Home Blog Page 401

Justice for 1984 Sikh Genocide Victims would be biggest tribute to Guru Nanak Dev Ji

0

On 31st October 1984, the then Prime Minister of India, Smt. Indira Gandhi was assassinated at her residence in Safdarjung Road, New Delhi. She was killed by her bodyguards, Satwant Singh and Beant Singh who belonged to the Sikh community. The killing was in reaction to Operation Blue Star that was ordered by the Prime Minister and in which Sri Harmandir Sahib, the most sacred shrine of the Sikhs was attacked by government forces to flush out Sikh militants. The operation badly damaged the shrine and caused terrible hurt to Sikh sentiments, which served as a trigger for the assassination of the prime minister by her Sikh bodyguards.

Post-assassination, as the nation struggled to come to terms with this unfortunate tragedy a catastrophe of unimaginable proportions started building up. The very next day, on November 1st there were widespread attacks on the members of Sikh community across the country. The numbers killed have never been clearly recorded or made public, but various estimates put them much above 10,000. According to official records 2,733 Sikhs were killed in cold blood in Delhi alone, though human rights organisations place the number nearer to 4,000. The numbers in the remainder parts of India continue to defy documentation. This apart, Gurdwaras (Sikh Temples) were damaged; shops and other businesses run by Sikhs were destroyed, their houses looted and women raped.

The killing was carried out in the most barbaric manner by use of weapons like swords and daggers, beating the victims to death and burning them alive. The most inhumane method used was enclosing a Sikh within a vehicle tyre and then setting it on slow fire. The madness went on for a number of days as the law enforcing machinery refused to intervene.

There have been attempts to pass on this genocide as a spontaneous reaction of the people distraught at the killing of their prime minister. A closer scrutiny however point towards a very well conceived and coordinated plan to “teach the Sikhs a lesson.”

The assassination of the prime minister took place at 0920 hours on October 31st and the sad news was broadcast by All India Radio at 1100 hours after she was declared dead by the doctors at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS), New Delhi. Rajiv Gandhi, Indira Gandhi’s son who was later on sworn as India’s prime minister arrived in New Delhi at 1600 hours. Till then there was no killing, even as isolated incidents of violent demonstration in the national capital were reported. The first indication of something bigger brewing in came when the cavalcade of President of India, Giani Zail Singh—a Sikh, was attacked by stone throwers.

On the night of October 31st / November 1st, organised and equipped gangs dominated the streets of Delhi and were involved in acts of violence and destruction of property. Sane voices within the city urged the government to intervene but the response was merely cosmetic. The first murder took place the next morning at about 0900 hours and then the floodgates opened. The madness perpetuated in Delhi found resonance in other parts of the country. On the face of it, restrictive actions like curfew were announced but they were not implemented on ground.

In this environment of utter depravity the only saving factor was that some people came out to help the Sikhs despite the grave dangers involved. They gave shelter in their houses and later provided assistance in the refugee camps opened for those people who had lost everything in the genocide.

The complicity of the political party in power became more visible when its leader, Rajiv Gandhi, failed to condemn the wanton killing of Sikhs. He, on the other hand, attempted to justify the same.  “We must remember Indira ji. We must remember why she was assassinated. We must remember who could be the people behind it. When Indira ji was assassinated, some riots took place in our country. We know the hearts of Indians were filled with anger, and for some days, people felt that India was shaking. But when a big tree falls, then the earth does shake a little,” he said in a condolence rally organised in commemoration of his mother, the demised prime minister.

It becomes quite apparent that the plan for attack was carefully laid out by certain perpetrators and meticulously carried out for a specified period of time. It was only when the desired impact was achieved, the “lesson taught” and when international pressure started mounting that it was stopped. Surprisingly, it stopped as quickly as it started which again points towards its micro-management by certain powerful forces.

The sequence of events nullifies the argument of “grave and sudden provocation” which is being used by legal elements to lower the gravity of the criminal and barbaric genocide committed.

No First Information Report (FIR) was filed in the immediate aftermath or cases registered in court, nor did any court call for action as is the trend now. In the last 35 years since perpetration of the genocide, four commissions, nine committees have looked into the carnage. In recent times, since 2015, two Special Investigation Teams (SITs) have been constituted to carry out investigation.

Going back to 1984, when international pressure became too much, the government constituted a committee under Ved Marwah, Additional Commissioner of Police. It was constituted in November 1984 and dissolved in 1985. The proceedings of the Marwah Committee were handed over to the Misra Commission whose findings were made public in February 1987. The commission stated that its term of reference was to determine “whether the violence had happened”, and not “identify any person” or their role. It further recommended that three more committees be set up, (1) to look into the role of the Police, (2) for registration of cases and, (3) to determine the total number of killings.

