Home Blog Page 443

Julian Assange arrested in Eucadorian embassy, US issues extradition warrant

In a dramatic move, police entered the Ecuadorian embassy in London Thursday morning and arrested WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, who has been in the embassy since 2012, when he was granted asylum as part of a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden, where he was facing allegations of sexual assault.  As per the latest reports, he was “further arrested” on his arrival at a London police station on behalf of United States authorities, who have issued an extradition warrant.

In a stunning chain of events, Ecuador withdrew his asylum and the ambassador ‘invited’ authorities into the embassy, to arrest Assange. Ecuadorian president Lenin Moreno said in a video statement Thursday that his country withdrew Assange’s asylum due to his “discourteous and aggressive behaviour,” “the hostile and threatening declarations of his allied organisation against Ecuador” and “the transgression of international treaties.” Assange “violated the norm of not intervening in internal affairs of other states,” Moreno said.

Kangana to be seen next in a real-life based action drama

Actress Kangana Ranaut has her hands full. After “Manikarnika: The Queen of Jhansi”, Kangana Ranaut has locked a script for her next directorial, an epic action drama based on a real-life story. On Tuesday wrapped up the shoot of “Panga” in Delhi and will now head to Kolkata for the next leg. Apart from “Panga”, she also has “Mental Hai Kya” and Jayalalithaa biopic.

Talking about the new film, she said, “I’m on the verge of announcing my next directorial venture. It’s an action film an epic drama. It has taken a lot of my time. Currently, we are putting everything in order, but we have locked the script. We’ll be doing a photoshoot soon after which we plan to release the poster too,” Kangana said. The film will be mounted on a large scale, but will be different from any other epic that has been made in recent times, the actor said in a statement.

The actor feels great that female artistes are bringing a lot of business in the industry and believes it is the “right time” for her to start working on her second directorial project.

INS Shikra hosts Naval Investiture Ceremony

The Naval Investiture Ceremony for 2019 was held at the naval helicopter base INS Shikra of Western Naval Command (WNC), Mumbai on 10 Apr 19.

Admiral Sunil Lanba PVSM, AVSM, ADC, the Chief of Naval Staff (CNS), on behalf of the President of India, conferred Gallantry and non-Gallantry Awards announced on the Republic Day this year to meritorious personnel, as well as citations to Naval units which have distinguished themselves during the past year. The ceremony was witnessed by senior dignitaries of the Indian Navy and families of the awardees.

A 50-men Guard of Honour was paraded during the ceremonial parade which was held as a part of the Investiture ceremony. The Guard of Honour was inspected by Admiral Sunil Lanba prior to reviewing the parade comprising 18 platoons of Naval personnel drawn from various ships and establishments of WNC.

On completion of the review, the CNS awarded the medals, citations and CNS Trophy for Best Green Practices to the various recipients. 45 medals which included 18 Nao Sena Medals for Gallantry, 09 Nao Sena Medals for Devotion to Duty and 16 VishishtSeva Medals for distinguished service, the Capt Ravi Dhir Memorial Gold Medal for Promoting Innovativeness in Flight Safety and the Lt VK Jain Memorial Gold Medal for best applied research in Naval Technology were presented.

The CNS also presented Unit Citations to four afloat units, viz. INS Trishul, INS Sahyadri, INAS 322 and INS Tarasa and four ashore units – NSRY (Kochi), INS Utkrosh, INHS Kalyani and Material Organisation (Mumbai) – for delivering exceptional performance over the past one year. Naval Dockyard (Vizag) and INS Dwarka were awarded the ‘CNS Trophy for Best Green Practices’ for their environment friendly green initiatives.

A Tale of Two Election Manifestos – BJP vs Congress

The elections are here. So are the election manifestos offering promises and dreams without looking back at what was promised and what was delivered since the previous election. Political parties, over the years have made this a routine that has to be gone through before each election. No one asks why they do this and none bother to look at the election promises once the elected officials are in power.

