there were collusion between the fund house and bond-issuing corporates, and if there were instances of conflicts of interest of directors or senior officials, and if there were transactions that were prejudicial to the interest of investors in the schemes, and if there were any regulatory violations. The scope of investigation, in short, is unlimited. Franklin Templeton will have to answer all questions, the most important being whether there has been circumvention of rules on fund management.

On paper, the wound-up schemes which are no longer available for redemption after 23 April, 2020, include: Franklin India Ultra Short Bond Fund, Franklin India Short Term Income Fund, Franklin India Credit Risk Fund, Franklin India Low Duration Fund, Franklin India Dynamic Accrual Fund and Franklin India Income Opportunities Fund.

But the process of investigation is easier said than done. For the records, the Gujarat High court has stayed the e-voting process following a plea from 83 year-old Arzeen Piruz Khambatta, his wife Persis Khambatta and Khambatta family trust of soft drink major Rasna against Franklin Templeton alleging that the winding up of six debt schemes is improper, arbitrary, taken in haste and illegal. The total investment of these three entities in Franklin Templeton schemes is to the tune of  ₹6.55 crore. The family members also made Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) and Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) a party to the case. The matter will be next heard on 12 June.

Franklin had issued e-voting notices to 30,000 unit holders’ seeking authorisation to monetise the underlying securities set aside on May 28, 2020.

The Khambatta family alleged that the bona fide and innocent unit holders are being arm-twisted to accept the decision of winding up which is detrimental to them and taken solely to hide the acts of mismanagement of funds by Franklin Templeton.

The family said Franklin Templeton has not been run to the ground due to COVID-19 crisis but by conscious acts of mismanagement. These investments were neither prudent nor in-line with disclosures made in scheme related documents. “Public money has been misused for personal gains instead of making safe investments in tradable and investment grade securities,” the plea said, adding the fall in assets managed by these schemes between the lockdown announcement till winding up decision was  ₹5,200 crores or 17% of the AUM (assets under management). However, for the rest of the industry fall in AUM for the same category of funds was  ₹2,596 crore.

The abrupt winding-up of debt schemes is also under the lens of Madras High Court which directed to issue notices to Santosh Kamath (CEO), Sanjay Sapre (President), other key management people and trustees. The court also sought a status report from SEBI. An online petition is being planned for www.change.org to showcase unity & solidarity amongst unit-holders / investors which shall then be forwarded to Franklin Templeton Investments in the United States and also the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). The plea was filed by Chennai Financial Markets Accountability (CFMA), a society in Chennai to protect the interest of investors.

Tough times for Franklin Templeton.

Pak media is hiding army’s ugly face by misreporting Dannuk incident: Akhtar Nadeem Baloch

Pro-independence Baloch leader Akhtar Nadeem Baloch said that the Pakistani media is trying to hide the ugly face of Pakistan Army by misrepresenting the Dannuk incident. He explained that Pakistani TV channel ARY and several other state-controlled media channels are broadcasting a picture of 4-year old Bramsh Baloch saying that the girl was killed in alleged domestic violence in Rawalpindi.

Akhtar Nadeem Balcoh in his statement said that it’s not difficult to gauge that the Pakistani state and Pak Army are afraid of the historic protests across Baloch nation on the martyrdom of Bibi Malik Naz, and the assassination attempt of innocent little girl Bramsh Baloch. “Despite all their tactics the Pakistani state and the Pakistan Army have failed to suppress the protests. Now they are trying to misrepresent the incident through their controlled media,” said Akhtar Nadeem Baloch.

Sameer Safzal, Death Squad commander with Pakistan Army officers. This Death Squad is responsible for killing Malik Naz and seriously injuring her 4-year old daughter Bramsh.
Sameer Safzal, Death Squad commander with Pakistan Army officers. This Death Squad is responsible for killing Bibi Malik Naz and seriously injuring her 4-year old daughter Bramsh at Dannuk in occupied Balochistan on May 25.

He further explained that Pakistan’s state controlled media was trying to distort the facts only because pictures of Death Squad thugs with Pakistani parliamentary leaders and their military officers have been circulating in the media, and these photographs are evidence that all the Death Sqaud culprits involved in the Dannuk incident were on the payrolls of the Pakistan Army. “Therefore, the Pakistani media is engaged in an attempt to clear the Pakistan Army of its heinous acts,” said Akhtar Nadeem Baloch.

Historic protests against the Dannuk incident across occupied Balochistan has instilled a fear with the Pakistani establishment. “That is why the Pakistani soldiers accompanied by Pakistani TV channel reporters tried to hijack the public protest in Buleda by entering the procession and threatening them. People were intimidated and harassed but the Baloch nation is aware of the real killers.”

Akhtar Nadeem urged Balochistan and other oppressed nations that they should unite against the naked aggression of the occupying Pakistan Army and expose the bullying of this army in front of the world. “Martyr Malik Naz has given a new dimension to resistance and her martyrdom has shown that a gun is not always necessary to resist the oppressor, but an unarmed person can also destroy the oppressor with passive resistance.”

National Center for Science Education, Role in Promoting Race Equity

Two of my favourite people in the world, Ann Reid and Kenneth R. Miller/Ken Miller/Kenneth Miller, have issued a statement on behalf of the National Center for Science Education. Ann Reid is the Executive Director and Kenneth Miller is the Board Chair. Both have been doing, and are part of, a noble tradition for the proper education of the public on matters of science.

As the late and beloved Dr. Carl Sagan noted, we live in a world built on science and technology, where the discoveries of science build the frameworks for comprehension of the natural world from which the engineering and technology can emerge in the first place. Technology is science applied for some purpose or function, typically relevant to a human need or want – for frivolity or necessity.