This sham enacted over three years was followed by a series of committees – Kapur-Mittal Committee, 1987; Jain-Banerjee Committee, 1987; Ahuja Committee, 1987; Poti-Rosha Committee, 1990; Jain-Aggarwal Committee, 1990 and Narula Committee, 1993

The tryst for justice gained momentum once more in the year 2000, when the NDA government, under Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee, was in power. A unanimous resolution was passed in the Rajya Sabha, resulting in the formation of a new commission under retired Supreme Court Judge G.T. Nanavati. The commission issued notices to HKL Bhagat, Sajjan Kumar and Jagdish Tytler among others, all Congress leaders known to be close to Rajiv Gandhi. It also added the name of Kamal Nath in the list. Shamefully, Kamal Nath is now Congress Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh.

The report submitted by the Nanavati Commission in May, 2005, was damning in its observations. “The systematic manner in which the Sikhs were thus killed indicate(s) that the attacks on them were organised,” it said. “Large number of affidavits indicate that local Congress (I) leaders and workers had either incited or helped the mobs in attacking the Sikhs… There is enough material on record to show that at many places the police had taken away their arms or other articles with which they could have defended themselves against the attacks by mobs,” it added.

According to open source media reports of the 587 original FIRs registered as per the Nanavati Commission, only 25 cases have so far resulted in conviction, of which only 12 are murder cases.

Recent times have witnessed the constitution of the Mathur Committee followed by the Central government SIT in 2015. At present matters are in the hands of an SIT constituted by the Supreme Court in 2018 that is re-investigating 186 closed cases.

In the last 35 years, justice for hapless Sikh victims of the genocide has not been forthcoming in the national capital, New Delhi, what to speak of the other states where even the process has not taken off. Every year on 1st November, media shakes out the cases from its files, a few victims whose addresses are available are approached to give statements. In their hand they hold photographs of their kin who were mercilessly killed and maimed and cry their heart out. This sentimental copy, good for TRP is played out over the day and stories are carried in Op-Ed pages of newspapers. After that, it’s back to business as usual.

This year, as the world gears up to celebrate the 550th Birth Anniversary of the First Guru of the Sikh religion, Guru Nanak Dev Ji, it would be only appropriate for the nation, its government and most importantly Prime Minister Narendra Modi, to ensure dispensation of justice to the faithful followers on the great Guru Nanak Dev ji who have being wronged in the most brutal, sadistic and inhumane manner for no fault of theirs. No bigger tribute than this can be paid to Guru Nanak Dev Ji.

Bhagwan Ram’s birth place is venerable for Hindus, says Ayodhya verdict

Unanimous Judgement on Ayodhya by the five-judge bench of Supreme Court corrects a historical wrong. Even as majority of Hindus and Muslims have accepted the apex court’s verdict with grace, the Left-leaning coterie is out with its dirty game to create a fear psychosis among Muslims.

The ninth day of November 2019 will be etched in the history of Indian subcontinent forever. Future generations across the subcontinent will remember this date as the day when balm was applied to a wound that had been festering for centuries.

Yes, I am talking about the unanimous verdict of a five-judge bench of the Supreme Court that ruled in favour of the Hindu community and handed them the entire Ram Janmabhoomi sthan (Ram’s birth place) at Ayodhya. The apex court in its 1045-page judgement accepted the evidence that Hindus had been worshiping the Janmasthan ever since Bhagwan Ram was born and that this 2.77 acre land is as venerable and sacrosanct as the Ram idol and his temple.

It’s after a long fight which lasted 491 years that Hindus can now dream of getting unfettered access to the Ram Janmabhoomi sthan at Ayodhya.

The big question is why did it take this long? Archaeological excavations, reams of literature, historical proofs, numerous books and other evidence clearly pointed towards the existence of a magnificent Ram Janmabhoomi Temple at this Janmasthan site in Ayodhya. And yet it took five centuries to reclaim the revered temple land at Ayodhya. Even independent India took seven decades to come to this conclusion.

Commies and their influence in stalling the Ayodhya resolution

Soon after independence British handed over the reins of India to Cambridge-educated Jawaharlal Nehru, who then imported and implemented the Western concepts of a nation state. The anglicized Nehru relegated all indigenous cultural richness of India into the dustbin. At that time the world was vertically split into capitalism and communism blocs and Nehru took a principled stand of not joining either of the two blocs. However, Nehru believed in Fabian Socialism—a form of socialism that relies in propagating socialist and communist thoughts through literature, art and history books. Nehru’s patronage of socialists meant that all forms of creative landscape in the country were occupied by the communists. And this was it. Even as India adopted a secular constitution and donned the secular fabric, the communist forces invaded creative fields and academia.

Creative fields and academia are soft powers that have the potential to influence an individual’s thinking. And this explains the 70-year delay by independent India in resolving the Ayodhya dispute.

A large majority of the Indian society was made to overlook country’s cultural glory, the historical wrongs committed by barbaric invaders were painted as acts of courage. As a nation we forgot to take pride in our glorious past. Simultaneously, alien role models were created and Ram was relegated to being a mythological figure who needed to be forgotten by this modern Indian society.

Yet, thanks to the collective cultural wisdom of Indian society and strong family values where Bhagwan Ram occupies prime importance, Hindus never forget their identity.