Therefore, we must look at the track record of the political parties in implementing what they promise in their manifesto as well as the credibility of the leader of the party issuing the manifesto before deciding on which manifesto suits our liking.

Let us examine the key issues facing our nation and how the BJP and the Congress plan to address these. We need to cut out all the rhetoric and weigh each point with a lens of fiscal prudence.

  • Jobs: With over 28 million people being added to our population each year, there is no denying the fact that the Government in power has to create jobs. But do these have to be only in Government jobs? Or does the Government have to provide an ecosystem that is conducive to creating jobs through entrepreneurship? The Congress is promising more Government jobs and the BJP is offering more entrepreneurial opportunities. Government jobs will always be finite if we want an effective bureaucracy.
  • Health: The health needs of our growing population needs no argument. The fact that our health systems are appalling is a fact no one can deny or challenge. What is worth examining is what the BJP has done through its Ayushman Bharat scheme which has provided medical insurance cover for almost 40% of our country. The Congress manifesto talks of a Right to Healthcare Act, but it is worth thinking about what has already been implemented versus what has been promised.
  • Education: The Congress manifesto promises to reserve 6% of the annual budget for education while the BJP manifesto talks about increasing educational institutions. What is important to note is that the BJP wants to develop our educational institutions to attain international eminence, once again focusing on the demographic dividend of India.
  • Farmers: Since independence, the plight of the farmers has been discussed with very little being done for them. It is important to understand that no farmer wants a dole to get a free meal. He wants to work hard and to earn a livelihood from his land. The Congress, its normal style promises more handouts while the BJP talks about doubling farm incomes by 2024 and providing more water for cultivation. In addition, the BJP has already implemented neem coated fertilizer and the increased MSP scheme.
  • Security: The matter of national security needs no explanation or discussion. Clearly, every Indian (barring maybe a few exceptions) wants security for himself and his family. This includes security of our borders, security of our homes and our personal security. The Congress wants to dilute the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA) without solving the problem of terrorism. The BJP clearly has a diametrically opposite view and we have seen which leader has taken what action over the years. The BJP has emphasised its zero tolerance against terrorism. Can we afford to simply “strongly condemn” terrorism as we have always done after being hit or should we hit back hard to create deterrence?
  • Financial Prudence: The Congress manifesto is clearly salivating at the prospects of being given a strong economy where inflation is under control, current account deficit is at its lowest and the GDP has consistently shown strong growth. They see an excellent opportunity to raid the treasury with their populist schemes like NYAY. The BJP, on the other hand has always demonstrated fiscal prudence and not hesitated to take tough decisions when faced with challenges that can impact the long-term fiscal policies for our country.
  • Uniform Civil Code: There is probably no country in the world that has a multiplicity of laws applicable for its citizens on the basis of their religion. The laws must be the same for all citizens. Because of our evolution post-independence, it has suited successive Governments to keep deferring the tough decision of a Uniform Civil Code. This has resulted in lots of challenges between the religious groups. It is time for a healthy debate to start the implementation of a Uniform Civil Code and the BJP has addressed this issue while the Congress is, understandably, silent.
  • Infrastructure: Post independence, we have been promised good infrastructure by successive Governments. The definition of “good” has never been clarified. Are the pot-holed roads considered good or acceptable? Are the brown outs and load shedding considered acceptable? Today’s young Indians take good roads, 100% power and broadband connectivity for granted. The BJP manifesto talks about significant investment in infrastructure and housing for all by 2022.

The manifestos of a few regional parties like the RJD that promises reservation of jobs in private sector and the judiciary does not need any discussion. There will be many more ridiculous promises that will be made by other regional parties. These are stillborn promises that everyone knows will never be implemented.

As the population of developed world shrinks, more and more Indians will find opportunity to migrate to these developed nations. Do we need a leader who makes India stand tall and ensure that our passport becomes more powerful OR do we need a group of leaders who are inward looking and will ensure that the world does not welcome future generation of Indians?