The note from Reid and Miller opened:

Today, in all corners of our nation, attention has been focused on a long-standing problem that pervades all of American society, including its educational and scientific institutions — the problem of embedded, structural racism. Our nation is gripped by protests against the latest in a long and shameful history of incidents of racist violence against black Americans. We grieve with our fellow citizens who have had to live with fear, oppression, and injustice for centuries. All of us at NCSE are inspired by the tens of thousands of Americans putting their bodies at risk to raise their voices in protest.

I am inspired by the level of solidarity expressed by several organizations on the educational front with a forthright statement as to the facts of the matter and the expression of the core issue in a cogent presentation. The purpose of the National Center for Science Education is the provision of real education and information on the sciences to the public. Indeed, one of the main areas of emphasis has been the evolution versus creationism sociopolitical, not educational, controversy over the development of life.

“The overriding goal of the National Center for Science Education is to ensure that every student in every American school has access to an effective, accurate, and inspiring education in the sciences. Many obstacles have stood in the way of this goal,” Reid and Miller said, “including unreasoning and doctrinaire opposition to the findings of many branches of science. Throughout its history, NCSE has fought to remove these obstacles and ensure that all students learn to think critically about evidence and reject flawed and misleading arguments.”

As has been said in many contexts by others and myself, and not original to me, but to the scientists and the science educators, previous eras of science support the idea of race while modern science advanced to state “racism is based on a lie — the lie that there are meaningful biological differences among humans that correspond to the color of our skin. While we acknowledge that there are real biological consequences to the lived experience of race, evolution reminds us that the genetic variation within groups we designate as races is significantly larger than the variation between those groups. Evolution tells us that we are 99.9% the same at the level or our DNA.”

In short, the proper framing of a lot of the issues facing us: species. We are an evolved product of a naturalistic process and a natural universe. Science has been used, at times, for divisive purposes. However, the full arsenal of science would seem to support a more unifying framework to plug modern human rights notions into them. In that, we can build a more equitable and just society as we deem fit rather than not – and one of the bases for this is the modern theory of evolution and, therefore, the work of the National Center for Science Education, as they conclude:

Science education can be a force for good; for unifying rather than dividing. Towards that end, we at NCSE resolve to support educational and scientific professionals fighting racism and educational inequality at every level of our society. Specifically, we commit to expanding our efforts to provide science teachers with the resources and learning opportunities needed to help their students dismantle misconceptions about race. Our common future depends upon it.

Photo by Arthur Lambillotte on Unsplash

Jehovah’s Witnesses Reject Plasma Injections for COVID-19

*Updated June 8, 2020.*

The Jehovah’s Witnesses have issues with modern medical information because this is seen as against the tenets of the religious faith. In particular, they, for the most part or by theology, have an issue with blood transfusions.

As per the attempts to reduce the negative effects of Covid-19 to medical patients affected by Covid-19, the FDA or the Food and Drug Administration of the United States of America issued recommendations or guidelines for healthcare investigators and providers. It is based on some studies into convalescent plasma collected from Covid-19 patients who have recovered from the ill-effects of the virus. 

Even with the experimental nature of the treatment, there are some circumstances under which the treatment can be considered well-advised based on some scientists and doctors using it. However, the ones for this treatment would be serious or critical cases along with the symptomatology of Covid-19.

For those with critical case symptomatology themselves or individuals with family members who are, unfortunately, suffering under the suffocating ravages of Covid-19 (coming from SARS-CoV-2), these kinds of potential treatments could – literally – save your life or the life of a loved one, or just save a life of another human being. It becomes incumbent upon us to support science, medicine, and the appropriate application in order to “do no harm.” It’s both a principle of medical professionals and civilized society, i.e., reflective of a common drive of human beings when not driven into insane circumstances.

Unfortunately, while many religious principles reflect some universal sentiments in human beings, at the time, others come out as pre-scientific understandings or rejection of modern medicine capable of helping individuals who may be suffering. One particular group, the Jehovah’s Witnesses, have been known to reject blood transfusions, as these stand against their stipulated principles of The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society. The Watchtower Bible and Tract Society is the governing or legislating body of the Jehovah’s Witnesses. This has been a strict policy since 1945.

The basis for the claim is that blood transfusions go against some divine law or ethical precepts derived from their understanding of the oughts of the world through their religious lens. Now, with the recent possibilities for critical or severe cases to be helped by the experimental treatments, the Jehovah’s Witnesses have been directed (or commanded by the legislative body) to not use them. More directly, they’re strictly forbidden, as this is Convalescent Plasma Therapy or a treatment using transfusion.

The directive from the Jehovah’s Witnesses stated:

The Blood Issue: There’s talk about the FDA allowing doctors to treat critically ill COVID-19 patients with “convalescent plasma therapy.” It would be wise to advise the publishers that it’s understood that this is giving the patient the whole plasma of the person who has developed the antibodies which would be unacceptable for Jehovah’s Witnesses.

However if the antibodies were extracted from the plasma (fractions/immunoglobulins) and then given to the patient, it would be a conscience matter for Jehovah’s Witnesses. Some doctors may view plasma as a fraction. Therefore the publisher may need to explain their personal decision not to accept any of the blood’s four main components, one of them being plasma. (Source: JWsurvey, based on work of Mark O’Donnell in “Jehovah’s Witnesses Denied Plasma Treatment Amid Coronavirus Pandemic” – click for article title for link)

This is a serious public health issue for which the lives of some members of the public religion becomes a public health hazard. As we see with the prevention within the directives (theological and faith-based in character), individuals cannot use the treatments, as they are forbidden, without consequence. If they use it, then the fear of the wrath of the legislative body, as representative of God, can come down like a ton of bricks. It is, as James Randi noted to me, based on fear. If an individual uses the blood or plasma, then they will become “Disassociated” from the community and will not be permitted contact from their own families.