Immediately after India’s independence, Hindu society made its first attempt to wrest back Ram Janmabhoomi in December 1949 by placing idols of Ram Lalla inside the Ram Janmasthan at Ayodhya. Courts granted permission to the Hindus for puja (worship). Courts also declined to order the removal of Ram Lalla idols and prohibited Muslims within 200 feet of the idols.

In February 1986, courts ordered that locks at Ram Janmabhoomi must be removed. This gave full access to Hindus to worship Ram Lalla. In fact, during the reign of three Prime Ministers –V P Singh, Chandrashekhar, and Narsimha Rao several attempts were made to resolve this contentious issue. During the tenure of former Prime Minister Chandrashekhar (November 1990- June 1991) Hindus and Muslims had almost resolved the dispute, when Muslims had agreed to hand over the Ram Janmabhoomi sthan (2.77 acre) to Hindus. But then the vicious Historians (read fiction writers) such as Romila Thapar, Irfan Habib, DN Jha and their ilk started a malicious propaganda that flared up the emotions of Muslims and the talks fell apart.

The discontent among Hindus kept simmering and gradually the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement gained momentum. The indiscriminate firing on karsevaks (temple volunteers) on 30th October 1990 and again on 2nd November 1990 in which thousands of innocent karsevaks were killed only strengthened the resolve of Hindus to wrest back Ram Janmabhoomi sthan. The killings and police brutalities fuelled passions and the subsequent mass frenzy led Hindus to demolish that symbol of slavery–Babri Masjid, on 6th December 1992.

Karsevaks (temple volunteers) being fired upon by Police on 2nd November 1990. Thousands of innocent karsevaks were killed in this indiscriminate firing.

It needs to be borne in mind that even at the height of frenzy of the Ram Janmabhoomi Movement all other mosques in Ayodhya remained safe, the karsevaks demolished only the Babri Masjid.

This brings to mind the most endearing question, as to what is so special about this Ram Janmabhoomi Temple and the Ram Janmasthan at Ayodhya for Hindus? What is it in that 2.77 acre land at Ayodhya which makes Hindus so attached with this land parcel. Well, before answering I pose a counter-question: What is so special about the Mecca and Medina for Muslims? Or, what’s so special for Jews and Christians in Jerusalem? Ayodhya holds such primary importance for Hindus. Not only the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple but even the plot of land where Bhagwan Ram was born—the Ram Janmasthan, is revered by Hindus across the world.

Temple of venerable deities can be built at any place in the world but their place of birth is one such unique location that cannot be transferred. Bhagwan Ram’s birthplace is permanent, irrevocable, immutable, invariable, irreplaceable, incontrovertible, indisputable, undeniable and can never be forfeited.

After marathon arguments during the hearings in Ayodhya case, the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court was convinced about this fact and ruled in favour of the Ram Janmabhoomi sthan.

“…Faith and belief of the Hindus as depicted by the evidence on record clearly establish that the Hindus belief that at the birth place of Lord Ram, the Mosque was constructed and three-dome structure is the birth place of Lord Ram…” read the unanimous judgement of the five-judge Bench of the Supreme Court.

Hindus and a large majority of Muslims looked upon Babri Masjid as a symbol of barbarism that was thrust upon the country by Babur and his army of savages. The nation felt, and rightly so, that Babri Masjid was built only with an objective to show and prove to the then Indian society, during sixteenth century, that Mughal invaders have become the new masters who now have control on every aspect of the lives of Indians which included their revered Gods and their temples.

Psychological scar on India

Babur was the victor in 1526 and to assert his victory over the indigenous Hindu population he had to inflict a deep wound on the collective psyche of the nation. And invaders choose local populace’s women and their Gods to assert their superiority. The marauding armies of Babur raped women and his commander Mir Baki demolished the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple at Ayodhya. The message from the Mughal invaders was quite clear: ‘We have your women and we have demolished the home of your God. Now subjugate’. A large portion of indigenous population did convert to Islam for fear of their lives, yet a few chose death over conversion and kept up fighting. During the four year of Babur’s rein (1526-1530) Hindus fought 4 battles to regain control of the Ram Janmasthan at Ayodhya. They lost these battles. And the Babri Masjid stood majestically reminding them of their defeat and savagery of Mughal invaders. This baton of resistance kept on passing to the subsequent Hindu generations to wrest back control of the Ram Janmbhoomi sthan. Till the year 1934, Hindus had fought 76 battles to regain control of the Janmasthan at Ayodhya.

Dead bodies of innocent karsevaks (temple volunteers) lined up after they were killed in indiscriminate police firing on 2nd November 1990 on orders of the then Uttar Pradesh Chief Minister Mulayam Singh.

For Hindus, a temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi sthan is not an issue of mere bricks and mortar. It is an issue of our cultural resurgence and identity where Shri Rama, as maryada purushottam, has a prime place of importance. The movement is an expression of the collective consciousness of the Hindu ethos.