The BJP manifesto talks about making India the third largest economy in the world and a developed nation. The Congress would prefer to keep our country in poverty and illiteracy since this is how they have managed to keep winning elections. But India has changed, and the young Indians know what they want.

The million-dollar question remains. Does an election manifesto mean anything to the voter or is it more an exercise to massage the egos of various political leaders? Do we want a manifesto that, if implemented will raid the nation’s treasury to meet short-term personal goals of a few politicians?

We need to assess the performance of our local politicians and our political leaders on an ongoing basis rather than wait for the “festival of democracy” every 5 years. This is an assessment that must be done of the party in power and the party in opposition. A leader does not need to be in Government to fulfil his promises.

As responsible voters, it is important to accept that a Government needs at least 2 terms to implement what it has started. If at the end of 10 years the promises have not been kept, the voter has every right to make a change. The UPA was given 10 years. The NDA deserves the same.

In conclusion, as the old saying goes, give a man a fish and he will eat for the day. Teach a man to fish and he will eat all his life (with apologies to all the vegetarians). We can see which manifesto is offering us fish to eat and which manifesto is promising to teach us how to fish!

Imran Khan’s olive branch to the BJP

“Perhaps if the BJP – a right-wing party – wins, some kind of settlement in Kashmir could be reached.” This statement has been made, not by a Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) candidate in election mode, but by Imran Khan, Prime Minister of Pakistan. Khan made this observation to a small group of foreign journalists in an interview on April, 09. He further elucidated his point by adding that the Congress party, if elected to form the next government, would be too scared to seek a settlement with Pakistan, fearing a backlash from the right wing.

On the sticky issue of proliferation of terrorist activities directed towards India from Pakistan’s soil Khan, once again, reiterated his resolve to dismantle the structure and emphasised upon the support that he has from the all powerful Pakistan Army in this regard. The social media is abuzz with reactions to these statements with people integrating Imran Khan into the “Main Bhi Chowkidar” election campaign of Indian Prime Minister Modi.

Interestingly, a few days earlier, on April, 06, the same Imran Khan had attempted to put a spook in the election campaign of BJP by once again raising the issue of downed F-16 of Pakistan. It is well known that Pakistan is taking great pains to prove to the world that it has not lost an F-16 fighter jet in the dog-fight with the Indian MIG-21 Bison. Pakistan’s hand in raising the matter in a US based magazine to say that Pentagon count of the F-16 inventory in Pakistan has found all jets to be intact is well within the realm of possibility. Imran Khan has attempted to gain traction from this dubious news piece by tweeting, “The truth always prevails and is the best policy, BJP’s attempt to win elections through whipping up of war hysteria and false claims of downing a Pak F-16 has backfired with US defence officials also confirming that no F-16 was missing from Pakistan’s fleet.” There is, of course, egg on the face of Prime Minister Imran Khan now that the Pentagon has officially stated that it is “not aware of any investigation like that”.

The very next day, on 7th April, Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi dropped another bombshell by insinuating that India will attack his country again in the month of April. “We have reliable intelligence that India is planning a new attack on Pakistan. As per our information, this could take place between 16th and 20th April,” Qureshi told reporters in his hometown, Multan. India has, of course, rejected the claim as “irresponsible and preposterous” and aimed at whipping up war hysteria in the region. “India rejects the irresponsible and preposterous statement by the foreign minister of Pakistan with a clear objective of whipping up war hysteria in the region. This public gimmick appears to be a call to Pakistan-based terrorists to undertake a terror attack in India,” said Raveesh Kumar, the Indian External Affairs Ministry spokesperson. In this statement, the mention of a possible terrorist attack by Pakistan during the election period in India gains significance.