Theology trumps medicine here.

Photo by Benedikt Jaletzke on Unsplash

Related article:

Ladakh: Well established protocols in place for Indo-China border management

As India and China continue with their face-off at multiple points along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) it becomes imperative to revisit the various agreements and protocols that guide the management of the LAC. There are “five pacts” that both sides, over time, have agreed upon to maintain “peace and tranquility” along the borders. These five pacts are–

  • The 1993 Agreement on Maintenance of Peace and Tranquility along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in the India-China Border Areas.
  • The 1996 Agreement on Confidence Building Measures in the Military Field along the LAC.
  • The 2005 Protocol on Modalities for the Implementation of the Confidence Building Measures in the Military Field along the LAC.
  • The 2012 Agreement on the Establishment of a Working Mechanism for Consultation and Coordination on India-China Border Affairs.
  • The  2013 Border Defence Cooperation Agreement.

By the beginning of 21st century, the two sides had agreed not to let the border dispute affect bilateral engagements. Both nations have, on more than one occasion, reaffirmed the need to respect and abide by the LAC pending a resolution of the boundary issue. During the then Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee’s visit to China in 2003, the two sides agreed on the appointment of special representatives for consultations to arrive at a framework for a boundary settlement. This was inked in 2005 into the agreement on “Political Parameters and Guiding Principles for the Settlement of the India-China Boundary Question.”

The present government has remained engaged on the issue with many bilateral meetings and summits having taken place between Chinese President Xi Jinping and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Discussions with regard to the border dispute was always prominent during the meetings.

Despite all the efforts, China has not relented from back-stabbing India and flouting established norms. The last few years have witnessed, apart from small intrusions and ingress attempts, three major incidents. These are the three-week standoff in Daulat Beg Oldi in April-May 2013; the September 2014 faceoff in Chumar region of Ladakh and the Doklam imbroglio last year.

The Chinese pattern of operations is well established. First its troops move into a location in the form of patrols, this is followed by gradual build-up of infrastructure and creation of an impasse, then comes government to government arbitration. Finally, once the right noises have been made the Chinese troops move back and status quo is maintained.

Troops of the Indian Army deployed along the LAC, on the other hand, scrupulously follow all protocols and guiding principles. They are well aware of the LAC alignment and have never transgressed upon Chinese land. It is so because China is a neighbour with whom India wants a relationship of trust and environment of peace. The problem lies in reciprocation of similar sentiments from the other side too.

The main reason behind the recent upsurge in Chinese incursions is India’s upgrading of border infrastructure. What China is conveniently sidelining is the fact that the Indian upgradation is in response to Chinese build-up of rail and road networks around the border.

Now a situation has arisen where US President Donald Trump has attempted to intervene in the faceoff. “We have informed both India and China that the United States is ready, willing and able to mediate or arbitrate their now raging border dispute. Thank you!” he tweeted on May, 27. The very next day he threw another bomb shell by implying that he had already spoken with Prime Minister Narendra Modi on the subject. “I can tell you; I did speak to Prime Minister Modi. He is not in a good mood about what is going on with China,” he said. India was first off the mark by strongly denying the conversation between US President and Prime Minister Narendra Modi having taken place. The very next day (Friday, 29 May) China rejected the US offer and reiterated that  India and China have in place required communication mechanisms to resolve problems.

“Between China and India, we have existing border-related mechanisms and communication channels. We are capable of properly resolving the issues between us through dialogue and consultation. We do not need the intervention of the third party,” said Zhao Lijian, Chinese foreign ministry spokesperson while describing the situation at the border as “stable and controllable.”

India too has tacitly snubbed the mediation offer of the US President. “The two sides have established mechanisms both at military and diplomatic levels to resolve situations, which may arise in border areas, peacefully through dialogue and continue to remain engaged through these channels,” said Anurag Srivastava, spokesperson, Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). On US mediation he glossed over by saying, “as I’ve told you, we are engaged with the Chinese side to peacefully resolve this issue.”

By suggesting mediation President Donald Trump has jolted the Asian giants into the realisation that the whole world is looking towards them and they need to show maturity by resolving the impasse.

The matter is presently being engaged at the diplomatic level as well as on ground by armed forces of both sides. Our leaders are hands on to the issue. Indian media can vastly help by not jumping the gun with sensationalism. It also needs to ensure that unnecessary confusion is not created by misinterpreting the LAC with China and the Line of Control (LOC) with Pakistan that has its own set of ongoing problems and issues. Reporting needs to be both responsible and authentic.

It is hoped that China will realise its mistake in heating up the LAC every now and then and thus opening the door of outside intervention as attempted by President Donald Trump. It is hoped that the two powerful and mature countries will abide by their well established protocols and diffuse the tension at the earliest. Not only this, they also need to work relentlessly towards a final resolution of the border that has dragged along for years on end and is now a source of embarrassment for both countries.

Interview with Ryan Faulkner-Hogg of Atlas Geographica

Ryan Faulkner-Hogg is the Founder of Atlas Geographica and a member of the team at Topical Magazine. Here we talk about the Atlas Geographica in the context of the other projects and work for Douglas.

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: Let’s start on the first major project, which is Atlas Geographica, the tag is “A Curiosity Blog.” What was the inspiration for the title Atlas Geographica and the tag with the title?