Unfortunately after India’s independence petty politicians with vested interests, a bunch of Left-leaning historians (read fiction writers) and journalists misguided Muslims into believing that Babri Masjid stood for their Islamic identity. This was utterly false. This Left-leaning coterie never told gullible Muslim masses that Babri Masjid was built against the basic Islamic tenets. Islam mandates that mosques should never be built on a land forcefully taken away or after demolishing religious structures of other faith.

The makeshift Ram Lalla Temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi sthan in Ayodhya. This place
where Bhagwan Ram was born and the adjoining land mass in equally sacrosanct and venerable for Hindus as the Ram Temple.

After unanimous verdict of the Supreme Court, learned and level-headed Muslims have said that they want to move ahead. Iqbal Ansari, one of the litigants for Muslims in Ayodhya case, said that he wholeheartedly accepts the Supreme Court verdict. “I respect the judgement of the Supreme Court,” Ansari said soon after the apex court’s unanimous verdict on the Ayodhya dispute. Iqbal Ansari is the son of Hashim Ansari who was one of the original litigants in the Ram Janmabhoomi Ayodhya case. Hashim Ansari died three years ago. “We will not challenge the court verdict. We are very happy with the decision,” Iqbal Ansari said.

Ditto for other Muslim leaders such as Tarek Fatah, eminent Islamic scholar, Syed Waseem Rizvi, chairman Shia Central Waqf Board, Zafar Sareshwala, former chancellor of Maulana Azad National Urdu University and several others who have gracefully accepted the verdict. However, as the nation is rejoicing and there appears to be a bonhomie among Hindus and Muslims this Left coterie has once again begun to raise its ugly head. Rather than accept the Supreme Court verdict with finality they have started nit-picking in the unanimous judgement. This Left cabal is now shouting that the Supreme Court verdict puts faith above facts and that gross injustice has been done to the Muslims!

Generations of Hindus have been defensive about their faith and culture. It’s time to come out of this shell and take these detractors head on with renewed vigour. Muslims need to realize that this opportunist-Leftist cabal is laying a trap for them. Rather than accept the Supreme Court’s unanimous judgement this band of fiction writers are out once again to create a fear psychosis amongst the minds of Indian Muslims. But these fissiparous forces must not succeed this time. We Hindus fought with grit to wrest back Ram Janmasthan at Ayodhya, this time we need to stand solidly with our Muslim brethren to brace against this fake communist propaganda.

It’s high time this opportunist coterie is unmasked who have developed a knack of finding problems for every solution.

Iran announces discovery of massive oil field

Iran has discovered a massive new oil field, President Hassan Rouhani said ON Sunday, a find that would boost its proven reserves by about a third in a rare piece of “good news” for an economy battered by US sanctions.

In a speech aired on state TV, Rouhani said the country’s economy had stabilised despite punishing US measures against its senior leaders, banking and finance sectors.

The vast field in the southwestern province of Khuzestan holds an estimated 53 billion barrels of crude, he said. The 80-metre deep reservoir stretches nearly 200 kilometres from Khuzestan’s border with Iraq to the city of Omidiyeh.

“This is a small gift by the government to the people of Iran,” he said in a speech from the central city of Yazd.

“We announce to America today that we are a rich nation, and despite your enmity and cruel sanctions, Iranian oil industry workers and engineers discovered this great oil field.” The find would add around 34 percent to the OPEC member’s current proven reserves, estimated by energy giant BP at 155.6 billion barrels.

Iran, a founding member of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries, sits on what were already the world’s fourth-biggest oil reserves. The new reserves, if proven, would lift it to third place, just before regional arch-rival Saudi Arabia. But it remains to be seen how much the country can benefit from the new field.

Iran has struggled to sell its oil since US President Donald Trump withdrew from a landmark 2015 nuclear deal last year and reimposed unilateral sanctions.

Iran has experienced a sharp economic downturn this year, fuelled in part by US sanctions, with a plummeting currency sending inflation skyrocketing and hiking the prices of imports. The IMF has said Iran’s economy will contract by a massive 9.5 percent this year, its worst performance since 1984 when the Islamic republic was at war with neighbouring Iraq, but notes the growth is expected to stabilise at zero next year.

The verdict of Supreme Court marks the start of a new dawn: PM

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has hailed the Supreme Court verdict on Ayodhya as historic and called it a golden day in the history of India and Indian judiciary. PM urged all citizens to come together to build a New India and work for everyone’s development.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi said, “Today, on 9th November, the Kartarpur corridor has begun. In this corridor, there have been efforts from India and efforts from Pakistan. And now, with verdict on Ayodhya, this date- the 9th of November teaches us the power of staying united and growing together. ”

PM said that SC heard everyone with much patience and gave unanimous verdict which has shown its tremendous resolve.

PM further said, “With this verdict, the Honourable Supreme Court has given a message that even the toughest issues can be resolved within the framework of the Constitution and in spirit of the laws.