Under these circumstances, the sudden change of heart towards BJP by none other than Imran Khan and that too within two days of showing out and out belligerence towards the party is something to think about. Two days is a long time in politics and in this context the change of posture should not come as a surprise. What is important is to try and understand the circumstances that have led to this U-turn and what Khan intends to gain from it. Is it that during the last three days Khan has been briefed about the imminent victory of BJP in General Elections since he tweeted against the party? Is he attempting to build a reconciliatory posture as a prelude to government formation in India? Or, is he merely sending a message to the international community of him being open to talks with India, especially the BJP, should it come to power?

Prime Minister Imran Khan is very conscious of the manner in which his predecessor, Nawaz Sharif was ousted from office for attempting to clip the wings of the Pakistan Army. It is common knowledge that hundreds within the country were involved in the Panama Papers Controversy but only Nawaz has been jailed and his family involved. Khan is, quite apparently, moving with great caution. It is axiomatic that he would have taken permission from Pakistan Army before endorsing the BJP in this manner, so what we have in hand is the new Pakistani policy for engagement with India. The statement will definitely come as a big morale booster for the Saffron Party. And, is this what Imran Khan and the Pakistan Army want?

It needs to be noted here that India has been following the policy of pro-active retaliation to Pakistani misadventures along the Line Of Control (LOC). Heavy retaliatory fire by India has caused Pakistan to admit to some casualties in the beginning of this month, this is unusual. India has reiterated that the pressure will continue to be maintained till Pakistan does not convincingly curb its cross border activity.

The BJP has also made it clear in its manifesto and through the statements made by its senior leadership that it will continue to maintain a policy of zero-tolerance to terrorist activities and will not shy away from punitive retribution to any military misadventures by the neighbouring country.

The writing on the wall is very clear! Imran Khan simply has to make good his promise of curbing terrorist activities directed against India from the soil of his country. No other diplomatic rhetoric and sweet talk is going to work out with the Indian leadership, definitely not with the BJP. Once the will to work in this direction is demonstrated, the Indian government will certainly respond to the Pakistani call for talks. A lot also depends on how the elections, especially in Kashmir, fare. A terrorist attack at this sensitive juncture will irretrievably dampen any future engagement.

Deepika Padukone shooting in Delhi for Chhapaak

Shooting for Deepika Padukone’s much talked about film ‘Chhapaak” has finally started. The film went on floors around Holi and has been continuing with its schedule in New Delhi. The 33-year-old actress was recently spotted on the streets of the Delhi dressed as Laxmi Agarwal during the film’s shoot and pictures and videos of the same are going viral on social media.

Chhapaak is being directed by Meghna Gulzar. Deepika Padukone and Vikrant Massey are playing lead roles in the film. A new video of the two actors from the sets has gone viral on the internet. In the clip, Vikrant is seen riding a bike as he arrives outside of a clothing store, with Deepika’s character Malti riding pillion. Deepika, who essays the role of acid-attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal, is seen wearing prosthetics make-up, as she will appear in the film. She is seen holding a file folder and a handbag, and is dressed in a yellow kurta, white salwar and a colorful tie and dye dupatta.

Earlier, Deepika had also shared her first look in the films on her Instagram.

(Photo: Deepika Padukone/Instagram)

Deepika is also co-producing the movie along with Fox Star Studios. Chhapaak is scheduled to hit screens on January 10 next year.

First look of Rajinikanth’s ‘Darbar’ out; theater release in January 2020

The first look of superstar Rajinikanth’s next film titled ‘Darbar’ was released on Tuesday.  It features a spectacled and bearded Rajinikanth, indicating that the AR Murugadoss directed flick could be a cop film. Darbar would hit the screens for Pongal (January) 2020. Lyca productions, released the poster on Twitter.

The poster carried a catchy punchline “you decide whether you want me to be good bad or worse,” and was splashed with paraphernalia attached to the police, including an IPS shoulder pin, a handcuff, couple of guns and a police dog.