Ryan Faulkner-Hogg: The name Atlas Geographica is quite uninspiring, unfortunately. I wanted to call it WhatAboutWhen.Com, but the URL was taken. I was sitting in a room. It was Norway in a place called Hoddevik. It was along the countryside along the West Fjords. There was an atlas. It was written in Norwegian called Geographica. I put in Atlas Geographica in the URL finder. It worked. I always loved atlases. Also, Atlas Geographica gives a little whiff of international scope. That’s the foundation of the title. I am happy that this became the title because I consider this better than What About When. I am realizing more, and more, as I write more online blogs. The URL isn’t so important. It is the branding of the name. People can associate Atlas Geographica with the statue of Atlas, which is the logo of the site and the random curiosity-driven content.

The reason for starting it. Initially, I had the idea to commercialize online writing for affiliate income, affiliate-marketed income, for tour agents. I work for a software company, which empowers tour agents all across the world. I thought, “The way affiliate marketing is so synonymous with pushing Amazon’s books or various articles through online marketing. Nothing like this operates for tour operators.” I was in Finland sitting in a meeting with the CEO of a company, who do everything from a 50 Euro day-trip to a 5,000 Euro package. They don’t market nearly as effectively – no one in tourism does – as simple goods. So, I thought while sitting in this meeting, “Why doesn’t somebody write an article about this amazing trip through this company, put affiliate links throughout, then it is free marketing for the company and an income for everyone based on the links on the other end?”

I had this lofty goal to do that. It could still totally be a profitable business idea if someone wants to take it on. However, I quickly realized. For this to be functional, I required the company to code in an affiliate link specific to me. Just using them as one example, they were not interested in doing. This would have to be replicated across the board. All of the affiliate links would need to come from TripAdvisor. I have a sour relation with them. They are a pretty bad company. We realized this from where I am working now. You would be doing this marketing for TripAdvisor rather than the end-user, which would be the other company. This is a roundabout way of introducing it. After I took out the URL and started to write for it, I, originally, wrote three food tour blogs, which are no longer on the site. They were for Amsterdam, San Sebastian, and Rome. They give different images of food tours in these countries. I thought, “This doesn’t excite me at all. It may make a few dollars of income.”

I thought, “I have this URL. I have written content, which I have done in the past. Because I have always enjoyed writing.” I have always found if I enjoy something. The best way to have this in my head and articulate this is to formulate and write it down. I have drafts and written pieces, so I could start uploading them.

Jacobsen: Is the end goal to have a multimedia platform?

Faulkner-Hogg: Yes, it is. Again, it is an end goal, but purely out of interest. I’ve completely steered away from trying to make these media issues a monetizable thing, moved out of financial interest. It is out of interest. A media platform where I have a blog, an email list, and a YouTube channel. It is a way to put all creativity out there and to further legitimize myself if I look back on someday. I can show my parents or if I go into a job interview, “Look, here is my stuff, here is who I am.” Rather than storing it on a hard drive, storing it on the internet, I have romanticized knowing there is the chance of someone to stumble across this article and have it mean something for them. I am sure. You’re familiar with Tim Ferriss. He is an inspiring role model when I think about where I want to take media arms for me. Also, it is a very lofty goal. You will see the latest video put out was on the Tim Ferriss empire. All media arms are multimillion-dollar enterprises. I’m not bothered whether it makes $10 or $0. It is a place where all of my creativity can exist online.

Jacobsen: What do you think makes Tim Ferriss’ different arms of his octopus so functional and profitable? All of the branches built by him.

Faulkner-Hogg: I think the Tim Ferriss phenomenon is genius marketing by him. Before he does anything, he leverages his extensive network to create hype. He has SEO optimized all of the different legs. Also, it is the flywheel. All additional legs complement the others. Since he started the podcast with extremely famous and successful guests, who are people he met in a previous life as a venture capitalist and an author, he had a really good starting block. Also, he was one of the first movers in the podcast game. He quickly created one of the biggest business podcasts in the world, which boosted the blog and the email list. This reinforced authorship when he continues to publish books. His success is really outlier stuff because he has one of the highest-selling books of all time, one of the most listened to podcasts of in the world, one of the biggest email lists in the world, and one of the most read blogs in the world. He is winning on all fronts and an exceptional person.

There is not one thing to point out for success in all his media arms. But I can give an example. During the week, he released a “Tools of Titans” podcast. It is him piggybacking on one of the books that he has already written. He is probably not going to create any original new content. He is going to reformat from the content of the book. He will create a new podcast and have a new revenue stream through ad revenue and introduce new people who find the “Tools of Titan” podcast into the Tim Ferriss brand. They will become subscribers on the email list. They might subscribe to the “The Tim Ferriss Show.” Potentially, they might buy the books as well. He has this huge, huge network, which they can leverage as well.

Jacobsen: When you’re having the different platforms for yourself, as a multimedia startup, are you intending something similar to that, where you have mutually reinforcing programs and initiatives?

Faulkner-Hogg: Yes, it is definitely something that I am actively trying to create. This is why you see the different tabs of Atlas Geographica, which can take you to the YouTube channel, to the podcast channel, and also to a subscription list.

Jacobsen: If you’re looking at 2020/2021, what are your actionables? What are you looking at as targeted objectives?Faulkner-Hogg: I shouldn’t shy away from saying this publicly. However, once you say this publicly, you are subject to ridicule if you do not reach the goals. I launched the YouTube channel. End of 2020, I want the channel monetized, which is 1,000 subscribers and 4,000 hours of watch time. It is not like you monetize this immediately into a lot of money. Once it gets the tick of approval from YouTube, it will become recommended to non-subscribers more. For the blog, I would like to see – a very lofty goal – 100 unique visitors per day. I would like 100 subscribers to the email list. That’s 6 months from now.