We should learn from this verdict that even if there is some delay, we should remain patient. This is in everyone’s interest. In every situation, our faith in India’s constitution, India’s judicial system must remain unwavering. This is very important.”

PM said that Supreme Court has given its decision on the construction of Ram Mandir and this decision has made it incumbent upon all us citizens to take our responsibility of nation building even more seriously. PM said that the harmony, brotherhood, friendship, unity and peace amongst us all, is very important for the nation’s development. PM urged all citizens to walk together and work together to achieve our goals and objectives.

Supreme Court gives the disputed Janmabhoomi land at Ayodhya for Ram Temple

In its much awaited verdict, the Supreme Court Constitution bench today directed that the disputed land in Ayodhya goes to the Hindus in its entirety for the construction of Ram Mandir. The Sunni Waqf Board will get five acres of alternate land, which will be accorded either by the state or the Centre.

The Constitution bench of the Supreme Court headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and comprising Justices SA Bobde, DY Chandrachud, Ashok Bhushan and S Abdul Nazeer said in its judgement that Centre will hand over the disputed site to the Board of trustees within 3 months and the management of construction of the temple is to be monitored by the trust.

The Supreme Court junked the theory of pre-existence of an Idgah at the disputed site. The SC held that the ASI report that held that there was a structure underneath the Babri Masjid can’t be dismissed as conjecture or just a guess work and junks theory of pre-existence of an Idgah at the disputed site. “Babri mosque wasn’t constructed on a vacant land. An underlying structure did exist.” The SC said that the underlying structure was not of Islamic religion as artefacts, architectural evidence had distinct non Islamic nature. ASI report can be lent credence to the underlying structure was dated 12th century, the SC says. But it adds that the ASI report hasn’t said the underlying structure was a specific temple.

The Supreme Court said that the travellogues also evidenced age-old belief that Lord Ram was born there. “Gazateers can also provide corroborative materials.”

“It is clearly established that while Muslims offered prayers inside the inner courtyard, the same was done by Hindus in the outer court yard. Prior to 1856-57, there was no exclusion of Hindus from praying there. Exodus of Hindus from the inner courtyard remained contentious too. They continued to worship at Ram Chabutara and they worshipped the Garbh GiRja from the railings,” said the SC. For 325 years, from the construction of the mosque till 1857, Muslims have given no evidence of offering prayers at the disputed structure in exclusion of Hindus, it says. Destruction of the mosque in 1992 was in breach of SC order, said CJI-led bench.

The Supreme Court said that the Hindus consider Ayodhya as the birthplace of Lord Ram and the faith of Hindus is undisputed. “Faith is a matter of individual believer. Once the court has the material that the faith is genuine, the court must not interfere and acknowledge it. Value of a secular Constitution lies in mutual deference.”

The Supreme Court judges also unanimously dismissed the Shia Waqf Board’s petition claiming rights on the Babri mosque on the disputed land in Ayodhya.

India’s honour rests in Shri Ram Janmabhoomi Temple at Ayodhya

2

I vividly remember that Sunday afternoon when I was loitering in the neighborhood along with other children. We were school students then and apart from cricket the other topic of our passionate discussion was the ongoing agitation at Ayodhya. A few minutes into our discussion, we saw a hefty man running towards us. He was panting. Tears were rolling down his cheeks as he repeatedly yelled “Jai Shri Ram”. Before we could react, several others in our locality had joined in and roared back “Jai Shri Ram”. Within minutes almost everybody, including me and my friends, were chanting “Jai Shri Ram” in unison.

This day was 6th December, 1992.

The Babri Structure (that looked like a Mosque) at Ayodhya had been demolished and news spread like wild fire. Conch shells were blowing, sweets were distributed, diyas and candles were being lighted all around.

This was the scene and extent of celebrations at a small colony in Kanpur an industrial town some 220 kilometers from Ayodhya. Remember this was 1992– a different era with no Facebook, WhatsApp or Twitter. Mobile phones were super luxury and 24×7 television news was nowhere. The only mode of communication was landline phones and word of mouth. Yet, news of the demolition of Babri Structure spread like wild fire and instigated hysterical celebrations all across the country. Post the demolition of Babri Structure a few political commentators and historians began calling this structure a Masjid and said that Babri Masjid was demolished on December 6th , 1992. But this Structure was never a Masjid (Mosque). Islam never permits demolishing one religious structure (be it a temple, church or synagogue) to construct a mosque.  

In fact, many historians and commentators like to describe the history of post-independence India as pre-1992 and post-1992. Such was the impact of Ram Janmabhoomi Movement on the lives of Indians. This impact has only grown over time.  

In recent years during my interaction with journalists and political observers, especially from the West, one question almost recurs: “How could a political party (read BJP) whip up mass frenzy on a scale that remains almost unparalleled in post-independence India”?

Well, first things first. The Ram Janmabhoomi Movement was never the brain child of one political party or any of its offshoot. So neither the BJP nor its ideological mentor RSS (Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh) or the VHP (Vishwa Hindu Parishad) can claim sole ownership rights of the Ayodhya movement. None of the people in my colony who were celebrating the demolition of Babri Structure were members of the BJP or VHP or the RSS. 