The first look also carried what seemed to be the Gateway of India in Mumbai, hinting that the story might be based in the western metropolis. Murugadoss’ earlier action flick ‘Thuppakki’, starring top actor Vijay was based in Mumbai.

This is the first tie-up between Rajinikanth and Murugadoss. Anirudh is scoring the music for the film, his successive outing with the superstar after the hit ‘Petta,’ whose songs went on to become chartbusters. Nayantara is playing the leading lady in the film, which is produced by Lyca Productions. Cinematographer Santosh Sivan and Editor Sreekar are the other technicians in the movie. Darbar is Rajinikanth’s 167th movie. 

#GeneralElections2019: Voters’ silence could be deceptive

India’s election fervor is gradually reaching its pinnacle. Amidst all the frenzy, it’s quite apparent that it’s not an easy election for the voters, irrespective of the candidates parties give or deny tickets. People are toying between emotions and reality. The choice is not easy.

However, the election is not devoid of strong issues. The issues are there but the opposition is unable to articulate it and the ruling combine is carrying out a vociferous campaign to project itself. For BJP, the biggest advantage is that in Narendra Modi they have a dynamic person as prime minister, who devastates all opposition moves. But there is also an emerging leadership, not so much in the ‘mahagathbandhan’ of opposition parties, but in the gradual rise of the Congress and the two siblings Priyanka Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi – soft new faces of Indian politics. They are trying to touch the core with old Congress linkages of regions, castes and communities. They are nudging the voters to rethink and have a look at financial, job and other statistics. They are marching on gradual rise of Congress votes across India. The Congress now has a government or is part of the government in five states–Punjab, Karnataka, MP, Rajasthan and Chhattisgarh–with 21 percent of the population, up from two states with 7 percent population in 2017.

The BJP leaders are watching every step of the two Congress leaders. They feel that Congress has only to gain in major states like UP, an old Congress bastion, where it still has its sympathizers. Somewhere there is also an apprehension that Priyanka’s “Ganga boat-yatra” through erstwhile Congress bastion, may impact voters’ minds. Recently, Congress had two major symbolic gains. Amrita Pandey, who is BJP’s UP president’s daughter-in-law joined Priyanka Gandhi in Varanasi, a few days after the joining of Manish Khanduri, son of Uttrakhand BJP leader BC Khanduri. Other opposition parties being fiefdom of families are less into studying statistics. But Congress is gradually harping on to it. So far, the onslaught is soft but one that is difficult to ignore.

When it comes to the most pressing issues in the elections, the scenario is puzzling. With an emotionally-charged campaign, post-Pulwama, BJP is trying its best to cover up hard issues. The figures, however, are telling and much of it has come from draft reports of parliamentary committees, NSSO and CAG. The CAG has pointed out to a huge-off-budget financing of about Rs 4 lakh crore in 2016-17. It says it could pose fiscal risk in the long term in case the entity that raises the funds fails to meet debt servicing.

The jobs data row has led to quitting of a top statistician. As official figures of NSSO, considered reliable, were not available, so figures of a private organisation, CMIE, got credence. The CMIE says around 31 million people are unemployed, the highest since October 2016. There are also figures of male (earlier it were female) workforce reduction. The NSSO’s periodic labour force survey 2017-18 shows males account for 28.6 crore employed. Since 1993-94 when the male workforce was 21.9 crore it swelled to 30.4 crore in 2011-12. This indicates that fewer male were employed in 2017-18. It reduced even in rural areas.

In India, the unemployment rate, which measures the number of people actively looking for a job, has been updated only in this March, and it was 6.1 percent, up from 3.41 in December 2014. The World Bank reported it in the latest report. Overall, labour force participation dropped in 2017. Such figures are always a discomfort for the government, particularly when the elections are around. The government is coming out with figures of MUDRA loans. The banks, however, find these adding to the NPA and are reluctant to proffer it. The cash dole, once a strict no for the BJP, of Rs. 6,000 a year to farmers is a mixed bag. Farmers in Western UP and Maharashtra want that the sugar mills should not sit over their dues of about Rs. 25,000 crore and pay it. No one, however, denies that the cash dole is a relief post-demonetisation.