Jacobsen: Have you looked into Patreon account, donations, grants, in Australia for startup projects, especially during coronavirus times?

Douglas: I haven’t looked at any of it. The main reason is; I wouldn’t feel comfortable having people donating for the stuff produced by me. I am stoked if people get a kick out of reading the articles. There is no expectation for a monetary reward for it. In terms of grants, I do not consider the media enterprises as a business of mine. That’s why I haven’t considered that route. I haven’t looked at any of that. More for personal business, totally independent of media and looking like things like grants.

Jacobsen: Some areas of focus, they will be individually driven based on what is an interest at a given time for you. Some of the main areas have been on the environment, economics, and travel. What are some of the reasons for some of the touchpoints of the interest for you?

Faulkner-Hogg: Because it comes back to the point of the blog being something going to compliment personal interest rather than something targeted as a niche blog site to get more organic traffic. It is because these things happen to capture attention for me. I want to find out more about them. That’s why there is such a wide variety of unrelated content. If you take vagabonding, I really like Rolf Potts and the book Vagabonding. I wanted to expand on it. I found Tim Ferriss. I wanted to expand on that as well.

Jacobsen: Also, we are involved with some other projects with Topical Magazine. How are you looking to adapt some of the content and interests to a publication like Topical Magazine, and vice versa? Obviously, there will be a Venn diagram of overlapping interest in Atlas Geographica content produced there, and then future stuff coming out of Topical Magazine.

Faulkner-Hogg: Yes, I think Topical Magazine has a much more event-driven side to its content. So, I think Topical Magazine has more sophisticated takes on the events compared to Atlas Geographica. If we look at Ben David’s recent post of Nietzsche and the New Atheists, For instance, also, his recent Covid-19 and the enemy conspiracy theory one too. It is “Topical” “Magazine.” So, they want to touch on relevant time-stamped content. Whereas, Atlas Geographica is more than likely going to be time-specific and a little bit more ever-green as an introduction or a take on something that is an ongoing discussion or an ongoing theme/mood within society. For instance, if I look at the Christopher Hitchens and mortality post, which Atlas Geographica put out, recently, it is a piece of evergreen content. Whoever is interested in Christopher Hitchens, whether the beginning or the end of the relationship with Hitchens, it is there. What Ben did with Covid-19, the sophisticated part becomes the fact that he’s also breaking down what makes the conspiracy. Again, Scott, I’m sorry if I answered the question so indirectly.

Jacobsen: Any other areas to explore today?

Faulkner-Hogg: Not specifically, Topical Magazine and Ben, and being introduced to you, too, it is a compliment to Ben David to publish a piece in Topical Magazine and took an interest in Atlas Geographica. I think the story is quite funny how I met Ben David, Benji.

Jacobsen: Did you meet him in Norway?

Faulkner-Hogg: In Amsterdam.

Jacobsen: Of course, yes.

Faulkner-Hogg: I am working for this company. We have a bunch of people coming in for interviews. A lot of them coming into the interviews with who my manager likes. He asks, “What do you think about this guy?” I will give a shallow commentary on it. I never got to interview Ben. I gave an opinion from a quick look at him and the things the manager said. I saw. He was editor of Topical Magazine. Usually, we don’t get people with non-relevant experience.

Jacobsen: [Laughing].

Faulkner-Hogg: [Laughing] I was like, “That’s fantastic.” I went on the site and read an article on the Zizek and Peterson debate. I thought, “This guy is cool. I hope we hire him.” Ben and I had some business, I introduced the fact of writing for a small blog called Atlas Geographica. He taught a lot about the WordPress side of things, to make sure the site looks good. He invited me to publish some material on Topical Magazine. It is entitled “Forget Chernobyl and Don’t Listen to the Hippies.” We retitled for Topical Magazine to get more clicks. The story was about the fact that it boggles the mind that the left is so anti-nuclear power, when it is the greenest form of technology available to us. The article debunks the extreme outlier events like Chernobyl. It is a fun story about meeting Ben. I want to leave that as a compliment about Topical Magazine.

Jacobsen: Ryan, thanks so much.

Image Credit: Ryan Faulkner-Hogg.

Weak China can only play psychological war games in Ladakh

Shifting the goal post and use of diversionary tactics are basic tools used by battle weary empires in order to buy time for their recovery. China’s hyped ‘transgression’ inside Ladakh is of similar nature. The prospect of a global retribution against China for its role in spreading the COVID-19 pandemic is real and has left Beijing petrified to an extent that it’s desperately looking for an alibi.

Global ring-fencing coupled with its fast deteriorating domestic economy has become too much for the mandarins of CPC (Communist Party of China) to be able to comprehend. Corporate biggies have begun to silently explore newer manufacturing bases in India, South East Asia and Eastern Europe. In coming months several thousand companies that make smartphones, automobiles, pharmaceuticals, textiles, electronic equipment, fertilizers, steel etc. may either completely shift out of China or scale down their production units within China. This effectively means that Chinese economy is all set to go into a tailspin and Beijing’s crown as the world’s factory is under direct threat. Unemployment is at a historic high and there’s a probability of Tiananmen Square type of protests as the discontent amongst Chinese middle class grows further.

Protests and discontent in Hong Kong continue to grow bigger by the day, Taiwan has become the fresh flashpoint, and the Baloch revolutionaries have ensured that the $62 billion CPEC (China-Pakistan Economic Corridor) remains a non-starter.

It is in this backdrop that China decided to shift the goal post and nudged its soldiers in Ladakh to have a faceoff with the Indian Army. What could be a better alibi than shoving the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) to ‘transgress’ in Ladakh where there’s several hundred kilometres marked as ‘Areas of Differing Perception’ that have not been resolved for the last three decades.