Let’s go back in history to put things into a perspective.

Mughal invader Babur’s commander-in-chief Mir Baki demolished the Ram Janmabhoomi Temple in 1528. The psyche behind temple’s demolition was to prove to the indigenous Hindu population that world order has changed and Babur is the new ruler who is here to take possession of the country, its people, women and their God. Since Ram is an integral part of India’ psyche so demolition of his temple at his birthplace would send a powerful message to the locals, went the thought in the minds of invading army. Yes, Babur did demolish the temple but faced stiff resistance from the then local population to an extent that he was unable to build a grand mosque in its place. It was a hurriedly built “Structure” that resembled a mosque; the minarets, place for ablutions and other essential structures of a mosque were starkly absent. The Mughal invaders paid no heed to the basic Islamic tenet that a temple cannot be demolished to construct a Mosque. 

During Babur’s short rein of four years the then local people fought four battles to regain control of the Ram Janmabhoomi site. The very fact that Babur was unable to build a grand mosque even after being the victor speaks volumes about the resistance he faced from the then Hindu population. And then these fights never stopped. Till 1934 Hindus fought a total of seventy six battles to regain control of the Ram Janmabhoomi site. Be it the rein of Akbar, Jahangir, Shahjahan or the brutal Aurangzeb at no time did the Hindu population stop battling to re-gain control of the Ram Janmabhoomi site. Since the year 1934, and thereafter India’s independence in 1947, this fight shifted to the court rooms. So, while earlier the battles were bloody and violent with time it has now become judicial. 

For people of India, a temple at the Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya is not merely an issue of bricks and mortar. It is an issue of our cultural resurgence and identity, where Lord Ram has a prime place of importance. The movement is an expression of the collective consciousness of the our ethos, our national honor and dignity.

Any interpretation of the Babri Structure, other than that of it being viewed as a monument which celebrates our slavery will clearly indicate that Hindus and all Indians are being asked to live with the feeling of humiliation that Babur wanted to inflict upon us as “conquered people”.

Now where does this leave the country’s Muslim population? Since it was never a mosque the Babri Structure was never a holy place for Muslims and there is absolutely no need for them to own up the barbarism of Babur and others like him. A little bit of historical research proves that present day Indian Muslims are converts from Hinduism and it is their forefathers who died fighting the marauding army of the likes of Babur. Later on, their families were forced to convert to Islam by the invading Mughal army. The right way for Indian Muslims is to distance themselves from such acts of vandalism and barbarism of the past.

In 1857, the year when India fought its first war of independence against British colonialism, Amir Ali the local Muslim leader from Ayodhya announced that Muslims must hand over the Babri Structure to their Hindu brethren. Unfortunately, rebels lost the 1857 war and British army hanged Amir Ali and his associate leader Ramcharan Das from a tamarind tree on March 18, 1858. For several years this tamarind tree was worshiped by both Hindus and the Muslims. The developing camaraderie between Hindus and Muslims worried British colonial rulers. Soon they uprooted the tamarind tree that was turning into a rallying point for the indigenous population. Sadly, this portion of history is skipped in present day narrative.

Elsewhere also there has been several precedents of such acts. When the Germans are asked to apologize for the crimes of Hitler, they never hesitate to do so, clearly indicating that they do not own Nazism.

In 1918 in Warsaw, at the end of first Russian occupation of Poland, one of the first things that Polish people did was to bring down the Russian Orthodox Christian Cathedral that was built by Russians in the center of the town. This was done despite the fact that Poles are Christians and Jesus Christ was worshiped in that Cathedral. The Poles demolished the Cathedral built by Russians only because they viewed the Cathedral not as a place of worship, rather as a structure that reminded them of their slavery.

The Babri Structure was a similar construction that reminded India of the savagery and so its demolition was celebrated all across the country. A grand temple at the birth place of Lord Ram will instill a sense of pride for Indians in their rich cultural heritage and correct the historical wrong.

Pak Army’s barbaric violence continues in Balochistan: Dil Murad Baloch

Baloch National Movement (BNM) Central Information Secretary Dil Murad Baloch issued the monthly report of October 2019 in which he stated that Pakistani forces continue to commit atrocities in occupied Balochistan. The state-sponsored death squads are inflicting innumerable atrocities under the umbrella of the Pakistan Army. The situation of Balochistan is in the worst condition and the Baloch nation is looking towards the international community for help.

The report states that the Pakistani Army conducted 28 military operations in the month of October and 30 people “disappeared”. Also, 25 dead bodies were discovered during this month, of which 8 were killed by Pakistani security forces and one person was killed by the death squads. Two elderly persons and two women were killed in Ormara. The women were killed in front of their children, whereas the two elderly men were shifted into the military camps, where they were tortured to death. Later, their dead bodies were dumped in Ormara. One person was killed by security forces who was previously released from the torture cell. The exact causes of the death of other 16 people remains unknown. The security forces also looted more than 100 houses during military operations in different areas of Balochistan.