Is there a discontent? Apparently, it is not being noticed. Nobody is talking about it. The charisma of BJP leadership is covering it up. So, is the Congress connecting with the rural masses? It is certainly trying, but its worker base is weak and so is the reach. Wherever possible, it is sending messages or holding on to people’s issues.

The voter is silent. It does not mean people are not aware of their problems. This silence could be deceptive. The election is not bereft of issues. The economic issues are stark. Changing political scenario can make a difference. It only points to an all-out impending battle. The churning would help reshape the future.

Why the Controversy on Downing of Pak F-16 fighter jet Refuses to Die

The dubious report in Foreign Policy magazine claimed that no F-16 fighter jet from Pakistan was shot down by India. Magazine said the US audit found all F-16s intact with Pakistan. This suspicious Foreign Policy report fell flat on its face when Pentagon flatly denied that it was not aware of any such audit that was carried out to determine the number of F-16s in Pakistan.

Founded in 1970, Foreign Policy (FP) is a prestigious American news publication with an impressive record of national and international awards for professional excellence to its credit. That’s why there was jubilation both in Islamabad and Rawalpindi when FP reported that two unnamed “senior US defence officials with direct knowledge of situation” had confirmed that after carrying out a count of F-16 fighter jets sold by Washington to Pakistan it was found that none of them were missing. Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan lost no time in using this news report to tweet a profound philosophical message that “The truth always prevails and is the best policy.” He even went on to add that “BJP’s attempt to win elections through whipping up war hysteria and false claims of downing a Pak F-16 has backfired with US Defence officials also confirming that no F-16 was missing from Pakistan’s fleet.”

Whereas Islamabad is going gaga over the FP report as it vindicates its stand that the PAF didn’t lose any F-16 fighter jet in a dogfight with IAF (Indian Air Force) on February 27, but suspicions that India’s claim to the contrary may be true still persists due to certain major inconsistencies in Pakistan’s Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR) narrative. Even though the versions given by India and Pakistan regarding what happened on February 27 appear to be in complete variation, there is complete unanimity on the issue that two fighter aircrafts were shot down on that day. India has claimed that the IAF shot down one F-16 and accepted losing a MIG 21. Similarly, even though Director General (DG) ISPR Maj Gen Asif Ghafoor denied that the PAF had lost any aircraft, he too tweeted that two IAF aircrafts were shot down on February 27. So, although there may be a controversy regarding the identity of one downed aircraft, both the Indian and Pakistani accounts accept that two fighter jets were shot down in the dogfight on the day after the Balakot airstrike by IAF.

The second common issue in both versions is that three pilots had bailed out. India has claimed that after an F-16 of PAF was hit, two parachutes were seen descending in Pakistan occupied Kashmir (PoK) airspace. It also accepted that IAF pilot Wing Commander Abhinandan Varthaman had parachuted and landed in PoK after his MIG 21 was hit (making it a total of three bailouts). Maj Gen Ghafoor also tweeted that while one IAF pilot who had ejected was in the custody of Pakistan Army, two others were “in the area” (PoK). An hour later, DG ISPR confirmed to the media that the pilot of the second IAF aircraft ‘shot down’ who had bailed out was also in Pakistan Army’s custody but couldn’t be presented before the media since he was being treated in a Combined Military Hospital (CMH) for injuries sustained during ejection. So, Maj Gen Ghafoor also confirmed that three pilots had bailed out and landed in PoK. But hours later, he surprised everyone by announcing that Pakistan had only one IAF pilot in its custody. Why ISPR hasn’t revealed the identity of the second pilot who it claimed belonged to IAF and was admitted on February 27 in an army hospital for treatment of injuries sustained while ejecting from an aircraft is indeed intriguing!