Beijing’s gambit is simple. Order PLA to ‘transgress’ and have a faceoff with the Indian Army and then get down to perception management and spin doctoring to create a fear psychosis within India.

Unfortunately, sympathisers of communist China within a section of Indian media swirled to the dragon’s hiss and dressed up the story about People’s Liberation Army (PLA) entering several kilometres inside the Indian territory. These spin doctors screamed about the “possibility of Indo-China war”, “disadvantages of India vis-à-vis China”, “India caught unawares” etc. etc. In fact, more than the transgression in Ladakh, this psychological war being waged by China at the behest of its sympathisers in Indian media is far more serious.

And yes, let’s be clear. China is not in a position to fight a war with India. We need to bury the ghosts of 1962. This is 2020.

But before I talk about China’s weaknesses, let me first explain the ground realities in Ladakh which continues to be misreported.

Reality of Chinese “Transgressions”

Transgressions by the PLA (People’s Liberation Army) have primarily taken place in Galwan Valley and North Bank of the Pangong Tso Lake in Ladakh. While the presence of PLA troops at Galwan Valley is strictly within their side of the LAC (Line of Actual Control) where there is no transgression, the one at North Bank of Pangong Tso is within Indian side of the claim line. Now, this did raise red flags within the Indian Army and it responded with appropriate measures like commander level talks and director level talks. Even Indian soldiers were sent in as reinforcement. However, as commander and director level talks between India and China were still on, a section of Indian media sympathetic to communist China began drumming up the fear psychosis. Articles, opinion columns, tweets, sound-bytes everything was geared up to make it appear as a repeat of 1962 and was painted in a manner to show that New Delhi and Indian Army commanders were caught napping while China just walked inside.

This is absolute rubbish.

There’s a basic difference between LOC (Line of Control) and LAC (Line of Actual Control). LOC is used in context of Pakistan with specific reference to Jammu and Kashmir. LOC is a single and well identified line along the geographical features that are known and accepted by both sides. Any attempt to cross the LOC or occupy an area is taken as an act of war. It warrants a counter action to evict. At LOC, troops occupy important geographical features in eye ball to eye ball mode and dominate the area along LOC by observation and/or firing. Presence of enemy is unacceptable at all for any amount of time.

On the contrary, border with China is either in the form of International Border (IB) or LAC (Line of Actual Control). At most of the places LAC is accepted by both sides as a single line, however at number of other places there are different perceptions of the LAC by India and China. Areas bound by two claim lines (India’s Claim Line and China’s Claim Line) are called as “Areas of Differing Perceptions”.

And the current standoff with China is in these “Areas of Differing Perceptions”.

Areas of Differing Perceptions (ADP)

There are a number of such Areas of Differing Perceptions all along the LAC and efforts have been on for last three decades to resolve them and define the LAC by a common and mutually acceptable line which can be respected by both India and China. In fact, over 20 meetings between ‘Special Representatives’ of both countries have been held but no common ground has been achieved as yet. Based on agreements in 1993, 1996, 2005 and BPMs (Border Personnel Meetings) several guidelines and mechanisms have been evolved for peace time management of the ADPs. These mechanisms also spell out the ways and means or protocols for surveillance through patrolling and resolution of frictions if any. Patrols are sent by both sides into these areas.

Whenever PLA patrol crosses the Indian Claim Line or vice-versa, it is called as ‘transgression’. Similarly, when patrols of both sides come across each other or meet, it is called as ‘faceoff’. Transgressions and Faceoff have been happening very frequently and were resolved amicably by both sides without any aggression or use of force. The differences that crop up during patrols, due to construction activities or activities that are taken upon as transgression or not permissible under the agreements are taken up through Border Personnel Meetings (BPMs). These meetings happen at two levels–delegation level meetings and highest commander level meetings. In case these issues are not resolved through these meetings, the meeting levels may be increased or taken up through the diplomatic channels.

“It needs to be understood that Indian and Chinese perceptions about the LAC (Line of Actual Control) are different. There has been no agreement between India and China on the maps of LAC. Except in the Middle sector where maps were briefly shown to each other, there has been no exchange of maps of the LAC. For the last three decades, the Chinese have not shown any inclination whatsoever to even demarcate the LAC, let alone solve the boundary issue,” explained Dr Arvind Gupta, Director Vivekananda International Foundation (VIF) and former Deputy National Security Advisor (NSA). He added that due to these misperceptions about the actual LAC, patrolling parties of India and China often come face-to-face that results in local standoffs. “This happened at Depsang in 2013, Chumar in 2014, and is happening now at the Galwan Valley and Pangong Lake in Ladakh.”

Background of the Current Transgression

Even as concentration of PLA troops in Galwan Valley was on, Indian Army patrols were actively operating in all the Areas of Differing Perceptions (ADPs) and a strict vigil was being maintained. However, on the 10/11th May, an Indian patrol operating at North Bank of Pangong Lake came across a PLA patrol at Finger 4. The banner drills were executed as per the norms but PLA patrol refused to move. Hence both patrols took their positions. All this while the Indian Army kept maintaining a constant vigil through all types of intelligence resources. And India’s intelligence wings IB, RAW and NTRO were also vigilant over the developments.

Subsequently, PLA brought in more troops along track from Finger 4 to Finger 8. Indian Army also responded by increasing its troop strength in areas of face off and with a rise in PLA force levels started moving reinforcements from outside. Mobilization of Indian troops from within the Ladakh region was followed by induction from outside and at each stage there were more number of acclimatized combat ready Indian troops than the PLA. Also, ever since first face off on the night of 5/6th May, Indian Army was aware about what was happening on the other side and kept mirroring force build up in terms of foot soldiers, artillery and armour.