Further, around 17 people were released from the torture cells of security forces. Among them one person was abducted in 2015, two went missing from 2016, three more people had gone missing in 2017, one was missing from 2018 and the other ten people were whisked away in 2019 by the security forces.

The Information Secretary of Baloch National Movement also mentioned the scandal of the University of Balochistan where university authorities in league with the Frontier Corps (FC) installed surveillance and hidden cameras and recorded candid videos of students to blackmail them. It was a well-organized plan by authorities of Pakistan government. These videos were used to blackmail hundreds of Baloch female students.

Khalil Baloch, the Chairman of Baloch National Movement has already expressed his worries about this incident, saying that it was an attack on our national dignity and honor which wounded our collective soul. Baloch nation will remember this for centuries to come and will take historical revenge for it from the state of Pakistan.

Dil Murad Baloch stated that in October, Panjgur, Awaran, and few other areas were under the constant attack of Pakistani security forces. Pakistan has turned Balochistan into an altar. Due to these atrocities by Pakistani security forces a humanitarian crisis has evolved in Balochistan.

He states that a few months ago the video of an elderly person Hassan son of Shay Sheru of Rach, Ormara turned viral on the internet. In that video, the man can be seen complaining about the death squads of Pakistan Army which have turned life unbearable and he appeals for help. As a result of this viral video Pakistani Army abducted Hassan Sheru and another old man Lal Mohammad Razai and killed them. Pakistani forces took them to the army camp where they were inhumanly tortured and killed. Among the dead women, one was also pregnant and the other had a three-month-old baby. Despite this tragic event, no one raised voice to condemn this hapless incident. This event is not a single event. It reflects the entire picture of Balochistan and the humanitarian situation over here.

Dil Murad Baloch stated that the incident at the University of Balochistan, the tragedy of Ormara, the long-standing naked military aggression across Balochistan are sufficient to prove that Pakistan has crossed all limits of atrocities and are committing genocide across the Baloch nation. In order to maintain its hegemonic control on Balochistan, Pakistan keeps on increasing the frequency and intensity of such incidents. But the historical facts tell otherwise, that the nations cannot be defeated and held slaves forever. Baloch nation is ready for sacrifices in all shapes and forms. Similarly, these atrocities of Pakistan will further motivate the Baloch nation to gain their national freedom by setting a new example of sacrifices.

He added that the silence of the international community is enough to teach us that the Baloch nation has to single-handedly fight their own war and secure freedom on their own abilities. “We have no complaint against Pakistani civil society and human rights organizations but the silence of international bodies and humanitarian organizations raises several questions. They have been tight-lipped on the humanitarian crisis in Balochistan and had refused to condemn the atrocities, due to which Pakistan has been exacerbating its war crimes across the length and width of Balochistan,” added Dil Murad Baloch.

He further added that the Baloch National Movement has been publishing and making public the documented reports and bringing them before the international organizations, but till date, no cemented action has taken against Pakistani atrocities. The time is ripe that the United Nations and International Human rights organizations should send their fact-finding mission in Balochistan to analyse the ground realities.

‘Ranj’ to have its Delhi premiere at Woodpecker International Film Festival (WIFF)

Sunit Sinha’s debut feature film Ranj (Slow Burn) will have its Delhi premiere at the upcoming Woodpecker International Film Festival (WIFF) on November 30 at Siri Fort Auditorium.  Globally acclaimed for its focus on popularizing issue-based cinema, WIFF will be organizing its seventh annual edition this year from November 29 to December 1, 2019. Sixty-seven films from 16 countries have been officially selected for screening in this year’s festival.

Ranj (Slow burn) is the story of Amanpreet, a youth from a village in Punjab, who is forced to migrate to New Delhi, for livelihood. But he is not wired for city life. He yearns for all that he has left behind- his days without a care; and Geetu, his bride-to-be. He constantly struggles with the unfamiliar way of life. He appears painfully disoriented. Employed at an automobile tools shop, while Amanpreet’s co-workers jump at every opportunity to humiliate him, his boss constantly threatens to fire him.

His harassed work-life, the pressures of the impending marriage and pennilessness drive him to total despair. He roams the streets in pitiable silence and guilt like a cursed loner. He soon cracks. Amanpreet engages in a murderous assault and self-destructs the very life he set out to build. Now an uncertain fate looms large. Will he survive the city? Can he make peace with himself?

The 80-minute long film is directed by Sunit Sinha. He is an independent filmmaker, and a practising theatre artiste for over two and a half decades. In the mid-90s, he essayed major character roles in TV Series such as UTV’s Trikaal, Nimbus Television’s Farz, Sippy Films’ Gaatha, and Hansal Mehta’s debut feature film, Jayate (1998). Sinha has written and directed several notable plays for Actor Factor Theatre Company, including Khudgudi, Taxi, The Red Corridor, and Three. As a filmmaker, his short fiction films Pratihinsa (2014), and Subah Ke Pehle (2015) have won acclaim at international film festivals.