It is from here that the ISPR version of February 27 events start falling apart. Luckily, Foreign Policy journalist Lara Seligman’s claim that “A US count of Pakistan’s F-16 fleet has found that all the jets are present and accounted for, a direct contradiction to India’s claim that it shot down one of the fighter jets during a February clash” comes as a big relief for ISPR. Seligman has also mentioned that it was Pakistan that had invited the US to physically count its fleet of F-16 planes after the incident as part of an end-user agreement of this sale. By requesting the US to carry out a count of F-16s does indicate that Islamabad is telling the truth as it has nothing to hide. But just like the ambiguity surrounding the hospitalised second pilot who vanished into thin air without any trace, by shifting his stand on use of F-16s in the February 27 dogfight, DG ISPR has once again attracted suspicion.

Readers would recall that immediately after the February dogfight, Maj Gen Ghafoor promptly dismissed India’s claim of having shot down an F-16 by saying that since this type of aircraft wasn’t employed in this particular action, the Indian claim was ludicrous. Instead, he specifically clarified that the two IAF fighter aircrafts were shot down by Chinese made J-17 jets. Even when India produced fragments of AIM-120 C-5 AMRAAM missile that can only be fired from F-16s, ISPR continued to maintain that these aircrafts weren’t used on that day. But just a month later, ISPR suddenly changed track by saying, “Even if F-16s have been used as at that point in time complete PAF (Pakistan Air Force) was airborne including F-16s, the fact remains that PAF shot down two Indian jets in self-defence.” The ISPR statement also went on to state that “Whether it was F-16 or JF-17 which shot down two Indian aircraft is immaterial” and this belated volte face has rekindled the controversy as it’s a clear admission that F-16s of PAF were indeed employed against the IAF on February 27.

Pakistan Prime Minister’s tweet that Indian government’s “false claims of downing a Pak F-16 has backfired with US Defence officials also confirming that no F-16 was missing from Pakistan’s fleet” has been contradicted by US Defence Department clarification that it was “not aware” of any such investigation. So how could Khan go so wrong? Experts maintain that since diplomatic protocol makes it incumbent on the US to approach Islamabad for permission to allow counting F-16s in the Pakistan Air Force, Khan would certainly have been aware if the US had done so as mentioned in the Foreign Policy report. So the only plausible reason is that in a bid to conceal the downing of an F-16, the ISPR persuaded the PM to send a tweet citing a report that lacked requisite credibility since it was based on inputs of two anonymous US defence officials.

Tailpiece- There’s an old saying that ‘what goes around, comes around’ and this seems to be true for Prime Minister Imran Khan as his sagacious advice that “The truth always prevails and is the best policy” has ultimately come back to haunt him!

Will Smith felt ‘awakened’ in India

Hollywood star Will Smith recently shared about his experience of visiting India. According to him the trip to India awakened a new understanding of himself and the world around him. The 50-year-old actor posted multiple pictures on Instagram from his visit to India. He visited Haridwar to shoot for his Facebook Watch show “Will Smith’s Bucket List”.  Will Smith’s post received over 18 lakh likes on Instagram within a few hours.

“My Grandmother used to say, ‘God Teaches through Experience’. “Travelling to India and experiencing the colours, people and natural beauty has awakened a new understanding of myself, my art and the truths of the world,” Smith captioned the series of photographs and a video, including that of the Ganga aarti.

For a previous episode, titled “Will Smith’s Bucketlist: Bollywood Dancing”, Smith shot a Bollywood dance sequence, which he said, was a dream come true for him.

In his latest India tour, the actor also roamed around in an autorickshaw across the busy streets of Mumbai and got some dance lessons from actor Ranveer Singh and filmmaker Karan Johar. Smith’s dance sequence will also feature in Johar’s upcoming production “Student of the Year 2”.

Earlier, in 2017, Smith had come to Mumbai for the promotion of Netflix film “Bright” and had also visited New Delhi.