“…there are well laid out, mutually agreed mechanisms and definite Do(s) and Don’t(s) for militaries at both sides of the LAC to handle such situations. Further, the military and diplomatic channels are functional and are working to resolve this issue. Higher-level channels can also be used to resolve the issue, if need be,” Dr Arvind Gupta, Director Vivekananda International Foundation said. “…it’s true and a matter of concern that these skirmishes have occurred for 3-4 times over the last few years but the current situation is not a build-up to an Indo-China war, as is being made out in certain quarters. That is being too alarmist. No doubt, India will stand firm and resolute in this crisis too. It must. But, the situation is delicate and we have to be very cautious on how we handle it. The government should have a proper communication strategy to keep public opinion informed,” explained Dr Arvind Gupta.

China’s domestic problems

China’s current unemployment is estimated at around 10%, which is its highest over the last several years. Chinese economy contracted by 6.8% in the first three months of 2020 when compared with the same period in 2019. This degrowth compares with a 6% growth in the October-December quarter of 2019. Further, China’s industrial sector growth has dropped 9.6%, services sector fell by 5.2% and the primary sector went down 3.2%. Car production dropped in the negative and was down to (-)44.6%.

Economists point out that China’s GDP contraction is an indicative of the severity of damage caused by COVID-19 pandemic to its economy.

As global manufacturing shifts out of China and/or if the production bases are scaled down, the unemployment will increase further thereby fuelling anger among the already restive masses.

And to add to China’s misery, there have been reports that New Delhi is in talks with thousands of companies to set up their manufacturing units within India. In this scenario PLA’s transgression into Ladakh is nothing but Beijing’s tired tactic of putting a psychological pressure upon New Delhi to stop wooing the manufacturers by abandoning the entry barriers and to stay away from Taiwan. But this is Beijing’s way of bullying.

A resurgent and confident India must brush away these irritants. India Army is responding in the way that it should. Indians, on their part, must not fall for Chinese propaganda of multiplying the fear psychosis that ultimately weakens the nation’s resolve to stand up to a bullying neighbour. Much like Chinese products the Chinese propaganda is not going to last long.

Interview with Adeline Sede Kamga – CEO, FabAfriq Media Group

Adeline Sede Kamga is the Founder/CEO of FabAfriq Media Group, a Creative and Innovative Marketing and communication agency with offices in the UK and Cameroon operating both in Europe and Africa. A change leader and inspirational speaker with over fifteen years of experience. She has expertise working across different areas in the corporate, business and community world. She is committed to delivering quality projects in Corporate PR and Communications, Change management, Executive Coaching. She has a BA in Corporate Communications, MA in Human Resource Management at Coventry University UK and professional qualifications such as CIPD, PRINCE2 & Dip in Business Administration.

Adeline is an expert in Corporate communications and PR, including digital communication and eventing. As a trained executive coach, she has worked with blue chip companies from varied sectors, helping them gain visibility across Africa and the rest of the world. Her previous experience in HR, gave her hands-on experience working in different HR projects with one of the largest employers in Europe (Birmingham City Council) & subsequently as a consultant. Amongst some of her expertise are change management, People Management, T & D and Strategic HR. She has led on many strategic and restructuring projects, leading to successful change management system & implementations.

Adeline is also a founding member of FEPPSAC (Women editors of Central Africa), a UN Central Africa Office initiative to work with women in the print magazine industry. This group seeks to help drive the United Nations mandate of women, peace and security in Central Africa. She is dynamic, innovative, and tenacious. Gifted with a sharp mind and innate ability to connect with others and an insatiable thirst for excellence.

In 2016, Adeline launched a Pan Excellence In People Management initiative for change called The Corporate Awards & The Corporate Women in Leadership program. Adeline invests in inspiring and empowering young leaders through speaking engagements and mentoring programs.

She is married to a very supportive husband and has 3 kids. adeline.sede@fabafriq.com

Scott Douglas Jacobsen: What have been some of the things that you’ve done to raise awareness about coronavirus?

Adeline Sede Kamga: The coronavirus pandemic has taken a huge toll on the whole world and I must say this has caused lots of mishaps, losses, panic, fear, anxiety, depression and you can name it. One of the things I do on a daily base is communication, so I used this skill to raise awareness via social media. Due to the sensitive nature of COVID-19, I had to be very accurate in providing such information, so I sourced from reliable institutions such as WHO, CDC, Medical News Today, and others.

As the Founder of Corporate Women in Leadership (CWILS), an initiative that seeks to increase the presence of women in the boardroom through inspirational career development projects. I started an online series for personal development amidst the lockdown. Our speakers are corporate experts in different fields from different countries. Through these sessions, we have touched more than 50,000 viewers and 12,000 participants.

My team and I launched “How I Stay Safe Campaign,” geared towards implementing the different measures to help curb the spread of COVID-19. Participants shared videos and key messages, which were shared on our social media platforms.

Through Fabafriq Media Group, we ran numerous campaigns for our clients and managed Corporate Social Responsibility projects. This of course involved using influencers and local communities to drive key messages.

FabAfriq Magazine, also launched a sensitization campaign whereby celebrities and high profile personalities in our communities sent images and messages of encouragement to our editorial team. These are used to design very attractive digital banners and are shared amongst their platforms.

Jacobsen: What are some organizations individuals can garner some assistance from now?

Kamga: It is no news that COVID-19 has affected most people, either psychologically or physically. As individuals, nonprofits and businesses grapple with the economic impact, many funders are stepping up to provide support through microgrants, hardship relief, and loan programs. It is truly amazing to see that many such organizations have adapted their giving policies to include people affected by COVID-19. We cannot give an exhaustive list but the following could be explored by people looking for funds. GlobalGiving, International Women’s Media Foundation, United Way, Candid, Prudential Beneficial Insurance, Ecobank Africa, and many others.