Swara Bhasker in trouble for abusing child actor; complaint filed with NCPCR

Bollywood actress Swara Bhasker is in some serious trouble, following her comments in a chat show. Swara in an appearance with stand-up comedian Kunal Kamra on Hotstar’s chat show Son of Abish, hosted by ex-All India Bakchod (AIB) comedian Abish Mathew, had opened up on her experience of shooting for a soap commercial. She had revealed how she was expecting a soap advertisement like the stars, but was surprised to find that she has to shoot with a four-year-old child. While recounting the incident that happened during her advertisement days, she referred to the child artiste she was then working with as ch***ya and kam**na.

During the episode, Swara mentioned that children can be evil sometimes, proceeding to add that one child she had worked with a while back had called her aunty and that had irked her. Mocking how the child called her an ‘aunty’, she used an abusive word for the child, apart from words like ‘kameena’, ‘menace’ and ‘evil.’ Social media had gone on an uproar for her comment. Since the episode of the chat show came out, Swara has been trending on Twitter.

Later, several complaints were also filed against her. An NGO called Legal Rights Protection Forum has filed a complaint against Swara for her actions. The official Twitter handle of the NGO recently tweeted, “Filed complaint with NCPCR against an actress named Swara Bhasker for her racist & discriminating comments against children of southern part of India during a TV show. Sought strict action against actress & directions to remove content from all its online accounts.”

A Bharatiya Janata Party leader named Akash Joshi also registered a complaint with the NCPCR. Sharing a photograph of the complaint he filed, he wrote on Twitter that he would not rest till Swara Bhasker was put behind bars. In the letter, he urged the authorities to take strict action against the Veerey Di Wedding actor. He also urged that action be taken against the others in the video for encouraging her behaviour.

Islamic Scholar Tarek Fatah calls upon Canada to support India on Kashmir

To mark the 30th anniversary of the fall of the Berlin Wall on Monday, the former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev warned that ongoing tensions among nuclear weapon-owning countries have put the world at “colossal” risk.

While the aging Gorbachev focused his attention on the tensions between U.S. and Russia, insisting that the two countries remained in a “chilly war,” 10 scientists from the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists agreed on Oct. 31 that the world did face a nuclear calamity. However, they said the danger of such a war was elsewhere — between India and Pakistan.

The scientists wrote that the direct effects of a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan would kill 50 to 125 million: “The ramifications for Indian and Pakistani society would be major and long lasting…. But the climatic effects of the smoke produced by an India-Pakistan nuclear war would not be confined to the subcontinent, or even to Asia. Those effects would be enormous and global in scope.”

And if we in Canada feel such a calamity will not interrupt our hockey or baseball games, the Atomic Scientists conclude that “A nuclear winter would halt agriculture around the world and produce famine for billions of people.”

And before someone says we must limit immigration to keep third world problems from creeping into our borders, let me remind them:

Firstly, we do not live in a Ziploc bag where we can lock-in the freshness.

Secondly, radiation and nuclear clouds need no visas to travel from the Himalayas to the Rockies.

The threat of nuclear war was first raised by Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan at the UN General Assembly, where he threatened India and the World: “If a conventional war starts between the two countries … anything could happen. But supposing a country [Pakistan] seven times smaller than its neighbour [India] is faced with the choice either you surrender, or you fight for your freedom till death? “What will we do? I ask myself this question … and we will fight … and when a nuclear-armed country fights to the end, it will have consequences far beyond the borders.”

And if such crude nuclear sabre-rattling at the UN was not enough, Imran Khan’s war mongering ministers kept raising the ante. One of them threatened to launch missiles at any country siding with India. “If tensions with India rises on Kashmir, Pakistan will be compelled to go to war. Hence, those countries backing India, and not Pakistan, (over Kashmir) will be considered as our enemy and a missile will be fired at India and those nations supporting it,” said the Minister for Kashmir affairs.

During the Cold War, the concept of MAD — Mutually Assured Destruction — kept the Warsaw Pact and NATO from being flippant about making nuclear threats. But the Pakistan factor and its “Islamic Bomb” throws a curve ball few strategists in the West understand.

While the rest of the world — from atheists to Catholics; Hindus to Jews and millions in between — strive to make the most of the gift of life, too many Muslim children are indoctrinated to believe that life begins after death, and that the earth is a mere transit lounge where the eradication of Hindustan and Hindus is a sacred duty of the Muslims of the Indian Subcontinent as outlined in the prophesized “Ghazwa-e-Hind” (the duty to carry out the Prophet’s war on India).

Silly as it may sound to the Western reader, no Islamic leader has as yet denounced this upcoming war to end all of civilization.

Pakistan has now joined hands with Turkey and Malaysia to form a Muslim nationalist entente of men in suits outside the Saudi or Iranian spheres of influence. Canada should be on the side of India in this war of civilizations centred around Kashmir.

(This column was first published in Toronto Sun)