Jacobsen: How can ordinary citizens work together to deal with the coronavirus?

Kamga: Scott, it is remarkably interesting that you asked. Through FabAfriq Media Group, we have taken on initiatives that call on everyone’s participation towards dealing with Coronavirus. We have been lucky to have our national celebrities join us in a national sensitization campaign through our social media platforms. We need to continue encouraging people to observe preventive measures like social distancing, wearing masks, etc. Without the right information, this virus is only going to keep spreading. Together, we have to educate as many people as possible about staying safe. I also encourage individuals, companies & leaders to facilitate the less privileged by donating what they can to help ensure safety. Coronavirus is our fight, and together we all can beat it!

Jacobsen: What have been some of the more important areas of empowering women across Africa through the work of FabAfriq Media Group?

Kamga: We started the group as an initiative to help share the stories of African Women in Africa and the diaspora. We launched our online platform in 2009, where we have interviewed and published inspirational, educative and innovative stories. Our print magazine, launched one year after the website has also featured some of the most amazing women making a difference in the African community. We believe through our storytelling, we have empowered and impacted more lives around the world.

Six years ago, FabAfriq Media Group started a Pan African movement called The Corporate Women In Leadership. Over the last 6 years, we have hosted Conferences and summits in different African countries, Gabon, Senegal & Cameroon, and Cote d’Ivoire. Through this summit, we create a stage for women in the boardroom to share their experiences and provide mentorship to aspiring leaders. Moving forward, I see a bigger network of women empowering girls, women empowering women & women empowering the next generation

At a much lower level, we work with underprivileged women in the communities. FabAfriq Media Group has partnered with some NGOs dealing in domestic violence, incest, women with Albinism conditions, videos, and teenage mothers. We support these set of women to adapt and achieve their full potential in life.

Jacobsen: What are the more vulnerable populations of women, i.e., the sectors of the population and specific nations underperforming on the empowerment of women?

Kamga: This may get me in trouble, but I’m just going to say it [Laughing]. In my honest opinion, I think the Muslim community is still very shy about gender equality & female empowerment. We have Muslim communities in every part of the world, but the heavily concentrated communities are in North Africa, Middle East & Asia, and in some of these parts women still can’t dress freely, speak freely, study freely, talk less of practice in careers of their choice. There has been a change, but it takes time, of course. In terms of sectors, I would say the architectural market continues to see few practicing women, aviation & why not women at the highest position of power in a country, i.e., Presidency.

Jacobsen: What will be the programs and initiatives rolled out in the second half of 2020?

Kamga: Scott like every other company in the world right now, we are just re-strategizing while fighting COVID-19 together. However, the plan is to continue hosting our on-site conference and mentorship programs. We had planned to host our annual Corporate Awards in London. This is an HR initiative we launched to celebrate excellence in people management and to help create a benchmark for companies. This year, FabAfriq Media group celebrates its 10th Anniversary, so we are currently working on the anniversary issue and plan. We are, however, skeptical, as mentioned above.

Jacobsen: FabAfriq Magazine relaunched on June 8th, 2020. What happened to the magazine before?

Kamga: To be honest, with the rise of digitalization, many magazines saw a decline in sales across the world. The last decade has seen the world evolve more into a global village forcing print to fade away while tablets, phones & the internet blossomed. This made most of the print magazines, including FabAfriq management team, put a stop to its print version and focus on the digital version.

Now, it feels like the perfect time to come back with FabAfriq Magazine print because there is a high demand for quality lifestyle information. We have also grown a huge client/readership network and truth be told; there’s nothing like that glossy feeling when you turn a page after an amazing read.

Jacobsen: Why relaunch in June of 2020?

Kamga: Well, the idea was to release this edition on the 29th of May, coinciding with my birthday…but unfortunately, COVID-19 did not make that happen, pushing it one week apart. The reason I set this date was because I wanted to combine and celebrate the things that matter in life for me – offering a platform to share real and inspiring stories. FabAfriq Magazine print was launched at my prime, and seeing this vision growing bigger each day, simply means there is a need for this to stay. The entire team at FabAfriq Media Group joined the business because they believed in the dream, part of this dream is the print magazine and this is exactly one of the reasons they are with the business. We cannot sell a lie; we have to make sure whatever we sell is what we give. I am glad everyone is excited about this relaunch. I truly think this will create a great sensation in the office

Jacobsen: What is its vision and set of targeted objectives for the rest of 2020 and 2021?

Kamga: Our vision is to provide results-oriented media and communication services to clients. Being a growth-oriented company, we are looking at growing our client base, extending our service offerings and providing more employment opportunities.

In 2020 & 2021, We would focus on sharing more corporate stories through videos and images. We believe our expertise in sharing corporate stories has a valid objective. We hope to attract more businesses looking at using this service.

One of our objectives at the beginning of the year was to celebrate our 10th anniversary. This plan is not really set because of the outbreak of COVID-19. This activity has to happen. So if we do not achieve it this year, we will do it next year.

As mentioned above, we have a flagship program called The Corporate Award. The corporate awards, research and recognize companies who invest in their staff. Our intention in 2021 was to invite past participants for a 3-day program in the UK. The objective of this is to exchange knowledge with UK based corporations and gain other skills where needed.

Jacobsen: Thank you for the opportunity and your time, Adeline.

Kamga: The pleasure was all mine, Scott, thank you for talking with me. Please do not forget to check out our work via our website www.fabafriq.com.

Image Credit: Adeline Sede Kamga.